track, ● support networking of these and other members, ● development of a STEM pipeline of female STEM academics.SWE, like other professional societies, recognizes the significance of mentoring, relationships,and retention of like-minded engineers. In the case of this discussion, it has been recognized fordecades that female STEM faculty benefit from mentoring due to their unique position inacademia.1 Not only are there issues based on gender, but female STEM faculty are often part ofa non-traditional group, which may include older, minority, and disabled women. Due to thenature of this paper, we will consider these topics as appropriate, but will focus on retention ofwomen in academia, support from other professional societies, networking
Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science
Paper ID #15411Connectivity at RIT - Developing & Delivering an Effective Professional De-velopment Workshop Series for Women Faculty in STEMProf. Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Dell is an associate professor in the Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT’s NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired
Paper ID #16882Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive,and Otherwise Chilly ConditionsRachel Yonemura , University of Washington Rachel Yonemura is currently working on her B.S. in Environmental Science and Resource Management at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. She has been working at the University as a Re- search Assistant under Dr. Denise Wilson on projects regarding the Engineering Workplace as well as E-waste Sustainability. Motivation for these projects stem from an interest in public discourse and the interrelationships that occur among people of different
Paper ID #14763Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and the Policies and Pro-grams that Support ThemDr. Deborah Ilana Karpman, University of California San Diego Deborah Karpman currently works as an administrator at the University of California San Diego in the Office of Research Affairs coordinating limited submission opportunities. Prior to that, she directed the planning and coordination of efforts to increase the external recognition of faculty in the Viterbi School of Engineering at the University of Southern California. Her dissertation (UCLA, 2015), ”Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and
Paper ID #19212Minority Women in the Workplace: Early Career Challenges and Strategiesfor Overcoming ObstaclesNicole Yates, National Society of Black Engineers Nicole Yates currently serves as the Senior Research Analyst for the National Society of Black Engineers. She graduated from Stanford University with a Master’s degree in Psychology and completed a thesis that focused on gender differences in reasons for switching from STEM to non-STEM majors. Her background is in research and academia.Ms. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Rincon joined the Society of Women Engineers in February 2016 as the Manager of
technologydesigns. As with the engineering education researchers, both groups see a dearth of intentionalefforts to change dominant discourses in the rhetoric and practice of technology cultures, andwere working to establish alternative spaces, practices, and cultures to counteract the dominantframe. A lesson for engineering education researchers to take from this recurring narrative thatsurfaced in interviews, might be to celebrate collectivist instincts, the need and desire forcommunity, and to revisit the passion that brought them to the field of engineering education inthe first place. Further, as the discipline and its researchers establish their own dominantdiscourses and practices, we should be mindful not to lose the connection to doing what
allowed for themes to emerge from the data in a ‘bottom-up’ inductive approach. When approaching the interviews inductively, themes were drawn fromthe data without a theoretical reference in mind, similar to grounded theory research methods.8Therefore, we sought to find descriptions related to our participants’ perceptions of women inengineering without using existing general theories for women in engineering. Thesedescriptions were then formed into general themes that captured the essence of our participants’perceptions of being a woman in engineering. Nelson interpreted the interviews with knowledgeof the engineering culture, whereas Shapcott, who is pursuing a Ph.D. in educational psychology,framed it with a gendered motivational lens
inengineering education focusing on women in engineering. We considered the context ofinclusive curriculum and showed the importance of a sense of belonging in developingengineering identity. Sense of belonging is a salient factor that enhances in-group feelingsthat confirm group membership and help develop stronger identity with the group [19]. Whileplanning and designing an intervention for empowering women in engineering classrooms, itshould be kept in mind whether the intervention is able to foster a sense of belonging in away that women feel they are a part of the engineering community. Strengthening groupdynamics can help minimize climate effects. So, interventions should be designed aroundincreasing women students’ belongingness in an
. C. (2005). The persistence of traditional gender roles in the information technology sector: A study of female engineers in India. Information Technologies and International Development, 2(3), 29-46. 2. Corbett, C. & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. 3. AISHE. (2018). All India Survey on Higher Education 2017-2018. Government of India: Ministry of Human Resource Development. Department of Higher Education. New Delhi, India. 4. Aspiring Minds. (2018). Women in engineering: A comparative study of barriers across nations. 5. Chandra, V. (2014, August). What India
Paper ID #18748An Exploration of Female Engineering Students’ Functional Roles in theContext of First-year Engineering CoursesMiss Juebei Chen, Shanghai Jiaotong University Juebei Chen is a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education in Shanghai Jiao Tong University. She obtained a B.Admin in business administration from Minzu University. Her current interest focuses on the cognitive development of engineering graduate and undergraduate students, the assessment of teaching and learning in graduate education.Dr. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of
