Session 2266 Thermal Fluids Systems Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy Michael R. Maixner, George Havener United States Air Force AcademyAbstractThis paper describes the new pedagogy used to teach thermal fluid systems engineering (TFSE)to cadets who major in either mechanical engineering or engineering mechanics. Previouslytaught as a 4-course sequence consisting of separate and distinct subject material onThermodynamics (ME 312), Fluid Mechanics (ME 341), Heat Transfer (ME 441), and EnergyConversion (ME 467), the current presentation integrates this subject material in
from fivedifferent academic departments at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology collaborated to developan introductory course in MEMS open to all science and engineering majors of junior standing.This course was team-taught and included a laboratory component, giving students hands-onexperience with the processes involved in the fabrication of MEMS devices. This paper presentsthe results to date of this multidisciplinary faculty team’s efforts to make MEMS more accessibleto a larger audience. In particular, the paper documents the development of the new course andits content, as well as the continuing evolution of its implementation.I. IntroductionStarting out as the realm of solid-state physicists and electrical engineers, the silicon
andmonitoring of large dynamic electro-mechanical systems, such as electric motors and/or drives.This paper concentrates on remote control of a group of electro-mechanical devices (variablepower supply, electric motor, dynamometer, and instrumentation) integrated in one complex aswell as visualization of their control parameters (such as voltage, speed, torque, current, andpower).The paper also discusses log-on security procedures, hardware and software development, videostreaming to ensure quality video and sound, and teaching methodologies to provide successfullaboratory delivery.HardwareFor electromechanical part of the project it was decided to utilize existing laboratory equipmentused in the Technology department of Buffalo State College. It
Session 2620 Computing and Programming with LabVIEW Shahnam Navaee Georgia Southern UniversityAbstractIn this paper an alternate approach in teaching various computing and programming principles toengineering students utilizing the LabVIEW software is discussed. LabVIEW, acronym for“Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench”, is a powerful and robust graphicalprogramming language developed by National Instruments, Inc. for use in various engineering andscientific related fields. At the present time, this software tool is mainly utilized in
escalate student engagementwith course content. As shown by B. Shneiderman a conceptual framework fortechnology-based learning and teaching has emerged as an engagement theory. 4 Thefundamental idea underlying engagement theory is that students must be meaningfullyengaged in learning activities through interaction with others and worthwhile tasks.While in principle, such engagement could occur without the use of technology, thetechnology can facilitate engagement in ways which are difficult to achieve otherwise.Thermodynamics together with other thermal-fluid sciences (thermodynamics, fluidmechanics, and heat transfer) are typically considered to be among the most difficulttopics taught in engineering curriculum.5 The Learning Tool described below
MATLAB INTERFACE WITH JAVA SOFTWARE Andreas Spanias, Constantinos Panayiotou, Thrassos Thrasyvoulou, and Venkatraman Atti MIDL, Department of Electrical Engineering Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 AbstractThe J-DSP editor is an object oriented environment that enables distance learning students toperform on-line laboratories. The editor has a rich collection of signal processing functions andis currently being used in a senior-level DSP course at ASU. In this paper, we present newenhancements to the infrastructure of J-DSP that provide embedded MATLAB™ scriptingcapabilities. The synergy of the J-DSP object-oriented
Session 2004-124 ASEE ANNUAL MEETING Salt Lake City, Utah June, 2004 The Trebuchet Project: Launching a “Hands-On” Engineering Technology Approach To Conducting Hands-On Statics and Dynamics Laboratory Courses Francis A. Di Bella, PE Assistant Professor Northeastern University, Boston, MA Mechanical Engineering TechnologyABSTRACT“…Hands-On, real word engineering experience” is the refrain that is
developedfor an undergraduate course in digital design. The projects to be described were initiallydeveloped within an undergraduate advanced digital design course and as independent studentprojects and were then adapted for use as a final project within a junior-level first course indigital design. As second-semester juniors, students are also completing a course in signals andsystems that provides them some initial background in frequency-domain topics that areapplicable.Beginning in Spring 2002, laboratories within the digital course were updated to make use ofaffordable and versatile programmable logic device boards produced by Digilent, Inc [DIGI
Session 1532 Reintroducing Amateur Radio In ECE Capstone Design Projects Dennis Silage Electrical and Computer Engineering College of Engineering, Temple UniversityAbstractPresented here from experience are the salient steps for the reintroduction of Amateur Radio intothe capstone design project in Electrical and Computer Engineering and diverse examples ofsuch projects. These steps include the involvement of the faculty supervisor, the establishmentof an Amateur Radio station as a communications laboratory sponsored by the department, asurvey
project choicesthat meet their individual needs for a challenging, rewarding academic experience. The fact thatthis course is offered in addition to the program-required capstone course and taken by over 90percent of the seniors each year testifies to the value that the cadets see in the course.In the past decade at USMA, academic promotion criteria have increasingly looked at researchand publication records of faculty members. Thus, what was once a primarily teaching-focusedschool has began to morph into a research-focused school. With the growing need for modestfaculty research and the absence of graduate students, the development of undergraduateresearch opportunities quickly evolved. There have been numerous successes and failures overthe
