Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Ron Eaglin; Z. Qu; Q. Zhang; P. Wahid; Issa Batarseh

, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 391-398, October 1998.[3] Oakley, Burks II, “A Virtual Classroom Approach to Teaching Circuit Analysis,” IEEETransactions on Education, vol. 39, no. 3, August 1996, pp. 287-296.[4] Wallace, D., and Weiner, S., “How Might Classroom Time Be Used Given WWW-basedLectures?” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, vol. 87, no. 3, July 1998.[5] A. McKenna and A. Agogino, "A Web-Based Instructional Module for Teaching Middle SchoolStudents Engineering Design With Simple Machines," Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol.87, No. 4, pp. 437-443, October 1998.[6] Webster, T., and Dee, K., “Supplemental Instruction Integrated into an Introductory EngineeringCourse,” Journal for Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 4, pp

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Andres; Marty Ferman

the ceiling. A landscape extension was constructed and the model was tested with a simulated SSE,S, and SSW flow. The flow for these orientations was observed with smoke. Again someoutflow occurred with the SSE flow while inflow occurred with the SSW flow, againdemonstrating that Easterly components produce inflow into the building and outflow throughthe roof opening while westerly components produce the reverse. Three effects are assumed toproduce the inflow when the wind has a westerly component: a. The blocking effect of the flame. b. The blocking effect of the roof wall along the front of the building, which was modeled as solid. c.The low pressure in the front of the building caused by the separation of

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Willam G. Curley; Sohail Anwar

. Anwar, S., and S.S. Anwar. 1999. “Training Partnership Between an International Labor Union and Academia: ACase Study.” ASEE 1999 Annual Conference Proceedings. CD Rom publication (session 3322)3. Gunter, B. H. .1996. “Making Training Work”. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.4. Ibid.SOHAIL ANWARSohail Anwar obtained a Ph.D. in Industrial and Vocational Education from the Pennsylvania State University inDecember 1995 and an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington in May1982. He completed additional graduate coursework in control theory and applied mathematical sciences at theUniversity of Texas at Arlington during 1982 – 1984. Since August 1992, Sohail has been working as an assistantprofessor of

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Sheila R. Curl; Leslie J. Reynolds; Brent Alan Mai; Alexius E. Smith

work“spaces” and facilities constructed in software. [S]pecial software structures [are] designed tosupport collaborative learning, including those meant to force active participation, and to allocateunique assignment topics, exam and gradebook facilities.”3 This sounds simple enough, butthere are many instructional challenges that are magnified in both course development andcourse delivery when teaching in the virtual classroom.Meeting the studentsDuring the first semester this course was offered, the students were asked to introducethemselves through email messages. No face-to-face meeting with the students was planned.However, during the first several weeks of the semester several students visited instructors’offices to express confusion

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Wesley P. Lipschultz; Jean Landa Pytel; Jayne Klenner-Moore

information about any major to help me decide. 7. I couldn’t decide whether I wanted to give up all the free time and fun that my friends in other majors enjoyed, and I was unsure that I could really make the necessary commitment.Practicing engineers were asked for the following information to discover how their choice ofmajor impacted their careers after graduation: • What are the primary entry-level positions after graduation which students in each major are most likely to get? • How likely were you to change positions within the same field, or how likely were you to change into different fields of engineering? • What types of problems did or do you solve in job(s)?The responses from the practicing engineers

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Bruce Segee; Michael D. Amos

web-based interface.Bibliography[Harris, 1999] G. Harris, “Neural network programming using rapid application development techniques:, SPIE Conference Proceedings, 1999.[Morrison, 1997] M. Morrison, “Using Microsoft Visual Interdev”, Que, Indianapolis, IN 1997.[Vaughn, 1998] W. Vaughn, “Hitchhiker’s Guide to Visual Basic and SQL Server”, Microsoft Press, Redmond Washington, 1998.[Welch-Allyn, 1999] Welch-Allyn Data Collection “Overview of Data Collection Technologies” http://dcd.welchallyn.com/techover/barcode.htm[Wynkoop, 1999] S. Wynkoop, “Using SQL Server 7.0”, Que, Indianapolis, IN, 1999.MICHAEL AMOSMichael D. Amos is

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Scott Danielson; Sudhir I. Mehta

