the lack of a perfect correlation between the two. To investigate the factors first-yearstudents consider during their engineering disciplines major selection process, this Work inProgress paper will illustrate our approach to identify the factors using Social Cognitive CareerTheory. A survey has been compiled from two existing instruments with some additional itemswritten for this study.IntroductionAccording to data from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, engineering jobs areexpected to grow at an overall rate of 4% from 2014 to 2024, with some disciplines growingmuch faster than average [1]. Despite a growing demand for engineering graduates, a recentstudy has shown that only 28.1% of junior and senior engineering majors are
: JosseyBass Higher and Adult Education. CookSather, A., Matthews, K. E., Ntem, A., & Leathwick, S. (2018). What we talk about when we talk about Students as Partners. International Journal for Students As Partners , 2 (2), 19. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790 Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014, July). Engagement Through Partnership: Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. The Higher Education Academy . MercerMapstone, L., Dvorakova, S., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felton, P., & Knorr, K. (2017, May). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners , 1 (1). (n.d.). In
focused on high assurance field devices using microkernel architectures. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Finding the Right Questions: Using Data Science to Close the Loop with Classroom Response SystemsIntroductionThis work in progress paper explores the use of data science to analyze classroom responsesystem (CRS) data. A CRS is an educational technology tools that when paired with anappropriate pedagogy, such as team-based learning, provide increased classroom engagement insupport of improved teaching and learning [1]-[4]. They do this by leveraging technology toallow every student to respond to instructor posed questions. Many of these systems, such asLearning
, innovation,discourse, and collaboration can take place. Adding to FYECS struggles is the fact that many donot have a mentor in their related field and are unable to start building their professionalrepertoire, network, technical skills, or their content knowledge related to engineering. Simplyput, many FYECS do not identify with a community. The EIRC can be described as aCommunity of Practice (CoP) where a group of individuals have a shared vision, mutualengagement, shared repertoire, and joint enterprise. The Value Creation Framework, constructedby Wenger, Trayner, and de Laat [1] focuses on assigning value which can be produced throughsocial learning. This theoretical framework can be used as an analytical tool to evaluate the valuecreated within
minority institution like a Historically Black College and University (HBCU)are still the first generation college students in their families [1, 2]. Hence, the challenges theyhave to overcome as a first-year engineering student are greater than their peers. Students are notprepared to enroll into the right set of pre-engineering courses and persist due to their lack ofprior preparedness in high school math, physics, chemistry, and English [3,4,5,6]. Gatewaycourses have been recognized as one of the major barriers to earning a STEM degree [7]. Thenumber of times pre-requisite courses can be offered particularly every semester and in summeris also limited in small schools. Our own research on HBCUs with a student enrollment of 3000or less has shown
lectures [1, 2], little is known about student differential levels ofcognitive engagement that underlie such improved learning. As part of a large program offederally-funded research, our research team has developed light-weight, portable, ultra-Low-CostDesktop Learning Modules (LC-DLMs) that enable students to employ systems experientially toillustrate the physics that underlie transfer processes and provide students with visual cues to helpdevelop robust understanding of the fundamentals of momentum, heat and mass transfer. Sixty-seven (67) participants used LC-DLMs to learn venturi concepts in an engineering course. Overall,preliminary results show that the majority of the participants reported that LC-DLMs helped fosteractive, constructive
curriculum change in achemical engineering degree course (WIP)IntroductionA curriculum review can be an intricate and arduous process, made more complex due to amyriad of interwoven threads that inform the curriculum. This is often the case in chemicalengineering due in part to the accommodation of employer expectations, requirements fromaccreditation bodies and the multidisciplinary, integrative nature of an engineering degreewhich depends on students acquiring a wide range of attributes, and which focuses onapplication and relevancy [1], [2]. In this paper, we present our efforts to review the chemicalengineering curricula at a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK.This review is being orchestrated by institutional
