Paper ID #18418Mechanical Engineering Capstone Projects in Rehabilitation DesignDr. Carl A. Nelson P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln Carl Nelson is a Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at the University of Nebraska- Lincoln.Dr. Judith Marie Burnfield, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals’ Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engi-neering Judith M. Burnfield, PhD, PT, is Director of the Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Di- rector of the Movement and Neurosciences Center and the Clifton Chair in Physical Therapy and Move- ment Sciences at Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital. Dr. Burnfield
,particularly when unraveling ill-structured problems such as engineering design. The major aimof this five-year research project is to study the self-regulated learning (SRL) activities of collegeseniors engaged in a capstone engineering design project. This project is grounded in Butler andCartier’s SRL model, which describes the interplay between affect, motivation, cognition, andmetacognition within academic engineering design activities. Dym & Little’s design processmodel was also used as sensitizing theoretical framework. Specific objectives of the researchactivities in this project are to (1) Build research protocols and tools for studying student self-regulation; (2) Describe the self-regulation strategies in which students engage
theanalysis of 10 semi-structured interviews obtained from five senior systems engineering studentsin the capstone project at the lead author’s institution. First, our research indicates theinterdependence among cognitive processes, discursive identity, and the students’ work context.Second, our research explores the interdependence among the various judgments students mustmake in order to construct the knowledge constituting their senior projects. These judgments areclassified within three broad themes—assumptions and model building judgments, rhetorical anddiscursive judgments, and framing and positioning judgments. Our thematic map illustrates therole of social practice in the creation and re-creation of engineering knowledge. Our thematicmaps
Paper ID #36853Board 323: Integrating Servingness in a Mini-Capstone Project: Resilientand Sustainable Emergency Housing DesignDr. Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Dr. Carla Lopez del Puerto is a professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez (UPRM).Prof. Humberto Eduardo Cavallin, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Experienced Faculty with a demonstrated history of working in the higher education industry. Strong education professional with a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) focused in Design Theory and Methods in Architecture from University of
. She joined the research team in December of 2015 and is currently working on assessing motivation in academia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Providing Student and Faculty Feedback from Motivation Assessments in Capstone CoursesAbstractStudent motivation in capstone design courses is assessed in six capstone project courses at sixdiverse institutions in the 2017-2018 academic year. This assessment follows a similarassessment study at a large public university in six unique capstone courses. Reliability andvalidity analysis during the first year contributed to upgrades to the assessment tools currentlybeing implemented. Qualitative feedback from student and
constructs of design activity engagement [4]–[7],motivation [8]–[10] and situated cognition [11]–[14]. Design activity engagement frames thesocial context of our investigation [4] and describes the complex cognitive [7], [15], [16] andsocial processes [2], [17] involved in the design process within a capstone course. Theseprocesses are a result from the structure of capstone courses, within which students engage incomplex open-ended projects and collaborate with student peers as well as professionalengineers sponsors. We further study student’s motivation to engage in design behaviors asrelated to their identity construction [8]–[10]. Finally, we connect students’ understanding ofdesign activity engagement to literature in situated cognition [12
suppliers in Asia and Europe. Most recently Robin worked as Senior Director of Project Man-agement for a small bio-tech company, Intrexon, located in the VT Corporate Research Center and hadthe opportunity to introduce manufacturing principles into a highly specialized DNA production facility.Robin joined her alma mater’s faculty in 2015, coordinating and teaching the Capstone Senior Designprogram in Mechanical Engineering. She has also completed her graduate certificate in Engineering Ed-ucation, leading to the development of her research focus area in the student transition from capstone towork. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021It’s a Context Gap, Not a Competency Gap
unmanned systems. He introduced an industry-sponsored model for capstone design with a favorable IP policy, established a student machine shop and introduced global humanitarian design projects as an option for students. Prior to Virginia Tech he was an Associate Professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology and developed a multidisciplinary design course that included students from Business, Arts and Sciences as well as Engineering.Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Graduate Student at Virginia Tech. The following ideas fall under the umbrella of my interests, humanitar- ian engineering, tolerance of uncertainty, engineering with community - instead of for industry, empathy
, engineering and operations. His research interests include systems engineering, product design process and engineering education.Dr. Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary projects. She is active in the national Capstone Design Community, and received her BSE in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from Duke University and her MS and PhD from Purdue University.Shun Takai, Northern Illinois University Dr. Shun Takai is an associate professor
question, no response is recorded under neutral,disagree and strongly disagree. Unlike group-project activities incorporated under some of theengineering curriculum, which is composed of students with the same major discipline andclassification and typically lasts a couple months or the formal senior capstone design projectswhich extend throughout a semester or two of the students’ senior year, the MAKERS prototypedevelopment team are composed of students from diverse background and classification workingtowards a specific goal. All students are required to actively participate and contribute to theproject, attend periodic meetings, and present the prototype development project at the jointannual STEM conference of all the participating
