Asee peer logo
Displaying results 181 - 210 of 480 in total
Conference Session
Potpourri
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
: • Providing ABET course control documents for the courses3 • Providing current course syllabi3 • Having qualified CC faculty (master’s degree and 18 hours within engineering)3 • CC faculty teach courses at the four-year institution • Link community college classrooms with four-year college classrooms taught on the four-year college campus5Articulation: Articulation agreements (state-wide, if possible) are a necessity for a smoothtransition for a community college transfer. The engineering and technology part of the IllinoisArticulation Initiative, started in the early 1990’s, is described by Mirman and Skattum.6Articulation agreements are an important part of
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Henriette D. Burns, Washington State University, Vancouver; Sean Palmer Marquardt Rice, Washington State University, Vancouver
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
in STEM careers is because the culture ofSTEM, especially engineering and analytical areas, is a limiting culture devoid of what femalesseems to prefer, empathy and social caring [8]-[10].However, measuring constructs such as interest is complex because of the interactive anddynamic nature of constructs with one another, that the constructs are usually self-reported, andthat few standardized measurement terms exist [11]. STEM can be considered as one contentarea or four content areas. We often ask our students to describe STEM. They usually answer bystating the letters S, T, E, and M stand for science, technology, engineering and mathematics, butdo not state any concept of what “STEM” means. The term STEM is thought to originate withthe
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) ; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
enact, and further establish a change-making campaign within thediscipline. The implications of visionary futures for how the world of technoscientific practicemight be otherwise via the grassroots organizing of feminist hackers and OSH groups is thusfertile ground for thinking through the leveraging of resources, expanding mindsets, tactics forshifting power dynamics, and continuing conversations as a mode toward energizing amovement.References[1] P. Brown, “Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and ProfessionalWays of Knowing,” Journal of health and social behavior, vol. 33 , pp. 267-81, 1992.[2] S. Epstein, Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge . Berkeley:University of California Press, 1996.[3] K
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy Elizabeth Dawson, Arizona State University; Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University; Kerrie Wilkins, Arizona State University ; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
%), African American (3.8%), Hispanic/Latino American (9.2%). Twenty-six percent ofthe sample identified as international students, and a similar percentage (24.2%) identifiedEnglish as their second language.Protocol To evaluate the effectiveness of the new interpersonal communication focused content, arandomized controlled trial was conducted, as it provides the strongest evidence for evaluatingthe effectiveness of an intervention49 An essential component of randomized controlled trials isthat participants are randomly split between treatment and control groups. Control group(s) arenot exposed to the intervention, while treatment group(s) are. Following treatment groupexposure, differentiations between the treatment and control groups are
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mary Kay Camarillo P.E., University of the Pacific; Eileen Kogl Camfield, University of California at Merced
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
project manager, team name, and a logo. The course isassigned an instructor although students are advised by all department faculty on differentaspects of the project. There are also industry advisor(s) and/or a project sponsor. Students oftenfind their projects and industry advisors while they are completing the co-op experience.Sometimes engineers within the community volunteer their time as advisors and bring their ownprojects. Other typical projects involve design of a new campus building or development of anempty property lot within the city. Similar to what is done at other institutions, students interactwith local engineers, stakeholders, and city officials during their projects [13, 16]. Each teamworks on a unique project.The course has
Conference Session
Retention of Women Students
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sriram Sundararajan, Iowa State University; Theodore J. Heindel, Iowa State University; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Iowa State University; Shankar Subramaniam, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[2] National Science Foundation. 2008. Science and engineering indicators 2008.http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/c0/c0i.htm (last accessed, August 2008).[3] Nicholls, G., H. Wolfe, M. Besterfied-Sacre, L. Shuman, and S. Larpkiattaworn. 2007. A method for identifyingvariables for predicting STEM enrollment. Journal of Engineering Education 96 (1): 33–45.[4] Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE). 2002. Cambridge, MA: Goodman Research Group, Inc.[5] Frehill, L. M., DiFabio, N. M., Hill, S. T., Traeger, K., & Buono, J. 2008. Review of the 2007 literature womenin engineering. SWE Magazine of the
