later activities.1Through the literature review, it was determined that many of the existing studies compare aflipped vs. traditional classroom strictly on a semester-by-semester basis. That is, a traditionalclassroom from the first semester is compared to a “flipped” classroom the second semester. Thisintroduces a wide variety of irregularities between the two semesters: test structure and content,professor interaction, lecture inconsistencies, and other variables.Bishop conducted a literature review on the topic of flipped classrooms, and found 24 relevantstudies.1 Very few of these studies examined a flipped and traditional course the same semester.In addition, only one study, from Day, examined student performance throughout the semester
module test tries also varied by the difficulty of the module material. While theaverage test tries per module averaged in the range from 1 to 2 for most modules, the averagetest tries was significantly higher for three of the 17 modules. The average tries per module forthese three modules ranged between 2.3 to 2.5. The three modules included introductorymechanics topics that often challenge students:Module 6: Applications of Newton’s Laws (frictional forces in a moving system, circular motion)Module 10: CollisionsModule 14: Oscillation and Simple Harmonic MotionIt was hypothesized that a possible “snowball effect” would limit the weakest students from
: Developing a New Degree ProgramAbstractIn this paper, we report on the development of a new industrial engineering program, framing itas a systems engineering process in the context of higher education curriculum development. Thecurriculum is described in detail, and innovative characteristics of the program are discussed.The resulting program is flexible, allowing the pursuit of accelerated graduate programs, asecond major, various minor options, and study-abroad; relevant, tailored to the needs ofindustry partners in the vicinity; and practical, providing hands-on education, resulting inemployment-ready graduates.1. IntroductionCurriculum development and innovation is critical to successful programs in engineering. In thispaper, we describe the
, andidentifying unexpected opportunities to create value. The Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN) defines curiosity, connections and creating value as three core components ofan entrepreneurial mindset. These 3Cs coupled with associated engineering skills forms KEEN’sentrepreneurial mindset framework. An entrepreneurial mindset enables engineers to developsound technical solutions that address customer needs, are feasible from a business perspective,and have societal benefit.The Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven is working to develop anentrepreneurial mindset in its engineering students through a four-faceted framework based onKEEN’s constructs that includes: 1) developing an entrepreneurial mindset amongst
Award.Marina Bograd, MassBay Community CollegeDr. Chitra Javdekar, Mass Bay Community College Dean, Division of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017ASEE Off‐Site Internship 2017 1 A Collaborative Capstone Industry Project for Community College Students Abstract The Community College, located in Wellesley, MA offers two certificates in Advanced Manufacturing: Manufacturing Technology and Manufacturing Innovation. Each certificate can be completed within a year. The final semester is dedicated to a paid industry internship where students are supervised by both company and faculty
acollaborative effort between the students, their faculty capstone advisor, the EPA Region 4College/Underserved Community Partnership Program (CUPP), the Thriving Earth Exchange(TEX), and the City of Midway, Georgia. This collaboration is illustrated in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Communication in project collaborationIn addition, the project implemented sustainable engineering design features and materials, andwas made available by CUPP.According to the U.S. EPA: The CUPP is based on developing partnerships between small, underserved communities and geographically close colleges/universities to provide a variety of technical support at no cost to those communities. This geographical proximity enables the
= 419). All of the girls in the Reach group were also invited to participate in a variety offollow-up gatherings and programs in their middle school and high school years. Applicants whowere not selected in the lottery, and any girls who started the two-week summer program but didnot complete it, were placed in the Control group (n = 312). Table 1 shows the number of girls inthe Reach and Control groups by program year.Data CollectionNames and birthdates of the 731 subjects were compiled from program records for the years1997 through 2010. We then collected three data points for each subject from admissionsrecords: whether she applied as an undergraduate (yes = 1, no = 0), whether she was accepted(yes =1, no = 0), and whether she enrolled (yes
