, “On Change III: Taking Charge of Change: APrimer for Colleges and Universities,” An Occasional Paper Series of the ACE Project onLeadership and Institutional Transformation, American Council on Education Publications,1999, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED450621[4] M. Borrego, J.E. Froyd, and T.S. Hall, “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: asurvey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments,” Journal ofEngineering Education, 99(3), 185-207, 2010.[5] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, “Facilitating change in undergraduate STEMinstructional practices: An analytic review of the literature,” Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 48(8), 952-984, 2011.[6] J.M. Williams, E. Andrijcic, S. Mohan, C. Margherio, E
://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for- states-by-states[11] Partnership for 21st Century Skills, “P21 framework definitions.” Accessed: Mar. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.battelleforkids.org/insights/p21-resources/[12] A. Srivastava and S. B. Thomson, “Framework Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Applied Policy Research.” Rochester, NY, Jan. 02, 2009. Accessed: Mar. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2760705[13] R. E. Mayer, “Cognitive theory of multimedia learning,” The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, vol. 41, pp. 31–48, 2005.Table 1Evidence of Generative Learning Strategies in EDII and SL GP Strategy Definition
studies. Then, wewill delve into the discussion section, where we will interpret the results within the context ofexisting literature and theory. This section will also explore the practical implications of ourfindings for educational institutions. Finally, we will conclude by offering a reflective summaryof the significance of the study and its contributions to entrepreneurial education research.MethodologySurveyA Cronbach's Alpha of 0.890 was attained during the survey validation process for theEntrepreneurial Competencies dimension and 0.876 for the Entrepreneurial Intention dimension.Table 1 shows the corresponding Cronbach´s Alpha reliability analysis by dimensions.Descriptive statistics were used in sample characterization for data analysis
, andphysiological. Two underlying factors were used to measure emotions: enjoyment (4 items; α=.86; ω= .87) and hopelessness (4 items; α=.80 ; ω=.84). All reported alpha and omega values areaveraged values from each time the items were used during year 1. The items were adapted fromthe AEQ-S scale [23]. All emotion questions were listed in one block with the following prompt“Please consider how you felt today in the camp”. Enjoyment was defined as having feelings ofjoy while learning content during the summer camp. An example of enjoyment is “I enjoyed thechallenge of camp activities”. Hopelessness was defined as the opposite emotional counterpart ofenjoyment: feeling discouraged while learning new content. An example of hopelessness is “I felthelpless
programmingsoftware. Faculty perspectives vary regarding the appropriate implementation of AI supportwithout raising academic dishonesty concerns. Clear communication of expectations andrestrictions regarding AI usage is recommended. It is proposed that faculty require anacknowledgments section in reports and require students to disclose any AI tools used anddescribe how the tool(s) was used to help complete the assignment.References[1] McMurtrie, B., ChatGPT is Already Upending Campus Practices. Colleges are Rushing toRespond, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol 69, Issue 15. March 31, 2023.[2] Terry, O.K., I’m a Student. You Have No Idea How Much We’re Using ChatGPT, TheChronicle of Higher Education, Vol 69, Issue 19, May 26, 2023.[3] Calabro, K., C.M
“Entrepreneurship – New Insights”, Eds. M. Mohiuddin et. al., Intech Open, September 2023[5] Dziobczenski, P. R. N., Kähkönen, E., & Mits, H. (2023). “Shaping A Sustainable Future Through Integra�ng Sustainability, Crea�vity and Entrepreneurship In Engineering Educa�on At Aalto University”, European Society for Engineering Educa�on (SEFI). DOI: 10.21427/BW39-Y819[6] A.A. de Bronstein, S. Lampe, and J. Halberstadt, “Fostering future engineers as transformational agents: integrating sustainability and entrepreneurship in engineering education”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 219 pp. 957-962 (2023)[7] Braga, M. [et al.]. “How do students transform good solu�ons from an educa�onal challenge in a startup? A case study to entrepreneurship
line . 10.18260/1-2- -34915[11] Parker, M.A., Ashe, D., Boersma, J., Hicks, R. and Bennett, V., 2015. Good teaching starts here: Applied learning at the Graduate Teaching Assistant Institute. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(3), pp.84-110.[12] Miller, K., Brickman, P. and Oliver, J.S., 2014. Enhancing teaching assistants'(ta s') inquiry teaching by means of teaching observations and reflective discourse. School Science and Mathematics, 114(4), pp.178-190.[13] Chadha, D. and Shah, U.V., 2023, June. Work-in-Progress: Unpacking Graduate Teaching Assistants’(GTAs) Taught Practice—Exploring Training through Decisional Capital. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[14] Chadha, D
: Jacobs Publishing Co., 1973.[9] D. Rohini, A. AmarKarthik, R. Abinaya, A. Mathan, S. Midhun, and D. Dhushyanth, "Buckling analysis of a commercial aircraft wing box and its structural components using Nastran patran," Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 66, pp. 895-901, 2022/01/01/ 2022.
