AC 2011-693: TURNING LIMITED RESOURCES INTO INCREASED RE-CRUITMENT & RETENTION OF FEMALE STUDENTS IN TECHNOL-OGY PROGRAMSDonna Milgram, National Institute for Women in Trades, Technology & Sciences (IWITTS) Donna Milgram, the Executive Director of the National Institute for Women in Trades, Technology and Science (IWITTS), has dedicated her career to helping women succeed in fields that have been tradi- tionally dominated by men – from engineering and auto technology to law enforcement and computer networking. Initially, Ms. Milgram’s work focused on helping women ”survive” the workplace, but she quickly saw that institutional change was critical. She shifted to helping employers and the education and job
AC 2011-2271: ESTABLISHING THE FOUNDATION FOR FUTURE OR-GANIZATIONAL REFORM AND TRANSFORMATION AT A LARGE PRI-VATE UNIVERSITY TO EXPAND THE REPRESENTATION OF WOMENFACULTYMargaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Margaret Bailey is Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineer- ing at RIT and is the Founding Executive Director for the nationally recognized women in engineering program called WE@RIT. She recently accepted the role as Faculty Associate to the Provost for Female Faculty and serves as the co-chair on the President’s Commission on Women. She began her academic career as an Assistant Professor at the U. S. Military Academy at West Point, being the first woman
AC 2011-2242: INTENTIONS AND EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT ENOUGH:THE REALITY OF ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT AND MENTOR-ING PROGRAMSCassandra Groen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Cassandra Groen is a graduate student emphasizing in structural engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. Her thesis work is in Engineering Education and she is the first student at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology to research in this field.Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Jennifer Karlin is an associate professor of industrial engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology and the faculty development
AC 2011-610: INCREASING THE NUMBER OF WOMEN IN ENGINEER-ING AT UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES IN JAPANEmiko Hirose Horton, Shibaura Institute of Technology Emiko Hirose Horton has been teaching English over 20 years in universities in America and Japan. She is currently teaching at a university of engineering. She is a member of the Dean’s office and is working on various administrative issues as well as teaching general and technical English courses.Kumiko Miki, Nihon University Kumiko Miki has been teaching chemistry over 20 years at university of engineering in Japan. She is a member of JSEE and core member of group for women’s engineer of that
science and engineering has long been an issue, withthe recent focus on how the United States will compete in a global economy, many agree thatbetter educating K-12 students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) iscrucial, although engineering has not been a traditional secondary school option. However, even Page 22.1607.2as some schools have incorporated engineering courses, they struggle with a lack of standards,leadership, and learning assessments 2. Although exact numbers are not known, Katehi et al.2Figure 1: Engineering degrees by field and gender, 1966 – 2006 (data obtained from1) All
Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press3. Busch-Vishniac, I.J. and Jarosz, J.P. (2007) ‘Achieving greater diversity through curricular change’, in R.J. Burke and M.C. Mattis (eds) Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. p. 2454. Chachra D, Kilgore D (2009). “Exploring gender and self-confidence in engineering students: a multi-method approach.” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, June 14-17, 2009, Austin, TX5. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen
Division, Women in Engineering Division and Minorities in Engineering Division. Her email is admin@laccei.org or petrie@fau.eduMartha Elicia Beltran-Martinez, Office of Science, Technology and Innovation of the Organization of Americanstates Martha Beltrn Martnez is a Specialist at the Office of Science, Technology and Innovation of the De- partment of Economic Development of the Organization of American States (OAS), where she works on issues related to gender and science, technology, metrology, biotechnology and energy. Previously, she worked at the Inter-American Commission of Women (CIM) of the OAS, on women’s human rights and gender equity and equality. In her country, Venezuela, she worked in the rivate sector as
; Claypool.5. U.S. Department of Education (2009) Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. Stats in Brief July, 1-25.6. American Society for Engineering Education, Profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges. 2010, Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education. 510.7. National Science Foundation - Division of Science Resources Statistics. Science and engineering degrees by race/ethnicity of recipients: 1997-2006. 2009 [cited 2010 March 5]; Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10300/.8. National Science Foundation, Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering
