gain an enhanced visual appreciation of how trusses behave.In the 2018/19 academic year, 166 first-year engineering students at the University ofSaskatchewan volunteered for a pilot study that examined the efficacy of TrussVR©. The studywas approved by the U of S Behavioural Research Ethics Board. Volunteers completed a “pre-survey” that examined knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding trusses, before trusses had beentaught in the classroom. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: no lab,regular lab, and TrussVR© lab. All participants then attended 2 weeks of in-class lectures ontrusses, frames, and machines, as they normally would. During this time, the “no lab” group didnot complete an experimental lab on trusses
, tolerances, and fits. Prepare process planning sheet independently by choosing the processes, sequence, tools, 2 parameters, cycle time, among few other alternatives. Manufacture the parts independently adhering to the process planning sheet and meet the 3 required dimensions, tolerances and fits. 4 Check the functions of the assembled product and make corrections. 5 Maintain high energy level and mental alertness. 6 Plan and work to schedules. 7 Communicate effectively with stakeholders to get things done and report progress. 8 Practice ethical responsibility.5.5.2 PSBL 2: Design: Design, Implement, and OperateThe second phase
(seePlant biology, Ethics, They will debate ethical issues related to Figure 5)Engineering, Large food production and consumption and learn ● Garden beds designedscale construction, about tried and true methods and new specifically for the plantsCommunication innovations in farming. Then, they will grown in the school garden create a growing system for the school, learn what it takes to grow and harvest successfully, and practice responsibility towards our earth and environment. Figure 5: Vertical hydroponic
in electrical and computer engineering (ECE) whichwas created to specifically address (1) provide an orientation and early success skills foruniversity life, (2) introduce ethical considerations in engineering, (3) introduce the profession ofengineering, and specifically, electrical engineering (EE) and computer engineering (CpE), and(4) give early technical and hands-on skills required of EE and CpE majors. Students in thecourse have predominantly already selected computer engineering or electrical engineering astheir field of study; however, a number of students enrolled in the first-year course are exploringthe fields of computer and electrical engineering in their search for a major. As the introductorycourse is a prerequisite to later
addition, two experimental studies were carried out to understand differentinsights into human-robot collaboration and the task fulfillment process [7], [23]. The findingsfrom the studies highlighted the importance of preparing students and the engineering workforceto develop teamwork competencies for an effective hybrid collaboration in all the three levels.However, with the increase in autonomous system Hoeschl et al. [19] recommended a differentperspective on hybrid collaboration in industries. According to Hoeschl et al. [19], humansshould always have control over autonomous systems to some extent in case of any extremeevents that might cause ethical conflicts during collaboration.High Interpersonal SkillsSome of the team roles will require
environmental engineering from the University of North Dakota. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Utah State University with a research focus on the ethical and career aspects of mentoring of science and engineering graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of diversity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She is Co-Director of
teaching”, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Expo, 2017.[7] ”The Ethical ”I” in Research: Autoethnography and Ethics”, SAGE Publications Limited, 2019.[8] C. Ellis, ”The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography”, Walnut Creek, CA, AltaMira Press, 2004.[9] S. Wall, ”An Autoethnography on Learning about Autoethnography”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 146–160, 2006.[10] A. Bochner and C. Ellis, ”Communication as autoethnography”, in G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas(Eds.), Communication as . . . Perspectives on theory, pp. 110–122, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAG, 2006.[11] K. Hernandez, F. Ngunjiri and H. Chang, ”Exploiting the margins in higher education: a
variety of instructional methods can helpstudents to succeed in more modes of learning in the classroom and beyond.In engineering education, there’s also an emphasis on non-technical aspects of engineering.ABET outcomes [6] focus not just on applying principals of engineering, science, and math, butalso addressing social concerns, communicating effectively, recognizing ethical responsibilities,etc. A growing number of engineering institutions are joining the KEEN network [7] andembracing KEEN’s three pillars of fostering curiosity, making connections, and creating value.This non-technical content is even less suited to passive forms of instruction.In light of these developments, the primary investigator’s teaching of statics, mechanics,dynamics