in computer aided design." 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, Jun 20th-23rd, 1999. [3] Chester, Ivan. "Teaching for CAD expertise." International journal of technology and design education 17: 23-35, 2007. [4] Bloom, Benjamin S. "Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1." Evaluation comment 1.2 (1968): n2. [5] “Entrepreneurial Mindset” engineeringunleashed.com. https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset (accessed January 2nd 2024).
engineering troubleshooting process.Through continuous adaptation of these problem-solving methodologies, engineers caneffectively address troubleshooting problems and propel innovation. We hope that this workoffers insights and guidance for engineers approaching troubleshooting, while also providingeducators with valuable tools and frameworks to prepare the next generation of engineeringprofessionals.References[1] A. Schaafstal, J.M. Schraagen. “Training of troubleshooting: A structured, task analytical approach” Cognitive task analysis: Psychology Press; 2000. p. 71-84.[2] K. Duncker, L. S. Lees. On problem-solving. Psychological monographs. 1945;58(5):i.[3] Schaafstal A, Schraagen JM, Van Berl M. Cognitive task analysis and innovation
Statics course course course course s course Before Before After Before After Before After Before After change After change change change change change change change change (n=122 change (n=197 (n=107 (n=178 (n=103 (n=227 (n=147 (n=252 (n=183 ) (n=44) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )% Summer Yr 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 2% Fall Yr 1 69 86 40 53 3 34 56 81 43 77% Winter Yr 1 25 12 43 34 87 55
. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” GlobalJournal of Engineering Education, Volume 11, No. 2, June 2007.[7] D. A. H. Samuelsen and O. H. Graven, “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education – anOverview of Implementation and Feasibility,” 14th International Multi-Conference forEngineering, Education, and Technology: Engineering Innovations for Global sustainability, SanJose, Costa Rica, July 2016.[8] A. Yousuf, A. Wong, and D. W. Edens, “Remote Circuit Design Labs with Analog Discovery,”2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, and T. F. Schubert, “Digilent Analog Discovery and Bench-topInstruments: A Comparison,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
efficient and scaleable manner.References[1] D. Clark and R. Talbert, Grading for growth: A guide to alternative grading practices that promote authentic learning and student engagement in higher education. Taylor & Francis, 2023.[2] L. B. Nilson and C. J. Stanny, Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Routledge, 2015.[3] J. Elsinger and D. Lewis, “Applying a standards-based grading framework across lower level mathematics courses,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8-10, pp. 885–907, 2020.[4] H. Ritz, “WIP: Implementing an alternative grading scheme in a large enrollment differential equations course: Lessons learned,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[5] S. Wagner and H. Ritz
Business Research, vol. 101, pp. 507-515, 2019/08/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.049.[5] S. Wilkins, "Two decades of international branch campus development, 2000–2020: A review," International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 311-326, 2020.[6] T. Heffernan and D. Poole, "In search of “the vibe”: Creating effective international education partnerships," Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 223-245, 2005/09/01 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6352-2.[7] R. Hickey and D. Davies, "The common factors underlying successful international branch campuses: towards a conceptual decision-making framework," Globalisation, Societies and Education, pp. 1-15
theCATME evaluation (13% in each year). However, all enrolled students were included in thestudy as CATME ratings from their teammates were still available.Description of teamwork assignmentsStudents were placed into teams of 4-5 members based on responses to the CATME teamformation survey. For the first team project, each team chose one of the 14 Engineering GrandChallenges [8] and were tasked with researching the challenge. The purpose of the project was toinvestigate the societal problem(s) the Challenge seeks to address and to identify recentengineering advances that address their chosen Challenge. Teams were instructed to create awritten report and a short (3-4 min) video to share their findings with the rest of the class.In Fall 2022, the