engineering degrees have been uneven at the bachelor’s level,shown relative increases at the master’s level and a slow but steady increase at the doctoral levelas shown in Figure 1. Unlike many other areas of science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM), a bachelor’s degree rather than an advanced degree, is the principlecredential for entre to the engineering profession. Among students who earned a bachelor’sdegree between 2003 and 2006, Figure 1. U.S. Engineering Degrees 1979-2008median earnings for those whosecured employment upon Number of U.S. Engineering Degrees by Year and Level, 1979 - 2008graduation were $50,000, which is
AC 2011-2792: DUAL CAREER PANELAdrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Technological University in 1998. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedi- cal microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER award; her group has published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Lab on a Chip, and had an AIChE Journal cover. She is an active men- tor of undergraduate
AC 2011-438: IMPLEMENTING ENGAGE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVERETENTION: FOCUS ON SPATIAL SKILLS - ENGINEERING SCHOOLSDISCUSS SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGESSusan Staffin Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology Susan Staffin Metz is Director of Special Projects in Engineering Education at Stevens Institute of Tech- nology. As a founder and president (1997 2002) of WEPAN, Women in Engineering Proactive Network, Susan has worked with over 200 colleges and universities to increase access and engagement of women in engineering and science through research, policy and program development. She is currently the prin- cipal investigator for ENGAGE, Engaging Students in Engineering, (www.engageengineering.org) a five year project funded by
focuses on thecultivation of technical and substantive knowledge embedded in an apolitical, individualistic andmeritocratic orientation.5,13,14 We elaborate on these themes in the next section.The findings reported here are drawn from a larger, longitudinal study of engineering students atfour sites, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), The Franklin Olin College ofEngineering (Olin), Smith College and the University of Massachusetts (UMass). Students werefollowed for five years, beginning with freshmen orientation in 2002, and concluding one-yearpost-graduation (for most of the participants in the study). Data collection included yearlysurveys to the panel (n=781), in-depth interviews in years one and four with a sub-sample of the
collapse that reverberated in form of massivelayoffs in the technology sector in Finland in 2002. After a few years, the global financialcrisis worsened the tainted reputation of the higher engineering education associated withrelatively limited job security. In order to face these problems looming ahead we are in a needof the most eligible candidates from both sexes in our degree programs. The long term viewof our university statistics reveals that the proportion of accepted female applicants had aslight positive curve from 1990 (17,5 %) to 2001 (25 %), whereas the 2002 collapse caused atemporary downturn in the figures.2 However, since 2005 the number of accepted femaleapplicants has not increased and has been established at 24,5 %. The role of
AC 2011-1325: THE ENGINEERING ”PIPELINE” METAPHOR AND THECAREERS OF FEMALE DEANS OF ENGINEERINGPeggy Layne, Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., joined Virginia Tech in 2003 as director of the AdvanceVT program, a National Science Foundation sponsored program to increase the number and success of women faculty in science and engineering. Prior to accepting her current position, Ms. Layne worked as a diversity consultant for the American Association of Engineering Societies and as director of the program on diversity in the engineering workforce at the National Academy of Engineering. She also spent a year as an AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow in the office of Senator Bob Graham, where she was responsible
AC 2011-1837: EVOLVING IDENTITIES: UNDERGRADUATE WOMENPURSUING THE ENGINEERING PROFESSORIATESarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Sarah Hug is Research Associate at the Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society (ATLAS) Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Hug earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research and evaluation efforts focus on learning science, tech- nology, engineering, and mathematics, with a special interest in communities of practice, creativity, and experiences of underrepresented groups in these fields across multiple contexts.A. Susan Jurow, University of Colorado at Boulder A. Susan Jurow is an Assistant Professor and Co
