University Dr. Nadia Kellam is Associate Professor in the Polytechnic Engineering Program at Arizona State Uni- versity. Prior to this position, she was an Associate Professor at the University of Georgia, where she was co-director of the interdisciplinary engineering education research Collaborative Lounge for Un- derstanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER). In her research, she is interested in understanding how engineering students develop their professional identity, the role of emo- tion in student learning, and synergistic learning. A recent research project uncovers the narratives of exemplary engineering faculty who have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching
limited to, materials science and engineering, physics, chemistry,textiles engineering and chemistry, statistics, and mathematics. The traineeship consists of core coursesand a suite of elective courses, co-curricular activities, professional development, and mentoring thatsupplement the research component of the program. The intent is to facilitate the development of thetrainees’ technical and communication skills, professional identities, and build professional networks. TheNRT provides fellowship funding for trainees and strongly expects participation from non-funded trainees(students that participate in all programmatic activities and complete all requirements without NRTfunding). Bridge trainees are integrated into all of SEAS activities and
National Academy of Sciences committee on ”Revitalizing Gradute Stem Education for the 21st Century.”Dr. Yvette Maria Huet, UNC Charlotte Yvette Huet is Director of the ADVANCE Faculty Affairs and Diversity Office and a Professor of Kine- siology at UNC Charlotte. She has worked with and created a variety of workshops for faculty, graduate students and post-doctoral fellows, and current and future leaders and provided professional development consultation to faculty. She has provided training at UNC Charlotte and other programs and institutions across the country, many with current or previous ADVANCE grants, that addresses best practices in recruitment, inherent bias, communication, mentoring and reappointment
Paper ID #24662Catalyzing Engineering Student Identity Development through an Indepen-dent Design ProjectMr. Kalen Kahn, U.S. Military Academy Kalen Kahn is a Cadet at West Point in his 3rd year of Mechanical Engineering.Lt. Col. Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy Brian Novoselich is an active duty Army Lieutenant Colonel currently serving as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (West Point). He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2016. He holds Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in mechanical engineering from The
Gender and Grade,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 275–292, Apr. 2015.[32] B. M. Capobianco, B. F. French, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Engineering Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners.,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698– 716, 2012.[33] B. M. Capobianco, E. D. Deemer, and C. Lin, “Analyzing predictors of children’s formative engineering identity development.,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, no. 1A, pp. 44– 54, 2017.[34] B. M. Capobianco, B. F. French, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Engineering Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698– 716, 2012.[35] G. J. Kelly, C. M. Cunningham, and A. Ricketts, “Engaging in identity work through engineering practices in
target themsystematically within programs. Therefore, it remains to the graduate students to createknowledge to support each other during their journeys through graduate education. Thus, thisstudy takes the approach of researcher to participant, to uncover our own experiences as ESLgraduate students. The experiences we have during our doctoral training influence the development of anidentity as researchers and as potential future scholars that will facilitate the education of the newgenerations or will perform successfully in non-academic contexts. The construction of suchidentities would influence our persistence in our graduate programs. A recent study aboutengineering doctoral students used Identity-Based Motivation theory to explore
Experience(REEFE) during my graduate educational journey on “who I am” and “who I want to be” as anaspiring faculty member in the engineering education community. The autoethnographic studyincludes analysis of interviews conducted at the beginning, middle, and end of the professionaldevelopment experience and weekly reflective journals to identify significant interactions thatinfluenced my construction, negotiation, or rejection of professional identities. In addition, thepaper discusses how my identity development through this experience has informed mydissertation direction for degree completion. This study intends to highlight the benefits ofprofessional development opportunities through avenues beyond coursework and researchprojects to encourage
evaluate the fate of pesticides in drinking water treatment plants, and to develop biomimetic membranes for desalination. Her current interests include undergraduate engineering research and education. Dr. Marincel Payne is co-leading an Undergraduate Research Community to support students learning through research, undergraduate re- search to remove stormwater pollutants via engineered treatment wetlands, development of courses and research related to appropriate technology with strong emphasis on social sustainability, and frameworks for integrating open-ended problems through students’ curricula.Dr. Irene M.B. Reizman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Irene M.B. Reizman is an Assistant Professor in the Department
over 10 years focusing on recruitment and retention of students from underrepresented groups and continues to implement the groundwork for enrichment programs.Dr. Sonia Garcia, Texas A&M University Dr. Sonia Garcia is the Senior Director for the Access and Inclusion Program in the College of Engi- neering at Texas A&M University. She joined the college in 2014. In this role, Garcia is responsible for the initiation, development, management, evaluation, and promotion of research informed and strategic comprehensive activities and programs for the recruitment and success of historically underrepresented minority students and under-served communities in engineering at the undergraduate and graduate levels
