out, there is a dearth of research conducted on programs designed to not only retain, but aidin the retention and success of these students.The course at the Wright State University called Preparatory Math for Engineering (EGR1980)has been run since 2008, with the latest iterations being implemented in 2012. Students that placeinto either developmental math or college algebra are enrolled in the course. Many of theseplacements, however, are below where the student should be placed based on previously completedcoursework. However, these students have scored a 24 or lower on the ACT math test, or havetaken the university math placement exam and been placed at this level based on that score. Figure 1. Highest math course enrolled in three
implementation ofthe proposed procedure was statistically significantly higher than the exam average score in thesections without the implementation of the procedure. A survey was conducted in the classesregarding the proposed procedure. The feedback information from the survey was very positive.This paper will also present these results of the data analysis of the student survey.1. IntroductionFor a mechanical engineering program, one of the main learning outcomes is that students candesign machine components. To design a safe component, students are required to apply theappropriate failure theories to evaluate the factor of safety at possible weak points. In order toapply failure theories for evaluating the factor of safety, students must know the
Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) program isunlike any other national initiative focused on undergraduate STEM education. In addition toproviding schools with resources to incite “revolutionary” change within engineering orcomputer science departments, RED teams are expected to serve as national models foraddressing systemic issues and instigating sustainable change in engineering and computerscience education. The RED program’s portfolio currently includes two cohorts composingthirteen geographically-dispersed teams using unique change strategies to address localchallenges shaped by institution-specific factors.1 Figure 1. Geographic Distribution of RED Teams in 2015 & 2016 CohortsThe RED Consortium’s
undergraduate research projects related to greentechnologies for the entire duration of this partnership. Our college made a commitment to 1) encourage our STEM faculty to attend Re-Energize professional development opportunities to learn and include green energy educational modules into our STEM curriculum; 2) seek space to establish a "start-up green lab" on our campus with Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program pass through funding from the four-year institution so that faculty can conduct classroom demonstrations and our students can perform undergraduate research. This initiative is meant to diversify and continue our undergraduate research program as we include our William R. Sinkin Eco Centro
metals and piping industry as a principal engineer have allowed me to promote necessary skills which need to be developed in the classroom so that the students have success upon graduation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Retention and Usefulness of Concept Maps as Advance Organizers1. Introduction:A concept map is a type of node-link diagram designed to show the interconnected knowledgestructures that a person possesses in a particular subject area [1]. The diagram consists of nodes,representing key concepts in the given subject area, and links representing key relationshipsbetween those concepts. An example of a concept map of engineering structures can be seen inFigure 1 below
orientation, resource management, and academic performance. Additionally, many STEMscholars expressed interest in participating in future mentoring programs. The success of thementoring program, coupled with Learning Center initiatives and support from the NSF STEMclub, enhances the STEM experience of women and underrepresented population at Penn StateHarrisburg.1. IntroductionPenn State University at Harrisburg (PSH) is an undergraduate/graduate university that enrollsapproximately 5000 students, made up of 10% Asian, 12% Black/African-American, 7%Hispanic/Latino/Latina, 66% White, 3% Multi-race, and 2% other, with approximately 40%women and 60% men. STEM faculty member at this university received an NSF grant to aid inincreasing both enrollment and
level programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Role of Engineering Identity in Doctoral-Level Engineering Students’ ExperiencesIntroductionThis research paper explores the role of engineering identity in graduate student success. Identityand belonging have been consistently linked to student success and retention in engineering, butthe majority of studies focus on undergraduate students 1–3. Graduate school presents uniquechallenges to students’ development of engineering identities and is both a key element of theSTEM pipeline and a point at which many students leave academia 4. To improve retentionamong engineering doctoral students (EDS), this paper
government have called for increasingthe enrollment of women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) as lessthan 20 percent of those earning bachelor’s degrees in engineering are women 1. According tothe Congressional Joint Economic Committee, about 14 percent of practicing engineers arewomen 2. Multiple organizations and governmental agencies have invested in STEM educationprograms to research the gender disparity. Possible reasons that have been raised regarding lowfemale and minority engineering rates include misconceptions of what engineers do 3, lack ofrole models in engineering 4, and a shortage of engineering experiences for girls in earlyeducation 5. In spite of informal STEM programs out of the classroom, there has been
