2006-853: USING RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SENIOR DESIGNPROJECTSJohn K. Estell, Ohio Northern University JOHN K. ESTELL is Chair of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department at Ohio Northern University. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, user interface design, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon.Juliet Hurtig, Ohio Northern University JULIET K. HURTIG is an Associate Professor of Electrical
2006-1751: USING THE SAE COLLEGIATE DESIGN SERIES TO PROVIDEHANDS-ON TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE FOR UNDERGRADUATESCraig Hoff, Kettering UniversityGregory Davis, Kettering University Page 11.1414.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Using the SAE Collegiate Design Series to Provide Hands-on Team Project Experience for UndergraduatesLearning experiences that are “hands-on, minds-on” are often considered to be more successfulat achieving knowledge transfer than the traditional college lecture approach. The Society ofAutomotive Engineers (SAE) annually conducts a series of design competitions, where studentsfrom Universities throughout the
apply. Particularly taking into consideration that during the same cycle of seniordesign projects there were also a service-learning project (for a non-for-profit organization) andcouple of commercial industry-based projects. Compared to other traditional capstone designproject, a different execution plan would be necessary for industry sponsored design competitionprojects.References 1. National Research Council, Engineering education: Designing an adaptive system, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1995. 2. National Academy of Engineering, http://www.nae.edu/nae/caseecomnew.nsf?OpenDatabase, 14 January 2006, 3. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind
2006-1647: A METHOD TO EVALUATE RELATIVE INSTRUCTIONALEFFICIENCIES OF DESIGN ACTIVITIES FOR PRODUCT PLATFORMPLANNINGAsli Sahin, Virginia Tech Asli Sahin is a PhD candidate in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on developing modeling systems that help designers to integrate engineering and management principles into conceptual design of products and systems. She received her M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech in December of 2005. She has experience and interest in adapting and developing computer-based visualization instruction models for education and training purposes. She is currently a member of
2006-1444: ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSESSteven Beyerlein, University of Idaho Steven Beyerlein is professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho, where he coordinates the Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering capstone design program and where he regularly participates in ongoing program assessment activities. For these efforts he won the UI Outstanding Teaching Award in 2001. He has been an active participant in the Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) Consortium for the last five years and collaborates with other authors on the NSF/ASA grant.Denny Davis, Washington State University Denny Davis is professor of
our technology.” Perceptions of Technology Mini-Project sketchfrom a humanities-affiliated student.Figure 2: Page 11.567.10“Explanation for you analytically-minded future engineers: swirling vortex of death. Period.”Perceptions of Technology Mini-Project sketch from a humanities-affiliated student.Figure 3:“Unlike some who feel that it is extremely bad or absolutely good, I see both sides in a balancefor I recognize what we have gained in our daily lives as well as what we have lost at the handsof technology. My picture thus represents this balance: one side has the negative aspects and theother has the positive. On the left is the negative
significant role in the recruitment and retention of underrepresentedstudents. It was with these concepts in mind that the author introduced a service-learningcurriculum into a required introductory engineering course at the University of Michigan. Page 11.185.3Engineering 100 Course objectivesIntroduction to Engineering, at the University of Michigan, is a required first-year coursedesigned to introduce students to their career choice through practice in the overall workexperience of professional engineers. The course topics, as written in the college bulletin are: “Focused team projects dealing with technical, economic, safety
2006-1278: USING REFLECTIVE ESSAYS AS PART OF A MIXED METHODAPPROACH FOR EVALUATING A FRESHMAN LIVING-LEARNINGCOMMUNITY FOR ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE STUDENTSJennifer Light, University of Washington Jennifer Light is a 2005 Ph.D. graduate in Engineering Education from Washington State University and was recently awarded a National Academy of Engineering post doctoral appointment with the University of Washington Center for Engineering Education. She is the author of several publications on engineering learning communities and assessment.Laura Girardeau, Washington State University Laura Girardeau, M.S., is a Learning Designer at Washington State University’s Center for Teaching, Learning, and