university-based entrepreneurship and innovation programs. Brent’s expertise also includes the design and leadership of impactful collegiate engagement programs for universal learners.Mr. Eric Prosser, Arizona State University Eric Prosser is the Engineering and Entrepreneurship Librarian with the ASU Library. Eric is the liaison to the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and provides research services for faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students along with instruction in critical analysis and information literacy, including the legal and ethical use of information. Eric has a Bachelor of Science in Physics from Harvey Mudd College, a Master of Information Resources and Library Science from the University
strategies to create a conflict resolution plan (based on the case study scenario)1 Ethics approval: Office of Research Ethics #41447 • Considering that some types of conflict can be productive, how did this influence the decision-making in your team? How might this influence the way you approach future teamwork? • Consider the nine attributes of effective teams, which of the attributes may have been lacking in your current team? What steps did you take as a team to strengthen and improve these attributes?A thematic analysis was conducted on these reflection reports to understand where students sawvalue in the conflict modules that they participated in. Each class of students was analyzedindependently to
, including the purpose andthe research question before agreeing to the interview, and participants were also ensuredcomplete confidentiality during information collection from the interview. The study securedethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of Australia and participation wasvoluntary. The interviews were held in an enclosed area to ensure confidentiality amongparticipants. Interviews lasted no more than 1 hour and were audio recorded. To ensure processreliability of the study, the transcription was cleaned by using pseudonyms and identifiable datawas removed in order to maintain participant confidentiality [23]. All participants signed aconsent form.Data AnalysisThe interview data were initially analyzed using an open coding
resulted in the increase inpersistence to graduation [1], [2]. More recently, researchers have shown that such participationis related to positive outcomes across a wide range of dimensions, including social capital andbelonging [3], design [4], [5], teamwork [4]–[6], communication [4], [6], [7], ethics [8], andleadership [4], [9]. This paper examines the relationships between participation in a variety oftypes of co-curricular activities and a number of social, academic, and professional outcomes.Conceptual FrameworkFigure 1 shows a schematic of the conceptual framework guiding this work (Authors, submitted).It is largely based on Astin’s Input-Environment-Output theory [10] and Weidman’s conceptualframework of Undergraduate Socialization [11
, cultural, and safety ramifications [2], [3].Design is progressively becoming the backbone of fostering a holistic engineering education asexperts and the ABET Accreditation Criteria underline the significance of a student’s ability to“apply engineering design” (from Criterion 2), "use engineering judgment" (from Criterion 6),and “recognize ethical and professional responsibilities” (from Criterion 4) in a variety of globalcontext [4]. Modeling a genuine design experience requires overcoming multifaceted obstaclessuch as forming realistic design constraints, providing adequate stakeholder accessibility, andcreating an atmosphere that provokes empathy towards stakeholders. Additionally, both studentsand educators face many challenges balancing
multidisciplinary team setting where “(1) each team member serves in awell-defined role in the team; (2) each team member brings a particular expertise to bear insolving the problem; and (3) the scope of the problem is sufficiently broad that no one teammember could successfully solve the problem alone [8, p. 20].”ABET addressed the liberal arts through a professional component by requiring “a generaleducation component that complements the technical content of the curriculum and is consistentwith the program and institution objectives [6, p. 2].” ABET directed that program outcomesand student assessments demonstrate that some of the skills related to the liberal arts as having:(1) “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”; and to (2
tasks, optimize flexibility, creativity, and productivity after a sprint per week.”Liberal Arts Core Experience for All StudentsIn designing the core courses, interdisciplinary teams of faculty worked alongside co-designersin learning how to create a curriculum for the context of the institution. The resulting seven corecourses that all students, regardless of major, are expected to complete by the end of their secondyear of study, are intended to transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries and to expose studentsto different ways of thinking. They are: ● Rhetoric ● Scientific Inquiry ● Vietnamese Studies ● Visual Studies ● Ethics and Moral Philosophy ● Logic & Limitations ● Creating & MakingThis common core