Paper ID #14975Barriers to Broadening Participation in Engineering Competition TeamsRui (Celia) Pan, Toyota Financial Services Dr. Pan is currently working as a sales, product and remarketing analyst at Toyota Financial Services. She received her Ph.D in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She hold a M.S. in Statistics and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering.Dr. Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education
support from role models (extrinsic) were major factors inhelping participants break barriers to engineering. L4 described how concepts didn’t come easyto her, “I just tend to work harder, but I had to work harder because I didn't come this natural tome as it would come to them” (L4). M5 struggled greatly in her calculus course and overcamethat as a barrier, “I started working really hard… I liked putting in hard work and seeing that Ican, I can get smarter and I can learn things if I put my mind to it” (M5). Barriers included thetraditional male dominated STEM classroom. M5 went on to describe challenges in a maledominated classroom that included both high school and her college experience, “I'm kind of lefton my own. I don't really get a
, class, andgender. With the purpose in mind, we have developed a questionnaire. Figure 2. Stages of the construction phase, adapted from Benson and Clark’s guide for instrument development and validation 41 Grounded in the literature on persistence and faculty retention, we identified and adoptedfor our research purpose the constructs relevant to the persistence of women engineering faculty.18,42,43 There are several sub-constructs identified from the literature review 1,36,44. For our survey,the sub-constructs include racial oppression, socioeconomic background impacts, genderoppression, and intersecting challenges. For instance, racial oppression includes culturalassociation, work
working environment. Yes, I decided to as engineering first because, actually in my mind I never think about teaching. But after several month of I worked as engineer, and my mother said, “Your face looks stressed.” And going back late at night and overtime is on that’s all make a little bit difficult for the parents but for me, I think it’s normal…after several months I decided to marry, so my parents said, “You just quit the job and apply for academic.” - Senior Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering, 8 YearsA senior lecturer shared her experience of joining academia once it was time for her to getmarried: “I forgot to answer why I involved in education, the reason was, at that time I worked in a factory and
Paper ID #30292Gender Stereotypes: Historical comparison of female students’ beliefs oncareer, marriage, and children (1935 versus 2019 populations)Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer is Associate Director of the Women in Engineering Program and Associate Professor (by courtesy) in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue Uni- versity. Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer conducts research and leads retention activities including administration of the undergraduate and graduate mentoring programs and the teaching of the Women
troubles with their homeworkand they’ve come to me for suggestions. So, I don’t consider myself as that far below them ifthey’re coming to me for questions. – Latina, Senior (P1)Another student expressed a similar sentiment of having to prove to her peers that she is just ascapable, if not more so, by earning some of the top grades in her engineering classes.Interestingly, while she described how her male, White peers are mostly close-minded, shealigned herself as being closer with them than other women in the program.Being in a major with church going rednecks who think one way, you have to remember, this isan engineering program, so most of the people in the program are kind of close-minded…It’s notreally an issue as far as me being Black. When
Dakota StateUniversity [26] where a network of trained men faculty work with other men faculty to promotegender equity on campus.Inclusive Leadership Cohort Structure (Autumn 2019)Based on the success of the Inclusive Leadership Course, it was decided to offer the course tofirst-year engineering students within the framework of an Inclusive Leadership Cohort. The aimof developing this cohort was to make students aware of concepts such as implicit bias, privilege,positionality, and inclusive minded thinking in their first year as college students so as tomaximize the impact of the course on their experience and on the climate in the COE. The firstInclusive Leadership Cohort (Autumn 2019) consisted of 72 students taking the requiredintroductory
mind a potentialexplanation. If women did feel threatened by stereotypes of women being less capable, theymight also avoid confirming the stereotype by avoiding saying no to tasks. Stereotype threat as aframe for these time-management challenges is also supported by its paradoxical nature: womenface more time management challenges perhaps because they try to avoid the stereotype of beingless competent.These scenarios also bring to mind these questions: How valued is the engineering woman’stime? How hard do these women have to work to prove their value? The previous research intothe engineering workplace would suggest that women must work harder to prove the value oftheir work if engineering is seen as “gender inauthentic.” Another way to frame
Paper ID #25613We are Thriving! Undergraduate Women in Engineering Student ProjectTeamsDr. Jia G. Liang, Kansas State University Jia Grace Liang is a faculty in the Department of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University (USA). Her research interests focus on school leadership, professional development and learning in STEM, equity for women and racial minorities, and leadership for community engagement. She holds a PhD from the University of Georgia in Educational Administration and Policy.Dr. Rick Evans, Cornell University Sociolinguist and Director of the Engineering Communications Program in the College of
nationwide.Additionally, the course choice opportunity data gathered from the institution catalogscharacterize the degree programs at a single point in time; however, curricula can change overtime. Some students matriculating through the degree programs (such as transfer students orthose with Advanced Placement course credit) may experience curricular choice opportunity thatis incongruent with what is reported in the catalog.Keeping these limitations in mind and looking at the program correlations next to the medianpercentages of their bachelor’s degrees earned by women, it is interesting to cautiously note thatthe correlations were the lowest (and not significant) for chemical and civil engineering, which—of the four disciplines—were more popular with women in