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
J. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University ; Joel Alejandro Mejia, Angelo State University; Maja Husar Holmes, West Virginia University; Rachel R. Stoiko, West Virginia University
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado, Boulder; Eva Leong
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering
. Analternative hypothesis is that there are more women and minorities starting civil or structuralengineering studies now than there were in the past, so the graduate student diversity willincrease as these students continue through the pipeline. However, nationwide data shows that, ifanything, women and minority representation among students in science and engineeringdisciplines has decreased slightly over the past 10 years2,5, making this hypothesis unlikely.Table 1. Demographic data obtained for university students and faculty in civil (C) and/or structural (S)engineering. FACULTY UNDERGRADUATE GRADUATE STUDENTS
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Susan J. Ely, University of Southern Indiana
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
gains from the last 5-10 years may becompletely undone during this pandemic season. References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, “Digest 2017”,https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/. (assessed October 12, 2019).[2] C. Poor and S. Brown, “Increasing retention in women in engineering at WSU: A model for awomen’s mentoring program”, College Student Journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 421-428, September2013.[3] Catalyst, “Research Women in STEM”. https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem/, (assessed October 12, 2019).[4] F.M. Haemmerlie and R. Montgomery, “Gender differences in the academic performance andretention of undergraduate engineering
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Shawna Vican, University of Delaware; Robin Andreasen, University of Delaware; Heather Doty, University of Delaware; L. Pamela Cook, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
facultyretention rates. Faculty climate survey data from 2018 provides a baseline for evaluating whetherthere are changes over time in whether faculty feel promotion and tenure processes are clear, orpromotion and tenure decisions are free from bias. Ongoing qualitative research projects onfaculty career satisfaction and faculty retention may also shed light on faculty experiences ofCOVID-19 career impacts.This research was funded by NSF grant number HRD-1409472. 8References[1] B. McMurtie, “The Coronavirus Has Pushed Courses Online. Professors Are Trying Hard to Keep Up.,” Chronicle of Higher Education, Mar. 20, 2020.[2] S. Goodwin and B. Mitchneck, “STEM
Conference Session
Mentoring
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Anakaorn Khan, North Dakota State University; David Wells, North Dakota State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
of the program in increasing female student enrollment at NDSU. Articles and programsthat appeared in local print and broadcast media communicate effectively to the broadercommunity the importance of engineering and technology and the need to encourage more girlsto pursue related fields. Indirectly, the program helped increase the visibility of the NDSUEngineering College as well as enhance the image of engineering in the area.References 1. Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost Talent: Women in the Sciences. Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press. 2. Widnall, S. (2000) Digits of pi: barriers and enablers for women in engineering, The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering 30 (3 & 4) 3. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the
Conference Session
Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Self-Efficacy of Women Engineering Students
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
differences on engineering solutions were given along with the MGUDS-S survey. 14,15The full 61 question Community Service Attitudes Scale (CSAS) survey16,17 was completed by28 EVEN students in 2007; Wilde’s Cognitive Style survey18,19 derived from Myers-Briggspersonality types was completed by 76 EVEN students in 2007 and 2008. Potential differencesin the cognitive style preferences of students based on gender will not be discussed in this paper.In addition to the quantitative data from the various surveys, the students in the CVEN andEVEN first-year courses write reflective essays at the end of the semester. They comment ontheir attitudes about engineering, how these have changed, and if they intend to change majors.The guidelines for the essays
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jennifer Serne, Central Washington University; David Wesley Martin, Central Washington University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