AC 2012-3739: GRAND CHALLENGES DELI (DISCOVER, EXPLORE,LEARN, IMAGINE) PROJECTDr. Jane Hunter, University of Arizona Jane Hunter received her Ph.D. from the University of Arizona Center for the Study of Higher Education. She holds an M.S. degree in engineering management and a B.S. degree with distinction in mechanical engineering. She is the Associate Director of the Engineering Management program at the University of Arizona and is a PMI-certified Project Management Professional (PMP). Her areas of interest include engineering education, teaching strategies, assessment and evaluation of program objectives and learning outcomes, student teamwork and group dynamics, business and technology management, strategic and
projects.IntroductionInternet of Things (IoT) capable products and applications continue to become more prevalent.As memory, digital storage, stand-alone processors, sensors, cloud-based storage andcommunication services have continued to generally become more affordable and readilyavailable, research on new IoT applications continues. This project has developed materials onIoT concepts to facilitate students gaining hands-on IoT experience. The students working withthe materials and or working on IoT related projects are enrolled in one of the following: 1. anIndependent Study course in which the student learns about IoT and works on a project thatutilizes IoT functionality, 2. a two-semester Capstone Senior Design course in which a studentteam works on a project
participate in SL/CE: paidinternships or through taking credit hours that counts towards their degree.Literature Review:Although there are not a lot of journal papers on the topics of SL/CE, there are many conferencepapers, especially published in ASEE conference, that address these topics. For example, Koh(2020) [1], developed a “Community Engaged Design” course as a senior design capstone in asmall liberal arts college. Students were able to address pedestrian safety in their community bycoming up with a prototype for a system which detected and warned drivers of the presence ofbicyclists. Jordan (2014) [2] took their service learning all the way to Haiti by working with thelocals there to establish a solar project that can offer sustainability for
by a collaboration of undergraduate engineering students atthree different universities in their senior capstone projects. Additionally, CooL:SLiCE is currentlyincorporated into the sustainability modules of three engineering courses (i.e., Integrated ProductDevelopment, Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing, and Sustainable Manufacturing)offered at the three universities from which we expect to collect over 125 student assessments ofCooL:SLiCE for analyses. Additionally, this research will provide behavioral findings byinvestigating how learners with different levels of autonomy engage in cyberlearningenvironments.In one of the engineering courses (Integrated Product Development) that introduced CooL:SLiCE,semester-long group projects
thepotential impact of the on-going work was evident [30]. It is well-accepted that the currentgeneration of college students have an affinity for environmental and social issues and thatlinking efforts to these “Grand Challenges” is inspirational and provides an external motivationfor long-term career goals [31], [32]. The Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation(LSAMP) program was used to give the RS students their first experience working in a modernresearch laboratory as a team member under faculty direction [33]. Once the students hadexperienced working under a faculty member, they were given a chance to direct a project oftheir own choosing. Similar to a capstone experience, self-directed technical work buildsconfidence and marketable
level rise to prepare for the inevitability of severestorms. Engineering students from Old Dominion University joined the effort, first as volunteersand then as capstone design students.The project began with significant community engagement which was orchestrated through thecivic league. Students were thus able to pin-point flooding, shoreline erosion, and the rates atwhich basements were taking on water and develop an urgent level of motivation to helpcommunity members with whom they became acquainted. Simultaneously, students met withacademics and area professionals with expertise in pieces of the puzzle (preservationists, marinebiologists, landscape architects, oceanographers, and hydrologists among them) and with cityplanners and storm
motivation to learn1, 2, 7.While project-based learning has been widely adopted for senior design capstone courses and isbecoming more common in freshman level courses8, the use of projects in intermediate coursesin engineering science is still rare. The National Science Board9 has identified three keychallenges facing engineering education including the need to retain more engineering majorsand the need to teach these students the professional skills needed to practice in the 21st century.Projects can be an important instructional strategy that engineering educators can implement toaddress these challenges; however, in-depth evaluations of the effect that project-based learninghas on a variety of student outcomes are difficult to find3. Without
).Activity Progress Summary (i) • Offered the new course at NJIT and CCM in Fall 2022 and Spring 2023. • Planned, developed materials, and offered K-12 summer workshop (in- (ii) person), July 19, 2022. (iii) • N/A • Advised undergraduate research including one student. (iv) • Advised two capstone senior design projects (one in progress) including nine students. • Attended and demonstrated at ATE-PI Conference (Virtual), Oct. 20-21 and 26-28, 2022. • Published and presented the paper [7] at ASEE Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration (CIEC), North Charleston, South Carolina, Feb
, and presentations by senior capstone design project students.Implementing these best practices not only increases first-year retention, but positively impactsretention in subsequent years, as well, since students carry forward their improved study habits,academic support network, and higher level of commitment to pursue engineering. A completemodel of the project inputs, activities and outcomes is shown in Figure 1. Page 23.551.3 Inputs Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes First-Year Interest Groups
