National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and his M. S. in Civil Engineering in 2015. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy within engineering. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineering Education PhD undergraduate student at Purdue University. Previously a high school educa- tor for six years with a masters in education curriculum and BS
instruction.Methods:Participants. Engineering students (N=4) who previously passed or who were concurrentlyenrolled a mechanics of materials course from various disciplines (mechanical, engineeringphysics, and civil and environmental engineering), grade levels (sophomores to seniors), andcoursework experience were recruited to participate in a pilot study and separated into twogroups each consisting of two students.Procedure. Students completed a video-recorded pre-lab assessment on torsion during which thefollowing questions were asked: 1. You are curious to know which material will respond better under a torsional load. The samples are consistent in shape and size; only the material changes. The program for the test permits consistent angular displacements
engineering.Jean S. DeClerck, Michigan Technological University Jean Straw DeClerck has supported two National Science Foundation (NSF) grants through the design, facilitation, and ongoing improvement of ethics education instruction to science and engineering students. She is an Engaged Learning and Integrated Technology Specialist at Michigan Technological University’s Van Pelt and Opie Library. Her undergraduate studies included technical communication and mechanical engineering coursework, and she will complete her master’s of science degree in rhetorical and tech- nical communications at Michigan Tech in early 2012. Her current interests include engaged learning environments, mentorship, and the rhetorical aspects of
, there were 442,273 international students in China in all, in which48,394 majored in engineering, ranking only below the numbers of students majored inthe traditional popular majors-Mandarin Chinese (169,093) and Western Medicine(49,022). In addition, with China joined the Washington Accord as a signatory countryand lots of engineering programs taught in English was developed for internationalgraduate students further increase of international engineering students can be expected. Existent studies have explored the motivation, social-cultural adjustment,learning experiences of international students in China. Nevertheless, few studies haveexplored their learning outcomes. Considering the shift towards outcome-basededucation in global
Paper ID #44419Scaffolding AI Research Projects Increases Self-efficacy of High School Studentsin Learning Neural Networks (Fundamental)S. Shailja, University of California, Santa Barbara Shailja is an incoming post-doctoral fellow at Stanford University. She completed her Ph.D. in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department with interdisciplinary emphasis on College and University teaching at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in 2024. She graduated with a bachelor’s degree from the Electrical Engineering Department at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 2016. Shailja has been
and students of color.Ms. Sarah Jane (SJ) Bork, University of Michigan Sarah Jane (SJ) received her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Ohio State University in 2017, and her M.S. in Engineering Education Research from the University of Michigan in 2020. As a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Sarah is studying the mental health experiences of engineering graduate students.Kayleigh Merz, University of Michigan Kayleigh Merz (she/her) is a recent master’s graduate in Higher Education from the University of Michi- gan. She earned a B.S. in Cognitive Science from the University of Michigan, and associate degrees in Mathematics
connections towardslearning engineering concepts. To achieve this objective the following research question wasexamined, ‘How do undergraduate engineering students understand and perceive learning throughthe cognitive domain of learning?’ A qualitative research design approach was used, and theinterview questions were designed based on the six hierarchy levels of cognitive domain(knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation).ProcedureThe different steps used in this study include IRB approval, pilot interview, participantsrecruitment, and conducting interviews are described in this section. First, the study and theinterview protocol were approved by the Institution Review Board (IRB). The pilot interview wasconducted
of Engineering. This paperpresents the first-year development, implementation, and outcomes of the program with plans forfuture program improvement.First-Year Implementation of the S-SMART Summer Research Internship ProgramIn 2022, the S-SMART Summer Research Internship Program was piloted with a cohort of tenstudents participating in four research projects across three engineering disciplines - civilengineering, computer engineering, and mechanical engineering. Each project team wassupervised by at least one faculty advisor and one SFSU student peer mentor.Recruitment and Selection of Program ParticipantsThe S-SMART interns were selected through an online application process. The applicationform, created on Qualtrics, asked for information
exposure to civil engineering disciplines. This study introduces a blended teachingapproach, in which students are actively involved in delivering lectures on selected topics, ratherthan relying solely on the instructor. Pre-class and post-class surveys were administered to thestudent presenters to gauge their perceptions on delivering team lectures. The surveys also aimedto assess whether their knowledge improved, their roles in team presentations, and theirdevelopment of effective presentation skills. Additionally, audience feedback on the grouppresentations was collected and it was observed that the majority of students reported an increasein their knowledge after lecture delivery. This not only developed a sense of student ownershipin the
. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222.25. Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Contribution of learner–instructor interaction to sense of community in graduate online education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(4).26. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 1-440.27. Kittur, J. & Tuti, S. (2024). Conducting Qualitative Research Study: A Step-by-Step Process. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 28. Chakraborty, M., & Muyia Nafukho, F. (2014
