level to increase the number of technical professionals are common in botheconomically developed and developing countries, particularly in engineering and computerscience.1According to a 2009 study of engineering faculty and students at the Universiti TeknologiPetronas (UTP), 90% of Malaysian women students (74% of the respondents to this survey wereMuslim Malays) believed that engineering is an appropriate career for women.7 Yet, only 20% ofthe male engineering students at UTP agreed that professional engineering is an appropriatecareer for women. The 587 study participants were primarily final year students; out of the 217female participants, the number of female participants who would give up engineering professionwas almost as many as those
resolutions, and discuss the coursemanagement using WebCT®.Course DescriptionThe Industrial Projects course represents the practical execution of the technological skills andknowledge the students have gained from all sources throughout their personal experience,college and professional careers. It is the capstone experience that requires both teamwork andindividual skills in solving an industrial problem. The students are taking the course during theirsenior year and only when they are prepared for it. Upon completion of this course, the studentwill be able to: 1) apply the principles and skills in solving a real-life industrial problem, 2)analyze an industrial problem by breaking it into component parts, each of which can be studiedseparately as
of their workand play an active role in directing it towards humane ends.” 11Subject Matter Professional ethics is a huge area for study, and instructors must make decisions about whatcomprises appropriate content matter within the realm of a technical course. The following isoffered as a starting point and is appropriate for lower division courses.Definition It’s difficult to discuss professional ethics without having a common definition to keep classdiscussions on track and to distinguish between personal and professional ethics. Brainstormingdefinitions is a useful in-class exercise, or an instructor may simply pluck one from a myriadversions. I tell my students to think of professional ethics as “codified behavior,” that is
integration of “business skills” throughout thecurriculum in the form of “just in time one unit modules” combined with a capstone experienceparticipating in the operation of a student run enterprise. Therefore, a graduate of theEntrepreneurial Program will receive a B.Sc. in engineering degree with the same total numberof credits as a student in the traditional path to a B.Sc. degree. The Entrepreneurial Programincludes an extensive multi-disciplinary design experience. Thus, the College of Engineering hasestablished a number of engineering/business entities, called Student Engineering Enterprises,where students form a “company” and work with other students, faculty, and industry partners tomanage a real company. The employees (students) solve real
with a series of tutorials and set-up instructions, they learn to reachout to peers and faculty members in addition to wiki instructions and videos. Students enterwith various levels of course and personal computing experience. Students learn and practicethese skills alongside supercomputing, benchmarking, architecture, and performance.Table 3: This table highlights the components of the research group intended to create asupportive community and broaden participation in the computer systems subfield ofcomputer science. Related Component Details
.” Students always show interest in things(proposals) that are related to personal benefits and/or career aspirations (i.e. what am I going todo with this?). Since most engineering curricula in the first 2 years are not necessarilyengineering or design based (ABET curriculum requirements call for one year combination ofbasic math and sciences plus a general education component), freshmen cornerstone classes suchas ours are a way to weave the larger story of being an engineer into the first year studentexperience and perhaps even help with learning gains (and motivation) in those courses.Teaching FrameworksA number of teaching frameworks for engineering courses have been described elsewhere16 andinclude: 1) Project-Based Learning (PBL)- projects
skills such as working in teams, writing,programming, applying physics to solve interdisciplinary problems, designing and developingproducts, managing complex projects, and working with clients. This is an important factorconsidering approximately 95% of physics graduates go on to careers in the private sector orgovernment labs, yet most undergraduate physics programs prepare students primarily foracademic careers. In fact, a survey of 1,407 mid-career physics PhD recipients found that theyfrequently attributed career success to their skills and abilities outside of physics (e.g.,interpersonal, problem solving, computing, and analysis skills). Conversely, some of the mostfrequently mentioned career barriers among 1,321 respondents included lack
presenting their inventions (flip chart and oral) to engineering faculty, technologytransfer faculty, parents and friends.While many of the programs described above focused on components of STEM, the EverydayEngineering program is unique as it focused on a diverse array of fields in engineering as theyrelate to all aspects of STEM including bioengineering, computer science, robotics, and electricalcircuits. Everyday Engineering was also unique in that the students were presented with thechallenge of designing an invention of their own making. Thus encouraging the students toexplore design topics most relevant to their own personal experience and fleshing out these ideasthrough team building, collaboration, and critique. Everyday Engineering engaged
