Asee peer logo
Displaying results 61 - 90 of 192 in total
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth Creamer, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
total numbers given the fact that bothwomen and members of other under-represented groups are often visible minorities in science,technology, engineering, and mathematic (STEM) fields. Social dynamics are shaped byproportional representation and when that proportion is highly skewed it can produce thephenomenon referred to as tokenism1. According to Kanter’s classic study, small relativenumbers heighten visibility and bring attention to discrepant characteristics or ways thatmembers of a population deviate from the norm. The effects of tokenism are most pronouncedwhen the proportion and number of women is so small that the opportunities to participate in acommunity of like-minded individuals are limited. Attention to secondary characteristics
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kaitlin I. Tyler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Nicole Johnson-Glauch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jessica A. Krogstad, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #17997Implementing Design Thinking into Summer Camp Experience for High SchoolWomen in Materials EngineeringMs. Kaitlin I. Tyler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Kaitlin is currently an Education Fellow with the Granta Education Division. She received her PhD at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign under Professor Paul Braun. Her research was split: focusing on manipulating eutectic material microstructures for optical applications and examining how engineer- ing outreach programs influence participants’ self-perceptions of engineering and self-confidence. Her interests lie in materials education
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth Horstman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Danielle Jamie Mai, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Yanfen Li, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Women,Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304.Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.2. Rethink your gender attitudes. Nature Materials, 2014. Page 26.88.9 83. Shen, H. Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature, 2013.4. Moss-Racusin, C.A., et al., Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences, 2012.5. van Anders, S.M., Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Technical Session 4: Environmental Issues and the Impacts of Intersectionality
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Angela Harris, North Carolina State University; Christina Martin-Ebosele, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering, Women in Engineering
, and leadershipNow we turn to the larger social context in which we see environmental engineering studentsstarting to form decisions about their career and then begin their career. By social context, wemean, for this study, the gendered and racialized contexts in environmental work. In fact, wewould expect these contexts to come into play even in the selection of their major—climateeffects, public environmental discourse, and environmental policy all have gendered and racialsocial components that frame students’ matriculation into the major as much as their journeysthrough and beyond it. Keeping in mind the gender, race, and ethnic characteristics ofenvironmental engineering degree-earners in Section 2.1.1, we will return to this
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Technical Session 4: Environmental Issues and the Impacts of Intersectionality
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; JoAnn Silverstein P.E., University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering, Women in Engineering
, fromthe fourth principle. Students picked up on specifics from Chief Albert’s presentation, includingquoting some parts of his discussion. Examples are provided below. words for engineers: “Your work is more than plans and specifications. Your work is more than creating a design for a client. Your work impacts people, communities, and the landscape. You have a responsibility to be aware of the negative impacts of the work you engage in.” A reminder to keep community in mind in every step of the process…. One element from Chief Albert’s presentation that I personally found most impactful was the list of his Tribe’s values. When I read the RAE report about sustainability, I only thought about the impact that civil engineers
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mahaa Mayeesha Ahmed, Rowan University ; Melanie Basantis, Rowan University; Kauser Jahan, Rowan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
schools to engineering and associatedopportunities and careers via one-day sessions. Participants have the ability to interact withengineering faculty members and undergraduate students while participating in hands-onengineering activities. The program reaches on average over 100 middle-school-aged girlsannually, bringing them to Rowan’s campus to explore engineering through hands-on projectsand demonstrations. This applied approach to learning, a hallmark of Rowan Engineering,introduces AWE participants to various engineering disciplines and careers and provides anopportunity to connect with like-minded peers and current engineering undergraduates asmentors and advisors. AWE was established in 1998 and has hosted over 2,000 middle schoolgirls