who came to speak to us…’ - ‘Yes, because I know things about engineering that I did not know before’ConclusionThe main focus of this paper was to share the experiences of the ongoing year-long activities ofthe project funded by EiF and jointly organized by Savannah State University and SCCPSS forthe local middle school girls with an aim to inspire them to pursue careers in engineering andtechnology areas. One-on-one conversations with the participants and some of the encouragingstatements, collected through a post-camp survey, revealed that activities like these might havehad a positive impact on the young minds that can help to make career decision in future.Although the overall impact of the program will be understood only after
toacknowledge that there are likely other factors that influence female student retention in engineering. Forexample, the unwelcoming climate that women face in the engineering through micro-aggression andimplicit bias is a factor. A more thorough investigation student perception of different majors is neededto show correlation between perceptions of majors at the current setting.Note1. It’s also important to note that the numbers listed above assume binary gender options. The numbersand results can vary slightly, keeping in mind that some of the numbers might change when gender nonbinary students are included.2. There might be some overlap with these numbers. So for example, a small number of students might bea part of the HES, have taken the ENGR
field tripThe ski resort hosted two engineering behind the scenes tours: (1) snow making and (2) chair liftoperations. These activities were seen to map to chemical engineering and mechanicalengineering topics, respectively. Therefore, the field trip was specifically designed with thesetwo majors in mind. Senior women from each department were recruited to act as leaders in theplanning and student recruitment of the process along with support from two engineering facultyand an administrative assistant. Trip planning included making transportation arrangements andhotel reservations, creating team building activities, and arranging ski lessons and rentals.The planning team sought to lower the barrier for attending the field trip in several ways
framing ofcertain engineering disciplines as more altruistic or communal than others. To work towardgender parity, Diekman et al. suggest “interventions… [to] demonstrate how STEM fieldsinvolve “helping” and collaborating with other people” as a way to increase the involvement ofwomen and communal-minded people in STEM more generally4. One potential strategy may befor engineering programs to highlight that many disciplines within engineering have the potentialto meet communal goals, moving beyond those already seen to be female-dominated. Thissignalling would be possible to implement through public-facing documents such as programpromotional materials that already tend to frame engineering in particular ways through languagechoices18.An important
engineering disciplines where women are most expected to succeed. The basis for this studyshould rely on success stories and experiences in Jordan, Malaysia, and other countries, whilekeeping in mind fundamental social and religious Saudi values. Given also Saudi’s challengingclimate, it is recommended (at least initially) that some of the ‘softer’ disciplines such aschemical, civil, electrical, industrial and systems, environmental, earth, and biologicalengineering be first adopted in Saudi higher education institutions. This detailed feasibility survey should be distributed to a large group of high-schoolstudents, parents of students, academics, important figures, government officials, companies,school administrators, and college and
to theinternship she always saw herself as a professor. After her internship, she shifted her careeraspirations into becoming a practicing engineer. Interestingly, prior to her internship Kayla hadother career paths in mind. She thought she “wanted to work in academia” but her internshipsparked her interest within the industry route. Kayla enjoyed working in the company, which“steered [her] more into working as a regular engineer” than she had expected. Kayla was notworking in an area that she was particularly interested in, nonetheless this did not deter her fromengineering. Her personal identity as an engineer was solidified. This finding is consistent withother studies that have found that internships increase student motivation to
- vironmental Engineering. Over the last fifteen years, Dr. Luster-Teasley has demonstrated excellence in teaching by using a variety of research-based, student-centered, pedagogical methods to increase diver- sity in STEM. Her teaching and engineering education work has resulted in her receiving the 2013 UNC Board of Governors Teaching Excellence Award, which is the highest teaching award conferred by the UNC system for faculty.Meghan Berger M.A., North Carolina A & T State University Meghan is a doctoral student in the rehabilitation counseling and rehabilitation counselor education pro- gram at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Her broad research interests in- clude exploring multicultural
universally designed engineering laboratories and machine shopsinclude the availability of: ● Adjustable height lab tables or work benches ● Equipment and controls that can be reached from a seated position ● Clear, large-print, or Braille labels ● Adequate lighting or additional light sources ● Clear lines of sight between instructional and laboratory areas ● Wide aisles throughout the space that are kept clear of obstructions ● Clear safety procedures for students with mobility, vision, and hearing impairmentsEnvironmental and curricular changes with UD in mind may increase the likelihood that studentswith disabilities and students from other underrepresented groups pursue and persist inengineering. By providing examples of UD
Paper ID #30117Mentoring Among African American Women in the Engineering AcademyJocelyn LaChelle Jackson, University of Michigan Jocelyn Jackson is a doctoral student in engineering education research at the University of Michigan and national chair of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Her major work includes research in entrepreneurship, organizational leadership and behavior, and strategic planning for NSBE.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State