Paper ID #26528The Tiny House Project: Building Engineering Proficiency and Self-Efficacythrough Applied Engineering at the High School Level (Evaluation)Dr. Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jessica Gale is a Research Scientist II at Georgia Tech’s Center for education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on project-based learning, STEM inte- gration at the elementary and middle grades levels, design-based implementation research, and fidelity of implementation. Dr. Gale has a particular interest in project-based engineering in elementary school communities and the
engineering profession is changing rapidly. Global issues,technological innovation, expansion of discipline boundaries, and increased professionalexpectations are transforming what engineers do and how they do it. Society is demandingengineering graduates, with strong technical knowledge who can think creatively and critically,effectively communicate, and work in teams to solve challenging problems. The earliestengineering disciplines, civil, mechanical and electrical, have given rise to distinct engineeringspecialties and application‐based disciplines. Many contemporary engineering problems areconsidered to be multi‐disciplinary in nature and require systems thinking in problemformulation and solution. It is clear that we must educate engineering
suggests that this type of studentmay approach writing differently than graduate students in other disciplines, and thus instructionshould be developed that best helps them participate in the discourse of their field.Developing academic literacy is also traced in a case study by [10]. In addition, [11], describe anational workshop to systematically teach Ph.D. students how to communicate engineering andscientific research as an antidote to the typical process of ad hoc student learning fromcolleagues and advisors. [12] describe the value of adding a component of ethics education toengineering graduate curricula to promote awareness of professional norms in the U.S. andgreater awareness of the societal context of engineering. Adding an ethics
to science and engineering communication studies 17,18, 19 and a plethora of advice from scientists and communication scholars about how to write forthe public20. Despite this interest, few university science or engineering programs dedicateformal coursework in public communication to undergraduate or graduate students 21. Whenprograms do offer such training, they are usually limited to teaching students to write intraditional genres such as press releases, newspaper-style articles, and essays13, 14, and fail toconsider more personal, informal, and affective forms of communication such as face-to-faceconversations that can occur through science cafes or street science 22, 23 or to make use ofmultimedia genres such as podcasts, blogs, or
engineering teacher educators and professional development [14], [18]: GOAL I: Engage teachers in engineering content and process GOAL II: Support teachers’ learning of responsive pedagogy in engineering GOAL III: Enable teachers to plan, modify & select curricula with attention to student thinking GOAL IV: Build a community of educators in engineering nationally and internationally In Table 1, we summarize the key instructional activities in TEEP, how they align to ourfour central goals, and in which courses teachers engage in these activities. Goals Key instructional activities Course Learning engineering
currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech
of Research ethics, the MIT Kaufman Teaching Certificate Program (KTCP) course, and un- dergraduate genetics. She believes in the power of peer-coaching as a method of improving an entire community’s ability to communicate effectively.Dr. Marina Dang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Marina Dang holds a PhD in Chemistry from Brandeis University, where she also served as an instructor for the Science Posse Boot Camp program. She taught chemistry at Emmanuel College and later became a STEM curriculum developer for an educational startup. In 2014, she joined the MIT Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering to serve as its first Communication Lab manager. As the Communication Lab model spread to new
agricultural storage warehouses. He is a licensed Certified Building Contractor in the State of Florida and a member of the USGBC of Oklahoma.Dr. Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University. Her research interest is the cost of sustainable construction and sustainable infrastructure. Other research interests include technology in the classroom. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 “A survey of undergraduate students utilizing an interdisciplinary laboratory building”AbstractUniversities with graduate programs typically focus on graduate research assistants seekingmaster’s and
Resources Engineering and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, while working with the Austin chapter of Engineers Without Borders as a volunteer and project lead for a project in Peru. She has published and presented on incentivizing decentralized sanitation and wastewater treatment, on sustainability of coastal community water and sanitation service options, as well as on integrating liberal arts and STEM education, currently through the vehicle of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program. She has co-designed workshops oriented toward educational change for Olin’s Summer Institute and the joint Olin College-Emerson College event: Remaking Education.Dr. Selin Arslan, Lawrence Technological
well as the Past-Chair of the Continuing Professional Development Division of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. Dr. Springer is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty
that as sort of the engineering education person. That's been a great experience to work with a near peer colleague in a traditional engineering field and to introduce him, for example, to the ASEE community, to see him go off into the disciplinary side, the disciplinary division of ASEE to present papers over there that I don't have anything to do with.This sentiment was also reflected in many other interview participants who saw one of theirgoals, or a strategy toward creating change in engineering education more broadly, to becultivating awareness and building capacity among engineering faculty to enact lessons of socialresponsibility and embed ethics into “typical” engineering coursework. For the feminist