program value to indicate the exceptional learningopportunities SA programs offer.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16A review of literature provides an array of assessment tools that may be used as a stand-alone orin concert with other tools (See Table 1). Each of these tools provides information that enablesresearchers and SA faculty to better determine how programs enhance student learning.The tools are designed to indicate competency development in students in areas such asincreased cultural understanding, improved communication skills, strengthened language ability,flexibility, and open-mindedness.2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 In addition, this skill development oftenresults in personal reflection and growth that changes students in terms of their
faculty members and encouraged them to leavefeedback in the form of specific comments tied to one of the program goals, student learningobjectives, or student proficiencies.This information was shared with the larger faculty of the department in November 2023 andtheir feedback was collected. The faculty members who participated with feedback providedinsightful comments and ideas that helped the committee integrate That feedback was reviewedand incorporated into the central document containing the program goals, student learningobjectives and student proficiencies, which is included as an appendix.Much work is still to be done on this project. The committee plans to complete the followingwork by April 2024: • Solicit feedback the department
be found in bringing in a new course into analready packed curriculum. A new course, IME540 Environmentally Conscious Designand Manufacturing, will be offered for both undergraduates and graduate students as anengineering elective across all disciplines in the university and will reside within theIndustrial & Manufacturing Engineering Department. In an attempt to reach as manystudents as possible, the course is being offered with minimal prerequisites and will beteam-taught by faculty from various disciplines including Business, Liberal Studies,Mechanical Engineering and Chemistry.The multidisciplinary faculty group will have completed two offerings of IME540 as asenior engineering elective course by the time this paper is presented at
undergraduate degree and this modeling would be showcased bythe diverse career pathways of the faculty body. After all, students came to Wake ForestUniversity to combine a traditional liberal arts education with the innovation of an engineeringdegree. Students wanted to use their engineering degree for both engineering and non-engineering pathways and diverse professional pathways. Students wanted a technicalengineering degree but had unique interests to combine general knowledge, engineeringdisciplinary knowledge, and professional knowledge. Faculty with both traditional academicjourneys and faculty with industry experience would need to be recruited and to be united arounda common vision, mission, and values of the new department. As will be visible
of this research project is to gain insights into learners’ motivation levels and how itevolves during the last two years in college, as well as to extend current Educational Data Miningresearch and Machine Learning analysis described in the literature. It is significant on two fronts:1) we will extend the ability of ML in analyzing reflective written artifacts to explore studentphysiological and emotional development; 2) the longitudinal study will help monitor theprogressive change of motivation in college students in a PBL environment.Preliminary results from an initial preliminary study are promising. By analyzing writtenreflection journal entries from previous students, the ML algorithm has differentiated keywordsinto three student
. Due to the complex and multidisciplinary nature of their projects, engineeringstudents must learn how to work effectively on a team, as the majority will be expected to workas part of a team after graduation. The projects that they will face during both their academic andpost-academic careers will involve problem-solving and critical thinking, and the unique skillsand perspectives of each team member are necessary to arrive at effective solutions. This paperintroduces a pedagogical boardgame aimed at simulating arguments within an engineeringexercise, as well as the study planned to track the changes.A diverse team has people with different backgrounds, experience, and ways of thinking. Thiscan lead to a wider range of perspectives and ideas
programmatic assessment. Consequently, there is only limited facultyinterest in NSSE results. Faculty members with an interest in student engagement are alreadyaware of the research and are more focused on programmatic assessment. Other facultymembers have simply not been given a logical cohesive argument based on the NSSE data. Asecond concern centers on the concept of attrition bias. As students drop out leaving a smallerpool of satisfied students, engagement scores increase in the junior and senior years, but thesesame students were also engaged in the first and second year. The real question is why weresome students engaged with the curriculum and others were not? Until there is a betterunderstanding of how engineering and science students learn
