. Shuman is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh and Professor of Industrial Engineering. His areas of interest are improving the engineering education and the study of ethical behavior of engineers. As Associate Dean, he has introduced a many curricula innovations. He has been principle or co-principle investigator on over 20 sponsored projects funded by the NSF, HHS and DoT, the RW Johnson Foundation, and EiF. He is Editor of the new Advances in Engineering Education.Chris Yoder, University of Pittsburgh Chris Yoder is a senior industrial engineering student at the Swanson School of Engineering University of Pittsburgh.Phil Weilerstein, National
for graduate education while pursing an undergraduate degree, as well.Table 2. ECSE III Research Awareness. ECSE III Research Awareness Seminar Schedule Day 1 AM Activities PM Activities Participants ∙ Academic Research Protocol ∙ Library Tour/Scavenger Hunt ∙ Faculty & Staff ∙ Presentation Forms ∙ Sociocultural Event ∙ Graduate Student Mentors ∙ Ethics in Research Seminar ∙ VolunteersECSE III students participated in standard campus activities (e.g., academic advising, diversityinitiatives, cultural recreation events). The purpose was to acquaint them with
. & Peterson, P. (2001). A tool to measure adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering students. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Albuquerque, NM: ASEE.11. Harris, T.R., Bransford, J.D. & Brophy, S. (2002). Roles of learning sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering education: A review of recent advances. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering,4, 20-48.12. Pandy, M.G., Petrosino, A.J., Austin, B.A. & Barr, R.E. (2004). Assessing adaptive expertise in undergraduate biomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3): 211-222.13. Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N.J., Hart, J. & Diller, K.R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Directions
in the future. USMA Course-End Feedback is collected using a 5-point scale.Students respond to survey statements by assigning values from 1: Strongly Disagree to 5:Strongly Agree.2 While the results were anonymous, the data could be analyzed by section.Some of the results that were similar for both sections are shown below: E7. I am able to work effectively as a member of a team to solve a technological problem. E5. I am able to demonstrate creativity in the formulation of alternative solutions to a technological problem. D3. This course helped develop my ability to function professionally and with ethical responsibility as an individual and on
creativity, there is also an increasingneed for faculty to educate students on the ethical implications and environmental consequencesof the tasks they perform as future engineers. The faculty has to balance this with other dutiessuch as scholarly development, accreditation, committee assignments, and other servicerequirements. In short, to be successful it is imperative that the engineering faculty acquire andpossess strong management expertise along with varied technical skills.Typically, all faculty members in universities have certain common responsibilities such ashaving to commit themselves to their teaching obligations; participate in the development of theprograms of their departments and schools and of the university as a whole, engage in
2 Project Plan 10 Test case 2 Completeness 5 Test execution 2 Traceability Accuracy 3 metrix 2 On time delivery 2 Social/economical/ethic 3 Requirement 12 Completeness 2 Acquisition 3 Quality 1 Operation/Demo Completeness 4 (HW) 8
"newCarnegie report...reinforces those warnings." The report indicates "that a widespread emphasison theory over practice...discourages many potential students while leaving graduates with toolittle exposure to real-world problems and ethical dilemmas." While "millions of dollars" havebeen offered "through a coalition of universities to try to break up old styles of teaching," manyschools "still couldn't overcome the 'cultural issue of change' among faculty members." Therehave been some successes, however. Georgia Tech's biomedical engineering program uses a"problem-based approach" that "helps attract and teach many types of engineering students,especially women, who have been traditionally reluctant to consider engineering."Students too are voicing
E16 Communication B B B B E17 Public policy B B E18 Business and public administration B B E19 Globalization B B B E20 Leadership B B B E21 Teamwork B B B E22 Attitudes B B E23 Lifelong learning B B B E E24 Professional and ethical responsibility B
contributions to the economic vitality of the region, state, and nation aredemonstrated. The educational experience at the College is centered on building a foundation ofknowledge along with an appreciation of culture, ethics, esthetics, and diversity that empowersthe graduate for continuous intellectual and personal development throughout life. The dedicatedfaculty and staff create a supportive environment in which teaching and learning take placethrough research and service.The proposed PSM degree program greatly complements the Board of Trustees approvedmission of the College and is expected to significantly enhance the overall campus enrollment byproviding students in a number of undergraduate programs with an opportunity to complete theirpost
students are required to enroll in a sophomore level introductory engineering course called“Principles of Engineering Analysis and Design” which is a prerequisite to all the 2000 levelengineering courses and as such treated as a gatekeeping course for the engineering program.The course is taught in the third semester with Pre-calculus as the prerequisite. This course iscomparable to any other “Introduction to Engineering” course taught in virtually everyengineering program and covers such topics as career opportunities, survival skills, team work,communications, ethical practices. Our course also reinforce the concepts learned in Algebra andPre-calculus with brief exposure to differentiation and integration, linear algebra, complexvariables and
