student outcome were met, but were within 3% of beingunsatisfactory. Table 1: Assessment instruments used to assess student outcomes Assessment Instrument Student Outcomes Assessed a b c d e f g h i j k Homework Problems x x x x x x x Exams x x x x x Capstone Project Assessment x x Peer Evaluations x Video and Exam x Capstone Reports x x x x x
engagement through service learning and isunique in the degree to which the organization has been built and directed by student volunteers.For the last decade, students have been self-motivated to manage an organization thatcollaborates with primary schools in the Khwisero district of Western Kenya to develop waterand sanitation solutions. The continued success of the organization requires students to overcomethe difficulty of year-to-year continuity, develop skills to undertake complex problems, and workin an unfamiliar culture to implement projects. To address these challenges, students engagefaculty advisors, professionals (both in the US and Kenya), their peers, and Kenyan beneficiariesto generate solutions collectively. While in the United
design process that hasmilestones with deliverables associated with a Gantt chart and work breakdown structure. Theymust also develop an instructional lab with a series of questions that helps reinforce the theorytaught in the classroom. And finally, they are required to teach this lab to their peers. The designpremise/requirement for the capstone students is that they must incorporate at least three coreareas of the curriculum into their team project. This will provide future implementation of the labto different areas of study with the engineering technology programs. The areas of study for thislab apparatus in this paper include measurements and instrumentations with LabView, strengthof materials, heat transfer and material behavior. The
one project and the role of clientin another. As professional skills can be incorporated into in an existing course at many levels, and ways,we conducted through literature survey to identify these different ways. As each institutiondevelops their own set of mechanisms, we did not simply adopt another’s mechanism butdeveloped our own implementations of instruction delivery and assessment tools based on ourown programs need. In the initial draft we identify the instruction delivery methods and studentassignments to incorporate different ABET outcomes: semester long group project, series of oralpresentations, enterprise architecture and project management case research, writing technicalreport, conducting research and discussion on ethics and
required to teach this lab to their peers. The designpremise/requirement for the capstone students is that they must incorporate at least three coreareas of the curriculum into their team project. This will provide future implementation of the labto different areas of study with the engineering technology programs. The areas of study for thislab apparatus in this paper include measurements and instrumentations with LabView, strengthof materials, heat transfer and material behavior. The assessment included in the final paper istwofold. The capstone students are assessed in the area of retention of fundamental coreknowledge upon graduation. The assessment tool was a comprehensive exam similar to theFundamentals of Engineering exam. Undergraduate
associated with a Gantt chart and work breakdown structure. Theymust also develop an instructional lab with a series of questions that helps reinforce the theorytaught in the classroom. And finally, they are required to teach this lab to their peers. The designpremise/requirement for the capstone students is that they must incorporate at least three coreareas of the curriculum into their team project. This will provide future implementation of the labto different areas of study with the engineering technology programs. The areas of study for thislab apparatus in this paper include measurements and instrumentations with LabView, strengthof materials, heat transfer and material behavior. The assessment included in the final paper istwofold. The
communication via the social web include collaboration,searching for relevant content, documenting original materials, promoting one’s work, buildingpeer networks, extracting and organizing information, and conducting peer reviews.4,5 Scientificand professional communication online supports diversity in the sciences and engineering. Itprovides a platform for role models from diverse backgrounds to connect with new scientists andengineers.6 Online scientific communication also allows individuals in specialized areasdispersed over a wide geographic area to easily communicate as a discipline in a designatedvirtual environment.4 It gives a venue for identifying and/or purchasing parts, information onuser opinions or demographic information, and competitor
faculty, and the survey completed by the graduating students in thisrespect. This serves as a tool for measuring the accomplishment of ABET requirements. Theresults also give some feedback for possible improvement in future.The Capstone Design course also serves to prepare the students to succeed as entry-levelengineers in industry, by acquiring technical design experience for appropriate careers. Thestudents are required to make several oral presentations with audio-visual aids (usingPowerPoint) about their project in front of the faculty and peers, during the semester. AProject Oral Presentation Evaluation Form has been developed which is completed by thefaculty and peers during each presentation. The results are compiled and analyzed. The
