is an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at Cal State LA. Joseph is an undergraduate research assistant, the Vice President of CSULA’s Robosub team, and he recently began an internship at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Outside of engineering education, his research interests are in the field of trajectory planning and control for potential future Mars exploration aircraft.Mr. Jorge Diego Santillan, California State University, Los Angeles AUV Mr. J.Diego Santillan is an Electrical Engineer employed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, cur- rently pursuing his Master’s in Computer Engineering. Diego acted as the President for the Robosub team as well as the senior design team lead for the same project in
research demonstrates that professional skills, such as teamwork, projectmanagement, cultural awareness, leadership, and interpersonal communication, are still lacking inour graduating students [7, 8], and, in turn, are slowing their career advancement. For this reason,university engineering programs, as well as professional societies in engineering [9, 10], haveidentified the teaching of such professional skills as a goal. Unfortunately, despite this growingand collective interest in professional skills, studies [3, 11] continue to show significant gapsbetween what students are taught in the classroom and what they need to know to succeed inprofessional engineering practice.There is well-established research that professional skills are
thechallenges that are present during graduate training are common among graduate students. Thesesimilarities are more evident among graduate students that share certain backgrounds, and inparticular among members of minority groups. While much research has been devoted to theexperiences of gender and ethnic minorities [1]–[3], the experiences of English as SecondLanguage (ESL) students in graduate school has been poorly explored. The challenges of ESLstudents often interplay with those of gender and ethnic minorities because their identities areintersectional with such characteristics. Therefore, being an ESL student represents a dimensionthat would be valuable to explore in the context of graduate education.Supporting the development of graduate
Paper ID #27554Fostering Belonging through an Undergraduate Summer Internship: A Com-munity of Practice Model for Engineering Research EducationMs. Nicole Bowers, Arizona State UniversityDr. Michelle Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan is as associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State Uni- versity. She also serves as the Education Director for the QESST Engineering Research Center. Michelle’s program of research focuses on social interactions in collaborative learning contexts. She is particularly interested in how students navigate communication challenges as they negotiate
theright message (messages about engineering) in front of middle and high school students.” Theframework for our Engineering Ambassador program was to establish criteria for theundergraduate to serve students in middle and high schools near Manhattan College.The Ambassador program was uniquely designed to engage engineers in education and educatorsin engineering. The combination of content and methods requires the collaboration that modelsfor students that learning is no longer competitive, but rather cooperative. A strong contentbackground for a teacher is a must. But, so is the need to provide pre-adolescents and adolescentswith the autonomy that characterizes growth and development typical of these age groups. Whilethere may be limitations on
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Developing and Assessing Authentic Problem-Solving Skills in High School Pre-Engineering StudentsIntroductionCritical thinking and problem solving (CT and PS) skills involved in solving authentic (real-world) problems are desirable for engineering students and practitioners. CT and PS go hand-in-hand, where achieving the end-goal or solving the problem requires decision-making aboutdisciplinary content to be used, discarding irrelevant information, devising a strategy andevaluating progress [1]. Among other reasons for students’ failure to persist in college STEMprograms, researchers [2] note that students’ lack the depth of knowledge, skills, and habits inproblem
airframe and powerplant certificate. Ms. Yother has 18 years’ experience in the aerospace and defense industry working for companies such as Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, and Pratt and Whitney. She has held positions in product support, customer support, and program management.Mr. Cooper G. Burleson, Purdue University A Graduate of Purdue University with a Bachelors of Science in Aeronautical Engineering Technology, Cooper’s field of expertise lies in Commercial / Private Space Operations (CSO). He has worked in Wash- ington D.C. at the Commerical Spaceflight Federation where he oversaw both commercial space policy and legislative drafting, as well as oversaw the public launch of Moon Express’s MX-model Lunar Lan- ders
Paper ID #24997Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Students Characteristics at Hispanic Serv-ing InstitutionsDr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso An Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to enable students to bridge the gap between traditional engineer- ing education and what they will really experience in industry. With a background in both engineering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latinx students develop an identity as an engineer, methods for enhancing student motivation, and
: Design characteristics of a graduate synchronous online program. Journal of Education for Library Science, 54(2), 147-161.[7] Park, J. H. & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12, 207–217.[8] Steinman, D. (2007). Educational Experiences and the Online Student. TechTrends, 51, 46–52.[9] Willging, P.A., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13, 115–127.[10] Smith, K. A. (2011, October). Cooperative learning: Lessons and insights from thirty years of championing a research-based innovative practice. In Frontiers in