learning process. One benefit is the possibility of including less routine activities, e.g., problem based learning, design projects or study of real engineering applications, case studies, ethics, and more advanced critical thinking and problem solving. And, to take greatest advantage of the feedback from OLI, more engaging in-class activities that target identifiable concepts and skills need to be developed.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSSupport by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation through the Open Learning Initiative atCarnegie Mellon University, by the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie MellonUniversity, and by the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Department at MiamiUniversity is gratefully
istaught over two semesters with 1 credit in the Spring semester and 2 credits in the Fall semester.The learning objectives for this course as listed in the course syllabus are to:1. Develop an understanding of the conception, planning, and design phases of a transportation project.2. Integrate information, ideas, and concepts from previous courses into a comprehensive design effort on a particular project.3. Work well in teams and effectively coordinate the efforts of all team members towards a common goal.4. Discuss issues related to the practice of civil engineering such as professional ethics, project management, and various types of design impacts, including those related to the environment, to economics, etc.5. Learn and
Nations. July 28 - August 1. Blacksburg, VA.21. Bauer, E.H., B. Moskal, J. Gosink, J. Lucena, D. Munoz. 2007. Faculty and Students Attitudes Toward Community Service: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education. 96(2), 129-140.22. “Fred Cuny (1944-1995)-Disaster Relief Innovator" Online Ethics Center for Engineering 6/6/2006, National Academy of Engineering. Accessed 2/4/2009; www.onlineethics.org/CMS/profpractice/exempindex/cunyintro.aspx23. Barrington, L. and J. Duffy. 2007. Attracting under-represented groups to engineering with service-learning. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. AC 2007- 2871
services currently offered. After completing the list ofservices it became clear that quality resources, expert assistance in the minutiae of everythingfrom patents and technical reports to ethics and interviewing skills, assistance with designingassignments, study space, and much more were the primary benefits to patrons. This list helpeddetermine potential marketing messages.After the completion of the first list, a detailed retrospective analysis of activity and resourcemarketing projects of the past was compiled. This analysis showed that the majority of marketingactivities were carried out within the library building itself. In addition to this, library posters
, chemistry and biology)towards applied, hands-on learning aimed at preparation for the workplace instead of research isgaining national support.3 Implications for existing programs in software engineering are minor,because the field turned from a theoretical framework to an applied framework at its outset. Butother disciplines may begin to expand master’s offerings that are more directly related to theneeds of the workplace, including computer science and mathematics, among others. Programelements would be more likely to include internships and industry sponsored projects,interdisciplinary components, business studies, and emphases on communication, teamwork,project management and business ethics. Such program changes may offer the opportunity
outcomes: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. 2. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. 3. A knowledge of contemporary issues. 4. Demonstrate the ability to apply probability and statistical methods to naval architecture and marine engineering problems.The contribution of the Ship Structures course to demonstration of these outcomes is subjectivelyevaluated in periodic course reviews involving all program faculty. In addition, numericalstudent performance on specific assignments and exams in the
ethics: lessons from the global supply chain.Quality Management and Organizational Development International Conference. Palermo, Italy. ISBN. 88- Page 14.147.9902094-2-97. Wang, J. et al. (2007) Preparing Engineers for the Global Supply Chain: The Case of Automotive Partsin China. ASEE National Conference.8. Bandyopadhyay, J. (2005) The Global Supply Chain Assurance Practices of United States Automakers:A Survey. International Journal of Management. Dec. 2005: 22, 4. pp. 582-585.9. Rajendran, M. and Devadasan, S. (2005) Quality audits: their status, prowess and future focus.Managerial Audit Journal. Vol. 20 No. 4 pp. 364-382.10. Kannan, V
decisions for a sustainable and environmentally compatible development?”This question became the cornerstone of this first Strategic Plan and helped delineate the corevalues of IFEES: • Promoting engineering education excellence globally • Supporting IFEES member excellence • Caring about our communities and our environment • Promoting culture of community building and strong collaboration among members and Page 14.168.2 other appropriate stake holders • Fostering cultural awareness and diversity among its stakeholders • Cultivating integrity, honesty, work ethics, and social responsibility in the engineering
ManufacturingEducation Conference, scheduled for June 2009 in Austin, Texas. At the time of writing Page 14.1036.15of this paper in September 2008, the recommendations from the SME team include thefollowing as the key components of the manufacturing degree programs:a. Technological Competencies - Product Realization Process- Engineering Materials- Engineering Mechanics and Design- Manufacturing Processes- Manufacturing Systems Design, Analysis, and Control- Control of Machines- Quality Systems- Computer Systems- Electrical Circuits and Electronicsb. Professional Competencies- Communication- Global Multiculturalism- Teamwork- Ethics- Creativity and Innovation- Enterprise