used in both middle and highschool algebra classes; (2) provide a summer workshop for in-service mathematics teachers andundergraduate engineering Teaching Fellows; (3) develop an undergraduate engineeringTeaching Fellows program to provide hands on instructional classroom support for middle andhigh school algebra teachers to help them integrate the CD curricula into their courses; (4)maintain student interest in engineering at schools through the development andinstitutionalization of an after-school engineering program that culminates in a series ofcollaborative and competitive activities; and (5) increase the involvement of females and otherunderrepresented groups in engineering by providing female and minority engineering rolemodels in the
resources which have equivalents in engineeringeducation: the meeting space or studio (the laboratory for engineering) and the humanresource (the instructor for both). Just like the laboratory in science and engineering, thestudio is a dedicated space which is usually assigned to a faculty member or a smallgroup of faculty in the same discipline, e.g., interior design, graphic design, etc. andreserved specifically for the teaching of studio courses by that faculty or the small group Page 9.145.6of faculty. To engineering faculty the teaching space resembles the “old” engineering Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education
Session 1630 Linking Student Learning Outcomes to Instructional Practices – Phase I Stephanie Cupp, Paolo Davidian Moore, and Norman L. Fortenberry National Academy of Engineering Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper begins to test the assumption that stakeholders in engineering education know whatset of teaching and learning practices by faculty and students will lead to desired student learningoutcomes. The work reported here seeks 1) to identify from published sources, a set of desiredengineering student learning
was a post-doctoral research associate in the Physics Education Group at the University ofWashington. Currently a research scientist at Information Systems Laboratories, Inc. in Seattle, WA, herresearch interests are in nonlinear dynamics.PAULA R.L. HERON is an Associate Professor of Physics at the University of Washington, where she is amember of the Physics Education Group. She has published several papers on her research on the learningand teaching of physics. Dr. Heron is currently a member of the Executive Committee of the APS Forumon Education. She consults on several NSF-funded education projects.BRIAN C. FABIEN is currently a Professor in the Department on Mechanical Engineering at theUniversity of Washington. His research interests
Session 1526Shreekanth Mandayam is an Associate Professor in the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department at RowanUniversity. He received his Ph.D. (1996) and M.S. (1993) in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University andhis B.S. (1990) in Electronics Engineering from Bangalore University, India. He teaches junior-level courses inelectromagnetics and communications systems and graduate-level courses in digital image processing and artificialneural networks. He conducts research in nondestructive evaluation and biomedical image processing.Anthony Marchese is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University, where he has beensince September 1996. He has also held positions in industrial and government laboratories
0 to 10 Difficulty 0 to 10 KNOWLEDGE ELEMENTS (EKEs) Laboratory Section Tensile Strength Testing 8.9 7.1 9.4 7.4 8.6 9.0 Impact Strength Test 9.0 6.7 8.4 7.2 8.1 7.9 Melt Flow Index 9.0 7.6 8.6 8.0 7.4 7.7 Torsional Test 3.9 2.4 3.2 3.8 4.0 3.4 Plastisol 2.4 1.6
of Engineering Educationtypes, and special features which can only be determined by working through thedrawings. The third goal is to teach AutoCAD. “Do you know AutoCAD?” is still the mostcommon question students are asked during job interviews. By learning it during thesophomore year, it becomes a tool that they can use throughout their college career. The course was developed to fit into the curriculum between Surveying in the Fallof sophomore year and the breadth of CE courses at the junior years. Because it usesland descriptions and legal documentation, Surveying is a prerequisite course. It alsofunctionally limits the class to Civil Engineering students. The course also has a co-requisite of Mechanics of Materials to ensure
. The second course is for mechanical engineering, material scienceengineering, and computer science students and focuses on structured programming through theuse of robotics.The future scholars program is the teaching analogy to a research post-doc. The future scholarswork with faculty on the integrated freshmen courses while receiving training on learning andteaching styles.The Hewlett Bridging into Engineering Program is aimed at students who are at high risk ofdropping out based on historic data. The program is being followed up with periodic meetingsbetween the participants and student mentors. Page 9.611.11 This project was
”technologies.The authors believe that the implementation of Strategic Market Assessments for NewTechnologies at USF has not only provided unique inter-disciplinary learning opportunities forgraduate students and faculty investigators, but has enhanced both the awareness of technologycommercialization in university faculty members and the university administration. Further, therate of movement of USF faculty innovations from university laboratories into new venturebusinesses has been increased in numbers and in level of success.IntroductionUniversities are repositories of large amounts of research, information, and knowledge; butunless moved from the laboratory, translated into useful technologies and/or products, andultimately commercialized, this
Session # 3613 Making Memories The Penn State Bioprocessing Cluster Program 2000-2002 Alfred Carlson Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyAbstractAs part of a larger National Science Foundation grant to Penn State, I ran a special hands-on, “real life” educational program in bioprocessing for senior chemical engineers. Thestudents took all of their courses for the spring semester, senior year, from a singleinstructor and pooled them into a seamless laboratory project to produce a recombinantprotein at pilot plant scale. The students were able to learn how to design experiments,plan and execute runs, and operate a