professional development of a competent biomedical engineer workforce that can effectivelyaccomplish emphatic innovation, and one that can frame and re-frame problems through theinnovation process. Our research examined how engineering students empathize with users anddevelop empathic abilities that have implications on their design innovation skills. The projectteam developed empathic innovation workshops and embedded them into existing biomedicalengineering capstone courses. Data were collected using surveys, student project reports,ideation tasks, and observations. These workshops resulted in significant changes in students’emphatic tendencies. From our qualitative studies, we also conjectured that the overall empathicpotency of a student design
, engineering and operations. His research interests include systems engineering, product design process and knowledge management in development teams.Dr. Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary projects. She is active in the national Capstone Design Community, and received her BSE in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from Duke University and her MS and PhD from Purdue University.Dr. Shun Takai, Northern Illinois UniversityMarcos Esterman Jr
chambers to processclinical specimens such as blood, saliva, urine, or environmental samples such as drinking water, food,air. The cassette or ‘chip’ is mated with a small, portable instrument that provides the cassette withcontrolled heating, fluidic actuation and flow control, and detection capabilities. Most commonly, thetest result is determined by measuring an optical signal such as fluorescence. Ideally, the system is self-contained, can be operated by non-technical users, costs about $10 per test, and provides an easily-interpreted clinically-relevant test result in a time frame of one hour or less.From the perspective of engineering education, POC technology offers many opportunities and vehiclesfor interdisciplinary, capstone projects
engineering departments to advertise tothe potential students who may be interested and has experience related to the topic of interest.Undergraduate students can register for a particular project in the form of research credits, but idlimited to a maximum of 3 credits per semester so that the effort is commensurate with the timeand effort expended. Based on individual departmental regulations, these credits may be used astechnical elective credits, capstone design credits, or research credits that count toward theirdegree plans. For high-performing honors students that are above a certain cutoff GPA, thesecredits are also eligible to be used as part of an honors section. Such flexibility allows for thisAggiE-Challenge program to conveniently
Jacob Nefcy, Oregon State University Erick Nefcy is a doctoral candidate in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. He is currently studying student modeling in capstone physical and virtual laboratory projects. He is interested in teaching and microprocessing, and has held multiple internships at Intel Corporation. Page 26.771.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Feedback in Complex, Authentic, Industrially Situated Engineering Projects using Episodes as a Discourse Analysis Framework – Year 3IntroductionOver the last ten years
, optimizing sample preparation methods andimproving workflow in and around the new instrumentation. A principal objective in thesecond year of the project was to establish ongoing undergraduate research projects,obtain preliminary results and perform initial data interpretation. This was accomplishedfor multiple projects in years one through three and continues for several projects thatremain ongoing.Impact on Faculty Development and Collaboration and Undergraduate ResearchThe fifteen projects took several forms, adapting to the existing academic framework ofthe Institute. Some projects were embedded in undergraduate project-based coursework,some were part of “Capstone” projects and some were entirely extra-curricular studentprojects. The framework
solving and education. In Problem Solving and Education: Issues in Teaching and Research, D.T. Tuma and R. Reif, eds. Erlbaum, 1980. 9. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, 2000. 10. E. Stroulia, K. Bauer, M. Craig, K. Reid, and G. Wilson. Teaching distributed software engineering with UCOSP: the undergraduate capstone open-source project. In Proc. of the 2011 Community Building Workshop on Collaborative Teaching of Globally
: Comparison of Industrially-situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 540–573.3. Gilbuena, D., B. Sherrett, E. Gummer and M. D. Koretsky. (2011). Understanding feedback in an authentic, ill- structured project through discourse analysis: interaction between student and instructor objectives. 2011 Research in Engineering Education Symposium: Program and Proceedings, 2011, 700-709.4. Johnson, G.R. (1979). Verbal Interaction in Junior/Community College and University Classrooms: Do Disciplines and Settings Differ? Research in Education, Aug 1979.5. Bostian, C.W. (1991). The Mechanics of Effective Classroom Teaching. Engineering Education, 81(1), 9-11.6. Felder, R.M. (2002). The
solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Erick Jacob Nefcy, Oregon State UniversityDr. Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a postdoctoral scholar in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. Debra has an M.BA, an M.S, and four years of industrial experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is
together and leveraging the research team’s expertise in civil engineering, engineeringeducation, and communication. We are focusing on the immediate need for improved, readily-transferrable techniques for the incorporation of technical writing in engineering courses, mosttypically at the sophomore and junior levels. The premise with selecting the sophomore andjunior levels is that most programs “bookend” technical writing in some fashion, with freshman-level design courses and senior-level capstone courses often being more project-based andalready involving substantial writing. In contrast, the sophomore and junior levels tend not toinclude much writing beyond formatted laboratory reports, although with resource limitationseven these reports have
age/education/experience of their various audiences. At the Innovation Showcase, participants interacted with graduating engineering seniors who demonstrated their capstone projects, many of which were industry sponsored. • An Evening with Undergraduate Engineering Students Participants and their parents networked with undergraduate students to learn about the college going experience first-hand from those who are in college and are closest to the participants. • Opportunities to Build an Engineering Identity Industry professionals from General Motors, Intel, and other major technology companies and university students who have held internships and conducted undergraduate research