with non engineering disciplines. ≠ Personal skills, such as persistence, curiosity, risk taking, reading and comprehension, humor, Page 14.1141.5 teamwork, communication, the cultivation of a positive can-do attitude, as well as life-long, lateral learning and artistic abilities. ≠ Social skills, such as economic, political, cultural, ethical, and environmental awareness. 4 Figure 2 shows the ten Module types currently represented in the program prototype that will be designed to stimulate innovative thinking. They will provide the basis for the
military officials to discuss starting a military academy. WhileAfghanistan has had military academies in the past, they were all modeled after Sovietinstitutions where there was only a military training emphasis. The NMAA model includes fourpillars: academic, physical, military, and character-leadership development, all supported by afoundation of Islamic based morals and ethics. Graduates from NMAA would receive a fouryear undergraduate degree. This new institution would resemble West Point in many ways. TheAfghan leadership envisioned this would be the way to prepare their future military leaders forthe countless challenges their country faced. This institution was such a priority that in just twoshort years, the country was ready to start this
globally aware leaders and influential citizens of theU.S. and world society of tomorrow. International business relations in future years are expectedto demand greater breadth of view and background. American infra-structure is barely passingwith the most recent grade for 2009 from ASCE being a D12. My greatest fear is that politiciansare like some students who view “D” as simply not great, but still a passing grade. However,funding for infra-structure renewal is a political issue, and civil engineers must become decisionmakers, instead of just being the ‘hired help’.As such, ASCE’s expansion of the BOK to include 10 specific professional educationaloutcomes to increase background on ethics, business, global awareness, history and politics
career planning, in clarifying the differences in the academics of E and ET programs, and in helping the students identify their strengths and interests; the sequence gives opportunities to cover topics in innovation, creativity & design, IP, the globalization of knowledge, engineering ethics, and economics all in the context of real case-based scenarios. These are left unspecified to also allow flexibility for individual programs to put emphasis in more manufacturing courses or to introduce a first course in design if so desired. Page 14.136.12 ¬ E & ET III in Term 4 would enable the students to begin a transition
of E and ET programs, and in helping the students identify their strengths and interests; the sequence gives opportunities to cover topics in innovation, creativity & design, IP, the globalization of knowledge, engineering ethics, and economics all in the context of real case-based scenarios. These are left unspecified to also allow flexibility for individual programs to put special emphases or to introduce a first course in design if so desired. ¬ The Elective course in Term 4 would enable the students to begin a transition to either an ECET or ECE degree plan. A typical ECET approved course would be Microprocessor Architecture (lecture and lab). Also, some ET programs may elect to replace MATH IV with
the local community. They describe the benefits of their program as22:As a result of this program, UC Merced engineering students gain long-term define-design-build-test-deploy-support experience, communication skills, experience onmultidisciplinary teams, and leadership and project management skills. They gain anawareness of professional ethics, the role of the customer in engineering design, the rolethat engineering can play in the community, and the importance community service andvolunteerism. Community organizations gain access to technology and expertise thatwould normally be prohibitively expensive, giving them the opportunity to improve theirquality of service and provide new services.University of Auckland, New ZealandThe University
within the ABETEngineering Criteria 2000.• an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering• an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams• an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems• an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility• an ability to communicate effectively• the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context• a knowledge of contemporary issues• an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.Including all of these criterions as course outcomes is very difficult in the typical disciplinespecific topic course, however, we found that
information resources and supporting technologies, with attention to the standards of academic honesty.5. Competency Area: General Studies and Culture ≠ O6: UDLAP graduates will have an understanding of how knowledge is acquired and applied through the intellectual traditions of the arts, humanities, or social sciences; engineering or natural sciences; and business or economic sciences. ≠ O7: UDLAP graduates will have a knowledge of and respect for the inherent diversity of peoples and ideas and for the principles and practices of ethical behaviors and moral values. Page 14.916.4 ≠ O8: UDLAP graduates will demonstrate
that the contributions are in their own words “good in ways and bad in ways.” This is alikely realistic perception as technology and engineering have the capacity to make societalstrides, such as the internet, which have both positive and negative implications. It also supportsthe need for technologists and engineers to be responsible to ensure that implications are thoughtthrough.10 As a teacher, it might be productive to include ethics of engineering and technologyin the curriculum since our evidence, in agreement with Gorham, suggests that students aretrying to understand if the contributions are good or bad and they will be making severalpersonal and community decisions about technologies.11Difficulty of understanding engineering and