becamethe school’s concerted effort to supply work-ready engineers who have had the opportunity tohone their professional skills through multiple linked courses requiring: written and oralcommunications; project management; open-ended problem solving; ethical and professionalresponsibilities; public health and safety; and an understanding of global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors.PBL senior-level activities (Capstone) are carried out by the School of Engineering +Technology (SET) in conjunction with the Rapid Center in the College of Engineering andTechnology (CET). These PBL efforts are strongly supported by the school faculty, which serveas faculty mentors on the various projects. The Rapid Center is the engagement arm of
regarding ethical challenges and how to respond to ethical challenges in the workplace. • Team Activity: In self-selected teams, selected a real-world issue, defined that issue as a problem, refined the problem statement through iterative analysis to propose a potential engineering solution to that problem. • Examined the potential engineering solution in greater detail using the Six Thinking Hats [6] (6TH) process. • Prepared and delivered a presentation regarding potential engineering solutions to a real- world challenge. o Regulations and prevention methods for earthquake-resistant housing in Mexico City. o Solutions for resiliency in rebuilding the electrical grid in
% Prefer not to disclose* 1% Directly from high school* 93% After time working / a break* 4% Entry into program Transferred from another school/program* 2% Another route* 1%* values estimated from self-disclosure on optional surveyAll incoming engineering students take APSC 100, an introduction to engineering course in thefirst term. The course covers a broad array of engineering topics including design, decision-making, sustainability, professionalism, and ethics. APSC 100 is the only engineering-specificcourse taken by all first-year engineering students in the first term. As such, it is used as aplatform for
students face in their learning. Wealso qualitatively assessed the degree of reinforcement and attitude propagation within eachcohort as potential mechanisms for the enhancement or suppression of student interest on anindividual basis. This study may offer insight into the value of strategic targeting of differingstudent demographics to systemically enhance STEM performance and interest during key pointsin students’ early careers, such as the end of secondary school and during the transition to post-secondary study.Methods Ethical statementAll data collection involving students was approved by the University of Toronto HealthSciences Research Ethics Board (Protocol # 34825) and the Toronto District School BoardExternal Research Review
/expanding the educational methods used in the formation of engineers.Dr. Nathan E Canney P.E., CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder.Dr. Benjamin V Fell P.E., California State University, Sacramento Professor Fell joined Sacramento State
] described an LCA project that could be incorporated intointroductory courses across diverse fields within and outside of STEM. In addition to technicalknowledge, she noted that LCA projects expose students to the following: 1. Working with real-world, open-ended problems 2. Understanding the details of design 3. Relevance of a product’s societal context 4. Importance of working in diverse and interdisciplinary teams 5. Values and ethics in decision makingLCA provides a context for problem-based learning and helps in the development of qualitativedata interpretation and communication skills [18]. Integrating an LCA module into anintroductory engineering course has been found to address some
. Nextwe incorporate sklearn 40 so students can execute and explore the results of machine learningalgorithms. To prepare for machine learning content students watch bots videos 14 and they arealso assigned some ethics reflection prompts in response to Cathy O’Neil’s TED Talk 35 .The common thread across topics is the problem-solving heuristics shown in Figure 1. Weintroduce these early on and revisit them with each topic and explicitly point out when we areusing a strategy, or trying several of them, to solve a problem. For example we point out the useof concrete examples for solving encoding problems, developing algorithms, and initially usinghard-coded values in incremental web development. Another example is how students areexposed to
the Mechanical Engineering Departmentfaculty. The book “An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering” by Wickert and Lewis [27] isused as the course textbook and the typical sequence of topics covered in the class is as follows: • The mechanical engineering profession • Engineering ethics • The mechanical design process • General technical problem-solving approach • Unit systems and conversions • Significant digits • Dimensional consistency • Estimation in engineering • Force vectors • Force resultants • Moment of a force • Static equilibrium • Elementary solid mechanics concepts (such as normal stress and normal strain in uniaxial loading, shear stress in simple connections, and Hooke’s
