Asee peer logo
Displaying results 271 - 300 of 856 in total
Conference Session
Assessment of Biomedical Engineering Programs
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Wendy Newstetter; Paul Benkeser
to beanswered, which constitutes the inquiry for the next session. From this list, each student choosesan area that s/he will research and report back to the group. This self-directed learning phaseinvolves tracking down the resources necessary to answer the identified questions, digesting thematerial and bringing information back into the group. This cycle of finding and developingknowledge, bringing it into the problem space, identifying new learning issues and research isrepeated until a solution is reached. Undergraduate students, however, rarely have sufficientexperience in locating appropriate materials to answer the evolving questions. Their search skillsare generally poor; they have no experience reading journal articles and they
Conference Session
Computers in Education Poster Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Paul Blowers
materials in non-static formats are just two ways to make supplemental Web-basedmaterials useful.References:1) Short, N. M., "Asynchronous distance educations: a five step approach to eliminate onlint problems before theyhappen", The Journal, 28, 56-65 (2000).2) King, K. P., "Course development on the World Wide Web", New Directions for Adult and Cont. Educ., 78, 25-32 (1998).3) Walters, R. F., and N. E. Reed, "Outcome analysis of distance learning: a comparison between conventional andindependent study instruction", http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/monograph/CD/Science_Mathematics4) Collins, M., "Comparing Web, correspondence and lecture version s of a second-year non-major biology course",British J. Educ. Technol., 31, 21-27 (2000).5) Escoe, G. M
Conference Session
Academic Issues
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Sarah Williamson; Fiona Lamb
Session 1460 Desires of industry, products from academia - Ships that pass in the night? R Eley, S Williamson, F Lamb LTSN Engineering, Loughborough University, UKIntroduction. The UK-wide Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN) was launched in January2000 following a British Government review of existing learning and teaching initiatives inhigher education (HE). Recognition that academics best appreciate, assimilate and implement apedagogic approach when presented to them in the context of their own discipline, resulted in
Conference Session
Manufacturing Processes and Systems
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
John Matsson
Page 7.896.5 8. Chandrasekhar, S., "Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability". Dover (1981). Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
Conference Session
Product and Venture Creation Curriculum
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Steven Krumholz; Steve Schiffman; Sean Munson; John Bourne; James Krejcarek; Dan Lindquist; Susan Fredholm
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliographic Information1. Adams, S. G. , The effectiveness of the e-team approach to invention and innovation,Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 90, No. 4, p. 597-600, 2001.2. Marchese, A. J. , Schmalzel, J., Mandayam, S, and Chen, J., A venture capital fund forundergraduate engineering students at Rowan University, Journal of Engineering Education,Vol 90, No. 4, p. 589-596, 2001.3. Miller, S. J., Doshi, R. , Milroy, J., and Yock, P. G., Early Experiences in Cross-DisciplinaryEducation in Biomedical Technology Innovation at Stanford University, Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol 90, No. 4, p. 585-588, 20014
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Simon Ang; Fred Barlow; Alan Mantooth; Sean Mulvenon
, which involve software,presentation format, and evaluation. Each course has specific developmental needs from accessto simulation software to the development of web-based access to the VLCT tester.VIII. Bibliography[1]. J. England, 1998 International Reliability Physics Symposium Keynote Address.[2]. CISM X2000 Program, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, http://cism.jpl.nasa.gov.[3]. S. Tabatabaei, A. Ivanov, “Built-in current monitor for testing analog circuits,” IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., paper 15.8, Orlando, FL, 1999.[4]. S. Chakrabarti, A. Chatterjee, “Fault modeling and fault sampling for isolating faults in analog and mixed- signal circuits,” IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., paper 73.7, Orlando, FL, 1999.[5]. J. Hou, A
Conference Session
Women in Engineering: A Potpourri
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Sheryl Gowen; Alisha Waller
defined the direction and scope ofsubsequent education policy and research in terms of gender equity. In 1964, Congress passedthe Civil Rights Act, which, among other things, prohibited racial discrimination in education.As a part of this Act, Congress also commissioned a national study to determine the extent ofracial inequality in terms of access to educational opportunity. With the passage of Title IX, in1972, discrimination on the basis of sex in educational institutions and programs was alsoprohibited, but, unlike the 1964 Civil Rights Act, no research to examine sex discrimination wasincluded in the legislation. In the early 1980’s, national concern about the growing shortage ofscientists and engineers gave rise to policy initiatives
Conference Session
The Modern ChE Laboratory
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Kathryn Hollar; Marvin Harris; Kevin Dahm
