, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement-Adaptation and Implementation. This newlaboratory will help integrate the engineering of daylighting systems into the school’scurriculum, with the anticipation that this will nurture the scientific background and design skillsof undergraduate students. The secondary mission of the laboratory is to disseminate the sameknowledge and/or skills between graduate students, faculty, and practicing professionals. Thelaboratory will also be an effective venue to integrate teaching and research.1. Design of Daylighting Systems in BuildingsIntegration between daylighting and electric lighting systems in commercial buildings may resultin a significant reduction in the annual energy consumption and operating cost. Indeed
temperatures as a function of time, as well as acurve showing a numerical integration of Equation 4 using the “best fit” experimental heattransfer coefficients. The experimental heat transfer coefficient for the smaller 4.1 mmthermometer at 309.2 K was 10 W/m2K, while the coefficient based on the Churchill/Churelationship was 5.6 W/m2K. The experimental heat transfer coefficient for the larger 6 mmthermometer at 315 K was 9 W/m2K, while the coefficient based on the Churchill/Churelationship was 4.1 W/m2K. Thus, a correction factor of 1.8-2.2 was needed in order to matchthe experimental data with the correlation. The need for the correction once again arises fromintroduced forced convection. It is very difficult to obtain and keep an ideal, free
methods, models and research to enhance professional and technical backgrounds andto develop technical management skills by combining qualitative approaches and quantitativetechniques in a balanced curriculum.Project management, telecommunications, and automatic data capture courses were added to thecore curriculum. Similarly, financial and managerial economics were added as an option for thesupporting management area. Students are required to conduct research in all graduate courses.Specific research methods are covered in ET 603, Applied Research and Design. For the ET 603course, students are required to complete a research study using accepted methods and statisticalanalysis. Additionally, all students have the option to take ET 648, Research
INNOVATIVE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Ajit D. Kelkar, Ram Mohan, Guoqing Tang, N. Radhakrishnan and Kenneth Murray Computational Science and Engineering Program North Carolina A&T State University Greensboro, NC 27411 North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCA&T) has established a master'sdegree program in Computational Science and Engineering (CSE). The program will be highlyinterdisciplinary, drawing expertise and resources from various disciplines across the University,and operating outside a department. It will offer an interdisciplinary curriculum combiningapplied
, American Society for Engineering Education”The primary interest in this paper is that part of the BOK fulfilled through the educationalcomponent of an engineer’s training. The curriculum subcommittee of CAP3 is working on thesegregation of responsibilities in the educational component of the BOK; that is, whichcomponents will be fulfilled by a traditional bachelor’s program and which will be acquired bythe civil engineer beyond the bachelor’s degree (i.e., B + M/30). Preliminary discussions withinthat committee indicate that the only addition to the BOK expected of the master’s degree orequivalent is outcome 12: “specialized area of civil engineering.” This outcome requiressignificant depth in one area of civil engineering to the ability level
data from the Internet, while also complementingexisting laboratory set-ups. Even though free networking software is readily available, itis not typically incorporated into undergraduate computer engineering/technology orcomputer science teaching curricula as comprehensively as one would like [1-4].Networking courses typically focus on theory, simulation and hardware applications, orsome combinations of these to impart knowledge. However, Internet-available freeware,typically used by networking professionals, can be used as a valuable resource tosupplant the use of theory, simulation and/or hardware applications in developing, andteaching through, an integrated networking curricula. The purpose in this approach is todo just that; that is, to
Engineering Education”matter of a software engineering course. Providing an experience that replicates thewhole software design process becomes the challenge. The importance of embeddingcommunication across the curriculum in this way and building upon basic skills taught indedicated communication courses has been endorsed by a growing number of institutionsof higher learning that have formalized such programs (see for example, University ofPittsburgh, and their Oral Communication Center http://www.cxc.pitt.edu/).To address the goals of embedding oral communication toward the end of improvingstudent skills and understanding along with their recognition of the need to studycommunication topics, we attempted to explicitly teach communication skills