chilly climate in engineering education not just from thedominant masculine culture but also from peer interaction.IntroductionDescriptions of engineering culture have often noted the divide between social and technicalcontent as a force in cultivating a chilly and uninviting climate [1]. The emergence andperpetuation of engineering’s uninviting culture can have a negative influence on the actions ofindividual members of engineering teams, and be a strong indicator of overall team performance[2]. Research has shown that the areas in which cultural pressures of engineering can influenceteaming include but are not limited to the development of team roles, project task distribution, andthe clarity of which goals and objectives are defined and met
laboratory.The specific experiment selected for discussion in this work-in-progress paper involves theutilization of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). Traditionally, the saponification reactionbetween acetyl acetate and sodium hydroxide is performed as a demonstration for this type ofreaction engineering laboratory study.[1-3] However, identification of CSTR experiments withimpactful reactions in the unit operations laboratory and the undergraduate curriculum is a long-recognized problem among many institutions.[4-6] In this work, the authors seek: (1) to add aCSTR laboratory experience with a tangible reaction engineering experiment that involves theproduction of biodiesel from vegetable oil, ethanol, and a catalyst, (2) to use the results
project.Education of Engineering StandardsSince the 2001-2002 accreditation cycle, undergraduate engineering curricula approved by theEngineering Accreditation Commission of ABET are required to incorporate engineeringstandards [1]. Current criteria require that curricula include “a culminating major engineeringdesign experience that…incorporates appropriate engineering standards and multiple constraints”[2]. This requirement addresses demand from industry for engineering graduates to enter theworkforce with knowledge of technical standards, particularly as a generation of baby-boomerswith expertise in standardization retires. This demand encompasses a wide range of industries,including the medical field [3].Despite the ABET requirement and practical need
Michigan.Mrs. Roya Solhmirzaei, Michigan State University I am PhD student in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University.Mr. Hadi Salehi, Michigan State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Improving Team Performance in First-Year Engineering StudentsIntroductionSeat and Lord (1997) [1] discussed two types of student cognitive style theories. These are fieldindependence and field dependence. Seat and Lord (1997) argues that these theories describehow technical students, or engineering students, learn new information. These theories involvestudents being classified as either independent or dependent
accredited programs [1]. More importantly, asundergraduate engineering students advance further into their careers, they are faced withmultiple tasks that require them to write extensively, whether that be in industry or graduateschool.Currently, in the standard engineering curriculum, undergraduate engineering students are onlyrequired to take a basic writing course, such as Introductory English, and some form of technicalwriting course, which is typically not engineering-specific [2,3]. Other courses that allow thesestudents to practice writing are engineering lab courses that require lab reports. In these labclasses, professors tend to focus on the quality of the technical material rather than the quality ofthe writing [4]. This could be due to a
content because of its hands-on nature andthe connection of what is learned in the class to real-world applications. Future work, notaddressed in this work-in-progress, will further evaluate the effects of including microprocessorsin these classes by examining student survey data as cohorts move through the newlyimplemented curriculum. Evaluating the use of relevant systems in senior capstone projects bothbefore and after implementation will provide particularly meaningful assessment.1 IntroductionThe advent of inexpensive, easily-accessible microcontrollers, such as the Arduino, has openednew opportunities for integrating hands-on activities related to sensors and mechatronic systemsinto the mechanical engineering classroom. For example, it is
Approaches for Starting Open-Ended Problems in Mechanical Engineering Hao Li (wl11@mit.edu) and Anette Hosoi (peko@mit.edu) Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyIntroductionMuch work has been done studying problem solving from beginning to finish [1] [2] [3], butlittle focus has been placed on the beginning of a problem, at least in the non-design mechanicalengineering curriculum. How a student starts a problem may have significant effect on theirability to fully carry out the solution. A student may solve the wrong problem, spend all theirtime pursuing the wrong approach, or forget their goal if they do not
engineering communities of First-Year Engineering students. Three phase interviewsare being conducted with participants from two different universities (Institution 1 and Institution2). First phase interviews were conducted with 12 students from Institute 1, and 14 from Institute 2in Spring 2018. Participants were selected to ensure there was representation of a variety ofbackgrounds and demographics (e.g., race, ethnicity, life experience.). During the initial interviews,students were asked questions including 1) What kinds of groups did you associate with duringyour first year? 2) In what ways are you connected to these groups? 3) What was your greateststruggle during your first year? 4) Are you an engineer? To analyze the data gathered from