, predominantly rural state could attend.Since I instructed several courses in the program, I taught the same students several times indifferent courses. For a period of about 2 and 1/2 years, I saw Cooper frequently—whether hewas attending class or studying in the classroom building before class.As the researcher, I credit my own previous experiences—as a service academy graduate, a U.S.Army veteran, and a returning veteran graduate student in mechanical engineering— for thedesire to exploring SVSM experience in engineering education, not just qualitatively, but alsorelationally. Using the relational, transactional methodology of NI, I came alongside Cooperwithin the context of a two-year, undergraduate engineering transfer program, to examine
teams that exist inworkplaces within the United States and abroad. As such, the purpose of this paper is to describethe process of creating and subsequent plans for implementation of an interdisciplinary capstonecourse at a large research-intensive institution in the Southeast US. The challenges associatedwith developing a course that meets the need of each disciplinary capstone experience and spansthe boundary of different approaches to pedagogy, knowledge structure and learning will beexplored as well.Background and ObjectivesOne of the most common complaints among recruiters of engineering graduates is a failure ofuniversities to properly prepare their students to collaborate within a diverse workplaceenvironment [1], [2]. Students typically
, interacting with judges, or perhaps even the visual appeal ofthe robot). However, the graph in Figure 6 suggests that the perceived increase in presentationskills may be marginal. The increase in leadership skills may intuitively be increased for projectleaders or subgroup leaders, but the increase noted by participants in general is slightlyunexpected. It may be that having the different fields collaborating together creates a dynamicwhere participants can take the lead in their respective area of expertise. Although, this woulddepend on group size (among other factors), and further evaluation would be needed to draw anydefinite conclusions.Lastly, most robotics competitions also provide an opportunity for students to meet with studentswho share
Paper ID #26565Towards an Employability Model for STEM Majors: Engagement-Based,Service-Producing, and Experience-DrivenDr. Faye R. Jones, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication & Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research.Dr. Marcia A. Mardis, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Marcia A. Mardis is a Professor and Associate Dean at Florida State University’s College of Communica- tion & Information and Associate Director of
AbstractGovernmental and nongovernmental agencies nationwide anticipate an ever-increasingworkforce demand due to the inevitable retiring of our current “baby boomer” population. In thepast, several initiatives to meet workforce demand through cooperative educational model wereshort lived. The reasons for discontinuation of such programs can be attributed to either lack ofplanning or not enough success compared to the anticipated level of success from the program.In this paper, authors explain how a Modified Apprenticeship Program (MAP) tailored to meetthe needs of local industries can be sustained without expending a large amount of resources.The example for this case is ‘Advanced Manufacturing Technician’ (AMT). Several years agoNorthwestern State
University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to
. He teaches undergraduate design, thermo- dynamics, and engineering experimentation and is the faculty adviser to both the Formula SAE Team (Cooper Motorsports) and Pi Tau Sigma Honor Society.Mr. Estuardo Rodas, Cooper Union Estuardo Rodas is Adjunct Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Cooper Union for the Advance- ment of Science & Art where he is also Project Coordinator of the Mechanical Engineering Lab. He is adviser for Cooper’s Formula SAE team and a Lead Instructor for the summer STEM program for high school students. Among his other projects, Prof. Rodas designed the Ike Heller Center for Integrated Manufacturing and Robotics at Brooklyn Tech, collaborated in construction and design of the
teamwork, communication, data analysis and problem solving [16].Additionally, a recent review of international literature identifying skills needed by graduate andfuture engineers found teamwork and communication skills to be among the top five mostemphasized skills [17]. Despite the body of evidence that should inspire engineering and other STEM faculty toincorporate collaborative activities in their courses, lasting changes in teaching practice havebeen slow to take place [2], [18]. Fairweather [2] noted that faculty perceive curricular changewill take valuable time away from research activities critical to promotion and tenure. This is notnecessarily the case, as barriers to change for STEM faculty have been researched and
-academic-programs [7] M. L. Springer and M. T. Schuver, “Dwindling graduate student enrollments in distance- based programs: A researched-based exploration with underlying findings and premise,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018. [8] P. Bawa, “Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—a literature review,” SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2016. [9] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? a review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004.[10] D. Johnson, R. Johnson, and K. Smith, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Class- room. Interaction Book Company, 1991.
