infrastructure for recording portfolios, amethodology to dynamically record and analyze those data collected in response to learningenvironments and learning conditions is essential for the development of students’ creativityin learning. A sound analysis on learning portfolios and exploring those links among learningbehaviors will substantially lead us to discover the factors that motivate creativity andobtained findings can be used by educators for teaching, guidance, and assistance.Therefore, this study explores two analytic factors: learning behavior and cognition portfolioin light of the theory of creativity development. According to the instructional outline andlearning objectives of the engineering curriculum, in this study we introduce the
a visiting research scientist in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, visiting faculty in the Center for Entrepreneurship, and a visiting Fellow in the Center for Education and Research in Information Security at Purdue University.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette Justin L. Hess received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education along with his Master’s of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher in the STEM Education Research Institute at IUPUI. Justin’s research interests include developing pedagogical strategies to improve STEM students’ ethical reasoning skills; exploring the role
engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Studying Education Organizational Change: Rigorous Attention To Complex Systems Via A Multi-theoretical Research ModelAbstractThe purpose of this paper is two-fold. We first explore the question how might we rigorously andcompletely study
Paper ID #16360Classifying Dissatisfaction: Student Perspectives on Teammate PerformanceEmily Miller, Ohio State University Emily Miller is a recent graduate of the Industrial Systems Engineering program at Ohio State University. She has worked for the National Integrated Cyber Education and Research Center, as a teaching assistant for the Fundamentals of Engineering program at Ohio State, and as a researcher at Olin College of Engi- neering and Ohio State. She will begin her graduate studies in Systems and Information Engineering at the University of Virginia this fall.Dr. Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan
preparation of engineering graduate students for future careers.Mr. Ekembu Kevin Tanyi, Norfolk State University E. Kevin Tanyi started his career in Oldenburg in East Friesland, Germany. There he earned his bachelor degree in engineering physics with a focus in medical physics and finished with honors. During a four- year sabbatical, he worked as a Call Center Agent and finally as a Web-programmer/ designer. Returning to his field, he pursued a Professional Science Master degree in applied physics at Towson University. There he carried out research in the fabrication and characterization (AFM, XRD, and four-point probe resistivity measurements) of colossal magneto resistant perovskite thin films. He also embarked on a
. In that sense, it can besaid, that the instructors were novice to asynchronous online teaching and learning.This course was a recipient of a university grant, specifically meant for developing asynchronousonline courses, from a distance-learning sub-unit of the university. Hence, the course wasdesigned in collaboration with an instructional designer with expertise in online learning andlearning environments. The learners consisted a mix of both graduate students and professionalsworking in a related area.Design approachThis course was designed with the Backward Design approach developed by Grant Wiggins andJay McTighe [13]. The backward design process starts with intended purpose and result of thedesign challenge in mind. Wiggins and McTighe
environment.Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shown that positive peer relationsare essential to success in college. The positive interpersonal relationships promoted throughcooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial to today’s learning communities. Theyincrease the quality of social adjustment to college life, reduce uncertainties about attendingcollege, and increase integration into college life. Isolation and alienation, on the other hand,often lead to failure. Two major reasons for dropping out of college are: failure to establish asocial network of classmates and failure to become academically involved in classes. (29, 30)Cooperation is more than being physically near other students. It is actually a state of mind.A
with thesematerials. It is primarily a call to consider how students engage in their college experience,and to search for proper tools that can be deployed to stimulate learning.In moving forward, there are numerous tools available to select from, including the modelspredicated on cooperation; i.e., working together to accomplish shared goals. Withincooperative activities, individuals seek outcomes that are beneficial to them and also benefitall other group members. (2, 3) Cooperative learning researchers and practitioners have shownthat positive peer relations are essential to success in college. The positive interpersonalrelationships promoted through cooperative learning are regarded by most as crucial totoday’s learning communities. They
) undergraduate classrooms when activeand collaborative instructional strategies are utilized; these are commonly referred to as inductiveteaching methods as compared to traditional lecture and discussion (deductive). However, thisdocument indicates that for more systemic change across STEM instruction, researchers need todevelop/evaluate pedagogical innovations that do not require substantial external funding ortime, and therefore can be easily adopted by other educators.1 This was one of the motivationsfor undertaking the study presented in this paper.The inquiry-based learning activities described in this paper address the necessity for engaging,student-centered experiences in the freshman civil/structural engineering curriculum with arelatively
Associate Dean of Research, Graduate Studies and Professional Education in the College of Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Facilitating Learner Self-Efficacy through Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Sustainable Systems DesignAbstractAn educational partnership between a minority-serving community college and a researchuniversity has been offering STEM students an eight-week summer internship in sustainableenergy systems with the goal of providing applied research experiences while strengtheningcommunity and institutional bonds. In 2015, the interns’ involvement in the successful design,development, and implementation of an innovative testbed for assessment