al., 2015) and research onstudents’ innovation and entrepreneurial skills (Duval-Couetil & Dyrenfurth, 2012; Dyer,Gregersen, & Christensen, 2011). In this study, we ask who are the entrepreneurs of tomorrow,what motivates them, and what learning experiences influence their career pathways.2.0 Starter or Joiner?An aim of this study is to understand students’ entrepreneurial intent, specifically asking Howvaried are entrepreneurial career goals among today’s undergraduate engineering students?(RQ 1)We begin by considering what entrepreneurial intent is. There exist many definitions ofentrepreneurship, such as the activity of starting a business, taking on risk in the hope of profit,or the discipline of managing innovation in the
Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML). The paperreviews relevant EML learning objectives and how these can be addressed through use of aMaker Lab in the context of a product innovation course, a single course-based learning module,and extracurricular activities.IntroductionThe Maker Movement is taking the country by storm. From the emergence of educational andcommunity makerspaces to the programs spawned by the White House’s annual National Day ofMaking, the Maker Movement is generating enormous excitement in hands-on creation and isstimulating interest in innovation and entrepreneurial activities. THE MAKER Movement Fig. 1: The Maker Movement
, statics and stress, filtration and chemical precipitation, and soon). These engineering concepts are not abstracted from social, political, and economicconsiderations. Rather, engineering is imbued with social context. The RPG offers studentsopportunities to reflect on economic, geographical, economic, and philosophical issues whilelearning the technical skills they need to make informed decisions to address the needs of arapidly expanding population.Introduction and Statement of the ProblemIn 1945, when the French mathematician Jacques Hadamard sought to uncover the thoughtprocesses of mathematicians, he approached Albert Einstein, who suggested that “combinatoryplay seems to be the essential feature in productive thought.”1 For many years
graduation. In addition,the IEI, aligned with the college’s funding priorities for years 2013-2018, contributes to increasethe college global presence by increasing graduate international enrollment, increasing researchrelated activities and support with international partners, expanding international partnerships,and strengthening academic quality and reputation. To support the IEI, the college developed astrategic plan for years 2013-2018. The plan included a budget increase from $100,000 to$800,000 per year for the international programs office to invest in office staff and operations.New priorities for 2013-2018 consisted in 1) the refocusing on academic cost neutral offeringsabroad after identifying the need to create more internships, research
children’s early exposure to science at the middle and even earlier grades (Tai etal, 2006). The concept of elementary school career education has gained momentum in recent 5years. According to Ediger (2000), “the elementary school years are not too early to begin toachieve a vision of what one desires to do in life contributing to the world of work” (p.1). Community partnerships are mentioned by career education experts as one of the “tools”that can increase students’ awareness of their own interests and help them learn about a widevariety of occupations (Hogan, 1995). Furthermore, research on cultural-historical factors andtheir influence on Latino student educational success points to
result demonstrated that there was a strongcorrelation between the scores of the two sections on conceptual questions and problem solving.IntroductionEngineering Thermodynamics is a very challenging course to many students, since this courserequires a new approach in solving problems. Beginning from their first physics course, studentsare used to solving problems with equations. However, most of the working substances inengineering applications are not ideal gases, and they cannot be described by equations. Instead,students have to rely on the data tables to find the solutions [1]. Furthermore, this courseintroduces many new concepts, which cannot be well understood without reflecting on themwhen working on the exercise problems. Unfortunately
assessment) a final writing assignment. So we haveboth qualitative and quantitative assessments.[1] Pre/Post SurveyBecause one of our design projects linked our students with the students from one of TaylorAllen’s classes at Oberlin College, we decided to use the same three pre and post-course surveysthat he had chosen. They were: 1. The Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry Questionnaire (SUSSI) (Liang et al, 2008). We administered the eight survey questions from the two parts on "social and cultural influence on science" and "imagination and creativity in scientific investigations." 2. The Views on Science-Technology Society Questionnaire (VOSTS) (Aikenhead and Ryan, 1992). We administered five