subjects in research: “the principle ofrespect for persons, beneficence and justice”. Miss Evers Boys raises issues about eachone of these principles. Therefore, we decided to use this movie as an introduction tothese ideas, which will be explored in more depth in the classroom as part of Bird’sresearch.Method In this first study a within subjects design was used to explore effects of using amovie to stimulate students’ noticing of relevant ethical issues raised during a movie.The participants in this study consisted of students (N= 5) from a 2nd-year undergraduatecourse on thermodynamics of biological systems. They must attend the movie as part oftheir participation grade (students must attend at least one of several
College offers multidisciplinary programs in the social sciences founded ona model of liberal education and designed to prepare students for law school, graduate study,decision-making roles in public and private enterprise. Students examine how public policyproblems are identified, analyzed, and resolved in the United States and globally.13Residential College in the Arts and HumanitiesThe Residential College in the Arts and Humanities (RCAH) is an interdisciplinary college forundergraduate students interested in the global connections between literature, history, ethics,culture, world languages, the visual and performing arts, and their own civic engagement in thesefields of work and study. Students, faculty, visitors, and staff are able to
byproviding an “artifact” for participating children to include in their career portfolios betweengrades 3-12. Developed in cooperation with school district administrators, Aspirations is ascaffold of programs strategically integrated throughout K-12 at the elementary, middle, andhigh school levels to support the awareness of, exploration of, and readiness for post-secondaryeducation and employment.Elementary - AwarenessAt the elementary level, Connected Classrooms introduces young children to a collegeenvironment by establishing partnerships between college-level and elementary schoolclassrooms. Lafayette College faculty partner with EASD elementary school faculty to determinehow their curricular activities align and how they can collaboratively
” during the core 3-hours withfaculty circulating between pods offering just-in-time desk crits or simply observing the interactions of theteam dynamics as decisions are being made. During the 1:35-2:30 time block, architecture and landscapearchitecture faculty members meet independently with their respective student cohorts. In 2021,architectural engineering instituted an “AE Huddle” after the core studio hour to address issues and providediscipline-specific feedback.4.5 Appropriate Project Selection Selecting an appropriate project is critical to the success of the studio due to the complex anddistinct expectations by each program and advising faculty. The faculty has found that a real projectprovides the necessary sense of purpose for
business environment and students need exposure to these team types as partof their education. Students in our programs should have an awareness of the types of teams andhow they function in an organization. Common team types found in the literature are: Functional teams perform specific functions in an organization. Sometimes they are called department teams. These teams have members from the same department or work area who meet regularly. Individuals relate to a specialty or focus he or she has mastered, with everyone working toward achieving goals outlined in the company’s mission statement. A manager holds the primary responsibility, with subordinates reporting to this person. Often, these are permanent
prepared candidates with greater potential for stable, long-term employment.Other benefits include:2. Priority access to engineering co-op students and graduates. IAC members get first access to a proprietary book of student resumes and, therefore, the first opportunity to hire co-op students and our graduates. In a tight job market this is an important advantage. Co- op placements are supervised by members of the York engineering faculty through on-site visits. This creates another powerful link between the participating companies and the engineering program. Page 6.465.7 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society
ILBs are centered on a body of work that is common to allthe FIGed courses, it allows faculty members to pursue the learning goals of integrationand critical thinking together. Students experience a learning situation that is notfragmented by discipline or course; their learning about the common work will employmultiple perspectives of the courses. It creates among the faculty, a community ofcommon learners, or students. When designing/establishing the activities to support the Page 5.316.3ILBs an essential component should not be overlooked: a main project [1]. Teams ofstudents will have to work on a project(s) and the projects should be structured
