Paper ID #10783Building A Healthy Online Student Community Through Education Environ-ment DesignMrs. Karen L. Bollenbach, The University of Virginia Mrs. Bollenbach is a student at the University of Virginia and anticipates receiving her B.S. in engineering science in May 2014. She graduated from Virginia Tech with a B.S. in health education in 1993 before beginning a career in the insurance industry. In 2009, she began studying drafting and engineering at Tide- water Community College. As a 2013 Virginia Microelectronics Consortium (VMEC) summer scholar, she conducted thermoelectric thin film research at the Applied
success in technicaleducation.ConclusionThe findings indicate that to increase diversity in technology and engineering education,programs should be designed to (1) build community college students’ technical capital and (2)help them develop professional identities.Moving students from very well-structured problems to ill-structured problems allows studentsto gradually build the knowledge and skills that they need to deal with problems that aretechnically more sophisticated and ill-structured. Such a gradual approach provides students whodo not have technical capital, or a background with doing hands-on activities or tinkering, anopportunity to acquire it upon joining technical or engineering programs.Students develop professional identities for
in the context of rural Haiti, and also through the related efforts to provide technical education and training to community members (capacity building). Personal Remark from Joann Rodríguez: My work with the GREAT IDEA project is the best professional and personal opportunity of my life. We, as engineering students, need courses and research experiences focused in the development of skills to work with and for the community. Engineers should work to solve problems in the simplest way and always keep in mind what the user really needs, rather than the creation of new products to make the user depend on it. For example, with the IBSF, the basic need of safe water can be provided without sophisticated technology and
approximately 19,042 (16,136 FTE) has been animportant step toward creating a climate conducive to facilitating fundamental change. Examplesof such change include building collaborations among faculty within and across departments,establishing the identity of students as part of a community beyond their chosen major,improving the efficiency and effectiveness of university systems, and perhaps most importantly,developing a framework to think deliberately about ways to effect change. This paper is focusedon describing and categorizing the development of a STEM “identity” over the past decadewithin a metropolitan campus that does not have an overall STEM central mission.The College of Engineering (CoE), established in 1997 as a result of a regional demand
survey in order to build upon this finding.The other remaining seven sub-themes in the survey include engineering motivations, ABETlearning outcomes, EWB-USA learning impacts (compared with coursework, questions onlygiven to EWB-USA members), global competency, engineering identity, career outcomeexpectations, and future career goals. These themes are briefly described below.Methods Page 24.439.4Findings from qualitative data, combined with the literature shared above, led to the selectedsurvey themes presented in Table 1. Of the nine survey themes, seven themes used items fromexisting scales, and two themes used items developed by the research
been shown to be effective in fostering the interest,skills, and aspirations that may develop into pursuit of graduate/professional school and potentialresearch and innovation careers.5,6 The concept of “communities of practice” described byWenger supports the idea that participation in different communities and experiences affectsparticipant identity development.16 The National Science Board members, in their report“Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education”, propose participation in researchexperiences, specifically in the freshman and sophomore years, as a desirable means to engageURM students in the community of STEM.17 These experiences aim at introducing students toSTEM and broadening their education while improving retention. One
aim to innovate,” strongly criticizing the engineering educationresearch community for not practicing what they preach. In recent discussions of this concern, ithas been identified that “…the issue is not simply a need for more educational innovations. Theissue is a need for more educational innovations that have a significant impact on studentlearning and performance, whether it is through widespread and efficient implementation ofproven practices or scholarly advancements in ideas, methods, or technologies (p. 5).6 ” Effortstowards this end have included the development of frameworks and strategies to make the linkbetween knowledge generated in the learning sciences to the practical delivery of education moreexplicit and implementable5,9,10
