working environment. Yes, I decided to as engineering first because, actually in my mind I never think about teaching. But after several month of I worked as engineer, and my mother said, “Your face looks stressed.” And going back late at night and overtime is on that’s all make a little bit difficult for the parents but for me, I think it’s normal…after several months I decided to marry, so my parents said, “You just quit the job and apply for academic.” - Senior Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering, 8 YearsA senior lecturer shared her experience of joining academia once it was time for her to getmarried: “I forgot to answer why I involved in education, the reason was, at that time I worked in a factory and
nationwide.Additionally, the course choice opportunity data gathered from the institution catalogscharacterize the degree programs at a single point in time; however, curricula can change overtime. Some students matriculating through the degree programs (such as transfer students orthose with Advanced Placement course credit) may experience curricular choice opportunity thatis incongruent with what is reported in the catalog.Keeping these limitations in mind and looking at the program correlations next to the medianpercentages of their bachelor’s degrees earned by women, it is interesting to cautiously note thatthe correlations were the lowest (and not significant) for chemical and civil engineering, which—of the four disciplines—were more popular with women in
engineering disciplines where women are most expected to succeed. The basis for this studyshould rely on success stories and experiences in Jordan, Malaysia, and other countries, whilekeeping in mind fundamental social and religious Saudi values. Given also Saudi’s challengingclimate, it is recommended (at least initially) that some of the ‘softer’ disciplines such aschemical, civil, electrical, industrial and systems, environmental, earth, and biologicalengineering be first adopted in Saudi higher education institutions. This detailed feasibility survey should be distributed to a large group of high-schoolstudents, parents of students, academics, important figures, government officials, companies,school administrators, and college and
Paper ID #21708Inspiring girls to pursue STEM (ages three to thirteen): a recipe for a suc-cessful outreach eventDr. Jodi Prosise, St. Ambrose University Jodi Prosise is Chair of Engineering and Physics and an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. She earned her PhD in Biomedical Engineering at University of Minnesota and her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University. She teaches courses in both Industrial and Mechanical Engineering at SAU, focusing in Engineering Graphics, Manufacturing, the Engineering Sciences, and Design. She was recently the PI of an NSF
Paper ID #22107Peer Mentoring of Undergraduate Women in Engineering as a Mechanismfor Leadership DevelopmentMs. Kristin E. Sherwood, Stony Brook University Kristin E. Sherwood is a doctoral student in Science Education at the Stony Brook University. She is focusing her research on the representation of women in engineering and other STEM related fields.Dr. Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of Physics and the Associate Director of the Science Education Program at Stony Brook University, New York. She attended La Salle University, Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania, where she
andreally just enjoy the process”“Working with a group of women who all had different levels of experience with each build fromweek to week was the most impacting for me. Every week, we would all combine our individualknowledge and experience to work together and complete the build as a team, which was themost rewarding to me.”“The aspect of flexibility made the biggest impact on me because it allowed the group membersto realize how we can do anything that we set our mind to. If we wanted to do a side project, andthe resources were there, we would just go for it.”“Seeing successful women in engineering. From the third and fourth year engineering students,to Dr. Dickrell herself, everyone in the group was someone I felt comfortable asking for help
students inSTEM fields, including those who changed majors within the STEM fields or out of the STEMfields, using anonymous surveys with a focus on gaining insight into why some female studentsleave STEM fields (particularly engineering). Data will be analyzed for recurring themes amongthe students in their experiences both positive and negative (e.g., moments they thought theywanted to quit, experiences that caused them to feel they could or could not achieve a STEMdegree, what changed their mind about staying, or what event caused them to switch to adifferent field). Though this research the authors’ hope to gain insight into why some femalestudents leave STEM fields and others stay. The goal of this paper is to correlate experiences ofthe
statistically significantlyhigher proportion (based on a one-tailed z-test with a p value of 0.025) of students who feltchemistry to be important at the start of the semester used SI during the semester than studentswho did not feel chemistry to be important. Furthermore, as shown in Table 3, among those whoreported chemistry as important at the beginning of the semester, a larger proportion of thosewho used SI reported chemistry remained important at the end of the semester than those whodid not use SI (i.e., students who used SI were less likely to change their minds about thecourse’s importance than those who did not use SI). Together, these findings suggest that theperceived importance of learning a gateway science subject by an engineering student
provided by participation in the program. As one mechanical engineering studentstated, “I am satisfied with my participation in WISE. I have support and friendship of womenwho are both in my major and going through similar situations…it is sometimes hard to be awoman and stand up for things in male dominated classes.” This camaraderie from peers andadvice from upperclassman seemed to help the first-year female students in science andengineering cope with the academic and social stressors within their majors, as reported by ageneral engineering student: I like how the other students in the program are like-minded as me, and understand the struggles/challenges I face not only as a woman in STEM, but simply as a college student. Not
Paper ID #23624Building and Breaching Boundaries: an Intersectional Coherent Group Ap-proach to Advancing Women Faculty in EngineeringDr. Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Professor Coleen Carrigan is a feminist anthropologist and an Assistant Professor of Gender, Race, Cul- ture, Science and Technology at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She investigates the historical and cultural dimensions of underrepresented groups’ participation in science, technology and engineering and the rea- sons why white males still dominate these fields.Saejin Kwak Tanguay, University of Washington Saejin
Paper ID #22182Valuing Women’s Contributions: Team Projects and Collaborative WritingDr. Jennifer C Mallette, Boise State University An Assistant Professor of English at Boise State University, Dr. Jenn Mallette teaches technical com- munication at the undergraduate and graduate level. In addition to working with STEM students in her undergraduate technical communication course, she collaborates with faculty in the College of Engineer- ing to focus on enhancing writing education in engineering courses. Her other research focuses on women in engineering, and she has recently published on the results of a case study exploring
Paper ID #21907Understanding the Experience of Women in Undergraduate Engineering Pro-grams at Public UniversitiesDr. Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Jessica Ohanian Perez is an assistant professor in Electromechanical Engineering Technology at Califor- nia State Polytechnic University, Pomona with a focus on STEM pedagogy. Jessica earned her doctorate in education, teaching, learning and culture from Claremont Graduate University. Her research focuses on broadening participation of marginalized group in engineering and investigating alternate paths to the field