Division of Material Research (DMR) Mary Galvin, Division Director From Project Summary of FY 13 Awards Directorate of Mathematical and Physical Sciences Office of the Assistant Director F. Fleming Crim, Assistant Director Celeste Rohlfing , Deputy Assistant DirectorOffice of Multidisciplinary Activities Clark Cooper Materials Astronomy Research Physics (PHY) (AST) (DMR) Denise Caldwell Jim Ulvestad Mary Galvin
Projects & Gen-3 Partners Translational ResearchResources Existing Challenge Research Resources Basin Innovation Infrastructure Research at New Products Sold by Companies Universities Level of Development Genesis of chart from Deborah Jackson, ERC Program Director ERC Strategic Framework: Proposal #, PI Name, ERC
”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(4), pp. 527-538, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.39.4.527[10] Honken, N., Ralston, P. A. S, & Tretter, T. “Step-outs to Stars: Engineering Retention Framework”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans. June, 2016.[11] Goodman, I., Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., Thompson, M., Bittinger, K., Brennan, R., & Delci, M. “Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project”. Cambridge, MA: Goodman Research Group, Inc., 2002.[12] Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory
, healthcare, higher education, Russia investigation, etc. – End result is little legislative change to immigration, research, or education policies• Mid-terms – Expected mass-turnover of senior members through retirements and close races • Includes many education and research champions and committee chairs – Early projections show Democrats taking control of the House and Republicans holding the Senate • Democrats will bring huge focus on Administration oversight, new prioritiesPolicy Opportunities: Workforce Development• Strong bipartisan support for encouraging growth of skilled technical workforce, lowering reliance on H1-B visas.• Huge Administration focus on skilled technical workforce, experiential education, and connections with
Due Dates, Templates Grants: A to Z Initiatives http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htmDoes NIH Already Support My Interest Area? http://report.nih.gov/quicklinks.aspxNIH Searchable Databases ContainAbstracts of All Funded Projects Search by MESH terms Key words Organizations States Investigators Mechanisms Solicitations Institutes Investigators …RePORTer Delivers a Treasure Trove… Click for
BSET graduate. It is aminor point, as most industry opportunities do not require PE certification for opportunities, thusthe BSET graduate is on an equal footing in most career opportunities.ConclusionThe question remains, which avenue should you pursue? It depends! If you enjoy mathematics,using the knowledge to solve complex problems in design projects, then the BSE may be thecorrect choice. On the other hand, if you would rather work with your hands using theknowledge base gained in school, then the BSET may be the proper choice. Either choice is agood one, so decide your strong points and interests and let the chips fall where they may! Enjoyyour career as an Engineer or Technologist, the choice is up to you. Proceedings of
more mathematics and contribute to engineering projects in industry so as to makescience should be introduced into the engineering the argument for changing the name of 4-year engineeringcurriculum. To make room for this, fewer engineering technology degrees to applied engineering was covered incourse had labs with them. As a result when these a paper by Ron Land of Pennsylvania State University. [3]graduates entered industry in the early 1960s, they were notready for lab work. In most cases this was not a problem as When the author was a dean at the Oregon Institute ofthis was the height of the space race and many large Technology, the Boeing Company asked OIT to come toaerospace
set theory early in their mathematical education. Set theory is aFig. 3(a). Now, let x ∈ A. If x ∈ A it does not imply that x ∈ B. wide field of study, and its introduction to students should beSee Fig. 3(b) started with the basic principles.3.2 Definitions Acknowledgement This work was performed as “classroom projects" funded and supported by the University of Texas at Tyler. Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference
. Gehringer North Carolina State University efg@ncsu.eduAbstractThis paper is a survey of dozens of active and collaborative learning strategies that have beenused in teaching computing. The most basic are “think-pair-share” exercises, where studentsthink about a problem, discuss it with their neighbors, and then share it with the rest of the class.Teams may work together in class to solve problems, with the instructor providing writtencomments. Bringing competition into the picture always helps motivate students, e.g., havingfinal projects compete against each other (e.g., a prey/predator game), or playing a Jeopardy-likegame to review for an exam. Many such activities can be
AC 2007-2341: TRANSFORMING THE MICROPROCESSOR CLASS:EXPANDING LEARNING OBJECTIVES WITH SOFT CORE PROCESSORSLynne Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University Lynne Slivovsky received her B.S. in Computer and Electrical Engineering and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University in 1992, 1993, and 2001, respectively. She worked with the Engineering Projects In Community Service (EPICS) Program from 2001 to 2003. In Fall 2003, she started a tenure-track assistant professor position in Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She received a Frontiers In Education New Faculty Fellow Award in 2003. In
, Mary-Anderson-Rowland and Regents' Professor Nancy Felipe Russo are collaborators on that project. Dr. Bernstein is.a professor of Counseling Psychology, Educational Leadership & Policy Studies, and Women’s Studies at Arizona State University in Tempe, AZ. She recently completed a term as Director of the Division of Graduate Education at the National Science Foundation, after eight years as Dean of the Graduate College at ASU. Dr. Bernstein specializes in counseling research on stress and cognitive mediation, gender and ethnic issues, and clinical supervision, and in higher education on broadening participation of women and minorities in science and engineering careers, preparing