concern. Since the exercisewas active and followed by a discussion rather than a lecture it is expected that students willretain more of the information.REFERENCES(1) Pintar, A. J. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Charlotte, NC, 1999.(2) Flynn, A. M.; Reynolds, J.; Theodore, L. Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2001.(3) Bell, J. T.; Fogler, H. S. Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2001.(4) Pintar, A. J.; Fisher, E. R.; Schulz, K. H. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2001.BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATIONKATHRYN A. HOLLAR is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering
Conference Session
Tricks of the Trade Outside of Class
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Manoj Patankar
Session 1675 Personal-Professional Development: A Formula for Success on the Tenure Track Manoj S. Patankar San Jose State UniversityAbstractMost universities in the United States measure the performance of their tenure-track faculty inthree areas: teaching, research, and service. This paper presents a “formula,” based on personalexperience, which would enable new faculty to better prepare themselves for success on thetenure-track. The central construct of this formula is an understanding of the various factors thatcan positively
Conference Session
Knowing Students:Diversity and Retention
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
John Demel
of the freshmanprograms, a summary of changes accomplished, and the retention statistics for the College ofEngineering.IntroductionIn 1988, at The Ohio State University the retention of engineering students to the junior yearranged between 40 and 50 percent. See Figure 1. This followed the national norms. In the early1990’s the Ohio State College of Engineering became part of the NSF funded GatewayEngineering Education Coalition. The other members of the Coalition were Drexel University,Columbia University, Cooper Union, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University ofPennsylvania, University of South Carolina, and Florida International University. One focus ofthe Coalition’s efforts was to improve retention to the junior year by using
Conference Session
Curriculum and Laboratory Development
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Prasanta Kalita; Peter Lyne; Loren Bode; Alan Hansen
continuing.References1. Bindon, J. P., 1999. The micro steam car, an all embracing practical and theoretical design Project. The International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 27(3): 181-194.2. Bindon, J. P., Kaiser, I. and Powell, N., 1996. The micro steam car, technology education by participation. Proc. Third International Conference of the Third World Science, Technology and Development Forum, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg.3. Ambrose, S. A. and Amon, C. H., 1997. Systematic design of a first year mechanical engineering course at Carnegie Mellon University. Journal of Engineering Education 86(2): 173-181.4. Butterfield, R., 1997. Benefit without cost in a mechanics laboratory. Journal of Engineering
Conference Session
Computers in Education Poster Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Patrick Dessert; Subramaniam Ganesan
press, ISBN 0-8186-6537-85. Java for Embedded System, by Ingo Cyliax, Circuit Cellar magazine, December 2000 and January 2001.6. Real Time JVM, New Monics Inc., www.newmonics.com7. Jworks, Windriversystems, Inc, www.wrs.com8. Java Chip, ajile systems inc., www.ajile.com9. Valvano, “ Embedded microcontroller system- real time interfacing” Brooks/Cole publisher10. Ronald Jurgen “ Automotive Handbook”, McGrawHill Handbook, second edition.11. Joseph Lemiux, “Programming in the OSEK/VDX environment”, CMP Books, ISBN 1-57820-081-4, 2001.12. www.real-time.org ---- for articles by Jensen13. www. Thinkingnerds.com/projects/rto s-ws/presentation.html14. WWW.arcom.control.com/prodcutsBiographyDR. SUBRAMANIAM GANESAN, is a Professor in the
Conference Session
Classroom Innovations
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Marilyn Smith
Page 7.799.8 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”resources developed via the original Digital Libraries Initiative, its successor, DLI -2, and thenewer NSDL, topics related solely to Aerospace Engineering have been extremely hard to find.Utilization of the material found in these Digital Libraries have resulted in the ease of providingdata for design projects, opportunities to examine research data, and applet s to understandphysical concepts.VIII. References1. Labaree, D. F., “Educational Researchers: Living with a Lesser Form of Knowledge,” Educational Researcher, Vol. 27
Conference Session
Computed Simulation and Animation
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Said Oucheriah; Abul Azad
kinetic, potential and dissipated energies. Thus, using the Hamiltonian’s Page 7.415.2 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”extended method, the dynamic equation of the flexible manipulator with the associatedboundary and initial conditions can be expressed as 2 ¶ 4 y(x, t) ¶ 2 y(x, t) ¶ 3 y(x, t) EI + r - D S = t (t) (2) ¶x 4 ¶t 2 ¶x 2 ¶t 2
Conference Session
Tools of Teaching
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Robert Carpick
.· The student is then required to answer the question within a reasonable amount of time (usually two minutes). The student is encouraged to “think aloud” on the board..· The student first tries to answer the question alone. Modest hints may be given by the instructor, and limited dialogue between the student and instructor may take place.· If the student is stumped s/he can “ask the audience”, whereby the audience votes but does not comment on which answer they prefer. The votes are recorded by the instructor on the blackboard. The student is then asked to provide their “FINAL ANSWER.”· If the student did not “ask the audience”, then a poll is taken after the student has submitted their answer, to gage the class’ response
Conference Session
Effective Energy Laboratory Ideas
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Ronald Nelson; David Flegel; Brian Johnson; Herbert Hess
