. Eddington, Kansas State University Sean Eddington (Ph.D., Purdue University) is an assistant professor of Communication Studies at Kansas State University. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersections of organizational communi- cation, new media, gender, and organizing.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Pur- due. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in
supported engines to choose from: Unity and Unreal Engine 4. These game enginesmust be configured for developing applications using the Mixed Reality Toolkit (MRTK), whichis an open-source resource that allows the game engine to interact with and build HoloLensapplications. These applications are designed using interactive environments, called scenes, inUnity. These scenes contain "Objects" that can take many forms, including but not limited to 3DModels, audio files, images, and video. The properties and interactions between these objects aremanipulated with the use of C# scripts. After a project is built in the game engine, it must beeither deployed directly to HoloLens or transferred to an application package for later installationusing Visual
upon one another), implementation ofactive learning strategies lowers the chances of students “missing a step” when learning how tosolve complex problems [13]. Student experiences with traffic operations are plentiful and, whenused strategically, can be capitalized upon to improve comprehension of complex concepts andmaterials. Experimental work has been done to gauge effectiveness of active learning strategiesin transportation engineering courses [14] - [19]. Concept maps [14], games [15], problem-oriented and project-based learning [16], group work [17], simulation [18], and inquiry-basedlearning [19] are a few strategies researchers have focused on in previous work. Active learningstrategies may be widely used, however a review of
will be presented. While thishas gone beyond a work in progress to reach a level of successful operation, more developmentis needed. The paper will also address projected improvements and ways to extend this practiceto other courses.Introduction - A Special Need for Video TechnologyThe COVID pandemic led to a temporary and immediate end to face-to-face instruction.Synchronous video and other distance learning tools were put to good use in coping with thecrisis. In the process, a large body of practical experience was developed. A literature searchreturns an overwhelming number of results. At recent ASEE conferences, authors havepresented papers describing their experiences with teaching engineering technology andengineering courses using
problemsthrough human action. Proponents of this Current focus on citizenship at both the local andglobal level, and use strategies like community projects, debates and action plans that actuallyencourage students to stand up for what is just. Educators may have concerns about exposingtheir ideology and political leanings in the classroom, creating some tension with respect to thisCurrent.STSE-Relevant Practices in Engineering educationIn reflecting on the nature of STSE as described above, and considering the integration withengineering, we might start with exploring the nature of the engineering profession, and how thattranslates to the engineering education context. In a critique of engineering education, Pawley(2019) suggested that engineering
of Bridgeport, academic year 2006-2007. He supervised hundreds of senior projects, MS theses and Ph.D. dissertations. He developed and introduced many new undergraduate/graduate courses. He also developed new teaching / research laboratories in his area of expertise. His students have won more than twenty prestigious national / international awards from IEEE, ACM, and ASEE. Dr. Elleithy is a member of the technical program committees of many international conferences as recog- nition of his research qualifications. He served as a guest editor for several international journals. He was the chairperson of the International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Technology & Automation. Fur- thermore, he is the co
(Professor)Benny Mart Hiwatig Benny Mart Hiwatig is a PhD candidate in the STEM Education program at the University of Minnesota. He earned his bachelor's degree in Secondary Education and took master's coursework in Chemistry Education in the Philippines, where he also taught high school chemistry. He is currently involved in a research project that aims to develop an observation protocol for STEM lessons and relevant training materials that are directed at improving the quality of STEM instruction in K-12 spaces. His primary research interests include assessment of student learning in STEM contexts, exploration of how integrated STEM is enacted in the secondary level (especially in chemistry classes), and assessment and
organizations. Rodolfo has taught multiple courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, and he is well versed in the scholarship of teaching. His efforts in leading the Sustainable Buildings program were recognized with the 2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector in the industry. He believes that educating the next generation of professionals will play a pivotal role in sustainability standard practices. In terms of engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club's adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team's faculty coach since 2013. He is currently serving as a CSU President's Sustainability Commission
