Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 8 results

Does Adding “Helping Disciplines” to Engineering Schools Contribute to Gender Parity?

Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Agnes Germaine d'Entremont P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Kerry Greer, University of British Columbia; Katherine A. Lyon, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
545.5 545.5 2013 S University of South Carolina 1278.5 1212 2006 S University of Wyoming 1245.5 1243.5 2009 S Vanderbilt University 1272 928 2006 S Wayne State University 818.5 772.5 2010 S Wichita State University 1389.5 1315 2011 SAppendix B – Normality assumption checkingShown below are the Q-Q plots used for checking the normality assumption of the proportiondifferences before and after adding BME
Relevance Score: 0.04324068

Self-Efficacy Study in Computing Among College Freshmen

Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Amrita Dhakal Ghimire, Mississippi State University; Litany H Lineberry, Mississippi State University; Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
of more complextechnical topics to freshmen level students. The increase in less positive perceptions of confidencein programming ability among female learners warrants further study and is particularly interestingsince the instructors for the classes surveyed were both female.AcknowledgementWork described in this paper supports the goals of NSF INCLUDES 1649312.References[1] G. W. Skelton., Q. Pang, W. Zheng, and H. Shih. “Using robotics for teaching critical thinking, problems solving and self-regulated learning for freshmen engineering students,” In proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2011.[2] Support K-12 Computer Science Education in Mississippi, 2019. Accessed on: Jan 20, 2020. [Online]. Available
Relevance Score: 0.025218476

Computing Pathways: A Quantitative Inquiry into the Dynamic Pathways of Students in Computing with Gender Comparisons

Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University; Zahra Hazari, Florida International University; Mark A Weiss, Florida International University; Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida; Ken Christensen P.E., University of South Florida; Tiana Solis, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support,” 2012.[9] R. W. Auger, A. E. Blackhurst, and K. Herting Wahl, “The Development of Elementary-Aged Children’s Career Aspirations and Expectations on JSTOR.” [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732626?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. [Accessed: 27- Feb-2019].[10] L. S. Gottfredson and R. T. Lapan, “Assessing Gender-Based Circumscription of Occupational Aspirations,” J. Career Assess., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 419–441, Sep. 1997.[11] D. A. Jepsen and G. L. Dickson, “Continuity in life-span career development: Career exploration as a precursor to career establishment,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 217–233, 2003.[12] “Women Who
Relevance Score: 0.024965018

A Comparative Study on Gender Bias in the Purchase of STEM Toys (Fundamental)

Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Huma Shoaib, Purdue University ; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Number of Reviews 2012 Reviews 2018Mindware physics Physics Concepts 51 71WorkshopMindware Q-BA- Engineering and 51 717MAZE 2.0: Big Box ConstructionMindware Math & Science 50 124Microscopic kit &bookMindware Chaos Engineering and 43 68Tower ConstructionMindware Equate Math & Science 51 51Mindware KEVA Engineering and 50 70Contraptions (200 ConstructionPlank)Mindware Snap Physics Concepts 32 174Circuits (500piece)Mindware KEVA Engineering
Relevance Score: 0.024965018

Assessment of the Effects of Participation in a Summer Bridge Experience for Women

Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University; James Samuel Carter III, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
cannotcapture.References[1] L. Bottomley, K. Titus-Becker, and H. Smolensky-Lewis. Escape To Engineering: A SummerBridge Program For Women In Engineering: 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2009,Austin, Texas. Available: https://peer.asee.org/5254 [Accessed February 5, 2018].[2] Lavelle, Jerome P. and Richard F. Keltie, “Calculus Intervention for First-SemesterEngineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition.[3] Bauer, K., and Liang, Q., (2003) “The Effect of Personality and Precollege Characteristics onFirst-Year Activities and Academic Performance,” Journal of College Student Development,Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 277-290.[4] Hurtado, S., Carter, D. & Spuler, A. (1996). “Latino
Relevance Score: 0.02017478

Improved Metric for Identifying Female Faculty Representation in Engineering Departments

Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jennifer Retherford P.E., The University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Sarah J Mobley P.E., The University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Kristen N. Wyckoff, The University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Teacher Quality, vol. 95, no. 2. pp. 152–157, 2005. [11] F. Hoffman and P. Oreopoulos, “A Professor Like Me: The Influence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement,” Cambridge, MA, 2007.[12] J. Price, “The Effect of Instructor Race and Gender on Student Persistence in STEM Fields,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 29, pp. 901–910, 2010.[13] S. E. Carrell, M. E. Page, and J. E. West, “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 1101–1144, 2010.[14] National Center for Education Statistics, “Postsecondary Education: Faculty and Instructional Staff,” in Digest of Education Statistics, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/programs
Relevance Score: 0.02017478

Engineering Students’ Views on the Effectiveness of Peer Tutors in Scholars Assisting Scholars Program

Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Yang Yang, Kansas State University; Bette Grauer PE, Kansas State University; Jennifer Renee Thornburg, Kansas State University; Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #29051Engineering Students’ Views on the Effectiveness of Peer Tutors inScholars Assisting Scholars ProgramDr. Yang Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is Assistant Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Education, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Florida International University. Her research interest include quantitative research design, Q methodology, recruitment and retention of women in STEM fields.Dr. Bette Grauer PE, Kansas State University Executive Assistant, Carl R. Ice College of Engineering, Kansas State UniversityMrs
Relevance Score: 0.02017478

Unpacking the Elevator Pitch: Women’s Narratives in Engineering

Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Eng. Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[8] K. Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Rev., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991.[9] P. H. Collins, Black feminist thought : knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York ; London : Routledge, 2000., 2000.[10] J. S. Jordan-Zachary, “Am I a Black Woman or a Woman Who is Black?: Thoughts on the Meaning of Intersectionality,” Polit. Gend., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 254–263, 2007.[11] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, The double bind: the price of being a minority
Relevance Score: 0.015131086