important reason could be the fact that there is little or no structure to the activities in theseuses of wikis. On the other hand, in our approach, the activities are designed to trigger cognitiveconflict leading to students engaging in effective collaborative learning.Some researchers have suggested that technology, which is indeed the backbone of CSCL, shouldbe exploited to realize some unique possibilities: • The fact that CSCL environments can record the interactions in detail allows researchers to zoom in and see what exactly is going on during the collaborative interactions 16 , making it a richer design environment for the researcher; • Computational media, being configurable and adaptive, can make new interactions
is an evolving technology that will affect all aspects of designand construction in the future. BIM not only creates a collaborative working environment forbuilding design and construction but also offers greater operational efficiency and effectivenessof supply chains in the construction industry. Perhaps the greatest advantage of using BIMtechnology is the capability to promote transparency and collaboration among all members ofproject teams, thereby reducing waste and saving time and money throughout the entireprocesses of construction. Utilizing BIM technology, participants involved in a project are ableto communicate ideas more effectively and provide competitive advantages for project teams.This is one of the main reasons why BIM is
construct a local typology to be shared and vetted in workshops and focus groups with stakeholders, including faculty, industry representatives, and students. Feedback from stakeholders on culture findings compared with current practices will enable the research team to develop a theory of engineering culture that can inform pedagogies of innovation and collaboration.We have chosen the departments of ECE and ISE within the college of engineering and partnersites for several reasons. First, both majors are innovative, large, and highly ranked relative toother departments nationwide. Second, both locally and nationally, these two departments are atopposite ends of the diversity spectrum, with ECE among the
), was implemented as the treatment intervention. Data gathered in thetreatment sections of Calculus I and II (AY 2014-2015) are the subject of this study. The calculus instructor required students enrolled in the treatment sections to postquestions related to concepts or out-of-class assignments (i.e., homework) in the online forumweekly. Posting was required a) to provide opportunities for collaborative learning and peer-to-peer instruction among students and b) to improve instructor-based support for thegeographically dispersed student body. Researchers selected the Piazza platform as theintervention based on its a) wiki nature that allows participants to edit posts for organization andcontent, b) conceptual organization, and c) built
research with the University of Rochester Center for Photo-Induced Charge Transfer. Since 2003, Dr. Walz has taught chemistry and engineering at Madison Area Technical College, and he is also an adjunct professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin. He has served as teacher for the UW Delta Center for Integrating Research, Teaching and Learning, and has mentored several graduate students who completed teaching internships at the technical college while creating new instructional materials for renewable energy and chemical education. Dr. Walz is also an instructor with the Wisconsin Center for Environmental Education and the K-12 Energy Education Program (KEEP), delivering
engagement from apsychological perspective, engagement can be studied from a systems perspective (i.e. Pentland,2014) at a group level of analysis, with overlapping complex and adaptive interactiveengagement dimensions (Hilpert & Husman, 2015). Complex engagement refers to connectedgroups of students working together in multiple ways to solve problems. It involves effectivecommunication among students and capitalizing on each other’s strengths. Adaptive engagementrefers to student groups adjusting to problems spaces and exploring multiple competing ideas. Itinvolves the evolution of possible solutions to problems within student groups, where ideas areexplored and vetted for adequacy. Interactive engagement properties are emergent; they
firmshould apply to select an academic collaborator to optimize its payoff from its R&Dinvestment. We also analyze the criteria a research team should apply to select aresearch project from a firm to advance its stock of knowledge. In our model, a firm links to a university to form a R&D research consortiumto conduct an innovation R&D project. The firm provides the investment, which isthe cost of project conduction carried out at the university. The university receivesthe investment and conduct the research for the project. The outcome of theseprojects, in the form of stock of knowledge and preparation for students, benefitsboth sides and gives a win-win situation: the firm uses the new innovation to reduceits production cost; the
sociocultural dimensions of engineering education.Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park Andrew Elby’s work focuses on student and teacher epistemologies and how they couple to other cognitive machinery and help to drive behavior in learning environments. His academic training was in Physics and Philosophy before he turned to science (particularly physics) education research. More recently, he has started exploring engineering students’ entangled identities and epistemologies.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Assistant Research Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in
on October 3, 2015 on thecampus of LU. Over 120 students and faculty attended sessions created to emphasize improvingSTEM education. College and university faculty members, administrators, and peers involved inSTEM education, or interested in getting involved, were invited to share and explore research,best practices, and ideas with their colleagues around the states of Texas and Louisiana. Theconference was also attended by eight S-STEM PI or co-PIs. This paper describes the ASCENTapproach, its structure and its expected results.Keywords- Bridge program, undergraduate research, STEM retention, timely graduation Introduction ASCENT is a collaboration between the Department of Mathematics (MATH) and
the learners by allowing them to modify, or “tweak” their role. For reasonspreviously stated, gamification of this experiment was intrinsically motivating as was the noveltyof controlling a MUAV.2. Collaboration and cooperative learning: On the day before the experiment, the students weredivided in the groups of their respective role and given ample time in class to meet and discusshow they might approach the experiment as a whole. Likewise, they had ~10 minutes toexchange thoughts at the parking lot just prior to beginning the experiment when theirexcitement was building. In between each trial, the graduate researcher instructed each group tothink critically out loud about the previous trial and how their role affected it. As a result