Identity, and Affective AwarenessAfter this model was applied to program development, program developers completed amixed-methods study including a survey to collect qualitative and quantitative data to evaluateprogram effectiveness at creating a transformative educational experience for participants [3].The findings of this study included key impacts of the program and recommendations for futuredevelopment:Key Impacts of the EECS Design Student Communities of Practice Program [3]: 1. Instructors of engineering education seeking to facilitate transformative learning experiences for their students should create their own auto-ethnographic teaching narratives and engage in interdisciplinary dialogues to share values and understanding
improving the culture and environment of undergraduate education experience for all students, particularly those from underrepresented groups.Mrs. Risa D Hartman, The University of Texas at Austin, NASCENT Center Risa Hartman oversees multiple Education and Outreach programs at the University of Texas at Austin. Her roles include: Staff Education and Outreach Director for the Center for Dynamics and Control of Materials, a Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) and as the Pre-college Ed- ucation Director for the NASCENT Engineering Research Center focused on nanomanufacturing. She manages programs in the areas of graduate student traineeship and career development, undergraduate research, Research
efforts have significantly more training for science education and, practices in quantitative methods, 86-99.anecdotally, we have observed that imbues a science-oriented lens whereby the distinctions and[14] Pleasants, J. & Olson, J.K. (2019) "Refining an Instrument and Studying Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of the Scope of Engineering," Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER): 9(2).[15] Pleasants, J., Olson, J. K., & De La Cruz, I. (2020). Accuracy of Elementary Teachers’ Representations of the Projects and Processes of Engineering: Results of a Professional Development Program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1-22.[16] Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus
disciplines and warrantfurther study with a larger sample of ET students.While student GPA at graduation is a valid measure of how students perform in the classroom,not all learning is best measured by a graded, quantitative scale. To measure classroomperformance in a “non-graded” way, the “seriousness of purpose” measure was conceptualized.The measure is intended to evaluate the student’s ability to apply what he or she has learned inan open-ended and practical way. In engineering and ET fields, the senior capstone course iswhere theory and practice collide, so assessing students on their capstone performance is alogical way to measure classroom performance. The qualitative measure of “seriousness ofpurpose” provides an alternative way to measure
must oftenemploy different pedagogical approaches than traditional writing centers. In addition, asa substantial proportion of engineering graduate students are multilingual speakerswhose primary language is not English, GWCs must also address these aspects ofstudents' learning circumstances.At USC, two technical communication faculty in the Engineering in Society Program withextensive background in communications instruction for engineering students receiveda one-year commitment from the engineering school to pilot a tutoring resource for its1,000 Ph.D. students. In this paper, these two faculty discuss some of the center'sfeatures, their pedagogical practices, and characteristics and feedback of their students.They also discuss some of the
upfront transdisciplinary knowledge to engineering students supports the adoption ofan HDT methodology and whether it is a viable approach in engineering design education.Additionally, it examines the impact of adopting holistic emotional, cognitive, and mentoringlearning practices on students. It also assesses their perceptions of various skills and practicessuch as critical reading, flexibility in modes of thinking, communication, analog practices,empathy, ethics, time management, and team dynamics. Furthermore, it explores how thesepractices influence academic success in college and students’ ability to recall knowledge whenneeded.Moreover, it continues the longitudinal study into its fifth year, tracking four cohorts ofsecondary students who
review. For example, Asimakopoulos et al. (2019) examined engineering students’ESE using a quantitative method. However, it was not clear whether the ESE instrument adoptedin their study measured individuals’ self-concept or self-efficacy, and the items were not createdto reflect the content of general entrepreneurship education programs. Therefore, based on priorresearch, a theoretically and empirically grounded ESE instrument for engineering students istimely needed. Based on the refined ESE instrument by McGee et al. (2009), we adapted andcreated items that assessed engineering students’ ESE. Phase 2: Item piloting In Phase 2, we aimed to pilot the items that were consistent with the entrepreneurshipeducation course content from
toward more inclusive behavior? It’s also interesting to note theuntraditional nature of these two students, their identities, and their experiences. S34, though hadmultiple identities which are underrepresented in engineering, enacted behaviors towardinclusivity and overcoming bias. On the other hand, S17 who matches a traditionallyoverrepresented group in engineering experienced inclusive behaviors from others whichimproved his experience during and after the HEP. Clearly, the expected results as demonstratedby quantitative studies around engineering and DEI are not exhibited among these two students.Their experiences show that individuals are unique and complex and cannot be simplified tostatistical data which further emphasizes the need for
factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Di- vision Apprentice Faculty Grant. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Ed- ucation Symposium and 2016 New Faculty
Jacques C. Richard Richard@TAMU.edu College of Engineering and Janie M. Moore Janie.Moore@ag.tamu.edu Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Texas A&M UniversityAbstractWe consider the impact of precipitous decisions to abruptly migrate a first-year and first-semesterengineering core course to partially online as a response to a pandemic. This quantitative andretrospective study seeks to identify any effects of a global pandemic on student performance in acourse at a large research