skills. Close collaborations between the industry,communities and the universities in design/make activities can help students to understand thetheoretical aspect of the subjects at the university when applying them to real-world applications.Students who are trained to carry out research, particularly in emerging and cutting-edgetechnologies, are desirable in the industry. Therefore, a solution to prepare a large group of studentswith the skills required for the 21st century challenges may be found by a research-informedapproach which is further enriched through industry, and community service driven goals, for bothundergraduate and graduate levels. The applied aspect of the research activity due to the servicecomponent can guarantee positive
with graduate and undergraduate students) and directed large scale projects in engineering education research. He is the founding editor for the Journal of Pre- College Engineering Education, co-editor of the book ”Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices” and ”Technology Education Today: International Perspectives” and co- lead author of Hands-on Standards STEM in Action, an award winning internationally available set of learning modules for grades preK - 5th grade published by ETA hand2mind and LearningResourcesUK.Prof. Suzanne – Burgoyne, University of Missouri Suzanne Burgoyne, Ph.D., is a Curators’ Distinguished Teaching Professor of Theatre, and Director of MU’s Center
studies from Old Dominion University in 2015. Isaac’s consultancy, HEDGE Co., focuses on working with formal and informal educators to grow the numbers of females pursuing engineering or technology careers. Additionally, she is a conferred Fellow of the Society of Women Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Does How Pre-College Engineering and Technology Role Models See Themselves Relate to Girls' Engagement in the Fields? [Research to Practice]IntroductionSince the Equal Pay Act in 1963, female participation in engineering has increased only eightpoints, from less than 5 to 13% [1], while, in the fields of medicine, female participation
1these concepts. Practices such as interactive engagement through cooperative and collaborativelearning, just-in-time teaching, case-based teaching, service learning, peer instruction and concepttests are some of the most common EBIPs used to facilitate student learning and engagement [8].However, the practices used in classes are typically at the discretion and expertise of the faculty[9]. Therefore, the questions of "What evidence-based instructional practices are currently beingused in first-year engineering courses? How do engineering faculty epistemological beliefs aboutteaching and learning influence what practices they use and their reasons for using particularpractices?" remain. This paper documents the beginning of a broader research
.Changes in industry trends are the primary cause for the addition of different areas in the ChemEcurriculum such as the need for large-scale production of commodities chemicals, productdevelopment, pharmaceuticals, and bioengineering [1]. However, there are many hurdles tocompletely invigorate the ChemE curriculum. Some examples may include accreditation, coursecredit limits, maintaining consistency with the rest of the universities, among others. Manyengineering disciplines have addressed these challenges by adding non-traditional learningexperiences such as research experiences, cooperative learning, project-based learning, servicelearning, and experiential learning [2].Conventional wisdom advocates that engineering student’s involvement in
today, about14% of the first year engineering cohort is enrolled in Pre-Calculus or year-long Calculus I their firstsemester [2].Eight credit hours of math is a lot to ask of first semester students, especially those among theleast mathematically prepared in the college.During the course approval process, it was decided to make Engineering Math a 3000-levelcourse (a designation usually reserved for third year courses) so that it could count as a technicalelective in several engineering degree programs. If it had been approved as a 1000-level course,most students would not have had free space in their degree plan to count the four-credit coursetowards graduation. For all these reasons, it was important to explain the course to students andmake
., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Veteran Leadership Skills in an Engineering Technical Writing CourseTechnical proficiency is a
commitment and motivation [7], [9]. faculty. - Faculty members serve as inspiration and as partner of discussion improving the aspiration of the students [3], [7], [10]. - Learning requires cooperation between student and faculty. Enhanced student-faculty contact promotes the cooperation [11]. 2. Promote student collaboration and - After graduation students will enter jobs where team-work-skills are often a requirement or at least appreciated [12]. responsibility for own learning. - Collaboration promotes
engineeringstudents with a mentoring faculty member and, occasionally, a graduate student who is an expertin the area of “innovative design”. The collaborative team works to solve a real-world problemthrough the application of various design techniques. In addition, the collaboration can improveor even identify enhanced design techniques and processes. For example, past research effortsimproved the design method in two areas: 1) the understanding of how to develop and implementprototyping strategies which are effective and efficient [11] - [15] and 2) new methods toenhance ideation based on analogies to biological systems [16]. The sponsor organizationresearch partners take keen interest in the design methodology research; oftentimes adoptingthese techniques
electronics often begins withmath, memorization, and lecture are not really engaging students, and there is a significant gap inteaching power electronics controls and thermal aspects in undergraduate courses. Practicum andlaboratory experience is instrumental in student professional development, and often the powerelectronics courses have no laboratory. These are main reasons for us to strongly advocate for theintegration of the laboratory in our power and energy minor. Continuity in hardware andsoftware is quite often infrequently preserved between undergraduate, graduate, and research,contradicting the outcome k of the ABET. Power electronics control topics, their goodunderstanding and knowledge must be included into the course content in the
structures of macromolecular assemblies including proteins, polymers, and lipid membranes. Undergrad- uates, graduate students, and postdoctoral scholars are trained in a multidisciplinary environment, utilizing modern methodologies to address important problems at the interface between chemistry, physics, engi- neering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduate courses to train engineers who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and able to understand the societal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand
the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for Engineering Studies (INES); past chair of the ASEE Liberal Education / Engineering and Society Division; and a former member of the Society for the History of Technology’s (SHOT) Executive Council. Publications include /Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers and Computers during the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research/ (MIT Press, 2006).Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany Sarah Appelhans is a PhD candidate in Cultural Anthropology. Her dissertation research, ”Steel Toes and Ponytails: Gender and Belonging in Engineering”, investigates the boundaries of membership in engineering in the Capital District of New