coursework for ME, biomedical (BME), civil, and some otherengineering majors and is typically taken during the sophomore year. Other engineering studentscan take the course as an elective; prerequisites include statics and calculus. The traditionalcourse used the three 50-minute weekly class meetings for lecture. The blended course used thesame class meetings for a mixture of lecture, in-class activities, and problem solving (Table 1).The two non-lecture days were held in a classroom specifically designed to facilitate group workand active learning. The two classes used the same online homework and exam formats.Table 1: Weekly course structures for Traditional and Blended courses in this study Before class Monday
,techniques, and strategies might be most effective.Introduction and BackgroundIntegrating humanities studies into engineering technology curricula is a central component ofthe transformation taking place at Purdue Polytechnic. Even as enrollment trends for humanitiesmajors have been declining in recent years [1], there are still consistent calls for humanitiestopics to be a part of STEM education [2-4]. Unfortunately, adding additional content to alreadypacked STEM curricula can be very challenging for institutions operating under total credit hourrestrictions. One promising strategy for incorporating humanities into STEM courses is tostrategically weave the individual humanities topics into existing courses. Toward this goal, thecollege has
KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) [1]. As these efforts strengthen, approaches toassess the entrepreneurial mindset have also been developed. A popular approach is the use ofsurvey instruments. Lichtenstein and Zappe [2] reviewed 22 instruments developed to assessentrepreneurial mindset.We have developed a rigorously validated assessment instrument to explore the entrepreneurialmindset of engineering and computer science students [3], [4]. This instrument was developedbased on a framework in which an entrepreneurially minded engineer is defined as one whopossesses curiosity about our changing world, habitually makes connections to gain insight frommany sources of information, and focuses on creating value for others. The italicized words
, and lessons learned.Program OverviewThe goal of the KickStarter program is to improve the recruitment and retention of Latinxstudents in STEM fields and careers by enhancing CC-HSIs’ participation and competitivenessin NSF-funded STEM initiatives.Primary objectives for KickStarter are to: 1. Increase the number of CC-HSIs who compete successfully as lead grantees on NSF projects; 2. Strengthen CC-HSIs’ STEM infrastructure (i.e., their capacity to increase recruitment and retention success rates among Latinx students); and 3. Engage CC-HSIs with a broader range of partners in K-12, industry, four-year institutions, and researchers to help sustain STEM programs and improve CC-HSI federal program competitiveness.Key
ethical mentoring principle; (b) elucidate participantperceptions of ethical issues in six case studies; and (c) reveal what ethical behaviors participantsexpect from their respective mentor/mentee if they placed themselves in the situation of the casestudies.BackgroundThe relationship between a faculty-advisor and a graduate student has been shown to be adetermining factor of graduate student success [1], [2]. Advising relationships are typicallyformally assigned and structured so that they can help students adjust to the departmental cultureand provide them with a role model, critical information, and an advocate for their professionalsuccess [3]-[5]. Advising, when described as exceptional or as a mentoring type of relationship,can foster a
, creativity is seen as the ability to generate new ideas, either as new ways oflooking at existing problems or of seeing new opportunities, perhaps by exploiting emergingtechnologies or changes in markets [1-4]; as shown in Figure 1, creativity has two phases. Incontrast, innovation is seen as the successful exploitation of new ideas—i.e., it is the process thatcarries new ideas through to new products, new services, new ways of running the business, oreven new ways of doing business [5-7]. By the time we reach our university studies, most of ushave been trained to move quickly from divergent thinking to convergent thinking, so we can findthe best answer or best plan to whatever problem we face. Interestingly, at an early age, primaryschool children
. Collier and five other co-PIs were awarded a Seed Grant from Tuskegee University titled ”Engaging Agricul- ture, Biology, and Chemistry Students Through Interdisciplinary Medicinal Plant Research Across the Curriculum”. Dr. Collier and Dr. Chastity Bradford, a TU biology professor, were also awarded a grant titled, ”Investigating the Enhancement of Angiotensin 1-7 by Hibiscus sabdariffa as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy for the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension” from The Herb Society of America. Dr. Col- lier’s other grants have included ”Chemistry for the Future of Water Sustainability” from The Camille & Henry Dreyfus Foundation, Inc. (role as PI) and an NSF grant titled ”Targeted Infusion Project: Infusing