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sagit Betser, University of California, Davis; Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis; Rebecca Ambrose Ph.D., University of California-Davis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #27539”They Don’t See Girls”: Construction of Identities in a Maker ProgramMs. sagit betser, University of California, Davis Sagit Betser is a graduate student in the Learning and Mind Sciences program at UC Davis School of Education. She received B.Sc in Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering from Tel Aviv University. She worked in start-ups, heading research and design multidisciplinary teams. Before joining the PhD program she taught science and design at a K-8 school.Prof. Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis Lee Martin studies people’s efforts to enhance their own learning environments
Conference Session
Potpourri
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nina Dahlmann, Technische Universitaet Berlin; Maria Elsner, Technische Universitaet Berlin; Sabina Jeschke, University of Stuttgart; Nicole Natho, Technische Universitaet Berlin; Olivier Pfeiffer, Technische Universitaet Berlin; Christian Schroeder, Technische Universitaet Berlin
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
one-sided, old-fashioned,technology-centered way engineering is often taught. A change of curricula supporting non-technological substructures such as methods and system expertise or also social skills would notonly address the interests of modern women and men but also the demands of the economy ofthe 21st century.Generally universities have to keep in mind the requirements of companies who constantly needwell-educated employees. In order to meet these demands today, universities have to redefine themeaning of “good education”. For a modern engineer a sound technical education forms only thebasis for a career. Companies increasingly require engineers who acquired profound analyticalcompetencies and problem solving strategies, structural
Conference Session
Focus on Faculty
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristen Constant, Iowa State University; Sharon Bird, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
AC 2009-644: RECOGNIZING, CHARACTERIZING, AND “UNSETTLING"UNINTENDED BIAS IN THE FACULTY SEARCH PROCESS IN ENGINEERINGKristen Constant, Iowa State University Kristen Constant is an Associate Professor in Materials Science and Engineering at Iowa State University.Sharon Bird, Iowa State University Sharon Bird is an Associate Professor in Sociology at Iowa State University Page 14.1012.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Recognizing, Characterizing and ‘Unsettling’ Unintended Bias in the Faculty Search Process in Engineering – A Case Study
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anne-Marie A Lerner, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Christopher Frayer, University of Wisconsin - Platteville
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #18637New Faculty Learning Community as Retention Tool for UnderrepresentedMinoritiesDr. Anne-Marie A Lerner, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Anne-Marie Lerner is an associate professor in mechanical engineering at the University of Wisconsin - Platteville. Her professional interests include inclusive in-class and out-of-class supports, investigat- ing effective teaching pedagogy for remote delivery as well as to nontraditional students, and education assessment. She received her PhD in mechanical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology in 2008.Dr. Christopher Frayer, University of Wisconsin
Conference Session
Undergraduate Student Issues II
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nadia M Alhasani, The Petroelum Institute
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
rewarding. Women do not seemto mind the medical field’s long years of study, hard training and difficult working hours. Nor dothey ponder, at least in the case of the UAE, the nature of the work environment in which menand women are expected to work together for long hours and under a lot of pressure. Themedical field has idealized their profession by focusing on the noble goal of serving humanityand treating the sick. This very notion has been lost on engineering and the sciences. In a similar Page 23.1374.6manner, when recruiting students from high schools, the focus of the PI presentation is on thesofter aspects of engineering such as
Conference Session
Perspectives for Women Faculty
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stacy Birmingham, Grove City College
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Engineering and University committees, as were manyof my (then few) female colleagues in engineering. We often joked that there was a perceptionthat each committee needed at least one woman from engineering, and we were she. I waselected to the University Senate and even chaired a university committee on facultycompensation prior to gaining tenure. After receiving tenure, I directed two different professionalmasters programs in engineering, one of which had a substantial distance-learning component.And, in my mind, I had achieved a satisfactory balance between my work life and my family life.My husband and I shared child rearing and home duties. We were able to arrange our teachingschedules so that we never taught classes at the same time, allowing