Paper ID #15031Creating International Experiences for First-Year Engineers Through theEWB Australia Challenge ProjectDr. Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University Tom Siller is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Col- orado State University. He has been a faculty member at CSU for 28 years.Mr. Alistair Cook, Colorado State University PhD Student in Education Sciences focusing on Engineering for Global Development as a context to teach engineering professional skills to undergraduate engineering studentsDr. Gearold R. Johnson, Colorado State University Gerry Johnson is a Senior
professionals avoid difficult yet necessary conversations, but this is a hugedisservice to their career growth. In this module we build on the effective and proven strategiesto having difficult, awkward, but crucial conversations within the ecosystem, whether that is toadvocate for an idea, to ask for resources or support, to clear up a misunderstanding, to buildtrust with peers or management or other similar scenarios. A sample scenario used in thistraining session is below. This scenario enables students to personalize their conversations, tobuild rapport and connect deeper with others rather than just mechanically go through themotions of conversation.Sample Scenario: We explored a sticky/awkward scenario where the engineer is the technicallead and
the advantage of doing so in thecontext of a global service learning program has been addressed by Shuman, Besterfield-Sacre & McGourty.6 Recent publications have reported on studies of portfolios used byundergraduate engineering students with regard to making personal sense of anddeveloping a professional identity for engineering as a career (Eliot & Turns7), whatconcepts students reveal about engineering as indicated by their written reflective entries(Dunsmore, Turns & Yellin8), and the development of self-awareness related to life-longlearning (Sattler, Kilgore & Turns9). Eris has proposed the portfolio as a way ofexternalizing the learning process of an engineering student, with the potential to promotedivergent inquiry
Education ’98 Conference Proceedings, November 1998, Tempe, Arizona, pp. 500-504. 31. Anderson-Rowland, Mary R., “Service Learning With Student Organizations,” Frontiers in Education ’95 Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, November 1995, pp. 4b3.8-4b3.10.BiographyMARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLANDMary R. Anderson-Rowland is the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the CEAS at ASU. The Society of WomenEngineers named her the Distinguished Engineering Educator for 2002. She has received diversity support awardsincluding the YWCA Tribute to Women 2001 Award (Scientist/Researcher) and the University Achievement inGender Equity Progress Award, Faculty Women’s Association, 1995. An ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speakeron the career
of which pinpoint writing deficiencies not technical deficiencies.Yes, these are one-on-one encounters with a graduate student and a faculty member and do notreflect the numbers of students in an undergraduate course, but they do reflect on particularcommunication issues that can be mentioned to undergraduates about their own writing. Studentslisten to their technical faculty and when one says that writing is important, it means a great dealmore than when an English teacher makes the same comment.This leads to the student response to an engineering faculty’s comments about a subjectseemingly outside the engineering focus. The student must be educated into understanding thatthere is no engineering without communication. The minute that they
industry projects class. This was run in an almost militaryfashion by a faculty member (since retired) with considerable industry experience who did notcare about student teaching evaluations, but who knew what students really needed to learn. Hisfavorite saying was: “an early stumble saves a later fall”. The personal qualities and charisma ofthe instructor, including sheer determination, industry connections, extensive time commitmentand constant supervision of the students all but guaranteed a successful outcome. For a numberof reasons, including the retirement of this faculty member, the course can no longer be taught inthis style.In the Mechanical Engineering class, each instructor would concoct a common “open-endeddesign” project to meet ABET
AC 2012-3524: THE UNWRITTEN SYLLABUSMr. Stanley M. Forman, Northeastern University Stanley Forman and Susan Freeman are members of Northeastern University’s Gateway Faculty, a group of teaching faculty expressly devoted to the First-year Engineering program at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational ex- perience that endorses the student-centered, professional and practice-oriented mission of Northeastern University.Dr. Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University Page 25.1350.1 c American Society for
engineers make, professional obligations, codes of ethicalconduct, and contemporary issues. This is followed by class discussions of real world casestudies applying this knowledge. Then two assessment methods are used to determine thestudents understanding of engineering ethics, an in-depth essay exploring two case studies and awritten examination evaluating four case studies. During the last academic year, over 200students from six classes have participated in this program. The results from the essays andexaminations indicate that students have a fundamental foundation, from which they can build abetter understanding, of how to handle real world ethical engineering challenges.IntroductionEngineers make numerous decisions every day that affect the