as to thecontent of their coursework and neither of these goals are easily met in large-format courses thatserve all majors [6].Students desire a community of peers and faculty as well as a sense of belonging [7] within theirmajor. Belonging can be developed in many ways, but a core piece of belonging is knowing whatyou belong to. When students understand what they are studying, they can connect their input(academic effort) to an output (degree attainment, career) that reflects their values and self-identity now and, in the future, [8]. A large contributing factor to programs not being able to helpstudents make connections is a lack of major-specific courses available where students can findand spend structured time with peers/faculty in
withdigital badges starting with our initial exploration of their viability.Early explorationThe initial motivation for our exploration of badging was our perception that students aremissing out on key skills that would serve them well in their careers. Early benchmarking alsoshowed the success being enjoyed by other programs such as work at Purdue University [8] andthe work of other schools like Robert Morris University [9]. Our particular departmental cultureled us to survey the 12 members of our industrial advisory board. This group was evenly split onthe idea of offering badges. Reasons cited against the badging effort included: 1) manycompanies already offer extensive in-house training on relevant but non-technical skills, 2) it isnot clear if
to electricity 2. Energy generation, transmission, and distribution 3. Energy and electric circuits 4. Energy efficiency 5. Introduction to renewable energy 6. Fundamentals of Solar Electric Circuits 7. Economics of Renewable Energy & Career Path in Renewable Energy 8. Social, Environmental, and Political considerations for Renewable Energy SystemsSeveral materials have been sent to the students including: an electric circuits kit, solar cells, adigital multimeter, energy-efficient bulbs, and an energy monitoring device. The contentpresented during the workshops followed the best practices for energy education includingcontent from the US Energy Information Administration[13], US Department of Energy[14], andthe National
. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years of experience teaching mathematics, statistics, computer science, and first-year engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first-year engineering students with a high- quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and academic support to facilitate their transition to university life and to prepare them for success in their engineering majors and future careers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Educating the Next Generation of Cybersecurity Experts1.0
Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conferencetheir families, brings STEM education outside the classroom and school day hours, andcelebrates informal learning and innovation.Meeting the ChallengeIn 2004 Michigan Technological University conducted its first annual YES! (Youth Engineeringand Science) Expo at Chrysler Arena in Ann Arbor, Michigan. This STEM career awarenessevent brought together industry, institutions of higher education, and government to participatein the event. The goal: inspire middle and high school students to explore education and careersin engineering and science. The program moved to Ford Field in Detroit with K-12 attendancegrowing from 5,000 students in 2004 to over 15,000 in 2008. YES! Expo event format
three departments in the Frank H.Dotterweich College of Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville have incorporatedengineering design instruction and hands-on design projects in the last two years as part of NSFgrant award #1928611. A primary objective of this grant is to increase the retention andpersistence of minorities in the engineering programs by incorporating high-impact enrichmentactivities into courses early in the student’s academic career. A logical course to include high-impact activities for first-year students is the introduction to engineering courses in thedepartments, which are titled “Engineering as a Career” (GEEN 1201), within the Frank H.Dotterweich College of Engineering.This work presents the approach used for a
Architecture peers. Bycomparison, this is one year longer than engineering technology graduates pursuing a ProfessionalEngineering (PE) license. This time lag places BSc Architectural Engineering Technologygraduates who plan to pursue architectural licensure at a disadvantage, and may affect theenrollment, retention, and graduation rates for this type of program. The objective of this paper isto compare course offerings of a four-year B.Sc. Architectural Engineering Technology Programto NAAB-accredited five-year Bachelor of Architecture programs, examine qualitative feedbackfrom students regarding the Architectural Engineering Technology Program and their career goals,and assess the continuing viability of the architectural engineering technician
programming course. Students often began their engineeringprogram knowing only that they were good at math and science, yet not knowing what anengineering career entails. As students may apply for a particular major as early as completion oftheir second-semester courses, weekly lessons exploring one of the many offered majors wasincluded as a component of their first-semester experience to drive informed decisions regardingchoice of major.The committee came forward in March 2017 with recommendations, which were immediatelyfast-tracked to support a fall 2018 rollout: • The first-semester course in engineering, for all students, was a newly developed computer programming course using Python and integrated various calculus and physics
include the NSF CAREER award, the 2016 Alexander Crombie Humphreys Distinguished Teaching Associate Professor award (Stevens), the 2014 Distinguished Faculty Mentor Award from the Stevens Student Government Association, the 2009 ASEE Mechanics Division Outstanding New Educator Award, and the 2009 Outstanding Teacher Award from the Stevens Alumni Association. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Review of Psychosocial Factors Associated with Undergraduate Engagement and Retention in STEMAbstractLow retention rates of undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) fields is a persistent problem in
education by attending medical school and studying immunology. She is interested in using the problem-solving skills that she has developed in her undergrad career and applying them to health and medicine. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring the Relationship Between Math Anxiety, Working Memory, and ExperiencesintroductionMath anxiety has been described as “a feeling of tension, apprehension, or fear that interfereswith math performance” [1]. Math anxiety is all too common in classrooms and can be a barrierto students reaching their fullest potential by limiting their career paths [2], [3]. Studies haveshown there
