progress through theSTEM pipeline also depends on the types of opportunities, experiences, and support studentsreceive while in college (Chang, Eagan, Lin, & Hurtado, 2011; Espinosa, 2011). “Theeducational experience and the culture of the discipline (as reflected in the attitudes and practicesof faculty) make a much greater contribution to [STEM] attrition than the individualinadequacies of students or the appeal of other majors” (Chang, Sharkness, Hurtado, & Newman,2014). In addition to the academic and social supports deemed essential for studentpersistence and transfer, there appear to be some specific recommendations that encourageSTEM students in particular to persist, transfer, and ultimately complete a STEM degree
of x, (b) Calculate 𝑍!" at 𝜆! /8 away from the load, (c)Calculate Γ! , (d) Calculate VSWR and (e) Calculate the transmitted power and reflected power as apercentage of incident power 𝑃!"Solution: (a) 𝑍! = 0, 𝑍! = 50 Ω. !! !!! Γ! = = -1 = 𝑒 !!"# => Γ! = 1 50 Ω 𝑍! !! !!! Φ = 180 ! !/! Applying this for 𝑉(𝑥) , we get ( 𝑉(𝑥) = 𝑉! (1 + Γ! )! − 4 𝑠𝑖𝑛! (𝛽𝑥
particular. Further,there are still few published studies that contribute in meaningful ways to our understanding ofhow to recruit and retain learners from diverse groups. We close by setting research agendas andavenues needed to understand and impact concerns over diversity and inclusion in engineering.Introduction and backgroundDespite myriad calls for and programs aiming to bring engineering into K-12 settings, progresshas been hampered by an already crowded curricular scope, comparatively limited resources forteacher professional development on teaching engineering practices, and a relatively sparseadoption of state standards that include engineering. In this metasynthesis, we reflect on pastfindings and contrast this with more recent
manufacturing. Students in Engineeringprograms have been very well versed in analysis, simulation, and abstract design. By themselveseach of these programs have strengths and weaknesses. However, when combining students fromboth of these program we develop teams that more closely reflect professional design teams. Theability to successfully implement complex design and build projects is enhanced.This paper outlines the design of a program at Western Carolina University (WCU) thatculminates with a senior capstone project for industry. Projects are done by teams of studentsmixed from the School disciplines of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electricaland Computer Engineering Technology, and Applied Systems Engineering Technology. A
Harvard’s Gender-Science IAT and were required to submit a form reflecting on taking the IAT (students did not submit the results from taking the IAT) 3. Implicit bias presentation: a lecture was given to all classes revisiting implicit bias, discussing why students took the IAT, showing interviews with women from industry, and suggesting possible ways to address implicit bias; students shared their own stories during lecture and via online formAlong with these implicit bias activities, we wanted to know how our students’ perceptions ofstereotyped traits, learning environment, and perceived abilities changed over the course of thesemester. Student cohorts can change drastically even from semester-to-semester, so it
and abandoned properties, and building on a sense of pride of place among the residents. Two undergraduate anthropology students studied, ethnographically, the interactions of the interns (e.g. Bernard 2011). They spent all 10 weeks observing the interns’ daily activities, participating in group events, conducting interviews, and analyzing interns’ periodic reflections. Two anthropology faculty met regularly with them. This paper principally relies on their anthropological analysis. This paper highlights some of the successes and challenges involved when the number of
hands-oninstruction to students on a variety of topics. Each week the program followed a similar pattern,involving a warm-up discussion about a professional from a STEM field, a thematic mainactivity, and a closing portion that encouraged review and reflection. At select points in theprogram, a field trip was incorporated that allowed students to visit university labs, sciencemuseums, or engineering open houses.SEBA Project OutcomesOver the course of the project multiple measures were used to assess student attitudes,engagement, and the overall impact that teaching assistants, parents, and mentors had onstudents’ perspective of STEM. Feedback about the program design, implementation, content,and outcomes was obtained from school staff, parents
along threedimensions: Process, Project, and Reflection.With regard to the process we anticipate students will be able to: ● Describe the “lens” of one’s disciplinary framework ● Find, read, and incorporate information from across multiple disciplines ● Communicate one’s perspective and decision-making process to colleagues from other disciplinesWith regard to the project we anticipate students will be able to: ● Design and build a quadcopter using open source technology ● Plan and implement projects in an interdisciplinary team environmentWith regard to the reflection component of the course, we anticipate students will be able to: ● Articulate in verbal and written form the importance of interdisciplinary teams ● Identify