considers without access to materials and lesson plans. Furthermore, the casestudies that are the basis of several lectures and of many seminar discussions are frequentlyupdated to stay current with the times. To support our 20+ instructors in planning theirinstruction under these circumstances, the program coordinator has created an online LMScourse where more experienced instructors can share materials and methods, and wherestandardized elements of the course can be mapped out in detail for easier onboarding of newfaculty. Prior to 2020, the materials provided there were sparse and not well organized. As partof Mancus’s project to digitize the lecture series in the summer and fall of 2020, she overhauledthe organization of that course database so
Paper ID #35904Studies on teaming experience through embedding psychological safety,motivational driver, and cognitive diversity into pedagogyProf. Mirna Mattjik, Colorado School of Mines Mirna Mattjik is a Teaching Associate Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division, Cor- nerstone Design@Mines Program. Mirna is also faculty in the McBride Honors Program, and faculty affiliate for Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Mirna’s formal education is in industrial technology, in- ternational political economy, project management and leadership. Her active research agenda is about improving teaching and learning for
Summit into the training of its Clark Scholars and MEP Envoys. The ClarkScholars are socially responsible leaders and innovators, with the drive to make a broad impactboth within the Penn State community and beyond. Through their academic pursuits, outreach, andcommunity service projects, the Clark Scholars uphold the four pillars of the program, 1) businessand entrepreneurship, 2) leadership, 3) social equity and global citizenship, and 4) communityengagement. The Clark Scholars are engaged in a yearly seminar, one of which is an EngineeringEquity Seminar. A component of this course includes attending and reflecting on the annualEngineering Equity Summit. The MEP Envoys are a group of 6 students dedicated to developingcultural and identity
Health and Safety, EngagementIntroduction According to the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), a Professional Engineer (PE) isto hold paramount the health and safety of the public with respect to all aspects of what they do. Engineers bynature design, create, and construct solutions for the human population. Providing a functional project orproduct is critical; yet designs also need to be safe. An example of safe design thinking is the Samsung Note7 issue from 2016 that worked until it was taken on flights and then started to catch fire. Scenarios such asthis, raise the question regarding how we develop students to both be aware of safe practices, but moreimportantly, gain a desire for life-long learning about health and
support services to awide variety of students at our institution. Students are admitted to this program based on“circumstantial criteria such as their first-generation college status, under-performing /under-represented high school or neighborhood, low SES, [or] HS counselor recommendation”[1]. We quickly discovered that the structure of the course was not resulting in equitable learningoutcomes for ASP students. For example, over the four academic years leading up to our work onthis project (AY15/16 - AY18/19), the average grade for ASP students was 2.6 (B-) vs. an averageof 3.4 (B+) for non-ASP students. Furthermore, the DFW (D, F, or Withdrawal) rate was 29% forASP students and 8% for non-ASP students.Further, Figures 1-3 indicate that
NUT visited UDEM in order to deliver lectures. Each year, UDEM has received at least two teachers fromNUT to provide intensive training in technical Japanese language for the dual degree program.UDEM professors have also visited NUT regularly; first two professors in March 2007 to attended NUT’s biannualsymposium for internationalization experiences (Demófilo Maldonado and Salvador Barrera). In 2009, ElizabethGutierrez also attended and discussed the dual degree program between NUT and UDEM. Friendly teachers were ourhosts and talked to us about their research projects and laboratories where our students can learn as soon as they arriveto Nagaoka.At UDEM the program is staffed by two teachers of Japanese. Every generation studies Japanese for
early 1980s. After a discussion about the short clip moreexamples are presented, for example, a soap dispenser that did not recognize a black person’s hand,hurricane Katrina and Ida and their disproportional impact on poor communities and communitiesof color. Students are then asked to think about the following questions: ● Who and what is engineering for?3 ● Who benefits from engineering advances? ● Who does not benefit from engineering advances? ● Who suffers or is constrained by what is created?Students were then introduced to the Engineering for Social Justice Criteria (E4SJ) and are guidedon ways to incorporate them into their future designs and projects (Leydens & Lucena, 2014).Thesecond intervention introduced
projects such as: Modeling and analysis of high-rise buildings, Analysis and design of steel structures, Floor vibration of slabs, and pedestrian bridges, Serviceability vibration analysis of high-rise buildings under wind effect, Earthquake Engineering, Design of post tensioned concrete structures. He also used Finite Element Analysis for: Nonlinear and Buckling analysis of silos and thin-walled members, Temperature effects on concrete slabs, Industrial concrete pavements, Analysis of long span spatial steel structures, Analysis of Glazing facade and so on. Furthermore, he has experience in: Below grade shoring walls using soil nails and ground post-tensioned anchors, retrofit of concrete structures using Fiber Reinforced