Conference Session
K-12 Programs (Co-sponsored by K-12 Division)
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynn Fujioka, isisHawaii and Women in Technology; Sheryl Hom, isisHawaii and Women in Technology; Leslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development Board
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. An experienced advocate for workplace equity, served as National President of the Business & Professional Women’s organization in 2001. Appointed by the Hawaii governor to two terms on the Hawaii State Commission on the Status of Women, she was Commission Chair from 1996 - 2003. Page 12.991.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 isisHawaii: The power of One+One brings girls into the science and engineering pipelineAbstractIn 2002, isisHawaii launched the first Hawaii-based online mentoring program to help local womennetwork with other women in various
Conference Session
WIED Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elaine R. Millam, University of Saint Thomas; Ronald J. Bennett, Univeristy of Saint Thomas
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
with a generalrelaxation in traditional gender-role attitudes as well as changes in public perceptions of whatleadership entails. Yet in contexts still defined in the public mind as requiring masculinequalities, women face tough barriers that stem from the difficulty of simultaneously transcendingand accommodating to gender stereotypes. It is critical to understand some of these barriers inorder to help women break them down and be determined enough to work their way throughthem. This paper shares some the stories of some brave young engineering women who aredoing just that.Catalyst Research1 reports that there are 51.4% of U.S. women in management, professional andrelated occupations today in Fortune 500 businesses. Furthermore, they report
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lourdes A. Medina, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez; Saylisse Davila, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Olga Beatriz Rivera, Amgen Manufacturing Limited; Nolgie Oquendo-Colon, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Maria Angelica Velazquez, Montana State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
issues females face is fear andlack of self-confidence in their skills to prepare teaching and research statements and negotiatesalaries and start-up packages [6].B. Females in EngineeringA question that may come to mind is: Why among all STEM fields highlight engineering? Theanswer is simple. ASEE’s report Engineering by the Numbers [24] depicts an alarming lowrepresentation of females across all levels−bachelor’s level all the way to tenure-track positionsin academia. Between 2008 and 2017, females earned 20.93%, on average, of all engineeringdegrees (BS, MS, and PhD) in the US (Puerto Rico included) [24]. In 2017 alone, femalesrepresented 26,514 out of the 124,477 (21.3%) undergraduate engineering degrees conferred.Environmental and
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Pre-college Student Experiences
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynsey Mitchell Kissane, Ryerson University; Liping Fang, Ryerson University ; Ruth Jean Silver, Groundswell Projects
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
world, their surroundings and themselves.”12 Gender adds another layer of influence.Girls, for example, tend not to see physics as relevant to their lives; they find it challenging andobscure.13 “Young people, especially young girls, although they appreciate technology, wouldrather like to have an identity that conveys late modern post-material values. Such values mightbe self-realization, creativity and innovation, working with people and helping others.”14 For theengineering identity to resonate with civic-minded Millennial females, it must convey the roleengineers play in fostering a strong sense of community, both local and global.3. WEMADEIT Program DescriptionIn Spring 2013, four faculties of engineering (Ryerson University, University of
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Student Issues as Related to Culture
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
developed with two objectives in mind: 1. Encourage a broader understanding among graduate students of the range of choices, opportunities and challenges that women must navigate, and of the impact of culture, community and context on women, whether in their personal lives, in higher education, or in the workplace. 2. Encourage and support the development of community among graduate students.The program met six times (approximately bi-weekly) during the spring semester of 2014 in alarge conference room in the College of Engineering. Discussion sessions were held duringlunch time (12:00 p.m. until 2:00 p.m.) and participants were free to come and to leave duringthat timeframe based on their individual schedules. Three of the
Conference Session
Interactive Panel on Advocacy Tips: an Initiative to Provide Individuals the Tools to Advocate for Women and Underrepresented Minorities