. If a car had finished several laps during its two minutes of time, then the besttiming was considered for the lap. The first team was from The Citadel with timing of 10.73 s,the second team weas from The Citadel again with timing of 11.45 seconds and third team wasfrom Military Academy with timing of 12.16 seconds. Figure 5. Amazon DeepRacer car running on the track [7]PerformanceWhen training of the model is finished in the simulator, the results can be evaluated in theevaluation section. Figure 6 shows the results of two sample models, the left one is a highperforming model, and the right one is a low performing model. These graphs have three distinctlines. The green line represents the value of the reward variable and
learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc. 103, 152– 153. (2015).5. M. T. Chandio, S. M. Pandhiani, R. Iqbal, Bloom’s Taxonomy: Improving Assessment and Teaching-Learning Process. Journal of Education and Educational Development 3, 203-221 (2016). Supplementary-Materials: Integrating Problem-Solving Studio into 75-minute Chemical Reaction Kinetics Sessions1. Supplementary Material 1: Example of A Well-Defined Problem2. Supplementary Material 2: Example of A Not Well-Defined ProblemGroup Members: Date: CHME 3321Complete the following in a group of 2-3 students, and
reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. K. G. Wolfinbarger, R. L. Shehab, D. A. Trytten, and S. E. Walden, "The influence of engineering competition team participation on students' leadership identity development," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 925-948, 2021.2. A. B. Hargadon, "Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation," Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 24, pp. 41-85, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24003-4.3. A. B. Hargadon, "Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation," California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 209-227, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165951.4. J. Saldaña, The
, Institute of Electrical andElectronics Engineers, 2013, 19 (12), pp. 2396 - 2405.[2] Jansen, Y. Dragicevic, P. Isenberg, P. Alexander, J. Karnik, A. Kildal, J. Subramanian, S. andHornbæk, K. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. CHI 2015, April 18–23,2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea.[3] Data Physicalization Gallery, http://dataphys.org/list/gallery/[4] Noë, Alva. “What Art Unveils.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 5 Oct. 2015,archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/05/what-art-unveils/.[5] Rohit Ashok Khot, Larissa Hjorth, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. Understanding PhysicalActivity through 3D Printed Material Artifacts. CHI 2014, April 26 - May 01, 2014, Toronto,ON, Canada.[6] Vetria L. Byrd. Usability of
also working to integrate specificfeatures such as titles, summaries, and keywords. These fields will hopefully allow us to developsoftware to automatically build a SCHOLAR tutorial index with the option of exporting theentire repository as a website.The SCHOLAR lessons and examples will continue to be refined and shared as a git repositoryfor any interested instructors. As the SCHOLAR type of lessons are adopted, it will be possibleto share the resources across institutions building a robust framework and resource for learning.References[1] “Git.” Accessed: Aug. 22, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://git-scm.com/[2] S. Downes, “Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources,” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects
Enhance Problem-based Learning,” Med Educ Online, vol. 2, no. 1, 1997, doi: 10.3402/meo.v2i.4289.[9] M. K. Pallikonda and R. C. Manimaran, “Research Problems: A Pathway to Introduce Industry 4.0 in Undergraduate Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.18260/1-2--44122.[10] P. Guo, N. Saab, L. S. Post, and W. Admiraal, “A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures,” Int J Educ Res, vol. 102, p. 101586, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.IJER.2020.101586.
Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, EDUCAUSE, Association for Advancement of Computing in Education, International Society for Technology in Education, Society for Design and Process Science, American Society for Engineering Education, Human Computer Interaction International Conference, and International Academy, Research, and Industry Association) in USA, Canada, England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Romania. Her work was also presented by co-authors at conferences in Brazil, Taiwan and S. Korea. Among Dr. Marghitu’s honors and awards are the following: 2011 AccessComputing Capacity Building Award, the 2012 Auburn University
, doi: 10.1057/S41307-016-0034-4/METRICS.[12] D. Larsen–Freeman, “On Language Learner Agency: A Complex Dynamic Systems Theory Perspective,” Mod. Lang. J., vol. 103, pp. 61–79, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1111/MODL.12536.[13] S. Mercer, “Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system,” System, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 427–436, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2011.08.001.[14] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior,” Psychol. Inq., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000, doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.[15] J. R. Savery and T. M. Duffy, “Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework,” Technology, vol. 35, no
connection") } } //Couple the button to the commandFunction when clicked commandButton.addEventListener("click",commandFunction)Fig. 3. Javascript code examples demonstrating the read/write operations from/to the Webbrowser.4. Prototype Implementation: Real-Time Control of Virtual Bottle Filling Process Trainer Unit with ArduinoFor prototype implementation of the approach presented in this paper, a bottle filling processtrainer shown in Figure 4 was chosen as a case study. The trainer is composed of 4 differentstages, namely: flavor selection, filling, capping and labeling. Two automated conveyor belts anda turntable are used to transport bottle(s) between the stages. The process starts with selection ofa flavor from the three available
this course. The authors would also like to thank VincentHornbach for his help with the editing of the lecture videos as well as assuring the accessibilityof those videos.References[1] R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement learning: An introduction, MIT Press, 2018, p. 2.[2] “OpenCV modules,” OpenCV. [Online]. Available: https://docs.opencv.org/4.6.0/. [Accessed: 28-Sep-2022].[3] Raspberry Pi Foundation, “Teach, learn, and make with the Raspberry Pi Foundation,” Raspberry Pi Foundation. [Online]. Available: https://www.raspberrypi.org/. [Accessed: 28-Sep-2022].[4] H. Lasi, P. Fettke, H.G. Kemper, et al. Industrie 4.0. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2014, 56, pp. 261–264.[5] S.B. Block, G.A. Hirt, and B.R. Danielsen, Foundations of Financial
, [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/college-tuition- and-fees-increase-63-percent-since-january-2006.htm. [Accessed 25 September 2022].[5] C. Nagle and K. Vitez, "Fixing the Broken Textbook Market," U.S. PIRG Education Fund, 2020.[6] OER Commons, "Open Educational Resources," [Online]. Available: https://www.oercommons.org/oer-101.[7] T. J. Bliss and M. Smith, "A Brief History of Open Educational Resources. In: Jhangiani, R S and Biswas- Diener, R. (eds.) Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science.," London, Ubiquity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.b. License: CC-BY 4.0, 2017, pp. 9-27.[8] Wikibooks, Open Education Handbook/History of the OER movement, 2021.[9] N. B
projects. This framework will appeal toyounger generations and help transform the learning of construction topics more effectively. Thedocumented results of the evaluation from this project will provide a clear guideline to easilytransfer and replicate the proposed approach to other programs at other institutions.References[1] BLS (2020). Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Construction Managers, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/construction-managers.htm (Retrieved June 19, 2022).[2] Bowen, S., (2005). Engaged Learning: Are We All on the Same Page?, Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), 7(2),[3] Young, M. R. (2010). The art and science of fostering engaged
, which will zero initial force and displacement.i) Start rotating the crank clockwise, the cross head will be driven by the power screw to move upward, adding tensile force to the specimen.j) Since the machine is hand operated, the speed needs to be in the range of 10 to 20 mm/s for good data resolution.k) Break the specimen, and click “record” again to end data logging.l) Initialize data analysis in the template to calculate modulus of elasticity, and compare with reference for initial verification.m) Export as Excel format for future analysis.Figure 3 shows the force in the load cell vs position of the crosshead, which represent theelongation of the specimen. Fig. 3. Force vs position (elongation of the specimen
applied during the test. The rotational motion ofthe lead screw translates the crosshead to apply force to a specimen; the force is measured by aload cell and then interpreted using a calibration factor via a microcontroller. Typically, materialstesters have a vertical orientation where the crosshead translates vertically. When doing initialresearch, the team researched a vertically oriented testing machine, but determined to utilize ahorizontal design after looking into various inexpensive horizontal testers for basic application;most benchtop, low-cost machines are only capable of testing in tension, mostly made of plastic,and some can be powered by a motor, generally utilizing an S-Type load cell. The team utilized asimilar conceptual layout
, Education for Chemical Engineers, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. e12-e30, 2013.[6] P. Field, Creating Case Study Presentations, Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 35, Issue 1, 2005.[7] P. Field, Revising a Formal Case Study Presentations as an Independent Research Project, Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 43, Issue 2, 2013.[8] https://cse.umn.edu/college/four-year-plans/mechanical-engineering-four-year-plan[9] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Vol. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay Company, 1956.[10] T. Girard, M. Pinar, P. Trapp, An Exploratory Study of Class Presentations and Peer Evaluations: Do Students Perceive the Benefits?, Academy of Educational