that changes are needed in theengineering classrooms, and the need to think about women as a diverse group. Femaleundergraduate engineering students are typically studied with little attention paid to theintersection of race/ethnicity and gender. Some researchers consider this dual minority status tobe a “double-bind 1” while other researchers look at how attributes of certain underrepresentedracial backgrounds offer advantages to female students in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) fields 2. Despite continued calls for disaggregated data on race and gender,few datasets have detailed information on student experiences with sufficient representation ofunderrepresented minorities to facilitate statistical analysis 3.Using
, students were asked to report the extent to which they agreed with a numberof statements related to motivation. The six motivation constructs and associated items are shown inTable 1.Table 1. Motivation constructs on the APPLE survey.1. Motivation (Financial)Engineers are well paid.Engineers make more money than most other professionals.An engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I graduate.2. Motivation (Parental Influence)My parents would disapprove if I chose a major other than engineering.My parents want me to be an engineer.3. Motivation (Social Good)Technology plays an important role in solving society’s problems.Engineers have contributed greatly to fixing problems in the world.Engineering skills can be used for the good of society.4
, Engerman, & Williams, 2006). Similar cases have been observed at U MassLowell-- a disturbing phenomenon that begs further study. The second relevant Howard findingis one of the major reasons their engineering students cite for leaving engineering: “lack of civicengagement”(Fleming, Engerman, & Williams, 2006).The annual spring Assistive Technology Design Fair (ADTF) at U Mass Lowell, in which teamsfrom area high schools identify a person in their lives with a problem, engineer, build and displaytheir solutions for each other to see, 30 out of 124 students were girls in 2006. Only 41% ofstudents surveyed said they had seriously thought about pursuing engineering/ technologycareers prior to ATDF. After having participated in ATDF, 70
: Enlisting Race, Resisting Power, Transforming Democracy. 2002: Harvard University Press.4. ASEE, 2009 Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges. 2010.5. Morrobel-Sosa, A., Minding the canary in the academy: A case for inclusive transformational leadership, in American Academy of Colleges and Universities. 2005.6. Moore, K.A., V.B. Brown, and H.J. Scarupa, The uses (and misuses) of social indicators: Implications for public policy. Child Trends Research Brief, 2003. Publication #2003- 01(February 2003).7. Holloway, B.M., T. Reed-Rhoads, and L.M. Groll, Defining the "Sophomore Slump" within the Discipline of Engineering, in Global Colloquium on Engineering Education. 2010
education. This was disproportionately the case with minority students who made up the majority at underfunded, inner-city high schools.... Thus, to mandate the admission of only qualified and not qualifiable students put the burden of integration on a part of the education system that patently was not doing its job. [...] What would have happened if institutes of technology and universities, given enough support and sanctioning by employers of their engineering graduates, took over the task of remedial education? Schools could conceivably maintain sound material standards for engineering but train students over longer periods, with greater provisions for remedial instruction. Even if such instruction costs more than existing
, Loyola University Maryland Page 22.1694.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Women and ALANA students in STEM disciplines: Evaluation of student retention and progress towards STEM degrees Introduction In the summer 2008, the Office of Institutional Research conducted a study evaluating women and African-, Latin-, Asian-, and Native-American (ALANA) students‟ retention and progress towards Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) degrees. The Classes of 2004 to 2008 were evaluated in terms of their initial educational goals compared to their actual retention
AC 2011-1508: UNDERSTANDING MEXICAN FACULTY DESCRIPTORSOF ENGINEERING USING METAPHORS TO HELP EXPLAIN GENDEREDBOUNDARIESSilvia Carreno-Castillo, Universidad de las Amricas PueblaAurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas PueblaEnrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Enrique Palou is Director, Center for Science, Engineering, and Technology Education; and Professor, Department of Chemical, Food, and Environmental Engineering at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. He teaches engineering design, food science, and education related courses. His research interests include emerging technologies for food processing, creating effective learning environments, and building rigorous research capacity in