moreappealing. As a result, the utility sector and energy industry now finds itself faced with alooming shortage of qualified and well-educated candidates. Many of the energy relatedcompanies in the Denver Metropolitan area are mindful of the anticipated shortages of qualifiedtechnical personnel. Companies like Tri-State Generation and Transmission, Inc. and XcelEnergy, and government organizations like the Bureau of Reclamation and the NationalRenewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) are active partners with CSM. This paper illustrateshow CSM works closely with the local industries to offer a high quality power engineeringeducation to the students. The power engineering curriculum at CSM serves as an example ofhow a program with limited resources can take
including graphics, mechanical engineering,electrical engineering, as well as engineering professional practice and ethics in order to achieveprogram and learning objectives. The course is structured into two parallel tracks, designated Aand B. While Track B deals with engineering graphics and spans the entire semester, Track Aoffers students a solid foundation in the general engineering disciplines of mechanical andelectrical, as well as concepts of professional practice, in multi-week modules. Designing andbuilding robots requires skills from all these disciplines and inherently helps to integrate them instudents’ minds. A robot project and competition was defined to integrate together thesecomponents, provide the students opportunities to learn
To alleviate the monetary hurdles faced by most entering students, this program providesfinancial incentives. Students, who meet the requirements by completing the program with aminimum specified performance, are provided with full-tuition scholarship to attend ouruniversity and pursue a bachelor’s degree of their choice.Wright Engineering Bridge Program Periodic revisions and improvements are one of the reasons behind the success of anyprogram. With this in mind, the Wright STEPP program has been in constant improvement sinceit was initiated. One of the supplemental programs designed in this process recently is the WrightEngineering Bridge (WEB) program. The key components of the WEB program are 1) WEBWorkshops, 2) WEB Mentoring Program
2006-262: IMPROVING SCIENCE LITERACY THROUGH PROJECT-BASED K-12OUTREACH EFFORTS THAT USE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL THEMESJan DeWaters, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters, PE is currently pursuing a PhD degree in Environmental Science and Engineering at Clarkson University, with a focus on energy and environmental education. She has several years of experience as the curriculum coordinator for Clarkson's Project-Based Learning Partnership Program and is director of the Partners in Engineering Program that provides mentoring and engineering activities for eighth grade girls.Susan Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers, PhD, PE is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Assoc Dean
Kukreti, University of Cincinnati Page 11.352.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Connecting Graduate Students with Secondary Teachers to Increase the Math and Science Literacy of Secondary Students: Impact on Teachers, Fellows and StudentsEach year hundreds of Fellows, undergraduate and graduate student scientists, participatein GK-12 National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants (Graduate Fellows teaming withteachers to teach in kindergarten through twelfth grade classrooms) throughout thecountry. One aspect of GK-12 funding focuses on the potential to make permanentchanges in institutions of higher
2006-848: COGNITIVE LEARNING IN INTRODUCTORY COLLEGE SCIENCEEDUCATIONEileen Kowalski, U.S. Military Academy Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry and Life SciencesJoe Manous, U.S. Military Academy Academy Professor, Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering Page 11.325.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Cognitive Learning in Introductory College Science EducationINTRODUCTION Webster’s Dictionary1 defines education as “… discipline of mind or character throughstudy or instruction” and includes “teaching and learning” or more simply the providing andgaining of knowledge. Unfortunately, this
themselveswith great flexibility. With this flexibility in mind, BME programs can be more creative thanever and maximize course double counting to construct a more expansive curriculum. Details on Page 11.1080.2ABET requirements and how BME programs can leverage courses are described in the nextsection.Engineering programs have typically included four semesters of math courses in the curriculum.These are usually Calculus I, II and III, and a differential equations course. The mathdepartment teaches these courses to all university students and do not provide any specificinformation to any one major. I have heard it said many times by engineering faculty