not easily altered without someimpetus to make the change. The introduction of individuals into the industry that are moreinclined to act collaboratively could act as a catalyst for change.Purpose of the StudyGender diversity has been connected to increased profits across multiple industries.8 Thesefindings have led to the creation of the value-in-diversity perspective, which contends that adiverse workforce has a distinct benefit to business.8 However, these benefits are not limited toincreased earnings.8 For example, there is evidence that the inclusion of women in CM maydecrease conflict and increase collaboration. Brahnam, et al.’s study suggests that women maypossess more effective conflict resolution attributes than their male
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura K Alford, University of Michigan; Valeria Bertacco, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
-efficacy (reflected in themarginal means), and also shows how the increase in Course 1’s women’s self-efficacy comesprimarily from those women who were neutral at the beginning of the course feeling moresuccessful at the end of the class.IntimidationVisually inspecting the survey results for intimidation by programming in Figs. 3, 5b, and 6b, wesee that overall women are more intimidated by programming in both courses, although thisdifference is statistically significant only for Course 2. Therefore, we cannot reject the nullhypothesis for Hypothesis 2. Interestingly, we see that men at the start of Course 2 are, onaverage, about the same as where the left off at the end of Course 1, but women are on averagemore intimidated (not statistically
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer I. Clark, Montana State University ; Sarah L. Codd, Montana State University; Angela Colman Des Jardins, Montana State University; Christine M. Foreman, Montana State University; Brett W. Gunnink, Montana State University; Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University; Katherine Ruth Stocker
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
completing graduation requirements. · Assess and evaluate information for personal use.Together, the Mentors and Mentees had the following shared responsibilities: · Set the mentoring agenda (discussing clear expectations and boundaries). · Practice honest communication and interaction. · Accept the “take it or leave it” option without fear of diminishing the helping relationship.Over the summer, the Peer Mentors participated in group training sessions involving reading,writing and discussion-based assignments in order to prepare to be successful Peer Mentors.Training materials used for the Peer Mentors included: • Students Helping Students: A Guide for Peer Educators on Campuses, F. B. Newton, S
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Suzanne Sontgerath, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
collection, and to their supervisors in the Enrollment Management division for supportingtheir efforts.ReferencesBieri Buschor, C., Berweber, S., Keck Frei, A. & Kappler, C. (2014). Majoring in STEM-Whataccounts for women’s career decision making? A mixed methods study. The Journal ofEducational Research, 107, 167-176. Table 5. Development of Pipeline Programs at WPI* Year Program Time Age Audience Founded Frontiers Summer 1985 High School Boys and Girls Camp Reach Summer 1997 Middle School Girls
Conference Session
Using Teams, Seminars & Research Opportunities for Retention
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
De'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana; Mica Hutchison, Purdue University; Deborah Follman, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
2006-1389: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE AS IT RELATESTO RESEARCH EFFICACY BELIEFS AND THE IMPOSTER PHENOMENONDe'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana De'Jeune S. Antoine is a dual-degree Physics and Biomedical Engineering major. She actively participates in several clubs and organizations, including National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., and youth mentoring. De'Jeune's research interests include cardiovascular instrumentation and engineering education.Mica Hutchison, Purdue University Mica A. Hutchison is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department Engineering Education and the Department of Chemistry with research interests focused on engineering
Conference Session
Undergraduate Student Issues: Persistence
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kerry Meyers, Youngstown State University; Catherine F Pieronek, University of Notre Dame; Leo H McWilliams, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
)). Lichtenstein reported tthat 66% of theseniors su urveyed indiicated that thhey would definitely or pprobably conntinue in an engineeringg-related fiield three yeaars post-gradduation.11 Lichtenstein’ L s results felll between the public (80%)and the private p (58.5%) institutioons, as shown n in Figure 33. By comparison, the W WECE studyyasked stuudents about their plans to t persist in an engineeriing related ffield seven yyears post-graduatioon and reporrted affirmatiive responsees from 80% % of seniors.5 And in coomparing theepublic annd private institutions, ov verall the ressponses are sshifted towaards more aff ffirmative plaansfor professional persiistence at
Conference Session