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Kristen P. Constant, Iowa State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sandra D. Eksioglu, Mississippi State University; Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Interactive  Panel     on   Advocacy  Tips:  an  Initiative  to  Provide  Individuals  the  Tools  to  Advocate  for  Women   and  Underrepresented  Minorities    Abstract:    Research  and  recommendations  have  shown  that  advancements  within  a  minority  group  benefit  greatly  from  majority  group  involvement.    With  this  philosophy  in  mind,  the  Women  in  Engineering  Division  (WIED)  has  facilitated  and  sponsored  the  development  of  a  website  (http://wied.asee.org/AdvTips.html)  with  the  content
Conference Session
WIED Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cassandra Groen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
AC 2011-2242: INTENTIONS AND EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT ENOUGH:THE REALITY OF ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT AND MENTOR-ING PROGRAMSCassandra Groen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Cassandra Groen is a graduate student emphasizing in structural engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. Her thesis work is in Engineering Education and she is the first student at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology to research in this field.Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Jennifer Karlin is an associate professor of industrial engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology and the faculty development
Conference Session
An International Perspective
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hasmik Gharibyan, California Polytechnic State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Structures and Algorithm Analysis, as well as introductory courses in Computer Science. Her research areas include Numerical Analysis, Computer Science Education, and Women in Computer Science. Page 12.778.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Gender Gap in Computer Science: Studying Its Absence in One Former Soviet RepublicIntroductionIt is no secret that women in the United States avoid Computer Science (CS) as a career choice.This is a big problem not only in the USA, but in numerous other countries around the world.However, there are countries – such as some of the
Conference Session
K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pat Pyke, Boise State University; Leandra Aburusa-Lete, Boise State University; Christa Budinoff, Visioneering LLC; Janet Callahan; Michael Luque, Boise School District; Cheryl Schrader, Boise State University; Michelle Taylor, Micron Technology, Inc.
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Program Created Needs/Interests Identified MESSAGES WHERE THE GIRLS ARE 1) Engineers help the world 1) Academically capable 2) Engineers think creatively 2) Sports teams 3) Engineers enjoy working with others 3) Lack of women role models 4) Engineers earn a good living 4) Want meaningful careers 5) Independent/career-minded 6) Don’t like isolation METHODS 7) Affected by culture 1) Provide academically challenging modules 8) Excel in some single gender 2) Enable teamwork environments 3) Enjoy sports
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristin E. Sherwood, Stony Brook University; Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #22107Peer Mentoring of Undergraduate Women in Engineering as a Mechanismfor Leadership DevelopmentMs. Kristin E. Sherwood, Stony Brook University Kristin E. Sherwood is a doctoral student in Science Education at the Stony Brook University. She is focusing her research on the representation of women in engineering and other STEM related fields.Dr. Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of Physics and the Associate Director of the Science Education Program at Stony Brook University, New York. She attended La Salle University, Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania, where she
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, and Y. Ma, “Gender Differences in Publication Productivity Among Academic Scientists and Engineers in the U.S. and China: Similarities and Differences,” Minerva, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 459–484, 2017.[19] S. J. Ceci, D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams, “Women in Science: The Path to Progress,” Scientific American Mind, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2014.[20] E. Judson, L. Ross, J. Middleton, and S. Krause, “Measuring Engineering Faculty Views about Benefits and Costs of Using Student-Centered Strategies,” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), vol. 7, no. 2, p. 65, 2017. Retrieved from http://online- engineering.org/dl/iJEP/iJEP_vol7_no2_2017_S.pdf[21] L. Ross and E. Judson, “Gender-based differences in
Conference Session
Using Teams, Seminars & Research Opportunities for Retention
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
De'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana; Mica Hutchison, Purdue University; Deborah Follman, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
2006-1389: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE AS IT RELATESTO RESEARCH EFFICACY BELIEFS AND THE IMPOSTER PHENOMENONDe'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana De'Jeune S. Antoine is a dual-degree Physics and Biomedical Engineering major. She actively participates in several clubs and organizations, including National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., and youth mentoring. De'Jeune's research interests include cardiovascular instrumentation and engineering education.Mica Hutchison, Purdue University Mica A. Hutchison is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department Engineering Education and the Department of Chemistry with research interests focused on engineering