AC 2012-3170: I2D2: IMAGINATION, INNOVATION, DISCOVERY, ANDDESIGNDr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Kerry L. Meyers is a Professional Faculty member in the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame, is an instructor and coordinator in the First-year Engineering program and is also involved with students at a variety of levels including a graduate student teaching apprentice program, an undergraduate peer mentoring program, and STEM outreach). She has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Purdue University, M.S. in mechanical engineering from Oakland University, and completed her Ph.D. in engi- neering education at Purdue University. Meyers has several years of industrial experience in automotive
difficulty byattending SI sessions, going to the library and working with classmates. Online courseswere a problem for freshmen as well. A student revealed that he was not ready for thatkind of classes which puts more responsibility to check homework and due dates onlinewithout having someone reminding him about the class duties.Socially, students from the three groups agreed that distractions and peer pressure weredifficult things to handle in freshman year. Students came to college, lived withroommates, and had no curfews as they used to have in high school. It was hard to takethe full responsibility to avoid these distractions and maintain academic success. Astudent from the second group stated that the whole new teaching environment whileanother
researcher’s judgment that a rater possesses bothknowledge of the domain and “familiarity with the kinds of creative products typically producedby the kinds of subjects in the study” 16. In recent years researchers have looked at comparisonsof novice and expert judgments. At least three categories of raters stand to provide valuableassessment data for engineering design education: self-evaluations conducted by students; peer-evaluations conducted by students enrolled in the same or similar courses; and adult ratingsconducted by raters with experience in the domain 17, 18. Across a range of domains, preliminarybut significant correlations have been seen between peer evaluations or otherwise non-expert, butsomewhat experienced, raters and those made by
in 2007 (i.e., theprogram was conceived in 2006, and the first cohort began in 2007). The students represent across-section of two technology and five engineering majors. Participants choose a studentorganization in the College of Engineering (e.g., Society of Women in Engineering) in whichthey would like to lead. A student then has their peers assess their leadership effectivenessthrough the results of the organization’s projects. This information is then recorded in the LDP’sX-matrix.The LDP has used the X-matrix over the past three years and the results illustrate a progressiveimprovement in the overall efficacy of the program each year. The quantitative resultsdemonstrate that students are improving their engineering leadership skills as
students form studyteams that they use for other courses. As with the dormitory experience, many of the design/study teams formed inthe freshmen year have persisted into the present junior class.III. Classroom EnvironmentThe College’s freshmen engineering courses have been redesigned to employ a strong, interactive learningcomponent. On average, about a third of the allotted class time is spent on lecture. The remaining time is spent insome form of ‘hands-on’ learning activity that involves laboratory-type activities with a LEGO-DACTA kit ordesign/analysis work on a computer (such as working on engineering graphics problems, writing reports, creatingpresentations, participating in classroom discussions, performing engineering design work). Also
learning contribute more thananything else to measurable student success. Involvement with campus communitiescorrelates with student success. This has led us to consider ways we can make ourengineering physics courses, which begin during the critical freshman year, anenvironment where students can become more involved with the material, their peers, andtheir instructors.I. Project StatusSCALE-UP is an extension of the highly successful IMPEC6, 11 project (Integrated Math,Physics, Engineering, and Chemistry), one of NC State’s curricular reform effortsundertaken as part of the SUCCEED coalition. We are in the third year of an effort tomake large enrollment calculus-based introductory physics courses more effective. Therehave been three phases to
Session 2793 Successfully Applying the Supplemental Instruction Model to Sophomore-level Engineering Courses Catherine Blat, Stephen Myers, Kathleen Nunnally, and Patricia Tolley University of North Carolina at CharlotteAbstractSupplemental Instruction (SI) is a non-remedial program that utilizes peer-assisted review sessionsand targets historically difficult academic courses. Although SI has been used nationally fordecades, there is very little literature on its application in engineering courses. There iswidespread evidence of its use in non-engineering and pre-engineering courses