voltage waveform zero crossings as shown in Figure 3.An innovative dynamic hysteresis method and an error-reduction algorithm operated on the “firstsignal” and “second signal” values to improve accuracy to within specifications. A secondaryzero-detection, based on current zero crossings, used the same innovations to provide timingsignals after fault initiation, when primary zero detection was lost. Gate drivers were purchasedfrom Enerpro, a decision that saved much design time and gave superbly reliable and accurategating of the thyristors that carried the fault current. Details of this are presented in [1].A software interface was written that allowed the user to enter in the fault data desired and thecommand to start the fault(s). This was
Conference Session
Design for Community
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Brian Thompson; Craig Somerton
Session 2625 Community Outreach for Capstone Design: The Cycle Projects Craig W. Somerton and Brian S. Thompson Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State UniversityIntroductionA current trend in engineering education is the incorporation of a service learning experience.One such example is the EPICS program at Purdue, which involves the volunteer work ofengineering students in the community [1]. Another approach, proposed herein, is to utilize thesenior capstone design experience in community outreach. This approach has been taken duringthe past three years in the mechanical engineering senior
Conference Session
CE Rap Session and Toys in the Classroom
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Ronaldo Luna
undergraduate students with faculty, • expand the level of research activity on the campus, • help recruit superior students into graduate programs, and • demonstrate that teaching and research are compatible and mutually reinforcing.The faculty agrees to supervise the undergraduate student as junior colleagues in their researchprojects, both during the summer session and during the academic year. The faculty member andstudent provide brief synopses of potential research project(s) to the office of academic affairsvia the departmental coordinators. The student signs the two-page proposal and commits tocomplete the research in the form of a scientific paper (see actual proposal, Appendix 1). If thestudent is awarded the OURE project
Conference Session
Energy Programs and Software Tools
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Laura Genik; Craig Somerton
Page 7.1118.2the system Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1. Operation of TEEHouse ******************************************************* * TEEHOUS: Thermal Environmental Engineering * * HOUSe * * Version 2.2 * * Copyright 2000 Craig W. Somerton * * Scott S. Strawn * * Wayne Thelen * * Dan Lewis
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
James Craddock; Lizette Chevalier
viable solutions.AcknowledgementThis project is funded in part from the National Science Foundation (DUE - CCLI ProjectNumber 9952577), the College of Engineering at Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC),the Department of Civil Engineering at SIUC, the Materials Technology Department and theCollege of Mass Communication and Media Arts at SIUC.Bibliography1. Kohli, G., Maj, S. P., and Veal, D., “Multi-media Technology - An Opportunity for Modern Engineering Education,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, St. Louis, MO, June 18- 21, 2000.2. Yew, Tze-Leong, and Gramoll, Kurt “Teaching Multimedia Development to Engineering Students through Web- Based Modules.” American Society for
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Eric Bell
there is a match,the results are stored in a temporary data file. When all of the combinations have beenprocessed, the system then attempts to find the most likely candidate for the error.In the first round of error checking, the system is only trying to find the terms that mustbe in error - not necessarily explain the error(s) to the student. Thus, the system scans thetemporary file for the shortest error. This is the most likely candidate for the error. Thereasoning behind this is that if a student has entered an incorrect solution, then the entireexpression is obviously incorrect, but knowing that is trivially useless. The goal it to findthe smallest set of errors that produce the same result as the student’s mathematicalexpression.An
Conference Session
Computers in Education Poster Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Eric Bell
student's entry, as well as the correct entry provided by theproblem designer. Both expressions are evaluated numerically. When there is a match,the results are stored in a temporary data file. When all of the combinations have beenprocessed, the system then attempts to find the most likely candidate for the error.In the first round of error checking, the system is only trying to find the terms that mustbe in error - not necessarily explain the error(s) to the student. Thus, the system scans thetemporary file for the shortest error. This is the most likely candidate for the error. Thereasoning behind this is that if a student has entered an incorrect solution, then the entireexpression is obviously incorrect, but knowing that is trivially useless
Conference Session
Computed Simulation and Animation
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
John Nestor
andsuggestions for future work.2. BackgroundAlgorithm animation and software visualization have been used in teaching softwarealgorithms for a number of years. In the mid-1980’s Brown and Sedgewick developedthe BALSA system4 as a framework for software algorithm animation and used thisframework in courses at Brown University. More recently, many other systems havebeen developed that extend and improve upon this work; a good overview is provided in5.BALSA and similar systems animate software algorithms by presenting views - graphicalrenderings of data structures and execution history. As an animation proceeds, theposition, shape, and color of objects in the view are changed to illustrate data structurechanges, plot historical information about execution