studentlearning in their graduate teaching. Most of the faculty currently rely on paper-and-pencil homeworks rather than homeworks submitted electronically. Likewise,the faculty regularly use paper-and-pencil exams during class time but only oneperson uses electronically-submitted exams administered during class time.Generally, our faculty do not currently use take-home exams, either paper-and-pencil or with electronic submission. The faculty are split on the extent to whichthey use laboratory activities and associated reports to assess student learning ingraduate courses. On the other hand, projects, which are completed outside ofclasstime and may involve group work, are often used in our graduate curriculum.Similarly, graduate student learning is
AC 2007-1732: DELIVERING CORE ENGINEERING CONCEPTS TOSECONDARY LEVEL STUDENTSChris Merrill, Illinois State UniversityRodney Custer, Illinois State UniversityJenny Daugherty, University of Illinois,-Urbana-ChampaignMartin Westrick, University of Illinois,-Urbana-ChampaignYong Zeng, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Page 12.443.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Delivering Core Engineering Concepts to Secondary Level StudentsIntroductionWithin primary and secondary school technology education, engineering has been proposed asan avenue to bring about technological literacy. 1,2 Different initiatives such as curriculumdevelopment projects (i.e., Project
thatinspired the ideas behind the UASPP. The partnership was solidified by the complementary contributions each entity couldbring to the project. In 2006 we became aware of a funding opportunity offered through the U.S.Department of Education’s Title II, Part B funds of the No Child Left Behind Legislation. Thisprogram is called “The Mathematics and Science Partnership Program.” It is designed toimprove math and science instruction in schools considered to be “high need.” Schools aredefined as “high need” if 20% of the children they serve are from families with incomes belowthe poverty line or if the school has a high percent of teachers not teaching in their academicsubjects, not teaching at their trained grade levels or schools with a high
exam performance”, The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 99-109.IFTE CHOUDHURYIfte Choudhury is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Science at Texas A&MUniversity. Dr. Choudhury has extensive experience as a consulting architect working on projects fundedby the World Bank. His areas of emphasis include housing, alternative technology, issues related tointernational construction, and construction education. He is also a Fulbright scholar. Page 12.576.6
brief lectures,readings, and homework problems. This paper describes the course and related resourcessufficient to allow other interested faculty members to develop similar courses at the universitylevel. Some of the engineering analysis may also be useful to middle school teachers andstudents to further the level of engineering rigor in similar projects. Experiences from fivesemesters of the course will be reviewed, along with recommendations for further improvement.IntroductionThis course was first offered in spring 2001 and has been described in two previous conferencepapers.1,2 This paper reviews the relevant information from these earlier papers and describesnew developments in this course including use of a new PV panel and motor
State and Federal curriculum projects, especially in the areas of technical education. Dr. Alfano has a B.S. in Chemistry, M.S. in Education/Counseling, and a Ph.D. from UCLA in Higher Education, Work, and Adult Development. She also directs the Cisco Academy Training Center (CATC) for California and Nevada.Sharlene Katz, California State University-Northridge Sharlene Katz is a co-Principal Investigator of CREATE and Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University, Northridge (CSUN) where she has been for over 25 years. She graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles with B.S. (1975), M.S. (1976), and Ph.D. (1986
undergraduates were asuccess. The motivation of the students is the most important reason for this. This project hasdemonstrated that it is quite feasible to give undergraduate students the benefit of expert teaching skillsthat are otherwise unavailable to them. Indeed the author feels privileged to have had this opportunity.1 M. Brorsson. MipsIt-a simulation and development environment using animation forcomputer architecture education. In Proceedings of 2002 Workshop on ComputerArchitecture Education, pages 65-72, May 2002. Anchorage, Alaska. Page 13.444.5
discussinitiatives that can be carried out effectively by individuals or small groups, initiatives that canbe supported by industry and by other groups external to the university, and initiatives thatrequire institutional support. Not surprisingly, successful projects draw support from several ofthese groups. Major stakeholders who can affect graduate education at an individual institutioninclude individual graduate students, student organizations, and supportive corporate sponsors.Major stakeholders who could help with institutionalization include not only university andcollege administrators and engineering faculty but also government and nongovernmentalorganizations, as well as corporate sponsors. Our goal in this session is to offer specificexamples of
bioengineering research and in more recent years has turned his attention to engineering education research. He is the P.I. of the GK-12 project to which this paper relates. He is the inaugural recipient of the Bernard Gordon Prize from the National Academy of Engineering as well as many other honors.Adam Fontecchio, Drexel University Page 13.319.1 Adam K. Fontecchio received his B.A. in Physics in 1996, his M. Sc. in physics in 1998, and his Ph. D. in Physics in 2002, all from Brown University. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and an Affiliated
Florida Gulf Coast University. He received his Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from Kansas State University in 1993, M.S. degrees in Structural and Geotechnical Engineering from Stanford University in 1984, and a Bachelor of Science from the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1975. He served in the Army Corps of Engineers for 23 years and retired as a Lieutenant Colonel. Dr. O'Neill has been active as a Senior Mentor and instructor in Project ExCEEd for the American Society for Civil Engineering. Page 13.1376.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Utilizing the