. Hutchings, P., and Shulman, L. (1999). " The Scholarship of Teaching: New Elaborations and NewDevelopments," Change, Sept.Oct. 1999, p. 11-15.7. Johnson, David, Johnson, Roger, & Smith, Karl (1991). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom,Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.8. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). “Cooperative Learning returns to college: What evidence is therethat it works?” Change, July/August, p. 27 - 35.9. Lowman. J., (1985). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.10. Mazur, Eric (1997). Peer Instruction. Prentice Hall, NJ.11. Mehta, S., & Schlecht, N. (1998). “Computerized Assessment Technique for Large Classes,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 87, 2, p. 167

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Peter J. Graybash

traditional boundaries to create useful and meaningfulprograms with Continuing Professional Engineering Educators, both must be prepared to createan awareness of these external influences. It is expected that many of these elements do notalign with what adult educators emphasize in instructional design and delivery, suggesting amore holistic perspective on issues of program planning.Defining the decision-making profile of corporations and developing a strategy to address theprofile elements will go a long way to helping you seek the understanding you can take to yourprofessions and to those administrators and decision makers through your educational programs.Bibliography1. Queeney, Donna S. (1996). Continuing Professional Education. The ASTD Training

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Resit Unal; Derya Jacobs; Charles Keating; Paul Kauffmann; Abel Fernandez

. 1, 1994, pp. 41-50.5. Armacost, R. L., P. J. Componation, M. A. Mullins, and W. W. Swart. “An AHP Framework for Prioritizing Customer Page 5.539.7 Requirements in QFD: An Industrialized Housing Application.” IIE Transactions, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1994, pp. 72-79.6. Wasserman, G. S. “On How to Prioritize Design Requirements during the QFD Planning Process.” IIE Transactions, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1994, pp. 59-65.PAUL KAUFFMANNPaul J. Kauffmann is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Management at Old

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Sanjay P. Ahuja

", Proceedings of the ACM Computer Science Education Technical Symposium 1991, San Antonio, TX, SIGCSE Bulletin 23(1), pp. 25-34, March 1991.[3] Barnett, B. L. III, "A Visual Simulator for a Simple Machine and Assembly Language", SIGCSE Bulletin, 27(1), pp. 233-237.[4] "Major Applications of COMNET II.5, Network Analysis and Capacity Planning Through Simulation", CACI Products Company, pp. 22-23, August 1993.[5] Ahuja, S. P., "COMNET III: A Network Simulation Laboratory Environment For A Course In Communications Networks", Proceedings of the Frontiers In Education Conference (FIE 98), Tempe, AZ, November 1998.SANJAY P. AHUJASanjay P. Ahuja is an Associate Professor of Computer Science in the Department of

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Karl Smith

the activities, and the predecessors of each, i.e. theset of activities that must have terminated before an activity can begin. The following exampleillustrates the critical path method. Page 5.555.7 Table 1. Bus Shelter Construction Example Job Name Duration Resources Predecessor(s) 1 Shelter Slab 2 2 5 2 Shelter Walls 1 1 1 3 Shelter Roof 2 2 2,4 4 Roof Beam

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Jan Genzer; Amy Michel; Hugh Fuller; Richard Felder

University Preparing theProfessoriate program.Bibliography1. S. White and G. Bodner, “Evaluation of Computer-Simulated Experiments in a Senior-Level Capstone ChE Course,” Chem. Engr. Educ. 33 (1), 34-39 (1999).2. R.M. Felder and R.W. Rousseau, Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.3. R.M. Felder, “Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education,” J. College Science Teaching, 23 (5), 286–290 (1993). Page 5.564.6AMY MICHELAmy Michel is currently a doctoral student in the Department of Chemical Engineering at North Carolina

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Jennifer Temple; Cynthia Atman; Jennifer Turns

) S ubject Number 0.50 1 2 Percentage of Subject Responses 3 0.40 4

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Maarij M. Syed; Sudipa Mitra-Kirtley

the majorityof the students are inactive and reticent to ask questions. As mentioned earlier, the experimentwith the studio format is still under way, and there is a possibility that all the threeintroductory physics courses at Rose-Hulman will be all taught in this mode.Bibliography:1. “Thoughts on Studio Physics Approach”, S. Mitra-Kirtley, Optics and Photonics News, September, 1998.2. "The CUPLE Physics Studio," The Physics Teacher, Vol. 32, p. 518, December 1994.3. Dr. Doyle V. Davis of New Hampshire Technical College developed the software.4. Dr. Michael J. Moloney of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology developed a number of experiments, and wrote the necessary computer software for data acquisition.Acknowledgements:The

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Young Hoon Kim; Sung Hwan Cho

study may be neededin other areas. Further studies are also needed on the role of general education courses invocational education of technical colleges. Also a study of vocational education in collegesabroad is needed to develop various programs such as degree and non-degree and short termprograms n Korea.References1. Yang, H. J. Development of Technical Colleges, in Hundred Years of Vocational Education in Korea, Korean Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET) (in Press).2. URL: http://std.kedi.re.kr/html/frame2.html, Basic school data, Junior College, Korea Educational Development Institute (1999).3. Kang, S. W. Direction for Development of Junior Colleges in 21st Century, College Education, Korean Council for

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Pete Tschumi

Arkansas at Little Rock. Hereceived his BS with a double major in Physics and Mathematics at Tulane University and did graduate work inPhysics at the University of Texas at Austin.AcknowledgementsOther members of the Information Technology Committee, who produced the study on which this paper is based,include Tom Teeter (chair), Janet Bailey, Don D. Cherepski, John Faucett, Robert J. Hines, Nickolas S. Jovanovic,Jeffery T. Walker, and Gretchen B. Watson. A special thanks goes to Chancellor Charles Hathaway without whosesupport the study would not have been possible. Page 5.63.10

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Samuel Homsy; Wayne Whiteman

develop both knowledge and lesstangible characteristics. Page 5.65.7Program representatives will develop a knowledge map for each sub-program within theirdiscipline (e.g. computer engineering within the Electrical Engineering program). Theknowledge map will identify the source of the knowledge, any prerequisites, and if possible thecourse(s) responsible. At this level, the knowledge items are at a higher level than those found atthe course level. (Example: Course-level: apply node voltage analysis to solve multi-nodecircuits. Program-level: solve circuits using various analysis techniques.)Faculty members identified in each department will

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Mohammad A. Zahraee; Gregory P. Neff; Susan Scachitti

on assessment andcontinuing improvement in its philosophy.II. Defining Continuous ImprovementThe term “continuous improvement” is derived from the essence of the Japanese term KAIZENwhich is a systematic approach to the closing of gaps between customer expectations and thecharacteristics of process outputs. First used in the 1950’s, it has since been known by termssuch as Continuous Quality Improvement and Continuous Process Improvement as well as beingclosely tied, and almost synonymous, with the umbrella expression called Total QualityManagement (TQM).In an article in Quality Digest, Danny Langdon [1] states: Continuous Process Improvement is designed to utilize the resources of the organization to achieve a quality-driven

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

William M. Jordan; Debbie Silver; Bill B. Elmore

: learning cycle/constructivist approach, active learning, team teaching,cooperative learning, integrated instruction, technology-based investigations, andproblem/project-based assignments and assessments.Problem Solving in Engineering Science for Teacher s follows the guidelines set forth in theNational Science Teachers Association’s (NSTA) position statement on Science TeacherPreparation Standards. While focusing on understanding and developing the major conceptsand principles of properties of matter, it helps students conceptualize the inter-connectedness ofthe sciences, mathematics, and technology. Students relate the study of matter and materials tocontemporary, historical, technological, and societal issues. Students are able to

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Layton

think-pair-share exercise on“Did you change your mind about your solution: why or why not?”, followed by another 20minute discussion. Again, the instructor makes no value judgements and gives no hints regardingthe “correct” answer to the case study.The day the instructor returns these graded papers, writing is discussed and the instructor leads afinal discussion concluding with his or her own reasoning about which answer(s) is correct. If thenational survey results from the Applied Ethics webpage are known, these results are shared withthe class. If the survey results are not yet known, the instructor will lead an additional discussionwith the class at the time these results are available.These assignments and discussion periods are summarized

Conference Session

Teaching Industrial Engineers Design

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Bopaya Bidanda; Kim Needy

, and aparagraph description of the project. The Student Bio Sheet asks the student to list: · Names of up to three other students with whom they wish to work with; · Name of at most one student with whom they would have a conflict working with; · Technical electives that they have taken or are currently taking; · Work experience (cooperative education and summer internships); and · Statement of which project(s) sounds the most interesting to them and why.Information listed on the Student Bio Sheet is kept in confidence and only viewed by theinstructor. The instructor also obtains each student’s overall grade point average in an effort tobalance the student resources across the projects.Next comes the task of

Conference Session

Tomorrow's Civil Engineering Profession

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

KC Mahboub; Anna Phillips; Paul Palazolo; Scott Yost

Session 2615 What does it mean to be an engineer? The 2001 Challenge to Engineering Educators S. Yost, A. Phillips, P. Palazolo, K.C. Mahboub Univ. of Kentucky/Univ. of Memphis/ Univ. of Memphis/ Univ. of KentuckyAbstractDean Kamen’s keynote speech at the 2001 ASEE National Convention in Albuquerque, NewMexico asked some tough questions of engineering educators. Primarily, Kamen questionedwhat we are doing to represent engineering as a viable career choice in comparison to thewidespread appeal of lucrative sports careers, which promise to pay young people extraordinaryamounts of money. His conclusion

Conference Session

Innovations in Freshman Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Teodora Shuman; Greg Mason

windspeeds are 5 m/s). The wind tunnel is shown in Figure 1.The design task is assigned to teams made up of students from each of the three coursesdiscussed in the previous section. Thus, each design team has electrical and mechanicalengineering students from MEGR181, civil and mechanical engineering students fromMEGR105 and high school students from CKHS091. Students from each course are given Page 7.340.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationdifferent responsibilities on the team. These

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Zhengtao T. Deng; Xiaoqing (Cathy) Qian; Abdul Jalloh; Amir Mobasher; Ruben Rojas-Oviedo

analysisStrength of Materials: In this sophomore level course, students utilize the program(s)developed by their peers in the finite element class to engage in design practices. At thispoint students employ the programs to both become familiar with development of Matlab Page 7.655.4script files as well as utilize the programs to assist them in their design. The problem Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Ralph Buchal

hands-on experience. CurrentCAD and mechanism simulation software makes it easy to create mechanism simulations, andhopefully in the future multimedia mechanism catalogs will be available to allow students to gainrich experience with many common mechanisms, and to easily find suitable mechanisms forspecific design applications.References 1 Ferguson, Eugene S., Engineering and the Mind’s Eye, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., 1992. 2 Hiscox, Gardner D., Mechanical Movements: Powers, Devices and Appliances, Norman Henley Publishing, New York, 1904. Page 7.1250.12 3 Chironis, Nicholas P., Mechanisms and Mechanical

Conference Session

Issues in Physics and Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Harold Evensen

Laboratory Course in Sensors,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 2001.4 J. Singh (1996). Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications to Technology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.5 J. Fraden (1997) Handbook of Modern Sensors (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.6 Beer, F. P., Johnston Jr., E. R. (1996). Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.7 Fowles, G. R., Cassiday, G. L. (1999). Analytical Mechanics (6th ed.). Fort Worth: Saunders.8 Pedrotti, F. L., Petrotti, L. S. (1993). Introduction to Optics (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Page 7.854.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American

Conference Session

K-12 Outreach Initiatives

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Timothy Harrah; Martha Cyr; Brad George

charts are commonly implemented using the Microsoft Project software package.(Fig 1)Large and more complex projects such as public works construction and military projectsoften rely on the more complex network based techniques of CPM and PERT. Thesemethods were developed in the 1950’s specifically for the management of large industrial and military projects where multiple interdependencies are present among tasks and resources are under tight constraint. They are based on the construction of a

Conference Session

Integrating Math and Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Bogdan Adamczyk; Wendy Reffeor

. It is ordered based on the test scores from Table 2. The second column of the table shows theACT math scores, out of a possible score of 36. In the cases where the scores are missing the stu-dents started elsewhere and transferred to GVSU. The ACT math score is highly variable withrespect to the test score, although there is a general correlation. In particular there are a number of Page 7.839.4higher ACT scores in the 30’s that have very poor math scores. This variability suggests there is Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002

Conference Session

Teaching Industrial Engineers Design

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Larry Dunn; Jessica Matson; Kenneth Hunter

for Engineering and Technology. (2000) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.2. Hunter, Sr., Kenneth W. and Jessica O. Matson. (2001) “Engineering Leadership and Teamwork Development Through Experiential Learning,” Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Albuquerque, NM.3. Priest, Simon. The Effect of Program Setting and Duration on Corporate Teamwork Development. Study No. 23, http://members.tscnet.com/pages/experien.4. Kaagan, Stephen S. (1999) Leadership Games, Sage Publications.Biographical InformationKENNETH W. HUNTER, SR.Kenneth Hunter is currently Director of the Basic Engineering Program at Tennessee Technological University. Hereceived his

Conference Session

Women in Engineering: A Potpourri

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Francis Hopcroft

, S., The Mismeasure of Man, WW Norton, 1996.[3] Gardner, H., The Disciplined Mind, Penguin, 2001.[4] Fernald, D. The Hans Legacy, Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ, 1984.[5] Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. Management of Organizational Behavior, Prentice, 1993.[6] Chomsky, N., Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, University of Chicago Press,1985. Page 7.830.6[7] Karanian,B., Engineer’s Response to Leadership: Does Gender Make a “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Difference? (unpublished