effect oftheir efforts. Often a true demographic of these students is not understood, leaving organizerswith generalizations based upon activities and interactions in the informal setting. Manysuccesses have been recorded and discussed at length11,13, without a great deal of differentiationof students based on gender, age, or ethnicities. All of them have been proven to influencechoice of major and extracurricular interests.Demographics. Some assert that the demographics of different STEM groups have changed dueto these efforts inside and outside of the formal school setting. However, the demographics havenot changed in ways that reflect current demographics of the population at large14. It is unclear ifthis is due to targeted or convenient
evaluating projected cash flows against a Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR), we bring up the issue of whether profitable plants should be closed if their rate of return is not sufficient. Closing the plant would put hundreds of people out of work, and decimate the local economy. A decision on whether to outsource a labor intensive activity to an overseas plant may need to account for qualitative factors such as local labor practices and how they might reflect on the company reputation, as occurred with NikeThese kinds of issues, that are quite real, require students to have an awareness of the biggerpicture, and a well developed value system.A number of approaches to improve the engineering economics course
-curricular support: A multi-case study of engineering student support centers,” Virgnia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2015.[16] J. Nosoff, “Minority Engineering Student Organizations,” in Handbook on Improving the Retention and Graduation of Minorities in Engineering, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc, 1985.[17] G. Young, D. B. Knight, and D. R. Simmons, “Co-curricular experiences link to nontechnical skill development for African-American engineers: Communication, teamwork, professionalism, lifelong learning, and reflective behavior skills,” in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014.[18] W. C. Lee and H. M. Matusovich, “A Model of Co-Curricular Support for
collected from the participants’ teacher for a response rate of over 50%.Upon confirmation that both the participant and the participants’ parents had signed the letter ofconsent, the letter was removed from the responses to anonymize the data.Data AnalysisDespite underrepresentation of females in the survey population, over 50% of the participantsidentified as female. This was ideal for studying gendered perceptions, but may reflect somegendered perceptions of the importance of this area of research.In this work two questions of the survey will be analysed, those where students were asked torate the skill set of a typical engineer, and then rate themselves in those same skills. The 13 skillsevaluated are found in Table 2. Of the 27 respondents two
university with a private charter located on the eastcoast. Data were collected via a faculty climate survey in spring 2014. The survey was developedusing faculty climate surveys tested and implemented at the University of Wisconsin-Madisonand at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Some questions were taken directly from Bilimoria,et al.’s survey to reproduce their work with a high degree of fidelity. Finally, questions wereadded and refined to reflect the specific climate and history at our institution.The original sample consisted of 644 full-time faculty members on and off the tenure track.Because the professional experiences of faculty off the tenure track vary considerably withcollege and workload assignment, we limited our final sample to
engineering bachelor’s degrees. However, while women receive over halfof bachelor’s degrees awarded in the biological sciences, they receive far fewer in the computersciences (17.9%) and engineering (19.3%). This trend reflects upon the workplace in these fieldswith women making up only 29% of the science and engineering workforce, with relatively lowshares in engineering, around 15%. The need for more educational opportunities for femalestudents in fields of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is present andthere is a need for programs to help correct this trend8.There are currently some STEM outreach programs in place within the United States. The UnitedStates Naval Academy (USNA) is the host of a STEM Summer Camp program. The
Design for an Integrated ProjectDelivery Studio. Proceedings of the 46th ASC International Conference. Omaha, Nebraska, 2011.8 Vanasupa, L., K.E. McCormick, C.J. Stefanco, C. J., R.J. Herter, & M. McDonald. Challenges in Transdisciplinary,Integrated Projects: Reflections on the Case of Faculty Members’ Failure to Collaborate. Journal of InnovativeHigher Education. 37/3, 2011.9 Estes, A.C. and Baltimore, C. “Using K’nex to Teach Large Scale Structures to Architects and ConstructionStudents.” Paper 2014-9826. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, ASEE, Indianapolis,2014.10 ARCE Magazine, “K’nex Connection: Students Play with Toys, Learn About Structures.” Department ofArchitectural Engineering, California Polytechnic