, and data collection and analysis. The students ultimately develop their confidencein problem solving and design skills using a balsa wood bridge design project. The skills, tools,and techniques developed during the semester in class and in laboratories are applied to thedesign and construction of the bridge. Students, operating in teams of three to five, also learn towork with their peers. The teams are given a Request for Proposals (RFP) and allowed toexercise creativity within the scope of the RFP. Students progress through the design process(concept, preliminary, and final phases) using both written and oral communication. The finalgrade of the design process is based on their prototype and on written and oral presentations. Atthe
for engineers entering the workforce. Therefore, to introduce students in civiland environmental engineering to these components as early as possible in the program, the CEEDepartment developed a freshman level introductory civil engineering class entitled“Introduction to Civil Engineering and Computer Fundamentals”. 2 3 The primary objectives ofthis course are (1) to provide students with a technical background in computer use, (2) tointroduce students to the technical fundamentals of the various disciplines in civil andenvironmental engineering, and (3) to provide students with written and oral communicationskills that will better prepare them for giving presentations and writing professional reports. Anumber of studies have shown that
significantly inspired by the T4E teaching model, which was developed at theUSMA and at whose NSF-sponsored short course the author attended.Student data both before and after the implementation are included along with faculty assessments. Comments fromother assistant professors who have implemented various aspects of the model are also included as are the author'sanecdotes. In the three semesters of implementation, the author has observed improved student performance asmeasured by written exams in addition to positive student and peer evaluations.1. IntroductionOne challenge faced by the author since entering the engineering education profession has beenlearning how to use the lesson time as a catalyst for student learning rather than simply a time
Let’s Get Students More Involved! -- Experiences from the Collaboration between the IEEE University Partnership Program and Chinese LibrariesAbstractInvolving students is not uncommon in university libraries. Students can greatly reducelibrarians’ workload, provide peer reference services, and change the image of librarians to thepublic. With the prevalence of e-resources, more users choose to work from their ownworkplaces and reduce their visits to physical libraries. To understand actual needs of end usersand offer better services in this digital era, it is very important for librarians to reach out tostudents and work with them closely in their routine work. However, it is quite challenging toidentify student
teaches graduate-level engineering communication courses. Her research involves engineering commu- nication, technical communication pedagogy, and knowledge transfer. She has published and presented widely including work in the Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of STEM Education: Innova- tions and Research, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, the Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Technical Communication and Technical Communication Quarterly. Julie has a PhD in Rhetoric and Professional Communication from New Mexico State University, an MA in English with Technical Writing Emphasis from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, and a BA in English from Elon University.Dr
assignment where students write problems and use some in future semestersObscure the source of the exercise and/or solution by: taking problems from other textbooks Page 24.681.5 rewording questions making them harder to find with a text search changing the names of people/organizations in problems never distributing solutions with problem statements and not including the semester/year on problem/answer sheetsUse newer pedagogies which promote learning through an avenue other than homework Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Team-Based Learning (TBL) Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Peer-Led Team
on the needs of the particular project. Most projects are externally sponsored, eitherby local industry or government agencies. Students also have the opportunity to propose theirown entrepreneurial clinic projects, and have them funded by the college, through the RowanVenture Capital Fund, which was created with the support of National Collegiate Innovators andInventors Alliance (NCIIA) grants and private donors.This paper focuses upon the Sophomore Engineering Clinic.Sophomore Engineering Clinic I and IIThe goals of the Sophomore Engineering Clinic consist of teaching engineering design principlesand technical communication (technical writing in the fall, public speaking in the spring). TheSophomore Engineering Clinics are integrated
