faculty in Engineering, facilitating career advancement, fostering connections, and providing leadership development opportunities. Heidi served as the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Diversity in the College of Engineering at Montana State University from 2001-2012. She also served as the Director of EMPower, the engineering minority program. Heidi earned her PhD in Educational Leadership from University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 2014. She studied developmental relationships in higher education and investigated the processes through which higher education leadership is fostered including mentoring, coaching, role-modeling, sponsoring, and networking. c American Society for
/service include 2015 AAAS Mentor Award, Fellow in American Institute of Chemical Engineers Board of Directors, NSF Presidential Award for Ex- cellence in Science, Math and Engineering Mentoring, Council for Chemical Research Diversity Award. She is the founding director of the Promoting Underrepresented Presence on Science and Engineering Faculties (PURPOSE) Institute”. A certified coach, Grant consults and empowers STEM individuals at all levels in the academy towards excellence in career and professional development. Her workshops on mentoring and academic career development for NSF ADVANCE programs at Purdue, Cornell, Texas A&M, University of Toledo, UVA, Prairie View A&M, and the ADVANCE Annual PI meetings
experiences of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century, higher education student success, and faculty mentoring programs.Dr. Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs Valerie Martin Conley is dean of the College of Education and professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She previously served as director of the Center for Higher Education, professor, and department chair at Ohio University. She was the PI for the NSF funded research project: Academic Career Success in Science and Engineering-Related Fields for Female Faculty at Public Two-Year Institutions. She is co-author of The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in a
of faculty personnel: military and civilian. Thecivilian faculty tend to be traditional tenure-track and typically remain at the institution for muchor most of their careers. The military faculty, however, are assigned to faculty positions foranywhere from three to six years, depending on their career field and the needs of the Air Force.Two categories of faculty at AFIT mean that there is a significant influx of new military facultyannually. The new faculty orientation program must be structured to accommodate a cohort ofnew faculty that are predominantly military members. The orientation program must be flexiblein meeting the needs of a diverse cohort of new faculty that enter their positions with variedbackgrounds and, in many cases
signal processing, specifically detection and estimation for applications in target tracking and physical layer communications. Her work on target detection and tracking is funded by the Office of Naval Research. Dr. Nelson is a 2010 recipient of the NSF CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and the IEEE Signal Processing, Communications, and Education Societies.Dr. Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University Margret Hjalmarson is an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education at George Mason University and currently a Program Officer in the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Infor- mal Settings at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests
unable to attract top-quality engineers for faculty positions due to the lack ofattractive long-term career growth prospects and due to the stigmatization of teaching jobs[3].This is not only seriously hampering building excellence in Indian engineering institutions,but is becoming an issue of their survival. The teaching-learning process in an educational institution is the key process like themanufacturing process in a manufacturing firm and the faculty members of the institute are itskey elements. The ABET report ‘Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000’ thatrefers to the criteria for accrediting engineering programs states that the teaching faculty is theheart of any educational program [4]. We contend that the
faculty members at institutions that focus more onresearch output. A study by Feldon et al suggests that teaching professional development canimprove research methodological skills, which can improve research productivity [5]. Facultywho engage in teaching professional development also need less time to prepare for class, andthus, can spend more time on other responsibilities like research.Second, engaging in teaching professional development is linked to adoption of research-basedteaching practices [6]. Future faculty, however, report a lack of structured professionaldevelopment opportunities that prepare them for their future faculty careers [7]. Engineeringdisciplines are ideal spaces and communities of action to engage future faculty in
interactions in theJTFD project would be of value to their future instructional practice and career success. 96% offaculty agreed that the JTFD project has been successful in creating Communities of Practicewhich support innovation, implementation, and open dialogue between colleagues. 96% offaculty agreed that discussions and community-building with other faculty is valuable. 94% offaculty agreed that the implementation of the six discussion sessions gave them the opportunityto interact with faculty they would not otherwise experience. Moreover, faculty showed interestin continuing their communities of practice and suggested ways to sustain them captured in thefollowing quotes: • “Communicate with my colleagues in the CoP [Communities of Practice
(CLOSING ACTIVITY) Team Career Title/theme of the problem proposed 1 Industrial engineering Determination of optimal routes for dispatches 2 Industrial engineering Improvement of waiting time in pediatric emergency rooms 3 Industrial engineering Characterization of the public transport system of Santiago 4 Geo. / Mining / Metallurgical Eng. Pre-feasibility evaluation of gold deposit 5 Industrial Engineering Challenge of the 500 pesos 6 Automation and robotics Eng. Temperature monitoring in vineyards and early warning system 7 Geology Determination of tectonic plate
questions, and totrain a new generation of students to meet the challenges of the next century [2]. HES has a set ofcore faculty plus “affiliated” faculty from other units on campus – we refer to the combination asthe “team.” The team is made up of some mid-career and senior faculty in established academicdepartments and a few new hires of junior faculty into the College of Innovation + Design (CID)– a new experimental unit of Boise State.Boise State launched CID in August 2015 with the mission to prototype novel models ofresearch, development, and education (RD&E) – without needing to subscribe to thebureaucracies of a state institution. Unlike other colleges, CID pilots RD&E programs and thendevelops a roadmap to integrate the viable ones
Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Ms. Dominga Sanchez, Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring Faculty Beliefs about Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures? AbstractIn this research paper, we
associated with teachingthe course include consistency across sections as well as limited teaching experience among newinstructors.As additional context, the College uses the framework of the “World-Class Engineer,” which wasdeveloped within the Leonhard Center. This framework is used as a set of guiding principles forstudents on what to strive for in their undergraduate path and into their careers and is often usedin strategic planning by the College. The attributes of the World-Class Engineer include solidlygrounded, technically broad, globally engaged, ethical, innovative, excellent collaborators, andvisionary leaders. This framework is relevant to this study as it served as the foundation for someof the instructional changes made within the