skillsand primarily the practice of exemplary leadership. It started with a self-refection where eachstudent was given a list of behaviors and actions to reflect if in leadership positions, they preformthem or not. The workshop then went into the five practices of exemplary leadership and how touse them. At the end of the presentation the ambassadors split into groups to create a skit basedon a given scenario and the material covered. The second workshop focused on team building.The workshop started with defining a team and the difference between a group of people and ateam. Then the ambassadors were divided into groups and given a task. After the task wascompleted and presented the group thought back to the first workshop on leadership. Each
temperatures. In addition, the antenna setup should be carefullyselected for temperature. For example, at room temperature, if the RFID antenna is required 2ftof antenna to antenna distance, the best distance between tag and the antenna is 3ft for the bestdetection rate. At the higher temperature, T = 130°F, if the tag is located 4ft away from thereading antenna, 4ft of antenna distance or DCA = 2ft is the best for the maximum reading rate.There are couple of limitations. First, the environmental temperature is simulated using smallbox and only the tag is inside of the box while the antennas are outside. This implies that onlythe tag is affected by the temperature, while the reflected signal from the passive tag is partiallyaffected. In other word
empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces.Mr. Joshua M Cruz Joshua Cruz is a PhD student studying education at Arizona State University. He is interested in in- novating qualitative methods in research, how students transition between high school and college-level coursework, student writing, and student engagement studies. He currently teaches educational founda- tions courses at Arizona State University’s Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Connected Ways of Knowing: Uncovering the Role of Emotion in Engineering Student Learning“Connected
within the team. Students were alsoless likely to exhibit the largest negative shifts in teaming attitudes (bottom quartile) if they hadpositive shifts in their multicultural awareness - openness. Results of this quantitative work wereused to further refine instruments and data collection protocols for replication in the subsequentphases of the project.Diversity OrientationsQualitative results indicate that students consistently described why diversity was important intheir teams and in engineering as a field. These descriptions reflected conversations within theirclasses and the language used by instructors to discuss why diversity and working in teams wereimportant learning objectives in the courses. However, when talking about their
, conceptual design is considered the most cognitively intensive inthe engineering design process (Kim, 2011). Therefore, throughout the whole design process,students may have engaged in their task differently, behaviorally emotionally and cognitively.Thus, we perceive the videos recording their design processes as temporal data. In order toanalyze such data, we used sequence analysis – a temporal data analysis method (Abbott,1995). Each video was divided into a number of two-minute segments for adequate coding,and each segment was watched and compared with predetermined indicators that reflect thethree types of engagement and thus record the presence of each type of engagement at thesub-group level. Due to space limit of this paper, these indicators
from Cognitive Information Processing theory to moreaccurately reflect SVE decision making about majoring in engineering. Practically, the resultscan inform military transition assistance programs and improve university efforts to ensure thatstudent veterans experience a successful transition from their military career to higher educationand engineering studies.This work focuses on two research questions. For Research Question # 1 “What are somebroader influences on the decision to major in engineering?” three themes emerged from ourdata. Theme 1: Decision to major in engineering was made prior to military service. Theme 2:Decision to major in engineering was prompted through the encouragement from otherindividuals. Theme 3: Decision to major
developing standards-based lesson plans.In turn, it was expected that teachers’ research experience(s) and implementation of theinstructional modules in their classrooms would thus impact upon their students’ learning andmotivation to pursue studies in STEM areas16.The success of the RET program has been reflected, in part, by the number of teachers whocontinued to seek a place in the RET programs that followed each summer. One such teacherwas a participant in the first RET program, and since then has been invited back each year toparticipate in the program; the only teacher to have been invited back for each of the ten years ofthe program to continue development of engineering curricula for her high school and serve as amentor for other teachers in