pipe networks. The Civil Engineering Department at theUniversity of Hartford has embraced the challenge of updating many of our courses to includethe use of Civil3D into all four years of the students’ curriculum to enhance learning and toimprove students’ success in landing a career. Based on advice from the Department’s AdvisoryBoard, Civil3D was selected as the software platform that is used throughout the civilengineering industry.This initiative supports the overriding theme of the Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Bodyof Knowledge that is “focused on preparing the future civil engineer for entry into the practice ofcivil engineering at the professional level [1].” Specifically, the use of design software enhancesthe Engineering
21st Century [1, 2].These were 14 game-changing goals for improving life on the planet, spanning four cross-cuttingthemes, namely sustainability, health, security, and joy of living. Following this several USuniversities adopted the Grand Challenges Scholars Programs (GCSP), a comprehensive researchimmersive program for the ambitious undergraduate students who wish to participate in solvingthe grand challenges to humanity. The GCSP identified five competencies to be achieved by astudent in order to prepare them to address the Grand Challenges for engineering one of thembeing entrepreneurship. These competencies are Talent Competency, MultidisciplinaryCompetency, Viable Business/Entrepreneurship Competency, Multicultural Competency, andSocial
work in progress) Abstract Wrappers are defined as a short form that students complete along with an assignment orexam that focuses on the learning process rather than on the content itself. In this study, studentsare asked to state the perceived “effort,” the amount of time spent completing or studying forrespective assessments and their preparedness to complete both formative and summativeassignments in an Electrical Engineering (SCADA Systems and Design) and MechanicalEngineering (Dynamics) class. As expected, scores on formative assessments are mildlycorrelated with summative assessments. However, results indicate that time spent studying forsummative assessments is not correlated to the summative assessment scores.1
, chemicalrefining, and electric power generation are examples of critical infrastructure that use IndustrialControl Systems (ICS), also known as Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Systems(SCADA), to monitor and control physical processes. ICS are cyber physical systems whichcollect data from sensors monitoring physical processes and use it to control the process vianetworked electronic control of actuators, switches, and valves. Protecting these ICS, and otherslike them, from cyber-attacks is a national priority [1]. The ICS used throughout critical infrastructure are often designed, built, operated, andmaintained by engineers from domains related to the physical process being controlled. Forexample, chemical engineers design refineries, civil
prompts educators to modify their courses in ways thatincrease the engagement of their students with the suggested benefit being increased learninggains, retention, and greater academic success [1]. Yet, even within the research community it isacknowledged that engagement is multi-faceted and difficult to define [2]. Educators are thereforeleft to make their own judgements on what their classrooms will look and feel like if their studentsare engaged. Research has shown that it is cognitive engagement (over behavioral or emotionalengagement) that is indicative of higher-order processing [3]. It therefore becomes important thateducators are able to assess the cognitive engagement of their students in straightforward andmeaningful ways.Chi and Wylie
collaborative learning in engineering courses [1].Organizations such as the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) haveencouraged team projects to develop skills such as leadership, effective communication, andconflict resolution [2]. Therefore, these learning instances are essential to prepare the futureengineers to face the world of real work [1].However, the benefits of cooperative learning are not immediate or automatic [3]. There arecertain considerations to be taken into account in order to avoid non-participation, social loafing,and minority bias. By non-participation, the literature refers to situations when team members donot attend team meetings, show no interest in teamwork at an academic context, or refuse to doanything
pathways for adult, nontraditional, and veteran undergraduates in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Mobile Instructional Particle Image Velocimetry for STEM Outreach and Undergraduate Fluid Mechanics Education Lori Caldwell1, David Armijo2, Sarbajit Mukherjee3, Angela Minichiello1, Tadd Truscott2, Vladimir Kulyukin3 1 Department of Engineering Education, Utah State University 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Utah State University 3 Department of Computer Science, Utah State
developedthrough the construction of a design-based task. Often, DBL is challenge driven, where learnersseek to find a solution to a complex problem through a project-based approach [5], [7]. The useof DBL tends to be within a single discipline (e.g., only electrical engineers) [4] or as means of“unifying” or mixing sub-disciplines (e.g., electrical, mechanical, and civil engineers) [11].Recent movements towards multidisciplinary learning in higher education have called for thedesign process found science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) to be blendedwith the artistic and creative process of the arts. Often referred to as STEAM or STEM + Art [1],[8], this approach aims to pique student interest through opportunities to engage in