will be presented discussing the attitudes and perceptions of the s-stem scholars and comparing students in scholarly programs and non-programmed situations.This research was supported by an NSF S-STEM grant (DUE-1742170).Introduction To meet the need for a highly trained workforce that satisfies current and futuretechnological needs of society [1], an S-STEM scholars’ program, sponsored by NationalScience Foundation (NSF), was proposed and created for mechanical engineering students at theUniversity of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC). The specific goal of the proposedMechanical Engineering (ME) S-STEM program is to provide enhanced educationalopportunities to 20 economically disadvantaged and academically talented students annually,with
North Carolina as prime. An additionalcatalyst was the successful MS Engineering (Coastal Engineering emphasis area) programapproved by Jackson State University in May 2014 which produced a steady, albeit small,pipeline of two graduates yearly, (about 75% underrepresented African American minority U.S.citizens) over the past six years. This MS Engineering degree, Coastal Engineering emphasisarea (emanated from another DHS cooperative agreement awarded to Jackson State University in2008) has helped build a, mostly local, potential supply of students for the PhD program.Reference [1] describes this MS Engineering program. One objective of these DHS educationfocused cooperative agreements was to enhance the inclusion of underrepresented minority
background.1. IntroductionThe Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing was founded in 1994 and is the world’slargest technical conference for women in computing. More than 15,000 people from 87countries attended the 2016 conference with an even greater number attending in 2017 [5]. Manystudents attend the conference to network, learn and find community, and a large number oftechnical companies attend to learn how to build inclusive cultures as well as to recruit technicaltalent.Since 2010, the Hopper conference has hosted an Open Source Day [6]. Originally titled "OpenSource Code-a-thon for Humanity", the day provides women of varying skill levels with a day-long experience in contributing to humanitarian free and open source software (HFOSS
atthree study sites to develop predictive models for student success.Motivation for this studyEngineering and computing education remains critical for U.S. workforce development andtechnological innovation now and into the future [1]–[3]. Many students recognize theimportance and opportunity associated with studying STEM majors, and engineering andcomputing programs today have a talented applicant pool [4]. As a consequence, manyinstitutions see relatively uniform and strong applicant credentials in terms of high school GPA,standardized test scores, and leadership experiences [5].Each admitted student has the clear potential for academic success in the undergraduatecurriculum. However, while some thrive at the university, many languish near the
Data” issue in 2015, a finalist for the 2015 Global Engineering Deans Council/Airbus Diversity Award, Sci Chic/Medium.com 35 ”Women STEM on Social Media Stars” (July 1, 2016), and 2016 winner of the Claire Felbinger Award for Diversity from ABET. She is a Tau Beta Pi ”Eminent Engineer,” and can be found online @Renetta Tull and https://renettatull.wordpress.com/.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering
Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) mycotoxin risk assessment and treatment in stored grains and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Work in Progress - Assessing Campus Climate: Students’ perceptions of inclusion beyond the first yearAbstractUndergraduate programs attempting to increase retention of underrepresented minorities (URM)often focus on the students’ experiences within the first year. At large institutions, students mayalso have access to additional services and programs to help them succeed beyond their firstyear
phase of this work will be alarger-scale study of engineering intuition across multiple disciplines and institutions that willpropel us towards developing classroom interventions for “teaching” intuition.IntroductionAs technology-aided problem solving has become standard practice, an engineers’ ability to“intuit” the results obtained through technology grows increasingly urgent. Studies on classroomlearning gains from technology use report both shallow learning [1] and deeper learning [2-5].The technology that aids today’s engineers in problem solution is not without limitations, asthese tools are based on underlying assumptions that may or may not hold true. Thus,engineering students must learn to use technology intelligently and critically
the transition experience. The NLP analyzerhelped summarize emotions and concepts, and identified some common concerns of students byidentifying common keywords. The Tone Analyzer tool uses linguistic analysis to detect joy,fear, sadness, anger, analytical, confident and tentative tones found in text. Such summarizationsof student stories provide suggestions to the college on how we can better orient students andprepare them for their first year. In this paper, we present top concerns of students who aretransitioning from high school to college. We will also investigate through the stories if theoverall experience of students gets better or worse through their first year.1. IntroductionEntering college is a major milestone that marks the