knowledge canbest be acquired through working on both well- and ill-structured problems.These findings indicate that to increase diversity in technology and engineering education,programs should be designed to build community college students’ technical capital. Studentswho lack technical capital are likely to be women and underrepresented populations (students ofcolor and economically disadvantaged students). Without technical capital, they are likely to findthe experience of dealing with ill-structured problems confusing, difficult, and meaningless.Such a negative experience is likely to push them out of technology and engineering fields. Onthe other hand, building their technical capital will provide them the skill and experience thatthey need
challenges in less technical areas also(g) an ability to communicate 1.56 (0.16) still exist – for example in helping students to present aeffectively professional identity and understand their professional responsibilities. We will respond in this area through(h) the broad education necessary to 1.5 (0.17) additional student preparation for internships (using on-lineunderstand the impact of engineering resources and by interacting more with students through theirsolutions in a global, economic, eportfolios).environmental, and societal
Workforce Development and Life Long Learning division of the Univer- sity of the District of Columbia, Community College.Dr. Annie R Pearce, Virginia TechDr. Christine Marie Fiori P.E., Virginia TechDr. Tanyel Bulbul, Virginia Tech Dr. Bulbul is an Assistant Professor of Building Construction and Adjunct Professor of Civil and En- vironmental Engineering at the Virginia Tech. She has expertise in investigating information and com- munication technologies together with the development of formalized, model-based analysis approaches to deal with the complexities of the built environment. Her research areas include Building Information Modeling (BIM); product and process modeling in AEC/FM; ontology based approaches for design
. Page 24.716.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Improving Engineering Curriculum and Enhancing Underrepresented Community College Student Success through a Summer Research Internship ProgramAbstractEfforts to remain competitive internationally in engineering and technology require a significantincrease in the number of STEM graduates in the United States. A recent report prepared by thePresident’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology states that currently less than fortypercent of students entering college to pursue a STEM career end up completing a STEM degree,citing that students typically leave the STEM field in the first two years of their program
documents an ongoing engineering education project that partners the development ofa new method for teaching engineering writing through the lens of mathematics, with theadvancement of a university assessment initiative. Since spring of 2013, the project has beenstaging system trials in both a writing class for engineers and an engineering machine designclass. In the latter case, the strategy is to thread compact Just in Time (J.I.T.) instructionalmodules into technical units of study that require status report memos or a final report. Thisaspect of the project is a partnership between the author—an engineering communicationspecialist and experienced mechanical engineer who now teaches for a university writingprogram—and a senior mechanical
. Page 24.493.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering Camp: a residential experience designed to build academic capital in pre-college studentsAbstractEngineering Camp is a one-week on-campus residential program that exposes pre-college (post7th -11th grade) students to engineering disciplines through introductory seminars,demonstrations, laboratory experiments, and design challenges. The program improves students‟awareness of the breadth of engineering and emphasizes the benefit of developing skills inSTEM. The camp is offered in grade-based parallel sessions geared to the audience, and camperscan return in subsequent summers. Importantly, Camp provides a
National ScienceFoundation, entitled BLIND FOR REVIEW. The study collected data from engineeringundergraduates and alumni, faculty, program chairs, and associate deans in a nationallyrepresentative sample of 31 four-year colleges and universities and from pre-engineeringstudents at 15 community colleges to examine the curricular, instructional, cultural, andorganizational features that support learning in engineering programs (Table 1). A team ofeducation and engineering researchers developed the survey-based instruments for each of thesepopulations through a rigorous, two-year process that included: 1) literature reviews; 2)individual interviews with administrators, faculty, and alumni; and 3) focus-group interviewswith students. To ensure
Engineering Education. His research is supported through various internal and external funding agen- cies including the National Science Foundation. He is a popular and well-respected instructor, and has received many teaching awards including the Regents Distinguished Teaching Award in 2010 at OSU.Dr. Kerri S Kearney, Oklahoma State University Dr. Kerri Kearney is an associate professor of educational leadership at Oklahoma State University. Her professional experience is in both education and organizational consulting. She holds an M.B.A. and an Ed.D. Her research agenda focuses on the emotional impacts of human transition, other mothering, visual methodologies in qualitative research, and other organizational and