as leaders within their sub-team and mentor new students.IntroductionAssistive technology projects have been used in engineering capstone and project-based courses,often as a way to introduce a real-world problem or client. Several sources cite both the benefitsand challenges of working with patients and clients through these projects [1, 2]. For example,solutions or prototypes might often be very limited in scope or number of clients but can oftenhighlight or include a service learning component [2]. Thus, embedding the topic in capstonedesign can teach students to identify engineering design projects with positive social impact [3].Overall, these projects are often strongly motivating for students, with student satisfactionreportedly
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Pilot Study of an Engineering Education Focused Problem-Solving Inventory using Civil Engineering Undergraduate StudentsAbstractThis work in progress (WIP) paper describes the development of a new engineering modified -problem solving inventory (EM-PSI). The EM-PSI is a student’s self-assessment of theirproblem solving and critical thinking abilities broken down into three sub-categories, 1) problemsolving confidence, 2) approach-avoidance style, and 3) personal control. The EM-PSI is aninnovative tool that is eventually intended be used as an evaluation metric, together withtraditional metrics such as GPA and test scores, to
workers who can effectively communicate with one another, problem- solve, and innovate… Preparing students for the future and to make significant contributions to society and the world has always been the noblest aim of higher education.” [1] Success then becomes not only a multi-objective problem, seeking mastery over thedefined learning objectives of the individual course, but also a transformational and aspirationalgoal of helping students to advance the depths of their own engagement and responsibility forlearning. A partial measure of success can also be seen in the degree to which students havegrown in terms of identifying themselves as an engineer, feeling part of the culture and having asense of belonging
model.BackgroundThis experiment grew out of studies of fluid mechanics courses and a fluids elective course,called Flow Visualization [1]–[4]. Students expressed greater fascination and higher engagementin the Flow Visualization course, which required that they create, capture, and describe fluidflows. This process appeared to both enhance their visual expertise in fluids and encouragedeeper conceptual understanding of key concepts. In an effort to substantiate this apparentenhancement in visual expertise, we sought collaborators in cognitive psychology, a move beingencouraged in engineering education research [5], [6].Overview of Experimental DesignTo explore this connection between conceptual understanding and visual expertise, wecollaborated with cognitive
scientific theories ofgender/sex, race, disability, and sexuality influence one another. Throughout the course,students are asked to reflect on who gets to be a scientist or engineer, who defines whichquestions researchers ask and which problems engineers solve, who benefits from thesesolutions, and what role social justice plays in science and engineering practice.Throughout the course, we explore these inter-related questions: 1) How do our cultural ideas about race, gender, disability and sexuality influence science/engineering knowledge and practice? 2) On the other hand, how does our science/engineering practice influence our cultural ideas about race, gender, disability and sexuality? 3) How can we use science and engineering
Arizona State University Work in Progress: Seeking Wa:k Community Perceptions in Engineering 2IntroductionIt has been recognized STEM fields need to broaden perspectives and find ways to connect thenext generation [1], [2]. Native Americans have been among the most underrepresentedpopulation in the fields of STEM [3]. To support inclusion programs already established or newengagement programs to support NA/AN inclusion in STEM, it is imperative to first understandhow Native communities and cultures relate to STEM. This insight could provide effectivestrategies for relevant and positive engagement to STEM among Native students.This Work in Progress research builds upon an approach for community-based
Sciences at Tecnologico de Monterrey as an educa- tion expert. Iliana has a Bachelor degree in Communication and a Master’s degree in Education. She was at the School of Education as an instructor in learning assessment and counselor of competency-based educational programs. Her research interests are the use of technology in learning and the impact of using innovative learning environments.Prof. Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, and Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Genaro Zavala is a Full Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies of the School of Engineering and Sciences at Tecnologico de Monterrey. Professor Zavala is National Researcher Level 1 of the National System of Researchers of Mexico and