increase in participation of girls in high level STEM classes [1].This positive trend, however, doesn’t apply to all STEM fields. While, for example, girls’participation in biology or biomedical engineering classes is similar to boys’, this is not the casefor physics or mechanical engineering [2], [3]. The numbers are even lower when we look atgirls from under-represented communities. In this case the participation numbers are lower for allSTEM fields and decrease as students move from high school, to college, and to work [4].A growing line of research aims to understand the challenges girls from under-representedcommunities face participating in STEM settings both within informal and formal settings [5].Brickhouse and Potter [6] followed two
an engineer, the complex relationship between a student’s gender, cultural context,and conception of engineering must be considered.IntroductionFemale representation in engineeringGender representation in higher level engineering education is predominantly inequitable. At anational level, 2016 data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD) indicates that the percentage of females enrolled in “engineering and engineeringtrades” education at bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral level ranges from 11.54% to 28.33% inOECD countries [8] (Figure 1). At a field level, taking 2017 data from the US as an example,Yoder [9] demonstrates that the percentage of females earning degrees at each of these levelsvaries from
Blackboard quiz, and potentially an assignment. Uponcompletion of each of the Blackboard modules, each student’s grades for the program contributeto the final grades in the associated discipline courses, thus providing the students with therequired motivation to complete the employment search skill development program. Studentsurveys and focus groups were completed to assess the employment search skill developmentprogram and to determine suggestions for improvement.1.0 IntroductionA myriad of books [e.g., 1-3] exist that instruct students on how to develop the required skills tobe successful when searching for a job, skills such as employment search strategies, networking,resume construction, interviewing, career fair preparation, cover letters
(Full Paper)Improving student accessibility, equity, course performance, and lab skills:How introduction of ClassTranscribe is changing engineering education at theUniversity of IllinoisAbstractThis paper presents three case studies that examined the use of ClassTranscribe in a diverse setof undergraduate engineering classes in 2019 and 2020 at the University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign. ClassTranscribe, a video viewing system designed with accessibility andlearning in mind, was first presented to the ASEE community in 2019 [1]. The pedagogicalfeatures of the tool include: pause, leave and resume viewing; captions available in multiplelanguages; downloadable transcriptions; shareable links to video moments; and searchablecontent within
course of the semester. The code posted is analyzedfor a variety of quality markers such as variable names, commenting, syntax errors, logic errors,correctness, and handling of edge cases. The responses are analyzed for effective errorcorrections, alternative solutions provided, formatting changes recommended, etc. There is alsoan analysis of student expressions. Finally, and perhaps most interesting of all is how thesedetails change over the course of the semester. I. IntroductionImposter syndrome has long been acknowledged within the Computer Science (CS) educationalcommunity with several studies reporting over 50% of CS oriented individuals exhibitingimposter syndrome [1]. Weber State University is an open-enrollment university. Students
focuses primarily on the initial workshop offered to teachers as anopportunity to introduce them to engineering content and asset-based approaches to teachingScience and Engineering Practices.IntroductionThis project centers around middle school students and teachers in the U.S.-Mexico border,particularly a predominantly Latinx area in the Southwest, where more than 36% of the residentsare English Learners/Emergent Bilinguals. The number of English Learners/Emergent Bilingualscontinues to increase but they continue to have limited access to appropriate STEM content thataddresses their linguistic practices [1]. As indicated by the National Academies of Science,Engineering and Medicine in their report English learners in STEM subjects
classes at Stevens do not rely heavily on these skills or that students can make up for themin other ways, e.g. teamwork. Future work will address these questions.IntroductionSpatial-visualization skills (SVS) are known to be critically important to success and retention inSTEM fields. At the same time, these skills are often learned through life experiences such asplaying sports, or playing with certain toys, rather than being taught explicitly in a formal setting[1-4]. Due to this reliance on life experience, the levels of spatial skills displayed by women andunderrepresented groups are typically lower than that of other student populations. Importantlyhowever, spatial skills can be learned and improved with appropriate training.One of the most