places an emphasis on the schemata of the learners. The mental framework of thearchitectural education experience supersedes the prerequisite knowledge. The architecturestudents learn and retrieve information differently while possessing the same prerequisiteknowledge as the engineering students because of the disparities in their mental frameworks.Structures education is commonly a linear progression from mathematics, physics, rigid bodystatics, mechanics of deformable bodies, structural materials design and analysis, to lateral forcesand overall building behavior.[7] The gradual accrual of prerequisite knowledge is suited for theengineering schemata rather than the architecture schemata. A need exists to develop new way ofthinking about this
, each E-Scholar class of about 20students is made up of approximately 55% Business majors with the balance being from Collegeof Arts and Sciences, Engineering, Nursing, and Education. In recent years, a more intentionaleffort to recruit non-Business majors has resulted in less than 50% Business majors in theprogram. The diversity of majors in each E-Scholar class adds to the variety and richness of theideas students in the program develop and in many cases implement.Business Plan CompetitionThe CLEI offers a co-curricular opportunity for all students, and even community members, tocompete in a $100K Challenge Venture Competition. The competition is no mere ‘beautycontest’ awarding cash prizes to winners. Rather, it provides an opportunity for
A robust cultural experience that comes from immersion into the local community An opportunity to innovate and develop problem-solving ideas, using the engineering design process, in an effort to make a positive difference through an entrepreneurial spirit A place where students are respectful of the cultures, beliefs, and views of others The opportunity to learn about the possible societal impacts resulting from introducing new innovations into a community of a developing country An increased understanding of the global opportunities awaiting students as they pursue their undergraduate degree at Northeastern University Begin to consider student’s future identity and the role engineering may
level ofpersonal and social development may exist because engineering students believe that the narrowfocus of engineering education on technical content has limited their opportunities for broaderpersonal development4. Other studies have provided evidence to support this contention.Smith and associates agreed that all engineering students throughout their undergraduateeducation require professional skill development in terms of talking through and listening toideas with peers, knowing how to build trust in a working relationship, and leadership of groupefforts5. Felder and Brent studied differences in terms of learning style, approaches to learning,and intellectual development throughout the entire college experience beyond academics
should be the foundation for the development of engineering curriculaand pedagogical strategies. Engineering curricula developers should rely upon the Navajoprinciples for thinking and knowing - nitsáhákees, nahat'á, iiná, and sihasin - in their decision-making processes6,13. Summary: A Navajo Framework for Learning Educational work done by cultural education leaders, such as Herbert Benally, paved the way forstudents to learn in an environment that supports their Navajo identity, including their history,language, and culture through songs, ceremonies, and prayers. Benally’s3 Diné Philosophy ofLearning transformed the way education was taught at the tribal college - the Diné College - bygrounding learning in a Navajo
development of engineering community relate to the educational process.21 Others,such as race, gender, and interest in other fields depend on a particular student.22,23,24Engineering identity and self-efficacy are the factors that are influenced both by an individualstudent and the educational process.24,13 The first year curriculum is where many universitiesstart tackling all of these retention-related factors.4,25,26,27 Developing experiences in the first yearthat actively engage the student in learning, such as an integrated curriculum, updated teachingmethods, or a cornerstone course, can be used to counteract attrition by improving theeducational process and addressing issues related to student specific variables.28,29,30,31,32Educational
project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Liz developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and undergraduate engineering and education teams as well as a popu- lar Family STEM event offering for both elementary and middle school communities. Current projects include providing comprehensive professional development, coaching and program consulting for K-8 integrated STEM using engineering schools in several states and serving as a Professional Development partner for the Engineering is Elementary program. She is also a Co-PI on two NSF DR-K-12 grants focused on practice and research in K-8 engineering education and the chair of the ASEE Long Range Planning Committee on K-12