engagement with coding and robotics, and early childhood preservice teacher learning.Nidaa Makki Nidaa Makki is a Professor in the LeBron James Family Foundation School of Education at the University of Akron, with expertise in STEM Education. She has served as co-PI on several NSF projects, investigating STEM education interventions at the K-12 and undergraduate levels. She also has expertise as program evaluator for various STEM education programs, and has led teacher professional development in Physics Modeling, Engineering Education, and Problem Based Learning. Her research interests include teacher learning and practices in science education, engineering education, and student learning and motivation for STEM
Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on STEM teaching in higher education, and B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Prior to joining academia, she worked with engineering teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy. She has over 30 years of experience teaching mathematics, statistics, computer science, and fundamental engineering courses as well as serving in several administrative roles within higher education. Throughout her career, Hensel has created a childcare facility at a federal research lab, coached middle school MATHCOUNTS students, facilitated STEM K-12 teacher training, built an undergraduate first-year engineering program
process. Struggles in statistical training for engineers is not anew phenomenon, and pedagogical approaches were debated as early as 1984 on the best way totrain engineering students effectively [1]. With the varying needs of different engineeringdisciplines, approaches varied widely in an effort to focus on the needs of their students. A shiftto more student participation-focused instruction was developed through an EducationInnovation Project through the Polytechnic University of Valencia in 1995 [2]. In this line ofthought, many engineering statistics courses have shifted to incorporating examples that aremore relevant and challenging students with applying statistics to relevant real-world problemsin their fields with more focus on problem
initialresults of a research project that aims to integrate AI and cybersecurity research into thecybersecurity curriculum. In his study, he developed a module that aims to teach students thedifference between causal analysis and traditional correlation analysis using real-world examplesfrom cybersecurity applications. Although promising, this study is somewhat limited whencompared to the wide scope of the cybersecurity and AI education field. The lack of research inthis field presents an opportunity for interdisciplinary work that considers both cybersecurity andAI education in a unified way.2.2 MotivationAI techniques have become a critical technology for cybersecurity researchers and practitioners.Integrating AI into cybersecurity curricula is
diverse and better prepared electrical and computerengineers through collaboration. It grew out of an NSF funded multi-year project to develop andimplement Experiment Centric Pedagogy (ECP) in 13 HBCU ECE programs. [Ref 1] Whileworking on that highly successful project, the participants realized that collaboration with oneanother and, potentially, with others could enhance all aspects of their education and researchenterprises in ways that were difficult or impossible to achieve independently. IEC offers a newproblem-solving lens to address problems-issues-opportunities by joining forces when moreresources are required than are available locally and/or when a more global approach isinherently better.Initially, IEC activities have been focused on
, particularly STEM fields and graduate education. Her research has been published in Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, School Science and Mathematics, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Improving Schools, and William and Mary Educational Review. She has taught master’s and doctoral courses in higher education leadership as well as undergraduate reading, writing, and literature courses in both New Jersey and Alaska since 2005.Adriana C Trias Blanco (Assistant Professor)Theresa Fs Bruckerhoff (Project Evaluator) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
. For his second master's thesis, he focuses on identifying the individual and institutional factors that contribute to a "culture of disengagement" from the ethical dimension of engineering work among students in the engineering profession. His Ph.D. project is funded by the NSF and is concerned with promoting and improving engineering students' ethical behavior and sensitivity through on-campus student organizations. His academic interests include mental health, international development, human rights, and engineering ethics. Currently, his ambition is to work within an international organization such as UNESCO and to be an advocate for promoting science and technology as critical tools of sustainable development as
–40, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1152/advan.00057.2006. 2. J. Le Doux and A. Waller, “The Problem Solving Studio: An Apprenticeship Environment for Aspiring Engineers,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 3, Fall 2016.3. D. Rae and D. Melton, “Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineering education: an international view of the KEEN project,” Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 7, pp. 1–16.4. S. Abidi, “Do Out of Context Applications Help Student Learning? An In Class Activity Applying Cable Properties of Polypyrrole Polymer Blends for Nerve Injuries.” May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/2588.
