Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal manuscripts and more than
in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received his PhD from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh, where he is currently working as an Assistant Professor. His research interests are engineering education, and in the area of optics; he specializes in developing optical fiber-based sensors for monitoring harsh environments.Dr. Irene Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. She has experience teaching programming, design, entrepreneurship, and sustainability topics, and is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the University
Paper ID #40032Measuring the Impact of Extra-/Co-Curricular Participation onProfessional Formation of EngineersDr. Aimee Monique Cloutier, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in
draft),CNC machining (tool access), casting, etc. That said, like any manufacturing technology, thereare still design rules that, when followed, will impact part strength, durability, build time, etc.The best practices for 3D printing part design are learned by students as they build, assemble,modify, and repair the prosthetics. Most additive manufacturing technologies continue tostruggle with accuracy and repeatability but improvements continue to increase part quality. The3D printer used for our prosthetic work is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. The Fusion3 F410 3D printer (www.fusion3design.com/f410-3d-printer/) and some prosthetic components printing in our lab3D printing is a great fit for affordable prosthetics. The
, encourage, and assiststudents in the development of their professional competencies and efforts to reach their goals.This approach to implementing the PFE course series helps faculty meet the following sixobjectives for the department’s undergraduate students:1. Improving career planning process by requiring active participation in industry, research and community organizations or experiential practical learning initiatives.2. Increasing engagement, retention, diversity, and potential for professional career success.3. Inspiring a greater interest in professional and social impact.4. Introducing engineering ethics and methods of evaluating risk and resolving conflicts.5. Increasing involvement in design-oriented projects during sophomore
research questions are answered using information gathered as part of theongoing program evaluation of the Robotics Academy. The evaluation is composed ofsurveys given to students throughout their participation in the Robotics Academy as wellas interviews with participants and advising professors. Thus far, the surveys have beentailored to the specific goals of the program rather than being based on standardizedmeasures. While this prohibits comparability with other programs, this allows us to bettergauge the impact of the Robotics Academy experience on the individuals involved. The program has been in place for two years, with excellent reviews from theparticipants. Many cite it as the best experience they had at Tufts specifically because
an obvious need toestablish a more sustainable assessment and evaluation process and oversight structure for longterm impact. Departmental leadership participated in several national workshops in 2010, tolearn best practices for sustainable assessment. As a result, new assessment and evaluationprocesses were established in Fall 2010 by engaging all constituents (faculty, industrial advisorycouncil) throughout the development and implementation process. The underlying philosophywas to focus on summative assessment of the program and minimize faculty and staff burden.New oversight structure and division of responsibilityThe current oversight structure, which was implemented in Summer/Fall 2010 leverages existingleadership positions in the
Award, 2005 Semiconductor Research Corporation Technical Excellence Award, and the Best Paper Award of the 2004 International Conference on Computer Design. He is a technical program committee member of International Symposium on Low Power Electronics Design and International Symposium on Quality Electronics Design.6. Cheng Chen joined SFSU in 2009 and he is currently an assistant professor in civil engineering at the School of Engineering at SFSU. He has a strong research background in hybrid simulation and earthquake engineering, and he has published more than twenty technical papers in professional journals and conference proceedings. He has served as faculty advisor for the ASCE SFSU chapter since 2009. He is also
. degree in Electrical Engineering from Grand Valley State Uni- versity. While at MSU, he worked as a network support assistant for four school years. During the summer of 2008, he held a full-time summer position at GE Healthcare working with computer virtual- ization technologies. Graduate assistantship work while at GVSU includes control system design, digital communications and digital signal processing. Current research involves time-frequency analysis of EMG signals in children with cerebral palsy. Page 22.1691.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
technical leader. The program grew steadily, attracted 10 corporate sponsors,and was awarded two major NSF S-STEM grants. The NSF research sought to understand ifearly leadership training resulted in higher graduation and retentions rates and faster time tograduation for academically talented, financially disadvantaged STEM majors. The preliminaryresults indicate a highly positive association.The goal of the LDP has remained the same since inception, help STEM students become futureleaders in industry by providing leadership training and mentoring with a cohort experience ofco-curricular education and community service opportunities. Teaching and modeling authenticproblem-solving to future leaders is an essential strategy and key component of the
Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Dr. Dale R Baker, Arizona State University Dale Baker is a science educator researching issues of equity and teaching and learning in