the bachelors’ degree [9].In the Ph.D. in Technology Management program, a student is required to take courses from thefollowing areas: General Technology Core (12 credit hours) Major Area of Specialization (18 credit hours) Professional studies (9 credit hours) Research Core (9 credit hours) Foundational Studies at Master’s level (minimum of 17 credit hours) Dissertation Research (18 minimum credit hours)General Technology Core coursework is designed to enhance effective communication,collaboration, and management strategies. Additionally, this coursework serves to fosterextensive understanding of legal and ethical issues associated to technology use which candevelop as a result of federal and governmental
reinforces WPLDS and all membersmodel both character and leadership. The goal of WPLDS is leaders of character who 1) livehonorably, 2) lead honorably, and 3) demonstrate excellence. A full description of these goals isaddressed in Table 2.Table 2: West Point Outcomes and Associated Actions [14, p. 6] WPLDS Outcome Associated Actions 1) Live • Taking morally and ethically appropriate actions Honorably regardless of personal consequences. • Exhibiting empathy and respect towards all individuals. • Acting with the proper decorum in all environments. 2) Lead • Anticipating and solving complex problems. Honorably
., Paretti, L., McNair, D. Simmons, and A. Shew, “Experiencing disability inundergraduate civil engineering education: An initial examination of the intersection of disabilityand professional identities” 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering andComputing Diversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia, April 2018. 2018, pp. 1-14.C. Groen, D. R. Simmons, and L. D. McNair, “An introduction to grounded theory: Choosing andimplementing an emergent method” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus,Ohio, June 24 – 28, 2017. 2017, pp. 1-18.Grounded Theory Online, “Ethical review proposals”, 2018. [Online]. Available: fromhttp://www.groundedtheoryonline.com/getting-started/ethical-review-irb/ [Accessed July 7, 2018]D. M. Hatmaker
opportunity to collect anonymous stakeholderfeedback (i.e., survey data) and grade data (i.e., deliverable scores and attendance) for thepurpose of studying the impact of this teaching and learning model. Working with the FacultyAdvisor, ethics approvals have been obtained from both the University of Toronto HealthSciences Research Ethics Board (Protocol # 34825) and the Toronto District School BoardExternal Research Review Committee (Protocol # 2017-2018-20). To date, data has beenanalyzed for dissemination of findings to relevant communities of practice, including theAmerican Society for Engineering Education (2018), the Biomedical Engineering Society(Education section; 2017-2019), and the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2017
graduate attributes. The accreditation units correspondto types of content and are categorized in a high level manner as following [6]: mathematics, natural sciences, engineering science, engineering design, complementary studies, and other unspecified content.The graduate attributes are also high level and can be thought of as program-level learningoutcomes. The twelve graduate attributes are as follows: 1) Knowledge base for engineering; 2) Problem analysis; 3) Investigation; 4) Design; 5) Use of engineering tools; 6) Individual and team work; 7) Communication skills; 8) Professionalism; 9) Impact of engineering on society and the environment; 10) Ethics and equity; 11) Economics and
also learnt that I cannot and willnot sacrifice my principles and ethics for any position. The costs have been due to stress from thenew position.Panelist 4: As far as I am concerned, it is all benefits. Many times at the university, I would tellmyself "Money and power are not important." I told myself I was changing the lives of thestudents I influenced. I do believe that was true and I was an excellent educator and mentor, butthis decision to leave was for me! The Naval Surface Warfare Center appreciates all of myskills. The DOD briefs I am a part of are fascinating and the nature of the problems we have theopportunity to try and solve matters! The practicality of the research and people I get to interactwith on a daily basis are
. By using Project Drawdown’s 100 technical, ecological, and social solutions [7,8,9,10]for reversing global warming as a framework to implement the UN SDGs in a developing country,the new program presents several advantages. First, it provides students with the ability to identifyand formulate engineering problems in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.Second, it provides an academic setting to produce solutions to meet a spectrum of considerationsfor real communities, including public health, safety, and welfare. Third, it enables the applicationof ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations to make informed decisions.In order to be competitive, aspiring engineers must be taught to: 1) explore