requires experiencing first hand environmentswhere individual innovation and independent thought are sought out, reinforced and rewarded.Agility of the mind, the ability to adopt professional skills to rapidly changing conditions,flexibility and risk-taking need to be prominent in the destinations chosen by UAE engineeringstudents when they go abroad.In this respect, North America is a good place for UAE engineering students to spend some time.Foreign students are frequently struck by the seeming endless flow of new ideas that pass Page 11.1192.3through the minds of North Americans, along with their deeply internalized conviction that theirsociety
creating the technical literacy. We view increasing technical literacy as more than an opportunity. We, too, feel a sense ofurgency.Bibliography1 K. Eric Drexler, Engines of Creation: The Coming Age of Nanotechnology, 19862 See http://www.union.edu/CT 3 George Bugliarello, “A new Trivium and Quadrivium,” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 2003. 4 Traditional liberal learning is generally recognized to include the arts, humanities and the sciences. In the minds of many today there is little difference between the terms “science” and “technology,” with technology often being viewed simply as applied science. However, historically these terms have very different meanings. The meaning of the word “science” comes from the
plane,” Produced by WGBH Boston, (2003).19. Macaulay, David, The New Way Things Work, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1998.20. Fountain, H., editor, The New York Times Circuits: how electronic things work, New York : St. Martin's Press, New York, 2001.21. Brain, Marshall, editor, How Stuff Works, Hungry Minds Press, New York, 2001.22. How Stuff Works Website, HSW Media Network, http://www.howstuffworks.com/.23. Byars, N.A., “Technology Literacy Classes: The State of the Art,” J. Engineering Education, Jan. 1998, pp. 53-61.24. Ollis, D. “Installing a Technology Literacy Course: Trials and Tribulations”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, June, 2004, UT.25
editorial board for Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University Gül E. Okudan is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design at The Pennsylvania State University. She received her Ph.D. from University of Missouri-Rolla. Her research interests include intelligent shop floor control, manufacturing strategy modeling and measurement, solid modeling, product design, and product design teams. Her published work appears in journals such as Journal of Engineering Design, Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of Engineering Education and Technovation. She is a member of ASEE and ASME. She is also a National Research Council-US AFRL
technical elective for students who major inmechanical engineering and have had the traditional prerequisites for classical fluidmechanics.The course was first offered in the spring semester, 2005. The total student populationequaled 38 with 21 bioengineering majors and 17 mechanical engineering majors. Theincoming cumulative grade point averages of both sets of students wereapproximately the same (2.86/4.00 vs. 2.88/4.00).ApproachThe approach taken in this first offering of the course was integrative in structure andincluded as well current movie titles to generate in-class discussions and follow-upcritical review essays. A mind-map of the course topics and activities is presented inFigure 1
2006-780: THE EFFECT TECHNOLOGY AND A STRUCTURED DESIGNPROBLEM HAS ON STUDENT ATTITUDES ABOUT THEORY IN A DYNAMICSCLASSLouis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso Louis J. Everett is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and has research interests in the use of technology in the classroom. His technical research interests include robotics, machine design, dynamics and control systems. leverett@utep.edu http://research.utep.edu/pacelabArun Pennathur, University of Texas-El Paso Arunkumar Pennathur is Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr
detailed design phase. ThisJIT technique worked very well as the immediacy of the need for the knowledge providedadditional motivation for the students and retention was much better as evidenced by theimproved designs and system engineering products produced by the students.To ensure the students learn the importance of identifying and clarifying system requirements,we intentionally introduced ambiguity to initiate discussion and clarification among the studentteam members and faculty. In this project and several others listed in Table 1, we found thatthese discussions served not only to clarify the engineering problem in the students’ minds; but
DIAGRAMS TO EXPLAIN THE OPERATION OF AM AND FM TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS Professor Lance Breger Professor Kenneth Markowitz lancebreger@hotmail.com kmarkowitz@citytech.cuny.edu New York City College of Technology 300 Jay Street Brooklyn, NY 11201ABSTRACT At New York City College of Technology, many students in electrical engineering technology are mathematically challenged. By this we mean that they are unable to relate complex formulas to a physical electrical system. To reach these students, mathematical