, it is important for adepartment to identify why they have introduced or are teaching such a freshman courseand whether (via specific assessment) the goals and objectives of the class are being met,from both the faculty and student standpoint.In the rest of this section, we briefly highlight (as a resource) some of the novel workavailable on freshman courses in chemical engineering.Some best practices that we have used (or discovered) for this course are: • The use of freshman design projects: o Design and economic analysis of a controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer plant5 o Design, build, and test an evaporative cooler6 o Design and build a pilot-scale water treatment plant7 o Analyze and
used to deliver the Power Pointpresentation and annotations for Fluid Mechanics. With both software applications, thepresentations were projected onto a large screen at both sites allowing students to see all noteswritten by the professor while listening to the lecture. The ability to write on the TabletPC wascritical for these instruction applications.Two additional courses, a junior level instrumentation laboratory course and EngineeringManagement, were taught by one of the resident professors. The junior Mechanical Engineeringlab course (taken by all junior mechanical engineers) made use of equipment brought fromGrove City College as well as available through labs at the University of Nantes. TheEngineering Management course incorporated
following pivotal factors which impact a woman’s career and earning power:choice of field of study, family and career choices, and gender discrimination. The reportcorrelating with the table above, states that one method to increase the number of womeninterested in STEM fields is to promote careers for women in STEM fields in interesting ways;allowing them to see how they could have a positive impact on society through work as anengineer or scientist.11Research suggests that pre-college outreach is especially successful when participants are giventhe chance to recognize the relevance and importance of STEM-based academic studies using“real-life” engineering projects. Judith A. Ramaley, visiting senior scientist at the NationalAcademy of Science
AC 2008-1900: INCORPORATING AND ASSESSING ABET “SOFT SKILLS” INTHE TECHNICAL CURRICULUMTimothy Skvarenina, Purdue University Tim Skvarenina was born in Chicago, Illinois. He received the BSEE and MSEE degrees from the Illinois Institute of Technology and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Purdue University. During his college career he worked four summers at U.S. Steel as an assistant electrician, rewinding motors and installing electrical equipment. He served 21 years in the U.S. Air Force, including six years designing, constructing, and inspecting electric power distribution projects for a variety of facilities. He spent five years teaching and researching pulsed power systems
PowerPointpresentation includes explanations of the covered topics and only statements of the problems thatare going to be discussed during the lecture. When an example is reached, the Journal Viewer ofthe Tablet PC would be used to show step-by-step solution of the problem. The Journal Viewerfile will include the schematics of the example problem. Electronics Workbench is used forschematic drawings. A brief discussion of this approach and the advantages and disadvantagesof such a scheme will be presented.IntroductionElectronic projection usually in the form of PowerPoint slides that are shown to students whilethe instructor discusses the material on the slides is an increasingly common method forinstructors to present lecture material. However, this approach
and removed from its original tubular frame. A newmounting base was designed and fabricated, and it was then placed in my garage where it sat forabout 25 years as an unfinished project.The project was pursued though-out the years, but only in the planning stages and the collectionof additional surplus parts to be used in the system. The control system was designed and re-designed several times but physical work, in earnest, did not begin until late 2010. By Fall 2012the system was functional. Additional control elements and features were added periodicallysince the initial commissioning of the system.Students were first invited and attended a demonstration in the Spring of 2013. Thesedemonstrations continued through Fall of 2019. My hope is
, Samuel Ibekwe, and Guoqiang Li are professors in Mechanical Engineering Department atSouthern University, Baton Rouge. They are co-PIs on the DOE/NNSA sponsored project. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Education
changingthe values of individual variables by one unit will allow educators to determine the resultingvalue in intervention efforts. The most valuable variables for developing intervention programswill be those that are directly controllable and have the greatest impact on increasing theestimated probability of a STEM outcome.Bibliography[1] National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Graduate Students and Postdoctorates inScience and Engineering: Fall 2002, NSF 05-310, Project Officers: Julia D. Oliver and Emilda B. Rivers (Arlington,VA 2004). (available from NSF website http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf04318/ )[2] Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (CPST), data derived from the American Associationof
13.546.5References1. Bonnette, Roy. (2006). Out of the Classroom and into the Community: Service Learning Reinforces Classroom Instruction. The Technology Teacher, 65(5), 6-11.2. Bradford, M. (2005). Motivating Students Through Project-Based Service Learning. T H E Journal, 32(6), 29-30.3. Campus Compact (2001). Assessing service learning and civic engagement. Providence, RI: Brown University.4. Eyler, J., & Giles, D. (1999). Where’s the Learning in Service Learning? San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishing Company.5. Goetsch, D. L. (1992). Industrial Supervision: In the age of High Technology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.6. Kurt, M. (2001). Technology Education