WIED: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Rae Volpatti, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl A. Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh; Lauren M. Byland, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
identifying it wasimportant, 2) 39 were interested in what to do if they encounter it, and 3) 32 were interested inunderstanding which department or person(s) they should contact for advice. Female studentsappeared to be slightly more concerned with what to do if they encounter it and who to turn tofor advice, compared to male students. The second questionsought to assess whetherstudents felt they shouldhave access to moreinformation on the subject ofSH prior to entering theworkforce. This questionprovided rationale forcontinuation of thisworkshop in the future.Survey results demonstratedthat 35% of students wantedmore information on how toidentify and cope with SH asthey entered the workforce.Subsequent analysis of thisdata revealed
Conference Session
Recruitment & Retention of Women I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Priti N. Mody-Pan, University of Washington; Suzanne G. Brainard, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
inclass suggest that other dynamics such as culture and family upbringing 24 may mitigate theirobservations of bias. This study begins to address the issues of climate in engineering forwomen of all races and ethnicities. Examination of other dimensions of diversity, particularlyclass and culture, may provide further insight into the mechanisms that enable women of certainracial/ethnic groups to persist despite being in an environment that singles them out for theirunderrepresented status.Bibliography1 Malcolm, S. M. (1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: Page 22.953.10 American
Conference Session
Retention of Women Students II
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heidi M. Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
professional engineering, (c) applying skillsand knowledge gained in the classroom to a real-world problem, (d) learning to work with teamsin a professional atmosphere, (e) gaining hands-on experience in a real-world situation, (f)learning to develop and compare multiple approaches to solving complex open-ended problems,and (g) increasing their opportunity to be hired post-graduation. The success that the CollegiateDesign Series has sustained since its establishment in the 1970’s indicates that participationyields high-performing and exceptional students. Page 25.1311.2Many universities tout co-operative education opportunities to help bridge the
Conference Session
Perspectives for Women Faculty
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Sheridan, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Eve Fine, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jessica Winchell, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Christine Pribbenow, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Molly Carnes, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Jo Handelsman, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
try and control for a variable such as “committed to diversity”, we compiled someadditional evidence that compares data from the one college that mandated attendance in2005 (the College of Letters & Sciences (L&S)) to other departments in the University.Because the Dean of L&S made attendance at the Searching for Excellence & Diversityworkshops mandatory in 2005 before he would release a faculty position, for the first timewe encountered workshop participants who were actively antagonistic to the messages andspirit of the workshop. Yet, even though some participants in L&S may not have been“committed to diversity”, L&S still showed increases in their offers to women andminorities, and the percentage of new hires who
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
data analysis appropriate for this data. Table 1: Effect Coding of Independent Variables for Linear Regression Models Characteristic Variable Name(s) Effect Coding Gender Gender Male = -1; Female = 1 Race/Ethnicity URM White = -1; Asian = 0; Other (URM) = 1 Father, Mother, or both have College Degree = -1 Family of Origin First-Generation Neither Father or Mother have College Degree = 1 U.S. or permanent resident = -1 Country of Origin International
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University; Jessica Sperling, Duke University; Megan Gray, Duke University; Medha Gupta, Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology; Amy Arnold, Duke University; Kelly Perri, Duke University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964–5969, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613117114.[7] G. Crisp and I. Cruz, “Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 525–545, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2.[8] S. L. Fletcher, D. C. Newell, L. D. Newton, and M. R. Anderson-Rowland, “The wise summer bridge program: Assessing student attrition, retention, and program effectiveness,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2001, pp. 10605–10611.