, all who share WEPAN’s commitment to enhancing the diversity of theengineering workforce.In 2002, WEPAN unveiled a new strategic plan centered on three keystone statements. (1) Toincrease the visibility and inclusiveness of Engineering to engage all talent; (2) to catalyzechange to create a critical mass; and (3) to make strategic choices that impact systemic change.The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of WEPAN and its operations. This isfollowed by a discussion of how WEPAN can affect women faculty in engineering and areas inwhich both WEPAN and women faculty could benefit from increased interactions.IntroductionEngineering education has long recognized the lack of diversity in their students. The numbersof students of color
, the faculty werenot so clear about how to integrate the challenge assignment into the course. LS providedguidance and practical suggestions for creating an HPL environment throughout the challengeassignment and entire course. For example, the LS negotiated for challenge first and assessmentfirst that became principles of our collaborative instructional design.“I was thinking of coming at it a slightly different way, introducing the challenge a little later inthe sequence of activities than I actually wound up doing... And in one meeting with [LS1] shesaid, well, just give them the challenge right up front. That was sort of a key meeting.” [quotefrom faculty 2]By challenge first, we mean that the challenge was posed to the students in the
dominant orthodoxies. Failure to display reason, analysis, objective consideration of evidence, and distance is much less used as an explanation for poor grades, as these keystones of modern science are themselves shown to be biased in favor of certain, but not other, views, and are hence no more valid than any other method 29 of arriving at conclusions.Johnson aptly describes this turgid nonsense as “bizarre.”29 It’s a prime example of what Leocalls pomobabble31and it’s Bogus Sophistry (BS) that’s unlikely to instill confidence in, andrespect for, academic standards in higher education.32From a political perspective, in the past, the (political) Left’s overall impact on the
advantages into oursociety through cooperation. As mentioned earlier, the activities of international cooperation can be classified into three categories: personalexchanges, holding seminars/participating conferences, and conducting research projects. Although these activitiesdon’t necessarily act in any sequence, coordinating these activities closely improves the dissemination of the resultsof international cooperation. Building up individual connection through personnel exchange and then progressinginto cooperation of researchers to reach consensus for further collaboration is the most common collaborative modelfor most researchers. However, for an integrated proposal in which more researchers like to participate, a seminarwhich aims to
Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Educators1 David Jonassen, Johannes Strobel, Chwee Beng Lee University of Missouri/Concordia University/Nanyang Technology University Many engineering programs have integrated problem-based learning (PBL) into their instruction. Quite often, the problems that are solved in PBL programs are not authentic. In order to develop more authentic problems that are required to prepare engineering graduates to solve complex, ill-structured workplace problems, we developed a case library of engineering problems as described by practicing engineers. The qualitative analysis of those stories showed that workplace problems are ill
their work. The first thing to work on is thetask planning sheet. Tasks must be identified and the individual responsible for finishing each taskis assigned.A series of two courses were introduced into the Mechanical Engineering curriculum at theUniversity of Memphis beginning with the Fall 1998 semester. Among other things, these coursesserve as an introduction to Mechanical Engineering and will hopefully aid our retention efforts.One of the ideas tried in Fall 2001 and carried through to Fall 2004 was to get the freshmeninvolved with the seniors. Seniors can provide valuable insights to the freshmen and provide themwith a perspective about the University that faculty cannot provide. The seemingly ideal way to dothis was to have the senior
: energy resources, energy conversion systems,energy conservation, and environmental pollution. During the course, exercises and teamprojects were assigned to design renewable and traditional energy conversion systems. Thispaper describes the assignments and projects used in the course to enhance the design experienceof the students. Detailed descriptions of each design project and the student design solution weregiven.Introduction Energy affects the lives of everyone in so many ways, economically, technically, andenvironmentally. Thus, integration of energy and its many aspects such as energy conservationtechnologies and environmental impacts of energy generation, in the educational curriculum ofscience, technology, and engineering
Session 3548 MiniTab in Assessment of the Dynamics Course Zhongming Liang Purdue University Fort WayneAbstract For better interpretation of assessment data, the author uses MiniTab, a statistical analysissoftware package, for evaluating students’ learning outcomes with multiple statistical measuresin several his courses in the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) program, such as thedynamics course discussed in this paper as an example. The better assessment and follow-upactions have indeed led to improvement of students’ learning and satisfaction