surfacewaters. It has served as the basis for senior design project for several engineering students atUniversity of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES) and continues to provide a development platformfor a multidisciplinary team of STEM students to meet all of the design requirements withsupervision of a team of UMES faculty members and collaborators from United States Departmentof Agriculture (USDA). The design and data analyses efforts will also serve as the basis of amaster’s thesis work for a STEM graduate student at UMES.At present the base platform has been designed and utilized for navigation using remote control tospecified locations to collect water quality data and sampling of surface water on a UMES pond.For visualization purposes geo-located
Government put forward a nationwide program knownas “A plan for Education and Training Outstanding Engineers (PETOE).” The goal ofthis engineering-focused higher education reform is to improve students’ socialresponsibility in terms of serving the nation, courage to explore creative ideas, andpractical ability to solve problems2. University-industry collaboration is a uniquecharacteristic of PETOE and a key factor for further implementation of this program,because university-industry collaboration can enhance the inventive and practical skillsof engineering students at the same time.The importance and necessity of developing engineers’ abilities throughuniversity-industry collaboration Cultivating engineers through university-industry collaboration
communities21, service learning22, problem-based learning23,24, cooperative learning24and the use of team projects25. More recently, researchers have tried to improve engagement byintroducing cultural touch stones for teaching engineering concepts in large classrooms26,collaboration with multiple disciplines27, collaboration between multiple schools28, ethnographicrecords and virtual learning experiments29.Recent research efforts have identified the role that faculty plays in the classroom to create anenvironment that is engaging to the students30. This is especially true in teaching focusedschools such as Tuskegee University31,32. The way teacher behaves in classroom and his/hercommunication ability plays a crucial role in the engagement of students8
, Universidad EAFIT, Medellin, Colombia - Purdue University, West Lafayette ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is an assistant professor at Universidad EAFIT and served as the Head of the Process Engineering Department from 2010 to 2014. He holds an MS in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven (Germany) and is currently enrolled as a graduate student in the Engineering Education Doctoral Program at Purdue University. Before his full-time appointment with EAFIT, he served as Engineering Director for a chemical company for 7 years. His research interests are focused on the practice and teaching of process design, simulation and control and also on faculty and institutional
to make meaning of theselived experiences using the interview as a collaborative mechanism49,54. Roulston55(p76)describes using interviews to aid in “research for understanding” with the research questionsdriving the approach. Since we are seeking to interpret, and make meaning of, HSB from theperspective of the student in the context of an undergraduate engineering environment, this studywill be an interpretive, qualitative, interview study49,52,55,56.Semi-structured interviews allow for flexibility in question order and direction based on datafrom the participants’ responses while providing a conversational, comfortable atmosphere57–60.A preconceived question list including a suggested order of questions provides scaffolding;however, in a
Paper ID #16011The Prototype for X (PFX) Framework: Assessing Its Impact on Students’Prototyping AwarenessMs. Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a third-year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship and the design process. She is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow and Dr. Timothy Simpson on a project devoted to understanding how prototyping processes affect product design. Jessica is interested in exploring how a structured prototyping methodology, Prototype for X, could increase the end design’s desirability, feasibility, and
the development of programs that assist entering freshman engineering students, including academically disadvantaged students, succeed during their first year. Of particular note are the highly successful counseling and cooperative learning programs for first-year stu- dents that he created within the freshman engineering programs at Purdue University and at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Budny has numerous publications and presentations on engineering education. He is widely recognized for outstanding teaching, receiving awards at both Purdue and Pittsburgh Universities, plus national and international awards. Dr. Budny is very active in ASEE within the Freshman Programs and the Educational Research and Methods
California, Santa Cruz. Beckett’s continuing dissertation research examines a community-university collaboration situated in a low-income, predominantly Latino community, that created and used digital stories as artifacts and learning tools to engage members of the community (parents, teachers, district officials, union leaders, students, non-profit service providers, etc.) in reflection and dialogue around the economic, social, and cultural barriers that constituents face when advocating for student academic achievement, and to identify the strengths and solidarities that can be created to change the school system to better serve the student body (Beckett, Glass, & Moreno, 2012). Beckett has presented her research at
. & Mclean, M. (1996). Peer Observation of Teaching and Staff Development. Higher EducationQuarterly, 50(2), 156-171.10 Bell, M. & Cooper, P. (2013). Peer Observation of Teaching in University Departments: A Framework forImplementation. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 60-73.11 Woodman, R. J. & Parappilly, M. B. (2015). The Effectiveness of Peer Review of Teaching when performedbetween Early-career Academics. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12(1).12 Carroll, M. P. (2014). Shoot For The Moon! The Mentors and the Middle Schoolers Explore the Intersection ofDesign Thinking and STEM. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4, 14-30.13 Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (2006
Paper ID #16930Group Problem Solving Coupled with Hands-on Activities: Conceptual Gainsand Student Confidence in an Introductory Biomechanics CourseDr. LeAnn Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania Dr. LeAnn Dourte Segan is a senior lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pa. Her primary teaching focus is in the field of solid biomechanics at the undergraduate and graduate levels.Dr. Emily R Elliott, Center for Teaching and Learning, University of Pennsylvania Emily R. Elliott is an Associate Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her PhD in Biomedical