of the summer research experience (See Figure E)as well, with general attitudes reflecting an extremely positive experience for most respondents;a majority of responses were “Strongly agree,” and the following statements received 75% ormore “Strongly agree” responses: “My position provided me with opportunities for learning andprofessional growth”, “There was a positive value to the research project in which I wasengaged”, “I would be interested in another research experience at CIAN”, and “I wouldrecommend this program to my colleagues.”Figure E. 2010-2016 Aspects of ExperienceParticipant Reported Perception of ExperienceROKET participants were asked to rate their overall experience, to which 89% indicated it was“Excellent” (97% indicated
were clarified. Students came to lab more familiar with the circuit and the process to buildit. All these effects contributed to prevent mistakes in the process.To sustain these improvements, the revisions to the lab assignment will be made permanent; theinstructor and teaching assistants will look for clarifications in other assignment instructions. In thefuture, students will be asked to anticipate failure modes and how to prevent them as part of the pre-laboratory assignment, then reflect on those predictions in lab report conclusions. Training on otherLean Six Sigma techniques will be included in the curriculum.This project demonstrates that even a brief, 75 minute Kaizen event held for freshman circuits studentscan improve their
and pre and postprogram assessment that includes both academic and interest outcomes. Various statistical testsincluding an ANOVA analysis of mean differences as well as a regression analysis of the studentand mentor data should be conducted. Additionally, as introduced within the limitations section,an analysis of classroom mentors opened-ended questions should be analyzed for qualitativeresearch purposes. This is especially important for those mentors who had negative experiencesand may have reflected that information within the survey.BIBLIOGRAPHY[1] Afterschool Alliance (2004). American After 3 PM: Afterschool Programs in Demand.[2] Afterschool Alliance. (2011). Afterschool: A vital partner in STEM education. Retrieved from http
level of agreement onwhether the session changed their perception of ECE, and the corresponding responses areshown in Figure 1.d. It can be observed that 80 percent of the respondents indicated a change inperception, while 20 percent didn’t. Of the two respondents who stated that the IoT sessiondidn’t change their perception of ECE, one was a student who maintained an interest in ECEafter the session. Responses to survey questions #5 and #6 are shown in Figures 1.e and 1.f, and they reflect theimpact of the IoT session on the respondents’ enhanced interest of ECE, and their motivation tostrongly consider it as a choice of engineering discipline. It can be observed that 80 percent ofthe respondents indicated an enhanced interest in ECE, and 60
includes sections on previous work, curricular context, description of the robotichardware with associated integrated development environment (IDE), and educationalexperiences for the robot builders as well as the first-year students. The results of a shortquestionnaire are provided and analyzed and appropriate conclusions drawn.Previous WorkThe importance of laboratory experiences and projects in engineering education can be justifiedby various learning theories, e.g., “Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle.” According to Kolb1,regardless of the learning style, people learn best if they follow a cycle consisting of four steps(axes): experiencing (concrete experience), watching (reflective observation), thinking/modeling(abstract conceptualization
impacted research, but also the classes that are using Buddy.The items in Tables One and Two reflect considerable effort on the part of faculty, students, andthe co-authors of this paper. It should not appear as though these results were not “hard-won.” Inthe conclusions of this paper we list some of the issues that have arisen in this deployment andoperation of the Buddy cluster in hopes that others can at least be aware of pitfalls.Conclusions and DiscussionAt UCO an NSF MRI grant was competed for and won for a HPC cluster, Buddy, to enable andenhance the research computing environment at UCO, which had not had any such facilitiesbefore. The competition for Buddy took several tries with
required to supplement the remote classroom experience. Social activities during this residency will bring cohorts together for a final shared experience. 3. Capstone/Graduation Residency (Reflections) - The culmination of the TCMT program, this residency provides students the forum for final class presentations and assessments. Interactions, discussions, and feedback mark the integration of learning and application. Students participate in Aggie's graduation ceremonies alongside campus students.Residency Week 2017 will be held August 13-17, 2018 in College Station, Texas.Costs & AdmissionsThe 2018-2019 tuition rate for the METM program is $45,000 for in-state and $55,000 for out-of
the Manufacturing Excellence group as a Process Engineer for the Paper Machines.Dr. Ashlee Nicole Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an assistant professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in ChE at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She also conducted postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for systems biomedicine & pharmaceutics and using computing and reflection in the classroom. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017