is arepository of “KEEN Cards'' which are instructor-produced records of EM-related instructionalartifacts such as assignments, modules, projects, or courses. Each card provides descriptions,learning outcomes, and instructional tips and materials to implement the module. Additionally,each card can be “tagged” with various engineering disciplines, EM skillsets, and EM mindsetsto enable a fine-grained search. We drew upon these cards and tags as the basis for our analysisof mapping the EML framework to convergence. An example card is shown in Figure 1 with the“tagged” skillset and mindset attributes on the right-side. Figure 1: An example KEEN Cards with Mindset and Skillset elements “tagged”. From KEEN card
Paper ID #38289The Cumulative Effects of an NSF-Funded AdditiveManufacturing Course at Three Large State Universities andTheir Surrounding CommunitiesPatricia Ann Maloney (Dr.) Dr. Patricia Maloney is an associate professor of sociology at Texas Tech University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Cumulative Effects of an NSF-Funded AdditiveManufacturing Course at Three Large State UniversitiesAbstract: This paper is the culmination of four years of an NSF-funded project implementingand assessing an undergraduate additive
laboratoriesrequired hands-on experiments which were difficult to execute in a remote setting. Educatorsadopted several simulation tools to replace the hands-on experiments to a certain extent. Many ofthe project-based laboratory courses suffered due to a lack of research capabilities. In addition,projects demand social interaction as students work in groups, brainstorm ideas, utilizelaboratory equipment, and closely interact with the instructors.This paper presents some of the challenges faced by the instructors and students in Electrical andComputer Engineering courses offered at one of the regional campuses of The Ohio StateUniversity. Even though some researchers have conducted studies in 2020 to investigate theeffect of the pandemic on teaching and
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section ConferenceCommunicating with engineering analysts, specialists, and/or contractors about advancedengineering science and analysis techniquesIn the last 5 years how important have the following skills been to your work? 13. Communicating well with an engineering analyst about analysis results related to a project. 14. Communicating well with an engineering specialist to help with a design decision. 15. Running simple calculations to check detailed design and/or analysis work of contrac- tors. 16. Communicating clearly with contractors about detailed design and/or analysis of me- chanical
students. To incorporate more focus on well-being and student success, thecourse credits were increased to allow for more contact with these students and dedicated time inthe classroom for a focus on well-being, introduction to resources on campus, and academicsuccess interventions.This work, conducted with support from an internal student success grant, has just completed thefirst year of data collection. Our goals for this project are to (1) develop increased confidence(self-efficacy) in ability to achieve in math and physics concepts and (2) understand howmindfulness can impact these students’ mental, physical, and emotional well-being and beincorporated into the classroom. To assess the impact of incorporating well-being measures intothe
todo the most with the least drastic changes.Discussion & Future WorkWebTA, especially this part, is a large, work-in-progress project. The analysis outlined abovewas an attempt to ensure that the development and design of WebTA is centered on the student(aka the human part of the system) as well as suggest possible amendments to further the designfor the better. One future effort that would be beneficial to said attempt is to look at conductingcognitive walkthroughs or more structured, in-depth usability testing with students. Other futuresteps should be to perform similar analyses on the planned training pages, the summary ofprevious code critiques, and individual critique pages (Fig. 1).AcknowledgmentsThis work was funded by the