imperative that the apparatus that held the probe be able toautomatically adjust the probe’s altitude as it traversed the changing contours of the abdomenwhile capturing 2D ultrasound images. It was also crucial that the system continuously align theprobe in a perpendicular fashion with the abdomen’s surface to ensure maximum contact whichyields minimal signal attenuation. Fig 1. 3D components created via CADThe prototype is shown in Figure 1 and final assembly in Figure 2. The probe is firmly heldinside the probe holder (blue part) and the holder is free to move freely inside its housing (redpart). The green part is attached to the middle shaft of an X-Y plotter. The holder is attached tothe arch, which is itself
beadapted to meet the unique characteristics and motivations of students enrolled in AE or BEdegree programs. For example, course instructors can connect theoretical course content to real-world examples. Meeting the challenges of a growing world population will require broadeningparticipation in agriculture and biological engineering. Promoting the potential of these fields tosolve real-world challenges related to food, water, energy and healthcare will help inspire thenext generation of agricultural and biological engineers to meet these needs.IntroductionThe fields of agricultural and biological engineering represent a distinct facet of engineeringapplied to living things (1). Growing from agricultural engineering in the early 1900s, programsnow
indicators.IntroductionPreparing Future Faculty (PFF) Programs were established in 1993, in partnership with theCouncil of Graduate Schools (CGS) and the Association of American Colleges and Universities(AAC&U) [1], with the basic premise that participation in program initiatives would produceassistant professors who are better prepared for their faculty roles than their non-participatorycounterparts. Specifically, as with many future faculty development programs, it sought “threetransformative outcomes: (a) [to improve] the quality of undergraduate education by enhancingthe pedagogical skills of program participants; (b) [to provide] training to doctoral students thatbetter reflect[ed] the full range of faculty responsibilities; and (c) [to change] the culture
hardware. For the Fall 2015semester, the class was transformed to utilize microprocessors and focus on hardware limitations.The transformation was done for primarily two reasons. 1) To advance the course’s curriculum.2) Improve student retention.Every day we interact with and are surrounded by embedded systems. From cars to microwaves,they have become an integral part of everyday life. It’s no surprise then that the area ofembedded system design has grown tremendously in the past few years [1]. More graduates areworking with microprocessors as a result of the growing embedded systems field and wouldbenefit from working with them and coding during their undergraduate coursework. Therefore, itwas decided that the courses’ new focus would be centered
University, Erie, PA(8/12 - 8/14) Associate Professor, Engineering Tech. Department Com. College of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, PA (8/10 - 8/12) Visiting Research Assistant Professor, Research on concrete structures retrofitting, Univer- sity of Pittsburgh, PA, USA (1/12 - 8/12) Part Time Professor, Research Assistant, Teaching Assistant, University of Ottawa, Canada (1/04 - 8/10) Part-Time Lecturer, University of Water and power technology, Tehran, Iran (8/99 - 8/01) Engineering Experience Consulting engineer, Structural, concrete & Geotechnical, Achievement Eng. Corp., CA (PT 04/10- Current) Professional Structural Building Design, in collaboration with R. Muhammad, Tallahassee, FL (PT Since 9/15) Project
of use tostudents themselves, helping them see the variety of ways that engineering studentspursue and consider job options.IntroductionIt is widely recognized that a strong engineering workforce is needed to tackle the grandchallenges facing our world today.1 And it has been the focus of much investigation toidentify innovative strategies for engineering education to ensure ‘that the U. S.engineering profession has the right people with the right talent for a global society’.2 Tothat end, since 2007 there has been a continual annual trend of increasing numbers ofengineering graduates, with around 107,000 students graduating with engineering degrees 1 in
other” [1], or for this paper the “ringer” based on self-reported prior learning. The ringer is intended to support the team through early programmingchallenges. In addition to the professor and teaching assistants, having a peer mentor can yieldhigher satisfaction and confidence in learners [2]. Our analysis evaluates learning outcomes asstudent progress through the term, comparing performance based on the performance and priorknowledge reported by the ringer. The major research questions investigate the role of the ringerin the success of the team, as well looking to see if teams that include a low performing studenthave any common characteristics. Findings include data from 2013, 2014, and 2015 with trendsapparent in each of the years across
awareness, entrepreneurialthinking, and creativity.” Second, in spite of the rich theoretical and practical accomplishments in thefields of engineering education and entrepreneurial ecosystem theory, few studies have attempted tocombine the insights from both fields of study. This paper makes a novel contribution by bringingtogether literatures in engineering education and entrepreneurial ecosystem.This paper begins with clearly defining and delineating entrepreneurship education and its objectivesin Chinese universities, identifying three major models of entrepreneurship education: 1) specializededucation model; 2) program-driven model; and 3) whole process engagement model. Next, usingsemi-structured interview and structured case study methods