architecture.” In contrast to skill-focused teaching, a positionstatement by eCAADia 2001 proposed that there should be an integration of CAAD educationinto architectural curriculum and that CAD education should be taught during the whole span ofarchitectural education [5]. Similarly, a white paper by the Association for Computer AidedDesign in Architecture (ACADIA) stated that “students need to use digital techniques throughoutthe curriculum” and that “a digital design sensibility must pervade the school culture” [8]. Given the predominance use of discrete courses to deliver content related to CAD inmany architecture curriculums, an alternative approach to integrating digital skills may be toutilize the discrete CAD courses as a mechanism for
foundation of the GTD curriculum. Together with theresearch sequence they are the common courses that all students take. Designed to integrate theprogram and provide a solid basis for approaching issues in development, these seminars are takenduring the first two semesters, in either order, to allow flexibility on when students may enter theprogram.GTD 501 Introduction to Global Technology and Development 2GTD 503 Technology and the International Political System 2The first seminar, GTD 501 Introduction to Global Technology and Development, introduces themajor approaches to economic, social and political development, seeking to expose students to thetheoretical heritage that integrates these aspects
criteria were not met, faculty were understandablymuch less enthusiastic. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationTherefore, as part of a planning process to develop an infrastructure and curriculum for thebroader integration of service learning in the mechanical engineering department, we sought tobetter understand faculty knowledge of, enthusiasm for, and concerns about service learning. Inpart, we needed this information to create a tailored educational workshop on service learning forthe faculty. To this end, structured interviews were conducted to gain insight into MITmechanical engineering
mechanical engineering curriculums a class in engineering ethics is a required part ofthe course of study. This training is essential for engineering professional development. Thefirst engineering fundamentals examination for professional licensure includes questions onethics based on lessons learned in class, while the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) lists training in ethics as an expected and measurable engineering programoutcome2. Concepts discussed in this academic context include professional responsibility andintegrity issues, conflict of interest, consulting and research ethics issues, as well as associatedengineering ethics issues dealing with the environmental and international perspectives.To continue the thread of
females.IntroductionThe VaNTH Engineering Research Center for Bioengineering Educational Technologies isfunded by the National Science Foundation (NSF EEC 9876363) as one of the severalengineering research centers. While its focus is primarily at the undergraduate and graduatelevel of college education, a significant outreach program to the high school level exists. As partof a NSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) supplement, an interdisciplinary group ofsecondary teachers and college faculty have come together to develop and field test newmaterials for secondary school science classrooms.The design utilized in the curriculum modules makes use of a strong contextually based“Challenge” followed by a sequence of instruction where students would attempt to
andinnovative teaching, the responsibility for student employment, and the responsibility tosociety, the transition to the development mode is still at its infancy. 4 The profoundchanges in societies and recent technological developments have had relatively littleeffect on the curricular structure of the EE. Most of the current EE organizations andprograms have been implemented in slowly changing organizations. The current EEmodel is based on the education structure and the curriculum implemented in the U.S. inthe late 1940s. The emphasis of the present EE must be on quantity, aiming to includeeverything an EE student needs during his/her career. “This way of doing things has ledto overloading, incoherence and the lack of the ability to combine
INNOVATIONS IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING PROGRAMS: FOCUS ON MULTILEVEL COMMUNICATION SKILLS Judith A. Todd, Akhlesh Lakhtakia, and Christine B. Masters Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802-6812AbstractMultidisciplinary engineering programs are uniquely positioned to integrate new educational andresearch initiatives into their curricula. In this paper, we describe an integrated series ofcontinuing innovations in the Engineering Science and Mechanics Department, College ofEngineering at The Pennsylvania State University. These
the springsemester of their senior year. The DBT project is coordinated through the ME program Designof Experiments Plan and further supports the ME program's Professional Component Plan byrequiring the use of engineering design with open-ended problems, integration of professionaltools, and demonstration of professional communications 1, 2.The ability of ME graduates to successfully design, conduct and analyze experiments isintegrated across the ME curriculum. Beginning in the freshman year, students are providedwith opportunities to acquire experimental, analytical and modeling tools and skills, and todevelop effective means of communicating the results of their work. In an analogous fashion tothe capstone design project providing a measure