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Understanding Design, Tolerating Ambiguity, and Developing Middle School Design Based LessonsAbstractWe have, over three years, developed a set of practices that helped move middle schoolmathematics, science, and special education teachers away from trepidation with engineeringdesign and toward comfort with ambiguity, confronting and reducing content knowledge gapsfor themselves and their students, and engaging a professional support network. Teachers needdeep understanding of the mathematics and science they will teach and knowledge of howstudents develop understanding of content, how to set significant learning goals, how to
), advanced manufacturing, advanced communications, andbiotechnology were recommended by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology (PCAST) to the President of the USA [1]. The IotF topics are critical for futureindustry development and thus the workforce development in these areas is of great importance.Meanwhile, K-12 education requires enhanced STEM content in high school curriculum as partof the graduation requirement [3]. Therefore, it is imperative to train secondary school teachersto be better prepared for more advanced learning engineering modules. One way advocated byNational Science Foundation is to provide authentic research experiences to preservice teachersin a STEM setting. The mission of this project, Industries of
. CM-177 introducesgreen building design guidelines, rating systems, and common practices. Studentsfrom the two classes made up project teams to co-develop Leadership in Energyand Environmental Design (LEED) strategies and conduct performance analysisthat is essential for accomplishing LEED certification with BIM for a project oncampus. The collaborative project-based learning is responsive to the real worldscenario where green building design and BIM are often implemented through anintegrative process. Both direct and indirect measures were used to assess theeffectiveness of the proposed collaborative project-based pedagogy on selectedcore student learning outcomes (SLOs). Rubrics were developed for eachmeasure. This paper discusses the
Paper ID #30515Implementation and Evaluation of Active Learning Techniques: AdaptableActivities for A Variety of Engineering CoursesDr. Jillian Schmidt, Missouri University of Science and Technology Dr. Jillian Schmidt is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She teaches primarily first and second- year engineering design courses, and her research interests include technology incorporation and team dynamics in project based courses.Dr. Nicolas Ali Libre, Missouri University of Science and Technology Nicolas Ali Libre, PhD
quantifytheir undergraduate experience. Students are able to track their progress, design their ownacademic path to graduation, and develop their own enrichment activity plan that best fits theirspecific interest. The engineering portfolio also assists students to prepare their resume for jobinterviews and, when used as a tool for interviewing, the portfolio highlights tangibleexperiences outside what is normally found in transcripts and conventional resumes.Our approach focuses on capturing the entire breath of each student’s educational experience,while setting the foundation for students to build an open-ended self-guided career plan thatdraws from their skills, experiences, and achievements that comprise their engineering portfolio
business process; (3) BPR tries to achieve major goals or dramaticperformance improvements; (4) IT is a critical enabler of BPR; and (5) organizational changesand human issues are critical enabler of BPR and must be managed accordingly16. We built ourBPR course around these five elements and specially tailored our curriculum to address the needto produce EM graduates who can work effectively at the interface between technology,management, and engineering.The Stevens BPR CourseThe BPR course provides knowledge on BPR and its main concepts; the technologies and thestrategies for implementing business transformation; and best practices on BPR. It emphasizesthe role of BPR in managing technology and the engineering functions. The course covers
Paper ID #26018Human Rights as a Lens for Engineering Ethics?Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Electronic System Design: A Hands-on Course on Creating a Professional Electronic ProductAbstractA new curriculum has been developed for an advanced embedded systems course. In this course,students construct a webcam from the ground up, resulting in a professional, aesthetic product.Along the way, they practice surface-mount soldering, PCB design, web design, 3D design, andembedded programming. The course is a guided journey in creating a device at the level of aminimal viable product at a startup company, and feeds into a followup class where studentspursue the journey without constraints, with novel projects. To assess the efficacy of thecurriculum, several
Internship Search ProcessAbstractThis research paper presents the findings from a study out of the University of Colorado Boulderfocused on using design thinking to improve internship search related resources and supports.The goals of the study were to 1) identify points of disconnect that students experience duringthe internship search process and 2) work collaboratively with student participants to identifyuseful, creative solutions. The identified points of disconnect can be viewed as potential points ofattrition, where students have the highest likelihood of dropping out of the internship searchprocess. By thinking strategically and creatively about how to address them, those points ofattrition can be converted into leverage points for positive
methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice Pawley (she, her, hers) is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program, Environmental and Ecological Engineering, and the Purdue Climate Change Research Center
early parts of their undergraduate experience. Often the only studentsengaged in applied research projects are seniors. These students have completed many of theirengineering classes and are prepared to positively impact a project. However, seniors tend tohave a nasty habit of graduating. The combination of younger students lacking skills and neededcoursework and seniors graduating makes successful large scale or multiyear projects morechallenging. The EE program has successfully used a few approaches to implement theseprojects. Four projects that have been successfully completed are discussed below.Project #1 – Curl Detection in Automation ProcessThe first project discussed is an automation design project with local industry. Two seniors
design and development engineer, and project and program manager for Hewlett- Packard Company, and management consultant for Personnel Decisions International, before becoming a professor at CSU. She is author of ”Understanding Employee Engagement: Theory, Research, and Practice” and ”Organizational Psychology and Behavior: An Integrated Approach to Understanding the Workplace”. She is an Associate Editor for the Journal of Managerial Psychology, serves on several editorial boards, and has published in peer-reviewed scientific academic and practice outlets. She has her own consulting practice, Atniz Consulting, LLC, working with organizations around the country focusing on their organizational culture and leadership
required, andall aspects of project documentation are available on the team’s website. Applying thismethodology to the capstone process has improved the overall quality of the project designs andbetter prepared our graduates for their industrial careers.Faculty evaluate projects at the end of each quarter through sets of rubrics; external feedback isobtained through project group interactions with the department's industrial advisory board andwith the local IEEE branch. Two competitions, for the best poster and oral presentations, areheld to provide performance incentives.II. Why Rubrics?The assigning of grades to a senior design project can be a cumbersome experience. By its verynature, a culminating design experience such as that called for in
Engineering Scholars.Prof. Rob Twardock, College of Lake County Rob Twardock is an engineering professor at College of Lake County in Grayslake, Illinois since 2000. Rob is a graduate of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign with a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineer- ing. He worked as a consulting engineer in Michigan and Illinois for 10 years prior to starting to teach at Mt. Hood Community College in 1998. Rob is the Co-Department Chair of Engineering Transfer and teaches all lower division engineering courses offered. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Incorporating Makerspace Design and Fabrication Activities Into Engineering Design
engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context j) a knowledge of contemporary issues k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Topics covered in this course: • Background research for experimental planning • Design of Experiments • Statistical data analysis • Executing engineering experiments and analyzing experimental findings • Oral communication of research • Written communication of research • Engineering ethics • Intellectual property, social impact, and financial considerations of engineering research • Software and hardware tools, such as
for graduate school.”She chose a research internship in an institute and convinced her reluctant professor who argued“normally undergraduates don't take on research experiences because their only job is to be astudent” by countering “Well, I can do it. I can do it. And I said, like, you can hire me full-time.I'm just really into it.” She landed the internship as a fulltime research assistant without a stipendand could afford doing so since she had received a Gilman scholarship prior to departure.Yet another outcome was a student, MO, who had doubts regarding her chosen field of civilengineering for a career path prior to her year abroad. Instead, she wanted to explore teaching.MO still chose a research internship during which she discovered
, Engineering, and Individualized Study programs at UMBC. He has been teaching role playing game design and leading campus wide RPG events for the past ten years. He also leads the multidisciplinary sustainable design course entitled INDS 430: The Kinetic Sculpture Project, which won the grand prize in the 2015 Baltimore Kinetic Sculpture race.Dr. Jamie R Gurganus, University of Maryland Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Computing Education Program and the Associate Director of STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Informational Technology. She also directs the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate
sections [4, 5]. As a resultof the meeting, the part-time instructor decided to not teach the course and abruptly resigned. Thiscreated a significant disruption since the other instructor as asked to teach an overload and therewere many student complaints. The Department decided something had to be done to reduceproblems with increased number of sections and variability between instructors.The Solution:The Department introduced a half-day training for all part-time instructors. The training wasmandatary for all part-time and was focused on the known challenges facing part-time instructors.The format of the training was conversational, with the Chair and Assistant Chair sharing best-practices and common problems. Although some resistance to the
Paper ID #36916A Multi-Phasic Approach to Increase Diversity AmongDoctoral Candidates in Biomedical EngineeringLacy White Lacy White is the Graduate Program Coordinator for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. She earned a bachelor's degree in Psychology and a master's degree in Clinical Psychology from The University of Texas at Tyler. Lacy is interested in best practices in graduate recruitment and retention to ultimately increase the diversity of the biomedical engineering workforce.Carly Eressy Carly Eressy is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Biomedical