13 Total 121 In the article selection process, we included those articles with explicit research objectivesof better understanding undergraduate engineering students’ curricular, co-curricular or extra-curricular experiences that shed light on student development. We excluded those studies thatcollected empirical data from engineering students but aimed to better understand theeffectiveness of a teaching or assessment method or an educational intervention as we view thesestudies as primarily pedagogy-focused research. We also excluded those studies that focus on theexperiences of graduate engineering students or K-12 students. The selected 121 articles serve asa purposeful sample that represent the recent
of the Engineering Educa- tion Faculty. He received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Texas A&M and Masters of American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #35151 Science in Software Engineering at SMU. He has 28 years of industry experience in most aspects of soft- ware development and product lifecycle. Robert Lightfoot is a Ph.D. student at Texas A&M University in Interdisciplinary Engineering. His research focuses on engineering education.Mr. Drew Steven Casey, Texas A&M University Drew Casey is a Graduate Research
scenarioAbstractThis education research and assessment paper describes a pilot study exploring howundergraduate engineering students sorted information related to an open-ended design scenario.To develop effective solutions, engineers must interpret design-relevant information fromstakeholders, benchmarked products, and secondary research and synthesize this information intostakeholder needs and requirements. While literature has explored how engineering studentsgather design information, less work has explored how students make sense of this information.To understand how engineering students may approach information synthesis tasks, we providedten undergraduate engineering students with 25 pieces of information related to an open-endeddesign scenario
, thecommunication techniques incorporate key elements of emotional intelligence. Last but not least,this course acts as a supplementary tool to coach students throughout their first half of thecapstone project, where effective communication plays a critical role in the success of the entireproject.This study uses a mixed method, in which both qualitative and quantitative data will be collectedfrom various instruments, including written reflections of participation of the interactivesimulations, grades obtained for the written and oral presentations, students feedback survey, etc.Preliminary results collected from the pilot semester will be analyzed to gauge the personal andprofessional impact on students, and to see what potential curriculum improvement
persistence in an engineering major at a university. Despite current researchthat identifies best practices for STEM interventions that support the formation of youngwomen’s STEM identity (AAUW, 2010), a persistent research gap exists on how women’sexperiences affect their decision to enter and persist in engineering. Increased knowledge aboutwomen’s K-14 experiences, including the supports that may have influenced persistence, willprovide additional insight into how to construct an environment that encourages young women toenter and persist in engineering majors.This mixed-methods sequential study utilized a survey and a focus group to provide insight intofemale students’ feelings of self-efficacy and perceptions of the academic, social, and
-taught engineeringcourse for pre-college students. This course, led by a diverse team of graduate studentinstructors, was taught for four years and serves as a benchmark for exploring the multifacetedimpacts of team teaching. It also explores the instructors’ experiences of teaching and teachingfor the first time, presenting an opportunity to learn and grow along with the students. The studydiscusses strategies the authors found effective to foster a successful team teaching environment,what worked, what was improved, and insights into coordinating a multidisciplinary instructorteam.CLASS LOGISTICSThe study took place in a one-week, one-credit university-level course for pre-college students asan introduction to civil engineering. The course has
the Context of Prompts and PerceptionsAbstractStorytelling can be valuable for developing empathy and enhancing communication, allowingindividuals to make connections with themselves and others. In this work, we sought tounderstand the potential of story-driven learning, the process of developing stories to connectdefining moments of the past and consider future goals, within the context of engineering. Wedescribe a required, non-traditional undergraduate course that employs this pedagogical approachfor biomedical engineering students to encourage them to integrate, reframe, and make meaningof their diverse experiences. We then detail our study, where we sought to explore: 1) how uniquestory prompts may elicit different aspects of empathy, in
framework for studying college impacts on students. Paper presented to the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 4. Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553-579. 5. Owens, E. W., Shelton, A. J., Bloom, C. M., & Cavil, J. K. (2012). The Significance of HBCUs to the Production of STEM Graduates: Answering the Call. Educational Foundations, 26, 33-47. 6. Jackson, D. L. (2013). A
Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their under- graduate student population. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. She remains an active researcher with MIDFIELD, studying gender issues, trans- fers, and matriculation models in engineering.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering
identifying and understanding factors that contribute toengineering students' motivation to learn and succeed, and compare these for different studenttypes (by demographics and choice of major). A quantitative study was conducted in which theMotivation and Attitudes in Engineering (MAE) survey was developed using achievement valueas the theoretical framework. Three constructs were identified through factor analysis:Expectancy, Present Perceptions (students' perceptions of their present tasks in engineeringstudies), and Future Perceptions (students' perceptions of their future tasks as engineers). Surveyresponses over the course of the first year in engineering for a single cohort of students (n=959)were collected and tested for internal reliability