- Conference Session
- Track 1 - Session 2
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, The University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Guangyu Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Tagged Topics
-
Curriculum and Lab Development
Paper ID #11011Orienting Engineering Ethics in terms of China: Curricula Shortcomingsand Case Studies on ChinaDr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, The University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute, ShanghaiJiao Tong University Rockwell F. Clancy is a lecturer at the University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute, Shang- hai Jiao Tong University. His research and teaching interests include applied ethics, political philosophy, and science, technology, and society studies. Rockwell completed his PhD at Purdue University, West Lafayette, MA at the Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium, and BA at Fordham
- Conference Session
- Track 1 - Session 2
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Achille Messac, Mississippi State University; James N Warnock, Mississippi State University; Masoud Rais-Rohani, Mississippi State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Curriculum and Lab Development
curiosity anddesire for continuous learning and an appreciation of globalization, ethical responsibility anddiversity.The challenge that many educators have faced is how to teach students many of the professionalskills. The traditional classroom setting may not easily lend itself to effective training ofoutcomes such as life-long learning, ethical and professional responsibility, or understanding theglobal context of engineering solutions. Therefore, it becomes necessary to look beyond theclassroom for the means to adequately prepare future graduates. Students develop theirknowledge and skill over time, and it is the cumulative result of the curricular path they follow(i.e. the courses they take), the pedagogies employed by their instructors, and
- Conference Session
- Track 1b - Session 1
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Steven M. Pilgrim, Alfred University
- Tagged Topics
-
Curriculum and Lab Development
—11 Famous Bb Week 12 Envelopes & Ethics CO2 and TP—12 Finance Bb due Week 13 The Present 13 SoE Assessment Bb due Week 14 No class 14 Light Bb due Week 15* The Future Reflective Paper Two* due— and Bb tbaFigure 1. Fall 2013 syllabus extract for ENGR 160. Weeks and/or topics discussed in this article are denoted with an asterisk.CommunityEngineering students are part of both their immediate community, i.e., peers and campuspersonnel, and the wider community of practitioners. Literature reveals that connectionto peers is a strong indicator of student persistence and retention7. Linkage to a localgroup, i.e., a benefit of a small school experience, is
- Conference Session
- Track 1b - Session 1
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Henry W. Kraebber, Purdue University, West Lafayette; E. Shirl Donaldson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Katie Mae Hackney
- Tagged Topics
-
Curriculum and Lab Development
grouped into eleven subcategories see Table 1. below: Sorted Reported concept learned responses percent Cultural differences 33 52% German manufacturing methods 30 47% Technology and innovation 20 31% Living and working - Transportation 18 28% Time management - work ethic 14 22% Relationships and communication 14 22% Table 1. Sorted responses to open-ended question on concepts
- Conference Session
- Track 1 - Session 2
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Miquela Trujillo, University of New Mexico; Peter V. Vorobieff; Francisco Martin Vigil, University of New Mexico; Tennille Charisse Bernard, The University of New Mexico; Clinton Lee Corbin, University of New Mexico
- Tagged Topics
-
Curriculum and Lab Development
31% to a B+ (89%). In the mid-semester evaluations for the Spring 2014course, 98% of students noted that working in a group has contributed to their understanding ofthe course material. Engineers in the workforce are constantly working with others on variousprojects. Another student explains that working in a group motivates students to stay on top oftheir work load as well as encourages them to produce higher quality work. This student states,“Working in a group allows me to work harder to guarantee that I do not let my partners down.”This accountability not only improves the students’ work ethic but also improves the way theyinteract with their peers. By exposing teamwork early in student engineering development theygain a sense of
- Conference Session
- Track 1b - Session 1
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Valentina Cecchi, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Mona Azarbayjani, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Brett Tempest, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
- Tagged Topics
-
Curriculum and Lab Development
consideration to “economic, environmental, social,political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability” aspects. Today’sengineer must possess more than just what has been traditionally considered technical skills andmust do more than just problem solving. He/she must be able to use creative thinking andinnovative design principles, while grasping importance of changing technologies. Moreover,working within multidisciplinary teams of other industry professionals and communicatingeffectively across all disciplines is of paramount importance 2.Involvement and, for some, leadership roles in “real world” projects that “balance technicalsolutions with social, cultural, environmental, economic, and sustainability concerns, in