Session No. 1532 A Digital Electronics Course Using CPLDs for Manufacturing Engineers Karl D. Stephan and Vedaraman Sriraman Department of Technology, Texas State University-San Marcos San Marcos, Texas 78666Abstract: The challenge faced by ECE instructors who teach a one-semester digital electronicscourse in a manufacturing engineering curriculum is to present a useful fraction of the material tostudents whose primary interest is not electronics. We have developed a course whichaccomplishes this goal with the use of complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs) and a termproject that
problems. Faculty responsible for this introductorycourse as well as a numerical methods course felt that too much time was being spent on theminutia of programming syntax. Both of these packages can be learned sufficiently quickly totackle meaningful problems in undergraduate engineering within one semester. Each package hasits strengths and a role to play in undergraduate engineering instruction. These strengths will bediscussed in the paper.IntroductionThe Mechanical Engineering Department at NMSU has a long history of teaching programmingat the undergraduate level. As with virtually every other engineering program, the important roleof scientific computing was recognized early on. When one of the authors joined the faculty in1984, FORTRAN was
Session 3130 An Analysis of Freshman Engineering: A Cross-College Perspective J.B. Connor 1, V.K. Lohani 1, E. Bull 3, T.M. Wildman2, S.G. Magliaro 2, T.W. Knott 1, O.H. Griffin, Jr 1 J.A. Muffo4 1 Department of Engineering Education 2 Department of Teaching and Learning 3 Department of Computer Science Office of Academic Assessment
routers, and associated on-line vendor basedcurricula, such as CCNA, CCNP, are now readily available. This approach to networktechnology education requires an understanding of switch and router operation. However, anextensive analysis of educational materials in this area has indicated that these devices aretypically treated as 'black boxes'. Such an approach may not be best suited to the promotion oflearning as students are required to construct their own mental model of the internal operation ofsuch devices and which may, or may not, be correct. To address this problem a state model hasbeen designed for both switches and routers which allows complexity to be controlled and hencecan be used as a basis for teaching both introductory and advanced
Engineering in Volgograd, Russia. This program successfullyaddresses such academic challenges in engineering education as the inherent verticalstructure of scientific curricula, courses with laboratory requirements, ABETaccreditation, and accelerated summer course calendars. Engineering disciplinesincluded are civil engineering, environmental engineering, mechanical engineering,chemical engineering, statistics, and construction management. Also featured in thisprogram is a unique curricular collaboration between the humanities and engineering.The paper also discusses the program’s treatment of such logistical issues as studentsafety, moving large groups of students through a cultural landscape where Russianlanguage proficiency is a necessity, as well
classes, a 55-minute period, but the total creditfor each laboratory is only 1 UV regardless of the actual time spent. A professor teaches lecturesclasses, and either a professor or a technician instructor teaches the laboratories.Table 2 presents a list of the courses offered at UF and UNAH. A comparison of course-by-course based on content is made. The left side of the Table 2 shows an example of the necessaryundergraduate courses for obtaining 131 credits at UF (degree requirement). The Right side ofTable 2 shows the courses that students are required to take under the plan of study at UNAH.The total at the bottom of Table 2 shows the difference in the number of credits and number ofcourses required to complete the civil engineering degree at
criticisms leveled at engineering schools by the Societyof Manufacturing Engineers in their Curricula 2000 Report1 and the Manufacturing EducationPlan: 1999 Critical Competency Gaps2 document and in other papers which alleged that schoolsoffer too few “practical” and “hands-on” courses. Stout has a rich tradition of teaching studentstechnical skills that can only be taught in laboratory experience. By integrating theory and Page 9.727.1Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering Educationexperimentation with
agreement of the three teachers (see Table 2), the following generalizations are made: 1. Working with the robotics materials helped students practice problem solving and inquiry skills. 2. The NSES goal of promoting inquiry was addressed in the small group work with the robotics materials. This work involved inquiry/ exploration and problem solving among the groups members and in some cases between groups as well. 3. Small group work with the robotics materials helped make the physical science content more interesting to learn. The robotics material also made the physics content more relevant. 4. Teaching strategies that use visuals and/or concrete materials such as those found in laboratory investigations, can
available, and ifput on line it is searchable, easy to update, and printing costs are reduced. The teaching staffsneed only to summarize and guide students as they approach and read the documentation.ResourcesIt is helpful to provide students with resources that they are able to use at home as well as in theuniversity laboratories. Small hardware devices can be issued to groups and taken away.Appropriate software can be distributed to students to use at home.PrinciplesSome key principles in managing the course include: - Keeping updated. Both technical and academic staff must invest a considerable effort in keeping up with technology, so that the large effort students make is devoted to technology relevant to expected employment
, G.L. 2001. Implementing a Common First Year Engineering Program at Michigan Tech. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.5. MATLAB, MATrix LABoratory is a trademark of The Mathworks, Inc., Natick Massachusetts.6. Devens, P.E. 2000. MATLAB & Freshman Engineering. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.7. Herniter, M.E., and Scott, D.R. 2001. Teaching Programming Skills with MATLAB. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education8. Bowen, J.D. 2003. Using a