, and as a Post-Doctoral Research Officer at the Center for Informal Learning and Schools (CILS) at King’s College, University of London. Her graduate training is in Science & Technology Studies and Women’s Studies at Virginia Tech.Ms. Helene Finger P.E., California Polytechnic State UniversityAlana Christine Snelling Page 24.1375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 When, Why, How, Who – Recruitment Lessons from First Year Engineering Students in the Millennial GenerationToday, an increasing number of women enter, remain, and succeed within science
Pajares40 posit that females Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM)students gain their self-efficacy through social persuasion and vicarious experience, whereasmales increase their self-efficacy through mastery experiences. Further, women in STEM fieldsrely on relationships to create and support their confidence to succeed in male-dominatedfields40. Both the present study and previous research in STEM education underscore the needfor effective interventions to increase self-efficacy among female students and thereby increaserecruitment and retention of females in construction management programs.Several potential interventions, as suggested by Lopez del Puerto, Guggemos and Shane,18 thatinfluence female student’s self-efficacy through
thorough knowledge of reading, writing and mathematics, plus a thorough groundwork in basic engineering principles. A good working knowledge of the English language and of the history of our country and at least a general understanding of the history of the world is also essential.7McKee’s commentary also referenced many other kinds of attributes and experiences importantfor success working abroad, but made it clear that these were to be developed after graduation. Page 24.1265.3Others argued that undergraduate engineering education should play a more prominent role. Forinstance, Cornell Professor of Civil Engineering N. A
identity asengineering majors is crafted through their course selection across the sciences, social sciences,humanities, and engineering; through daily interaction in those courses and as part of the generalcampus community (curricular or otherwise) where interdisciplinary interaction is de rigueur;and by virtue of the interdisciplinary content of some engineering coursework, especially for Page 24.807.4majors in the Engineering Studies program. It is within that traffic of disciplinary interaction that“ES 101: The Introduction to Engineering” sits.Engineering as a liberal artA motivating factor in the course design has been the view that
. A student that struggles with these concepts is atan increasing disadvantage as the course progresses and new material builds upon these concepts.A student that is less skillful at parsing word problems is further disadvantaged.Success and progress through the engineering economy and other time value of money courses isthe focus of this paper. However many of our points are also relevant to the larger problem ofthe efficient progression of engineering students through the STEM pipeline which is of greatimportance to educators. The supply and quantity of STEM graduates has a direct impact on thecompetitiveness of a nation 1. Students that perform poorly in a course or must repeat it are at agreater risk of dropping off the STEM track and may
one line of questions for another. This aspect of data analysis – that the data collectionframes the analysis through the identity of the interviewer (or, in cases with more rigid interviewprotocols, that of the protocol designer) – while acknowledged in the qualitative methodliterature,15,17,20–22 has remained opaque in much published engineering education research.We also have come to recognize through our initial analyses, as others have done e.g.,21–23 that ourinterviews with participants are also not simply transparent windows that let us see the Truth ofparticipants’ lives. Participants had stories they wanted to tell us, stories they were willing to tellus, and undoubtedly stories they did not tell us. The interviews, therefore, are
their academic majors. This isparticularly important to increase retention among under represented minorities (URM) andensure diversity among the population of students.Figure 1: Retention data for all new freshmen that start their mathematics coursework with Math1825. Term/semester 12 retention rate for these students is under 10%. The decision to admit tothe engineering major is nominally made near Term 7.The COE at MSU has developed two programs that address impediments faced by students fromeconomically disadvantaged areas. Students from low socio-economic areas are recruited by theDiversity Programs Office (DPO) to take part in a summer bridge experience that includesacademic pre-classes and social network building. The capacity of the
Engineering Plus, as well as STEM education courses for pre-service teachers through the University’s CU Teach Engineering program. Additionally, she manages and mentors graduate and undergraduate engineering fellows who teach in local K-12 classrooms through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s NSF-funded TEAMS initiative, is faculty advisor for the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), and on the development team for the TeachEngineering digital library. Dr. Zarske’s primary research interests are on the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, recruitment, and retention in K-12 and undergraduate engineering.Ms. Madison J. Gallipo, University of Colorado Boulder Madison Gallipo is an