Director of Science Education at the University of Delaware’s Professional Development Center for Educators. In her role, Amy works collaboratively with K-12 sci- ence and engineering teachers to develop and implement standards-based curricula and assessments. She also provides mentoring and coaching and co-teaching support to K-12 teachers across the entire tra- jectory of the profession. Her research focuses on teacher education, classroom assessment, and P-16 environmental and engineering education.Prof. Andrew Novocin, University of DelawareDr. James Atlas, University of Delaware c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 FLC E2T: A Faculty Learning Community on Effective (and
Life As a 2017 graduate from Tufts University, Marian served as Student Outreach Coordinator for Tisch College of Civic Life for the 2017-2018 academic year. In this capacity, she supported many initiatives around the College, including programs, communications, and research. Long interested in the fusion of civic engagement and education, Marian was proud to participate in the development of this project. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preparing Engineering Faculty for Inclusion of Civic Engagement in Curriculum “21st century engineers are faced with unprecedented challenges of developing a sustainableworld in balance with the
, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication & Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing Educational Pathways for Manufacturing in Rural Communities: An Investigation of New and Existing Programs in Northwest FloridaAbstractA subset of manufacturing, the AM sector is defined using two criteria: high levels of spendingfor research and development (R&D) and a high share of STEM jobs within companies. In NWFlorida, AM employment is concentrated in two sub-sectors
knowledge, concept inventories and self-efficacy.Prof. Nicholas Langhoff, Skyline College Nicholas Langhoff is an associate professor of engineering and computer science at Skyline College in San Bruno, California. He received his M.S. degree from San Francisco State University in embedded elec- trical engineering and computer systems. His educational research interests include technology-enhanced instruction, online education, metacognitive teaching and learning strategies, reading apprenticeship in STEM, and the development of novel instructional equipment and curricula for enhancing academic suc- cess in science and engineering.Mr. Marco Wehrfritz, Skyline Community College Marco received his B.S. and M.S. in
and retention. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #23158Supporting Diversity in Teams Through Asset MappingDr. Jamie Gomez R, University of New Mexico Jamie Gomez, Ph.D., is a Lecturer Title III in the department of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) at the University of New Mexico. She is a co- Principal Investigator for the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Professional Formation of Engineers: Research Initiation in Engineering For- mation (PFE: RIEF) for the project- Using Digital Badging and Design Challenge Modules to Develop Professional Identity
looked at knowledge building in coursework and found that students’ abilities toconnect this to imagined futures was an important factor in their motivation to succeed [3]. Moregenerally, the specific information that instructors emphasize with respect to the future in theclassroom has been shown to be important to students [4].The role of first-year engineering programs also may play a role in students’ continuation andcompletion of an engineering degree and may contribute to a higher graduation rate thanprograms with a direct matriculation [5]. However, these programs are not without challenges.Notable concerns include a potential for a higher student workload, in a time whenadministrations are seeking to reduce this [6]. It has also been
University Mary- land. Her primary research is in writing pedagogy and assessment, and she has taught a wide variety of writing courses including first year composition, professional writing, rhetoric, and style. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Integrating Writing into Engineering Labs: Developing Curriculum and Creating a Writing Fellows Program I. IntroductionThis paper presents a Works-in-Progress. Communication competency is critical for practicingengineers [1]. Research demonstrates that learning to write and communicate in engineering islinked to learning to think like an engineer and to developing a professional identity as an engineer[1], [2]. ABET lists
by President Obama as a Champion of Change for Women in STEM, and participates in a number of diversity-enhancement programs at the university including serving as the Deputy Chair of the Women’s Commission and as a member of the ADA Task Force.Miss Catherine McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Joseph Murphy, Clemson University Joseph Murphy is a Fall 2018 graduate of
), both in the student experience and in the creation of knowledge bycurrent members of the ‘community of practice’ [18]. In their paper, Lave (1991) describedlearning as “… a process of becoming a member of a sustained community of practice” arguingthat “Developing an identity as a member of a community and becoming knowledgeably skillfulare part of the same process… (pg. 65)”. A previous study consistent with this theory of learningin an interdisciplinary engineering setting showed that participation in activities relevant to adiscipline may increase students’ understanding of the disciplinary skills and concepts to thesame degree as traditional engineering educational strategies [24].In addition to meeting those educational needs, situated
. Tracey, and C. A. Enz, “Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments,” J. Hosp. Tour. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 100–120, 1997.[29] T. Nomi, “Faces of the Future: A Portrait of First-Generation Community College Students,” 2005.[30] Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, “Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits,” National Research Council of the National Academies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.[31] K. B. Wendell and C. Rogers, “Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 513–540, 2013.[32] K. B. Wendell and