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelsey Morgan Irvin, University of Missouri, Columbia; Elizabeth Hiteshue, Bain & Company; Samantha Laurel Swanson; Caroline Missouri Wochnick, Augsburg College; Hannah Bech, AmeriCorps VISTA; Amanda Marie Kapetanakis, Augsburg College; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Derrick Langley, Space and Missile Center, Enterprise Ground Services Office (SMC/ADZS); Michael Geselowitz, IEEE History Center at Stevens Institute of Technology; MaryAnn C. Hellrigel, IEEE, IEEE History Center; Gregory Alan Good, American Institute of Physics
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #17793Following in the Footsteps of Distinguished Leaders in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Narratives of the Next Generationof Young People Preserving key Oral Histories of our Societal HistoryMs. Kelsey Morgan Irvin, University of Missouri, Columbia Kelsey Irvin is a Clinical Psychology Ph.D. Candidate at the University of Missouri, Columbia. She is studying youth emotion dysregulation and how its physiological presentation correlates to depression.Ms. Elizabeth Hiteshue, Bain & Company Elizabeth graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in May 2015 with a degree in Systems Engi
Conference Session
Institutional Transformations
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #6812Strategies to Support (Female) STEM Faculty as Voiced by Female STEMFaculty at a Major Research UniversityPamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, has taught high school physics and pre-engineering, and has taught engineering and science to children in multiple informal settings. She prepares future early childhood, elementary and middle school
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Randy Yerrick, Fresno State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
be sitting in thatclassroom. As argued by Turner [28], marginalized faculty ‘socialized for success,’ may reproducepatterns of inequity.We believe that engineers are fair minded and rational and do believe that, when researchdemonstrates a clear connection between gendered teaching practices and a consequential exodusfrom the field, engineers will take heed. We therefore call upon researchers to explore morecritically learning contexts with an eye toward exposing the implicit White, male dominant normsand their effects on the discipline. As many have shown [12], [41] engineers have been ratheruncritical of their working contexts—looking for alternate explanations and anemic solutions likerecruitment to resolve inequity. Research on the
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eleanor Leung, York College of Pennsylvania; Inci Ruzybayev, York College of Pennsylvania; Brandy Maki, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
be more open-minded towards females asking for those positions. Theymay not have “enough experience” because they are not offered enough opportunities to gain“enough experience”. Female faculty need to be encouraged to improve their leadership skills byattending training, workshops, conferences, etc.Conclusions and Future WorkAutoethnographic narratives of three female faculty in engineering who have experienced genderbias have enabled this topic to be explored. The findings from this research are consistent with thelarge body of literature on gender bias in academia. The recommendations indicate the need forfurther research, support, and awareness for female faculty who face these biases.The authors plan to continue their work on gender
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pamela L Dickrell, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
andreally just enjoy the process”“Working with a group of women who all had different levels of experience with each build fromweek to week was the most impacting for me. Every week, we would all combine our individualknowledge and experience to work together and complete the build as a team, which was themost rewarding to me.”“The aspect of flexibility made the biggest impact on me because it allowed the group membersto realize how we can do anything that we set our mind to. If we wanted to do a side project, andthe resources were there, we would just go for it.”“Seeing successful women in engineering. From the third and fourth year engineering students,to Dr. Dickrell herself, everyone in the group was someone I felt comfortable asking for help
Conference Session
An International Perspective
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carmen Maldonado, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Tatiana Ramirez, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Idalis Vazques, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Alexandra Medina-Borja, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Page 12.1080.7Table 1 Factor Questions Asked Dreaming to get Did you think you were going to be admitted in the UPRM? admission to engineering Did people talk about the UPRM when you were in High School? Did you have any doubts about completing the application Self-efficacy beliefs Do you think you were good in math? What came to your mind when you completed your college application? In which IE specialty area you see yourself working? Cultural biases and