[9] S. C. de Janasz and S. E. Sullivan, “Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professorial network,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sagit Betser, University of California, Davis; Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis; Rebecca Ambrose Ph.D., University of California-Davis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Recognition was also central in Barton et al.’s [8]longitudinal study tracing the identity work of girls from nondominant backgrounds. They foundthat girls imagined for themselves possible futures in science when their identity work wasrecognized and scaffolded while they engaged with science in formal and informal learningsettings. These studies contribute to a growing realization of the complex work girls face inconstructing and sustaining a disciplinary identity in STEM. These researchers, along withothers, call for further studies to enrich our understanding of the aspects of identity construction,especially with regards to the interaction between gender, ethnicity, and STEM in the transitionto adulthood.One avenue that holds promise to transform
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Anne M Lucietto, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University; Liza Ann Russell, Purdue University ; Meher Rusi Taleyarkhan, Purdue University; Shelly Tan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
listen to me: Anticipated power and women’s disinterestin male-dominated domains,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 116-128, Jan. 2015.[4] V. VanDoren, “Road to engineer's license is both difficult and worthwhile,” ControlEngineering, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 21, Jan. 1998.[5] J. Keen and A. Salvatorelli, “Principles and Practice of Engineering Exam Pass Rate byGender,” Engineering Studies, vol. 10, no. 2-3, pp. 158-168, Sept. 2015.[6] E. Hamm, “Have you considered certification?” Cost Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 6, Feb.1995.[7] J. Naveda and S. Seidman, “Professional certification of software engineers: The CSDPprogram,” IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 73-77, Sept. 2005.[8] D. S. Sink and J. L. Higle, “Fusion
Conference Session
Perspectives for Women Faculty
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University; Mara Wasburn, Purdue University; Valarie young, Ohio University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
canslow the tenure clock for women, work in the mid-1990’s showed that very few of them actuallytake parental leave for fear that their senior colleagues will hold it against them.23,24While childbearing has received some attention in the form of policies designed to assist womenprofessors, little if any attention has been paid to the effects of child rearing.25 Significantly moremen than women with children under the age of six achieve tenure. Many women assistantprofessors are cognizant of this additional disadvantage and are choosing to postpone havingchildren. Almost half of them say the decision was made because of their careers. A 2006survey of 4,400 ladder rank faculty found that 40 percent of women said they had fewer childrenthan they
Conference Session
Effective Methods for Recruiting Women to Engineering
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Manjusha Saraswathiamma, North Dakota State University; Kathy Enger, North Dakota State University; Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Achinthya Bazebaruah, North Dakota State University; Bruce Schumacher, North Dakota State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Nebraska, an M.S. in Environmental Science and Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, and a B. S. in Civil Engineering from Assam Engineering College in India.Bruce Schumacher, North Dakota State University Bruce Schumacher is an ABD doctoral student in education at North Dakota State University. Schumacher holds an M.S. Ed. from Northern State University in Aberdeen, South Dakota, an M.A.T in Education and B. A. in History from Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Page 15.367.1© American Society for Engineering
Conference Session
Interactive Panel on Advocacy Tips: an Initiative to Provide Individuals the Tools to Advocate for Women and Underrepresented Minorities
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Kristen P. Constant, Iowa State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sandra D. Eksioglu, Mississippi State University; Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
 with  substantial  programs  in  STEM  fields  are  known  to  have  lower  proportions  of  women  faculty,  the  2006  American  Association  of  University  Professors  (AAUP)  data  [5]  placed  [Institution]  second  from  the  bottom  of  1,445  U.S.  universities  for  women  in  faculty  ranks.    The  national  averages  for  percentage  women  across  assistant,  associate,  and  full  professor  ranks  were  45%,  31%,  and  24%,  respectively.  While  these  numbers  were  lower  at  doctoral  institutions  (41%,  26%,  and  19%),  [Institution]’s  profile  revealed  significantly  smaller  percentages  of  women  at  the  advanced  ranks.    Further,  the  pattern  was  not  confined  to  STEM  departments  but  prevalent  across
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Christine Delahanty, Bucks County Community College ; Jason Silverman, Drexel University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering