GIFTS: Big E Little e, What begins with Ee? – EthicsWe develop our students’ ability to navigate professional ethics in our Introductory Engineeringcourse. In seven sessions, we examine ethical decision making both at the big E – societalimpact of the profession – level and the little e – individual professional responsibility – level.Instead of the typical ethics gone wrong at the corporate level, often captured in classic casestudies (i.e., Challenger Disaster, VW emissions scandal), we encourage students to bothconsider the grand implications of their responsibility as engineers alongside issues of personalintegrity as an engineering student. Too often, students react to the case studies with criticaljudgment but feel
assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global engineering ed- ucation at several national conferences. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Kauser Jahan, Rowan University
student volunteers to respond to their individualrequests. Structured programming that promotes undergraduate peer-mentors in the Faculty ofEngineering can benefit WINONE as the facilitator of these types of requests as well as thestudent mentors, ensuring that students are properly screened through application process andreceive official recognition of their service within the faculty.Iron Pin Ceremony: Despite first- and fourth-year courses that address topics like ethics and professionalism in engineering, the consensus amongst administration was that additional programming should be introduced to address academic dishonesty within the faculty. With this intention, the first
, we hold a parts auction. Teams competitively bid on thereusable components from year’s past. Students from previous years enjoy connecting to thecurrent groups using “their” motors or wheels.Teams budget parts purchased at auction in the same manner as purchased new components.Students gain insight into design for reuse, recycling, and the circular economy connecting ourstudy of ethics and sustainability to an applied project. Following the competition, studentsdisassemble their vehicles and complete a reusability report tabulating the percentage of theoverall vehicle cost that is reusable. Students were intentional with their incorporation ofreusable parts with one team having 92.2% reusability and the overall winner of the
social responsibility education in first year, including ethicsand societal impact. Ethics education has been correlated with increased measures of socialresponsibility, and greater student ranking of the importance of ethics relative to fundamentaltechnical skills [7]. The case studies allow reflection on and discussion of ethics, economics,stakeholders, and impact of engineering projects; while providing a richer context for learningengineering math and science fundamentals. The term “case study” as used in this paper refersto an exercise that contains elements of “inquiry-based learning”, “guided discovery learning”,“problem-based learning”, and “case-based learning” [5]. Our case studies at this point do nothave the historical, decision
Paper ID #27998Creating Engaging Escape Rooms in First Year Engineering Courses: A PilotStudyDr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the
importance of engineering College of Engineering ethics. 8. Describe the different engineering disciplines. College of Engineering 9. Develop an engineering entrepreneurship mindset. College of EngineeringLessons LearnedUNIV 1131 was taught for the first time in the fall 2018 semester. Over 1000 students weretaught in 35 sections. The class meetings included the content generally described above and, inparticular, devoted three class periods to departmental presentations and were given three classdays dedicated to design work for their team projects.Of the 35 engineering sections, UTA faculty taught 23. UTA drew from its strong industrypartnerships to support the remaining sections. Working engineers in the DFW area
the lives of our students by helpingthem to obtain necessary skills that would help them in their study and their life. We realizedthat to accomplish our goals we need to make sure that our students have an in-depth knowledgeof their major field of study, broad understanding of the engineering and its impact on society,skills in communication and critical inquiry, multi-cultural and global perspectives, activeparticipation in professional communities, and a clear understanding of ethical choices inherentin human development. To accomplish these objectives, the following topics, with theanticipated outcomes, were developed:Topics Covered: 1. Keys to success in Engineering Study 2. Success in the Classroom 3. Problem Solving 4. Personal
that “[i]mplementation is notan all-or-none construct but exists in degrees along a continuum, from 0% to 100%” (Durlak, p.7). Nevertheless, quantifying the quality and dosage of implementation can be difficult, andresearch literature on the subject is sparse. Barry and Ohland assessed the extent to whichcoverage of the ABET ethics student outcome criterion (3f: an understanding of professional andethical responsibility) in coursework affected students’ scores on the National Council ofExaminers for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)Examination. Determining the dosage of ethics coursework was done through faculty interviews.The researchers found a relationship between coursework and the exam outcomes, but
, and Seeing the Big Picture. Additionally,faculty are encouraged to incorporate elements of making, CAD, and spreadsheet use into theircurriculum. There is an emphasis on collaboration and group project work. The seven attributesof a World Class Engineer, as defined by Penn State’s School of Engineering Design,Technology, and Professional Programs (SEDTAPP), include being solidly grounded,technically broad, globally engaged, ethical, innovative, an excellent collaborator, and visionaryleaders. At Penn State Brandywine, a small campus of about 70 engineering students per year,the ability to help students become globally engaged, as well as to develop internationalcommunication skills, has been emphasized by incorporating a design project that