Conference Session
Real-World Manufacturing Education
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Syed Azmat; Snehamay Khasnabis; Richard Darin Ellis; Pratap Srinivasa Murthy; Frank Plonka; Diane M. Schuch-Miller
Session 3563 The Engineering Economics Case Study at Greenfield Coalition Francis E. Plonka, Diane M. Schuch-Miller, Syed Khusro Azmat, Pratap S. Murthy, Snehamay Khasnabis, R. Darin Ellis Wayne State University/Greenfield Coalition/Wayne State University/ Wayne State University/Wayne State University/Wayne State UniversityAbstract -The Greenfield Coalition (GC) located at the Focus:HOPE Center for AdvancedTechnologies (CAT) and funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) offers aManufacturing Engineering Program that integrates academic work with manufacturing skillslearned in the workplace
Conference Session
Freshman Success/Retention Strategies
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Heidi Diefes-Dux
participants who had similar academic performance characteristics atthe time of first semester registration.II. Math Bridge ProgramBridge begins the Sunday one week before the fall semester begins. Students move into theirassigned first year housing and register for the program Sunday afternoon. The programofficially starts Sunday at 6 pm and concludes on Friday at 3 pm following the completion of theMA 151 credit exam. A summary of the program schedule is shown in Table 1. The breadth ofmath topics covered in the program is equivalent to that taught in MA 151. Math topics timeslots were broken into a series of mini lectures that introduce math concept(s) and group problemsolving sessions in which teams of four worked on a series of math problems
Conference Session
Improving Statics and Dynamics Classes
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Christine Masters; Renata Engel
Session 2368 Spicing up Statics Lectures with Concept Questions and ‘Around Town’ Assignments Christine B. Masters, Renata S. Engel Engineering Science and Mechanics Department The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractConcept questions and ‘around town’ assignments were incorporated into Penn State’sintroductory statics course during the Fall 2001 semester in an attempt to reinforce key concepts,catch student’s attention, provide in-class feedback, and extend textbook work to ‘real world’applications without major changes to the
Conference Session
Computers in Manufacturing Education
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Harry Hess
are required and what systems ofproduction are used leading up to the finished commercial product(s). In the Manufacturing Processes course, by way of the hands-on teaching approach, the solidmodeling and reverse engineering elements provide the stimulus for student learning. Solidmodeling manufacturing and the reverse engineering projects provide the learning adhesive thatunifies all of the course concepts and are the course centerpieces. They provide the transfer oflearning from course topic to topic. The following pages outline how the ManufacturingProcesses course is organized using the hands-on approaches of solid modeling and reverseengineering.II. FacilityTwo large materials manufacturing laboratories, one small solid object processing
Conference Session
Improving Statics and Dynamics Classes
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Nancy Hubing
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationexample shown in Figure 2, where all possible equilibrium equations are provided and thestudent selects the appropriate equation(s) for implementing the step. For classroomimplementation, all of the frame analysis modules discussed in this section are specific to asingle topic, and each one only takes a few minutes to complete in the statics classroom.IV. Shear and Bending Moment DiagramsOne key to successful analysis of beams involves determining the distribution of internal shearforce and bending moment for the beam. The ability to accurately sketch the shear force andbending moment diagrams using
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Benjamin Flores; Jose Fierro; Daniel Grajeda; Steve Stafford; Rosa Gomez
Copyrightã2002, American Society for Engineering Educationa dynamic facility through motivation, innovation, and the desire to be a positive part of thestudent support process - everybody wins. Those who frequent the facilities receive the highestquality of service, and the students who manage the Centers learn and practice the essential skillsof teamwork, accountability, and ownership before they graduate from this university. Students,who care about the level of excellence that they produce in college, will no doubt be equipped tooffer that, and much more to any organization that they join after college. This is why ACES is aliving model for student support.References[1]. L. Floyd, E. Ruiz, S. W. Stafford, and C. Romero, “Academic Center for Engineers
Conference Session
Technical Issues in Arch. Engr.
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Neil Opfer; Jaeho Son; Thomas Korman
to facilitate the construction needs of their own trade.During coordination meetings, the participating specia lty contractors compare preliminaryrouting for their systems to identify and resolve conflicts. They typically overlay transparentdesign drawings on a light table. The SCOPE method continues until all interferences areresolved. This often requires preparing section views for highly congested areas to identifyinterferences. They also decide which contractor(s) will revise their design and submit requestsfor information (RFI) regarding problems that require an engineering resolution. The product ofthis process is a set of coordinated shop drawings that the participants submit to the designengineer for approval.Upon completion of the