their research. Also included are literature research techniques, methods for acquiring off-site material, and strategies for pursuing their research interests once the students leave this program and return to their classrooms. The workshop is conducted in a PC-Lab and the participants are actively engaged in first-hand experience in using the search engines for their literature search. 2. Communicating Science Effectively Workshop. Is held in the first week and consists of three components: “Writing Science,” which will support trainee co-authorship of research results; “Speaking Science,” a means to prepare undergraduate trainees for effective slide presentations; and “Presenting and
BB CPS PP MATLAB 1. Prior experience in-class -0.21 0.36 -0.07 0.29 2. Prior experience out-of-class -0.15 -0.29 -0.29 0.14 3. Prior comfort 0.21 0.21 0.14 -0.21 4. Communication with instructors 0.07 -0.21 0.50 0.14 5. Communication with peers -0.64 0.29 0.36 0.86 6. On-going feedback 0.86 0.00 -0.57 0.14 7. Reviewing course material outside of class
informal peer mentoring network structure as there was no formal mentoringprogram in place at the department level. Zoe shared one of her peer mentoring episodes, when my tenure stuff was official, I just did an open invite at a coffee shop away from campus, so it was kind of in a protected place, and I said, “Anybody who wants to come and talk to me, you can ask me anything you want about my process and my experience,” and I gave them a copy of my stuff, and pretty much all the assistant professors showed up. It ended up being like a two-and-a-half-hour-long discussion.In addition, Zoe and a couple of other untenured faculty members engaged in peer mentoringduring their writing sessions at a local coffee shop (see Figure
with the lowest rate of degree earners with adisability was engineering (8.2%) [14]. Additionally, the National Science Foundation [15]reports that disabled scholars receive less funding and had lower employment rates than theirnon-disabled peers, and the National Institute of Health (NIH) [16] found that the percentage ofdisabled people in professional STEM fields grew only 3% (from 6% to 9%) between 1999 and2019, but that the number of people in STEM fields overall increased approximately 79% since1990 [17]. Poignantly, research has also shown that there is a significant disparity betweendisabled STEM students who have dominant identities and those who have what are consideredmultiply-minoritized identities, particularly feminine presenting
turbomachinery instabilities, for which he received NASA Performance Cash awards. Dr. Richard is involved in tutoring, mentoring, and outreach and teaches first-year introductory engineering, fluid mechanics, and space plasma propulsion. He has authored/co-authored 45+ peer-reviewed journal and conference papers.Janie M Moore (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress of an initial phase of a research study of data on student performance impacted from modifying a first-year/semester engineering core course during a global pandemic
and his B.S. in chemical engineering with honors from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Han has over 25 years of experience in electronic and pho- tonic materials engineering and fabrication. His current research topics include (1) writable/rewritable quantum structures by stress patterning; (2) low-cost, crack-tolerant, advanced metallization for solar cell durability; (3) thin film processing and nanoscale surface corrugation for enhanced light trapping for pho- tovoltaic devices; and (4) microsphere-based manufacturable coatings for radiative cooling. He has close to 70 publications in peer-reviewed journals and over 200 invited/contributed papers at academic insti- tutions, national laboratories
thiscourse was modified in 2014 from its original lecture-centered format to include group problemsolving coupled with kinesthetic, hands-on, discovery based activities. This unique combinationof active learning principles was hypothesized to increase conceptual understanding and studentconfidence in their biomechanics and problem solving skills.BackgroundStructured, active, in-class learning (SAIL) is a term used to describe classroom education withan emphasis on learning-by-doing. Class time is built around a variety of student-centeredactivities with clear educational goals meant to engage students in the learning process.Activities are often performed in groups further enhancing the learning environment byproviding opportunities for peer
: Effects calculation and risk analysis” published by CRC Press) and more than 20 papers in international peer-reviewed journals.Ms. Raelene Dufresne, Texas A&M University - Qatar Ms. Dufresne is an educator with 20 years experience in both secondary and tertiary educational insti- tutions in North America and abroad, teaching students from all over the world. A proponent of using technology in the classroom, she currently flips her classes using videos and interactive learning activities to improve student understanding, as well as to level the playing field for her freshmen mathematics- for-engineers classes at an overseas branch campus of Texas A&M University. Notably, her secondary students at the American