institution with two branchcampuses, almost 40,000 students and more than 3,000 tenure track faculty as of fall 2010.Thirty-one percent of the tenure track faculty is female and 14% is faculty of color. Theuniversity hires over 200 new faculty members per year. Diversity is considered a key priorityby the university’s Board of Regents and many initiatives are in place to aid in recruitment andretention of diverse students and faculty. In October 2001, the University of Washington was one of eight institutions to receive aNational Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation award to advance womenfaculty careers in science, engineering, technology and mathematics (STEM). The five-yearcooperative agreement with NSF allowed UW to
Professor at the University of Missouri in the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies. She is Director of Research of the NSF-funded Assessing Women and Men in Engineering (AWE) and Assessing Women in Student Environments (AWISE) projects, and a co-principal investigator for the National Girls Collaborative project. Dr. Marra teaches course on assessment, evaluation and the design and implementation of effective online learning experiences.Lisa R. Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkKatie L. Piacentini, University of Missouri - ColumbiaMr. David B Knight, Pennsylvania State University, University Park David Knight is a PhD candidate in the Higher Education Program at Pennsylvania State
degrees in Educational Psychology, Industrial Relations, and Organizational Leadership. She is a published author of several articles and two books.Ronald J. Bennett, Univeristy of Saint Thomas RONALD J. BENNETT PhD is Honeywell Fellow in Global Technology Management in the School of Engineering at the University of St. Thomas after having served as the Founding Dean. He holds a Ph.D. in Metallurgical Engineering and an MBA. With a background of more than 20 years in industry, Bennett teaches and publishes on diverse topics including materials engineering, technical innovation, technology transfer, leadership and engineering education. He is an EAC of ABET commissioner for SME
Technology is a land grant institution with strength inscience and engineering. The university, with about 28,000 students and 1,750 faculty, has 8colleges, the second largest of which is the College of Engineering with a faculty of 225. IowaState’s faculty is 28.9% women in tenured or tenure eligible positions, but the College ofEngineering (COE) has only 10.1% women faculty.1 Additionally, the attrition rate for ISUwomen faculty in STEM fields (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) issignificantly higher for women as compared to men (especially in the first three years).2Although these numbers are less favorable than national averages, ISU has demonstrated a strongcommitment to increase the diversity of the faculty and has invested
students who lack the usual entry requirements to undertake higher education. One ofATU‟s areas of priority has been women in engineering.The first female civil engineering student at the Institute of Technology which was one of ATU‟santecedent institutions, graduated in 1974. The study included all female students who hadgraduated with civil engineering bachelor degrees up to 2008, totalling 76 women. Currentcontact details were sought by utilising alumni databases, social networking sites such asFacebook and by asking members of the cohort to provide contact details for others that theyknew. After this process, no contact details were able to be obtained for 11 of the graduates. Ofthe 65 who were sent the survey, 56 responded (86%). It cannot
. Program Development Structure, 2010 - 2012References[1] Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attributepreferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.[2] Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. Retrieved October 4, 2010, from http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/whysofew.pdf.[3] National Academy of Engineering (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public
-mail: 479-575-3386; E-mail: jjrencis@uark.edu.Rodica Lisnic, University of Arkansas PhD student in the Public Policy program at the University of Arkansas. Page 22.1223.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Recruitment Strategies for Gender Equity: Lessons from Cohort 1 ADVANCE InstitutionsAbstractThe NSF ADVANCE program represents one of the most far reaching gender equity effortsimplemented jointly by a government agency and institutions of higher education. Focusing onscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, in 2001
competitive departmentalclimates. Reliance on remote communication provided by advanced technology as well as theprocess of academic specialization are also related to the isolation experienced by the womenparticipants. In the absence of the buffering aspects of social integration,3 discouraging incidentsled students to question their competence, their “fit” in the institution and by association, theprofession and future aspirations. The paper further explains how the process of academic andsocial isolation unfolds and is negotiated over the course of doctoral studies, as reported by theparticipants.Introduction and Literature ReviewWomen are more engaged in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) thanever before, holding the