premise was to instill a visual image of the engineering principalbeing “discovered” then relate that “discovery” to an equation or concept in hopes of establishinga better understanding in the minds of the students. As an example, the concept of stability andequilibrium are introduced using “the point”, “the line”, and “the plane” models2. First, aconceptual discussion about translations and rotations is presented. Then a more specificdiscussion ensues where the degrees of freedom are established (3, 5, or 6 degrees of freedomdepending on which model is being examined) and whether those degrees of freedom aretranslational or rotational. And that’s the extent of the discussion, no “x”, “y”, or “z”, justmovement in this direction or rotation about
2006-2385: VERTICAL MENTORING: CLOSING THE LOOP IN DESIGNGlen Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology GLEN A. LIVESAY is an Associate Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses on biomechanics, capstone design, experimental design and statistics and data analysis, and experimental biomechanical testing of soft tissues.Renee Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology RENEE D. ROGGE is an Assistant Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering. Her teaching interests include orthopaedic and sports biomechanics, biomaterials, capstone design, and introductory level mechanics courses
information from multipledirections. Highly toned information literacy skills are the key to unlocking the potentialfor lifelong learning.How do we teach our students to be lifelong learners? This paper shares a glimpse of howa science course instructor, librarian, and the writing center staff have dialogued for acommon goal based on individual and collective teaching/learning outcomes. Scienceliteracy, information literacy and communication skills are crucial and criticalfoundations for students in Engineering Technology programs to become lifelonglearners. One of assignments from the University General Education course,Introductory General Chemistry, involves an integrated three-step process withdiscipline-specific pre-lab activity, general
Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Integrating Applications in the Technion Calculus Course: A Supplementary Instruction ExperimentIntroductionScience and Engineering students in the course of their academic studies and further carrierscontinue applying calculus as their professional tool. In higher education, the ability to applymathematics has been recognized as one of the main learning outcomes required fromgraduates of the engineering programs1. The mission of mathematics education is more thanto impart the knowledge of mathematical rules, theorems and procedures, but to develop theability to put mathematical knowledge and skills to functional use in a multitude of contexts2.Applications and modeling are a
”, Grossman, New York, 1973.4 Vygotsky,L., “Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes”, Harvard University Press, MA, 1978.5 Starrett,S., Morcos,M., “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 90, No. 1, pp93-100, January 20016 Felder,R., Peretti,S., “A Learning Theory-Based Approach to the Undergraduate Laboratory”, ASEE Conference Proceedings, Session 2413 , June 19987 Pavelich,M.J., “Integrating Piaget’s Principles of Intellectual Growth into the Engineering Classroom”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, pp719-722, 1984, Wash, DC8 Dale,E., “Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching”, 3rd Edition, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 19699 Wolkson,A
2006-1936: LESSONS LEARNED: IMPLEMENTING A LARGE-SCALE PEERMENTORING PROGRAMBevlee Watford, Virginia Tech DR. BEVELEE A. WATFORD, P.E. is the founding Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity, established in 1992. Watford received the ASEE 2003 Minorities in Engineering award due to her efforts to increase the recruitment, retention, and graduation rates of under-represented students in engineering. She is currently working for the National Science Foundation as a rotator in the Division of Undergraduate Education.Carrie Slater, Virginia Tech CARRIE R. SLATER is a graduate assistant in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity at Virginia
results obtained from such a teaching method could be compared with results from amore traditional teaching technique. The data available from such a study may be more useful inshowing the importance of using cases to teach deeper technical concepts.Acknowledgement: National Science Foundation award No.DUE-0442531References 1. “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 2005. 2. Fromm, E., “The Changing Engineering Educational Paradigm, Journal of Engineering Education,” 92(2):113-121, April 2003. 3. Sankar, C.S. and Raju, P.K. "Use of Multi-Media Courseware to Teach Real-World Decision Making Skills