science and engineering in a variety of contexts, both in and out of school.Participation in informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) activities,along with interest in STEM subjects, is associated with interest in STEM careers when studentsreach the university level [1]. Out-of-school, informal learning can occur at a variety of sites,including everyday experiences; designed sites such as museums, nature preserves, and libraries;and structured programs such as after-school activities and summer camps [2]. This paperdescribes the programming provided at one academic library to a STEM summer camp formiddle schoolers [3] and explores the opportunities and challenges of this kind of programmingin an academic library.STEM
by the many activities that emphasize its creative and experiential aspects,often in the form of action verbs. In a 2014 interview with Phil Larson of the White HouseOffice of Science and Technology, Maker Media CEO Dale Dougherty loosely defined Makingas “creating, producing, crafting, shaping, tinkering, composing, and building” (p. 1). In a surveyof Makers at the 2012 World Maker Faire in New York City, Lande, Jordan and Nelson notedthe most frequent verbs used to define Making were “making,” “doing,” and “creating” (2013).Anderson (2012) asserted that everyone is a Maker, noting activities including gardening,cooking, and scrapbooking. By conducting a thorough review of recent literature on the subject,Martin created a working definition
diversity in engineeringstudents by focusing not on outward or non-visible social groups but students’ underlying attitudes,beliefs, and mindsets and then examine how demographic backgrounds might be an underlyingcause for the manifested attitudes and beliefs. Felder and Brent23 emphasize the need for this kindof understanding to support engineering students, “Students have different levels of motivation,different attitudes about teaching and learning, and different responses to classroom environmentsand instructional practices. The more thoroughly instructors understand the differences, the betterchance they have of meeting the diverse learning needs of all of their students” (p. 1).Latent diversity can provide a different way of examining how
within other courses.Those best suited are machine design, design for manufacture, or tooling design. For thecurriculum in question, the bulk of this material is covered within the context of a DFM class,MFGE 333. A follow-on class on Design of Tooling, MFGE 463 is used to further develop andhone these skills. Both are required courses in the curriculum.Figure 1 shows the content of this DFM class arranged pictorially and highlights the GD&Ttopics. The strategy adopted spreads these topics out over the duration of the term so that theyare presented concurrently with other DFM concepts. The course starts off with an introductionto DFA which motivates topics such as mechanical fits and finishes. Fits in turn bring out theconnection between
the regular classroom poses numerous problems, especially given the work andschool schedules as well as family responsibilities that many students have to juggle.A natural answer, especially for millennials who are constantly online, would seem to be to orga-nize such collaborative learning tasks online. And, indeed, there have been numerous attempts atdoing just this. But the results have been quite disappointing. Thus Cole’s 1 course on informationtechnology with 75 students in it was organized so that lectures were in alternate weeks, the otherweeks being intended for students to discover new material and post to the class wiki. Fully onequarter of the questions on the final exam were to be from the material that students posted
consultationsSince this list varies, many resources emphasize to candidates the importance of identifyingwritten and unwritten expectations for tenure at their institutions as soon as possible.1-4 Once acandidate has identified the criteria, Wankat and Oreovicz3 suggest creating a schedule fortechnical research and publishing over their entire probationary period. Candidates are alsoadvised to keep a record of activities to ensure nothing is missed in their portfolios.3PurposeDuring graduate school, I attended workshops for future faculty and compiled a reading list fornew faculty. When I started my tenure-track position, I had a little bit of time to look at a fewpages of the book on my reading list. I also consulted mentors about advice on how to get off
support the fledgling startups http://business.fullerton.edu/centers/cfe/StartupIncubator.htm Jackson is co-principal investigator for a National Science Foundation Grant called I-TEST; this $1,000,000 grant has created an after-school program at Anaheim middle schools which encourages STEM ed- ucation and entrepreneurship. http://bizblogs.fullerton.edu/blog/2014/09/23/mihaylo-entrepreneurship- collaborates-to-win-1-million-nsf-grant/ As Center Director, Jackson conducts two all-college events: The Business Plan Competition and The CSUF Fast Pitch. Both events reach across the campus to engage students from all disciplines to idea- generate new business concepts, test feasibility, and pitch to a panel of real investors