-term impact the seminar has on theirsubsequent college and career choices. Our hope is to expand to multiple seminars, each basedon technologies useful to the DIY ethic (e.g., Raspberry Pi, Wearable Tech, etc.). Finally, welook forward to brainstorming ideasfor future/further directions at theconferenceOur first questionnaire/survey isshown to the right. This fillable pdfwas disseminated to 4 semesters’worth of students (80+) via e-mail inlate Spring 2019, with a reminderone month later. Response has beenpoor thus far (below the levelrequired for proper statisticalanalysis). Anecdotally, some initialfeedback from the questionnairesinclude: o “I still code with my Arduino from class for club projects and even some personal
. research teamconducted a qualitative study that categorized engineering curricula into four independentblocks: the first block includes general science, fundamental engineering science, andmathematics [6]. The other three blocks are lab, design, and ethics courses. Sheppard et al.indicated how engineering programs introduced theory before practice where open-ended designand lab courses were at a later stage of the curriculum. They noted that engineering ethics,humanities, and social science coursework were not treated as an integral part of the engineeringcurriculum [8]. Chen conducted a nationwide examination of first year engineering curricula [7].She categorized the first-year engineering courses into five categories: (1) engineering, (2
is working under Dr. Scott Streiner in researching international engineering education. Specifically, his work is focused on intercultural wonderment and its relationship to global competency in engineering undergraduates.Dr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education
axis (1-12) corresponds to a chronological ordering of the modules as follows: Optical Communications (1), EnergyC. Facial Recognition Harvesting (2), Brainwaves (3), MATLAB Programming (4), The final lab is focused on yoga pose identification. The Image Processing (5), Engineering Ethics (6), Computer Visionstudents start with a pre-lab assignment familiarizing (7), Cybersecurity (8), Digital Circuits (9), Microprocessorsthemselves with the NiTE2 libraries. The goal of this lab is for (10), Android App Inventor (11), and Internet of Things (12).students to use existing NiTE2 body
more convenient for students to fit into their first-semester schedules,which often include blocks of lab time.A committee of COE faculty was assembled to develop the course, which was given thedesignation ENGR 1101. After reexamining what could be accomplished in fifteen 50-minutesessions, and what would be most useful to transfer students, the committee decided on thefollowing learning objectives for ENGR 1101: Work on a design project in multi-disciplinary teams Develop an engineering entrepreneurship mindset Explain the basis for and importance of engineering ethics Describe the different engineering disciplines Recognize and utilize academic and personal student resources available at UTATeam ProjectThe
Understanding of Engineering Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28153 7. Bielefeldt, A. R., & Polmear, M., & Knight, D., & Canney, N. E., & Swan, C. (2017, June), Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into First-Year Engineering Course:: Results of a National Survey Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28515 8. Whalen, R., & Freeman, S. F., & Love, J. O., & Schulte Grahame, K., & Hertz, J. L. (2018, June), Evolution of Cornerstone: Creating a First-year Culture with a Multifaceted Approach Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference
; and (6) grand challenges. Each of the modules is comprised of two or threelessons that introduce each topic, with lessons accompanied by hands-on activities and in- andout-of-class reflections to actively engage the students.World-Class Engineering Attributes: This module is comprised of three lessons—world-classengineering attributes, teamwork, and leadership and ethics—that are broadly applicable to anyengineering discipline. These lessons invite the students to reflect on their own experiences, theirown motivations for pursuing engineering, and to think more broadly about the role ofengineering and engineers in society.Systems Thinking and Sustainability: This module incorporates core lessons on seeing the “bigpicture”, i.e., systems
professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Valparaiso University. His sci- entific research is in the area of nanotechnology. His pedagogical research interests include creativity, design, ethics, and computer programming. 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Promoting Student Confidence in a First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering Course Jennifer Felder Marley and Douglas Tougaw Valparaiso University, jennifer.marley@valpo.edu, doug.tougaw@valpo.eduAbstract – First-year electrical and computer engineering programming fundamentals, and the analysis of electrical(ECE) students who have not yet
. The students practiceengineer’s societal roles and responsibilities while solving various pre-selected engineering problems within thecreating new innovative ideas and concepts with the Engineering Problem-Solving module session, through thepotential to investigate existing markets and technologies; use of proper problem solving steps and team discussions.furthering the ultimate goal of the engineering discovery The students also begin to recognize and eventually followcourses of providing new engineering students with a various engineering standards (e.g., engineering ethics,vision of how to become a future engineer with an engineering graphics, computer-aided design, teamwork,entrepreneurial