Bay Area professionals andclass offerings. We utilize the strengths of the university to develop a balancedcurriculum including courses from Engineering, Management, Finance, and Statistics.Special considerations are given to admission requirements, prerequisite structure, andcourse offerings such that we can create a large pool of qualified applicants for theprogram.MotivationCalifornia State University, East Bay (CSUEB) began an engineering program in 1997,starting with a single offering in Industrial Engineering at the undergraduate level. Theoriginal vision was to slowly grow the program to a sustainable critical mass byintroducing other engineering disciplines and degree options over time
Course into the CurriculumIt is one thing to be lucky enough for a “perfect storm” of funding, expertise, and studentinterest, and quite another to integrate the resulting course into the curriculum on an ongoingbasis. The first step is to obtain special status for this course so that a student can takedifferent subtopics for credit under the same course number and title, as described in sectionII above. The next step is to allow special credit at either undergraduate or graduate level forspecialized, experienced students who will help you train newcomers and assist on finalprojects. At Cal Poly a senior project is required. This is a two-course sequence that must bedefined by the student. These projects are ideally suited to the ongoing
includesthe following: holistic, interdisciplinary approach to civil and environmental infrastructure prob-lems; collaborative research within and outside CEES that teaches valuable partnering skills; par-ticipation in CEES’s novel educational efforts, including integrated curriculum projects,multidisciplinary design experiences, team learning, team teaching, and K-12 alliances; a full yearin the classroom team teaching with a faculty member; and participation in new faculty seminarsand at least two educational methods courses. Table 1 below lists 10 measurable objectives takenfrom our GAANN contract, that we are using to track progress of the fellowship program. Ourbroad-based program exposes GAANN Fellows to all of the rigors associated with a
objectives and learning outcomes, while based upon the specific program mission, allowdata collection, metrics for assessment and evaluation to be focused upon in-common corecourses. Certain aspects of the mission, goals, outcomes and objectives will differ betweenprograms. The assessment of the differences within each discipline is conducted withinspecialization courses with separate assessment methods. The final evaluation of data and theassessment of each program curriculum becomes a discipline dependent process with theanalysis and evaluation of data, and the program recommendations conducted as an independentfunction by specialization faculty and members of the program industrial advisory board.The University adopted an assessment plan for all
of group processes were introduced in theclass. By semester’s end, the students were expected to complete a complex design projectwhere parts are designed and integrated in a team effort. This final project, which Johnson et al4describes as “formal” cooperative learning, required the team to complete an assembly fromseveral individual component parts. The teams were selected by the instructor to ensurediversity of talent, culture, and performance level. Each team of four was assigned a number ofsmall component parts of an assembly, varying in difficulty. The team structure allowed forgroup roles to be self-assigned, therefore each group leader had the opportunity to distributeassignments according to ability. Upon completion of the project
curriculum should be equally divided between liberal studies, engineering, and architecture theory and practice, allowing students hands-on experience in architecture within the context of other studies that integrate the technical and management aspects of practice with considerations of how their practice fits into the values and aesthetic contexts of community.3. Unique Challenges and Opportunities of Architectural Education in Taiwan Social change refers to any changes in social processes or structures, including changes inpolitical and economic systems and human relationships (Erman et al., 2004:52; Hindle &Rwelamila, 1998:151). People form affiliations within a larger social structure. When basicsocial structures
textbooks limits them to relativelysimple problems that fail to show students the larger picture when it comes to economic analysis.The use of personal finances similar to those identified by Martinazzi and Lavelle3 has beenfound to increase interest in a subject that many students find dry and confusing. By usingpractical common sense problems, faculty is able to impress the applicability of engineeringeconomy on the individual student.Bibliography1. Hartman, J.C., “Engineering Economy: Suggestions to Update a Stagnant Course Curriculum,” American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 1998.2. Wells, W.E., “Economics for Engineers: An Integrated Approach,” American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference