Board 139: Work in Progress: Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Renewal Process at a Ohio State University

Sandra Anstaett Metzler; Annie Abell

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Poster Session
Tagged Division: Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/46697

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Sandra Anstaett Metzler P.E. The Ohio State University

visit author page

Professor Sandra Anstaett Metzler received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University in 1983. Dr. Metzler received her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and her D.Sc. in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering from Washington University in St. Louis. Professor Metzler is a Professor of Practice in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at Ohio State University. She teaches and performs research in the areas of Mechatronics and Medical Device Design, as well as teaching a Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing technical elective. She has industry experience in medical device design and manufacturing, and currently performs technical analyses in forensic engineering applications and testifies as an expert witness. Dr. Metzler has been a registered Professional Engineer since 2007.

visit author page

biography

Annie Abell The Ohio State University

visit author page

Annie Abell is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State University in Columbus, OH. Annie earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from Valparaiso University and her MFA in Design Research & Development from Ohio State University. She teaches capstone design courses for mechanical engineering students, and a variety of product design elective courses for engineering students as well as for students of all majors at OSU. Annie’s current scholarship interests are focused on investigating the ways in which students approach open-ended, ill-structured, or ambiguous problems. Previously, Annie taught in Ohio State's Department of Design and Ohio State's First-Year Engineering Program, and has past experience working in prototyping labs. She currently serves as the Central-District representative on the IDSA Women in Design Committee, and is a general member of the American Society for Engineering Education.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Work in Progress: Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Renewal Process at a Large University

In late 2019, the Mechanical Engineering department at X University began a long-range initiative to redesign the undergraduate ME curriculum. The aim was to develop a new set of goals for the program independent from the current curriculum, with a focus on meeting the needs and challenges of modern students as they enter a constantly changing professional environment.

Following the best practices in instructional design and working with a professional from the University Teaching Center, the committee has employed the Backward Design Process (Understanding by Design, Wiggins and McTighe, 2005) to ensure that the focus was on student learning outcomes and proficiencies, rather than specific course content. To begin the curriculum redesign process, a retreat was held in December of 2019 to gather input from faculty and staff of the department, with a focus on the question “what do we want our students to be able to do, know, and care about after successfully completing the ME program?” The output of this retreat was six guiding “areas” that would guide a department committee in (eventually) redesigning the curriculum: Problem Solving; Communication; Professional Identity and Ethics; Teamwork, Leadership, and Inclusivity; Information Literacy, Judgement, and Critical Thinking; Character Traits and Self-Directed Learning.

As all readers will know, the Covid-19 pandemic ground many workplace plans and initiatives to a screeching halt. This curriculum renewal initiative of the mechanical engineering program at X University was no exception. Over the course of 2020-2022, slow progress was made on writing specific program goals to match each of the six guiding areas developed during the 2019 retreat. Next, progress was made on developing the student learning outcomes that would comprise each program goal. Starting in 2022, the curriculum committee was finally able to move the project off the back burner and work with more focus and purpose to flesh out the student proficiencies, which are the fine-grained skills that make up student learning objectives.

At present, the committee has developed the program goals, student learning objectives, and student proficiencies. These have been mapped to the ABET required student learning outcomes. This information has beenshared with the larger faculty of the department and feedback is being collected.

Much work is still to be done on this project. The committee plans to complete the following work by April 2024:

• Continuing to solicit feedback from faculty, the department external advisory board, current undergraduate students in the program, recent graduates of the program, and representative industry professionals who frequently hire entry-level mechanical engineers. • Determining which mechanical engineering topics should be core parts of the curriculum, and which topics might be more marginal. This will be determined by input from a variety of sources including: benchmarking of peer institutions, consulting with the core competencies represented on the FE exam, and by consulting with our department’s faculty interest groups (e.g., sub-groups of the faculty who share similar disciplinary interest and expertise) • Working with faculty interest groups to train all faculty members on the Backward Design Process, so that all faculty will be able to focus on curricular redesign without focusing on a given topic, class, or subject area.

Future work that the committee plans to embark on in fall of 2024 includes using the developed program goals, student learning objectives, and student proficiencies to develop the specific courses that will make up the new curriculum.

Citation
Format

Metzler, S. A., & Abell, A. (2024, June), Board 139: Work in Progress: Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Renewal Process at a Ohio State University Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/46697

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Work in Progress: Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Renewal Process at a Large University

In late 2019, the Mechanical Engineering department at X University began a long-range initiative to redesign the undergraduate ME curriculum. The aim was to develop a new set of goals for the program independent from the current curriculum, with a focus on meeting the needs and challenges of modern students as they enter a constantly changing professional environment.

Following the best practices in instructional design and working with a professional from the University Teaching Center, the committee has employed the Backward Design Process (Understanding by Design, Wiggins and McTighe, 2005) to ensure that the focus was on student learning outcomes and proficiencies, rather than specific course content. 
To begin the curriculum redesign process, a retreat was held in December of 2019 to gather input from faculty and staff of the department, with a focus on the question “what do we want our students to be able to do, know, and care about after successfully completing the ME program?” The output of this retreat was six guiding “areas” that would guide a department committee in (eventually) redesigning the curriculum: Problem Solving; Communication; Professional Identity and Ethics; Teamwork, Leadership, and Inclusivity; Information Literacy, Judgement, and Critical Thinking; Character Traits and Self-Directed Learning.

As all readers will know, the Covid-19 pandemic ground many workplace plans and initiatives to a screeching halt. This curriculum renewal initiative of the mechanical engineering program at X University was no exception. Over the course of 2020-2022, slow progress was made on writing specific program goals to match each of the six guiding areas developed during the 2019 retreat. Next, progress was made on developing the student learning outcomes that would comprise each program goal. Starting in 2022, the curriculum committee was finally able to move the project off the back burner and work with more focus and purpose to flesh out the student proficiencies, which are the fine-grained skills that make up student learning objectives.

 At present, the committee has developed the program goals, student learning objectives, and student proficiencies. These have been mapped  to the ABET required student learning outcomes. This information has beenshared  with the larger faculty of the department and  feedback is being collected. 

Much work is still to be done on this project. The committee plans to complete the following work by April 2024:

•	Continuing to solicit feedback from faculty, the department external advisory board, current undergraduate students in the program, recent graduates of the program, and representative industry professionals who frequently hire entry-level mechanical engineers.
•	Determining which mechanical engineering topics should be core parts of the curriculum, and which topics might be more marginal. This will be determined by input from a variety of sources including: benchmarking of peer institutions, consulting with the core competencies represented on the FE exam, and by consulting with our department’s faculty interest groups (e.g., sub-groups of the faculty who share similar disciplinary interest and expertise) 
•	Working with faculty interest groups to train all faculty members on the Backward Design Process, so that all faculty will be able to focus on curricular redesign without focusing on a given topic, class, or subject area. 

Future work that the committee plans to embark on in fall of 2024 includes using the developed program goals, student learning objectives, and student proficiencies to develop the specific courses that will make up the new curriculum.

AU  - Sandra Anstaett Metzler P.E.
AU  - Annie Abell
CY  - Portland, Oregon
DA  - 2024/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Board 139: Work in Progress: Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Renewal Process at a Ohio State University
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/46697
ER  -