Paper ID #32583Virtual Femineer R Program: Engaging K-12 Students and Teachers in Re-moteSTEM Instruction (Evaluation)Dr. Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University-Pomona Dr. Rigden is the Director of Outreach Programs and the Women in Engineering Program for the College of Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. In her position, she secures funding and provides several different outreach programming events to engage K-12 female students to pursue STEM majors and/or careers. Dr. Rigden’s research focus is the STEM pipeline from K-12 to college and career for underrepresented mi- norities. Her teaching
Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David B
identify as Latino/a, Black, Native American, or Alaska Nativetogether make up 27% of the U.S. population age 21 and older but hold only 11% of science andengineering positions [2]. Relative to other fields of engineering, electrical and computer engineering lag behindwith women making up 19% and 18% of undergraduate degrees awarded, respectively.Underrepresentation of women in engineering majors and subsequent industry positions beginswith an individual’s choice to pursue this career field [3]. Difficulties in recruiting and retainingfemale-identified engineering students have been explained by availability, or absence, ofenvironmental supports such as assistance in male-dominated teams [4] and positiverelationships with advisors and
thus suggests that theuse of supplemental resources is a support effort that continues to privilege already privilegedgroups of students rather than supporting minoritized students. Similar results were reported byBoone [18] and McLoughlin [34], who note that first-generation and female engineering studentsmay experience self-doubt when they believe they are given additional help and/or resources overmales. Instructors’ practice of connecting course topics to future career options more supportedmajoritized men’s belongingness in the classroom than minoritized women’s belongingness (β =-.43, p < .000). This could be due to what type of future career options are being presented tostudents by instructors. Godwin & Potvin [9] discuss
information aboutthe life and work of the professional engineer in order to obtain morefrom their studies, to make adequate career planning, and to carry thesebenefits into their professional practice. One way to affect this isthrough an orientation to electrical engineering course. Erlandsen [l] reviewed dozens of university catalogs and found thatonly about 50% of the engineering programs offered something like an engi-neering orientation course. Further, study of the last several years ofthe IEEE Transactions on Education will reveal very few articles on sucha course. It seems as though very few people are motivated to contributein this area perhaps due to the lack of professional compensation forsuch efforts.History Probably many
Offer post-baccalaureate engineering education opportunities to engineers employed on the Minnesota Iron “Range” Provide expanded opportunities for faculty in Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Mechanical Engineering to engage in applied research and development activities with the private and public sectors Enhance UMD engineering faculty career development and retention. Expand opportunities for external research funding from the private and public sectors.EXTERNAL FORCESAnother major driver in offering an MEng degree is recognizing that there are changes loomingon the horizon with respect to professional engineering licensure and
North Midwest Section Conference Observations from academia2: The current mechanical engineering curriculum is not successfully attracting and retaining women or minorities. New graduates forget much of their technical education shortly after graduation, and use little of it during their professional careers. Many faculty members have less than five years practical engineering experience. Engineering faculty members are often very narrowly focused on their areas of specialization and tend to emphasize technical depth in their courses. Most BSME programs appear to be preparing students for graduate school and research-oriented careers rather than engineering practice, and this is out of
at Lafayette College has graduated more than 900 majors overits 50-year history. These graduates have gone on to careers in a wide range of roles in a varietyof industries. While the major requirements have evolved over time, the core principles of theprogram – articulated in the program’s founding documents as “Society needs moreliberally-educated persons with technical backgrounds” – have not. Thus, as the programcelebrates its 50 years of educating sociotechnical citizens, and as society grapples withall-consuming sociotechnical problems – climate change, systemic racism, and pandemic spreadand disruption – we are endeavoring to understand how our alumni see themselves and how theirsociotechnical education has contributed to their
. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering
prepare participants to pursue graduateeducation in a science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) discipline[2-4]. Theearlier students are exposed to STEM research experiences the better their chances of succeedingin STEM related professional careers or in the pursuit of a STEM related graduate degree [5-9].Undergraduate research serves as an efficient vehicle to motivate students to apply classroomknowledge to real world situations and problems. Research experiences for undergraduates alsosupport the development of specific skills that will be useful to the participants’ future researchendeavors. This includes that ability to work through the uncertainty and ambiguity present inopen-ended research problems[10], gaining a deeper
credentials related to international experiences, and selection ofresearch topic or career direction related to environmental sustainability. 1Fig. 1: Logical model for the Sustainability Across Sectors-Sweden short-term study abroadprogram. The program content and structure were updated three times, based on studentassessment.Program Development and Implementation The program entitled “Sustainability Across Sectors-Sweden” was developed to helpengineering students at Purdue University meet specific learning outcomes required by theirmajors, including an understanding of how engineering fits into a global, economic,environmental and societal context. The program provided an opportunity for
PhD, Arizona StateUniversity aims to engage the next generation of engineers and problem solvers in thinking aboutthe future, the types of problems they wish to solve, and enhance their awareness and interest inengineering as a career. The Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering offers a variety of experiencesto K-12 students that range from campus visits to week-long summer programs. Programs arethematic and help students explore problems that can be addressed through engineering. Thus,when the National Summer Transportation Institute opportunity became available, we pursuedthe funding opportunity to design and offer experiences to high school youth who can explorehow engineering and its many disciplines offer career paths where they can make
into K-12.Nevertheless, many students complete high school never having the chance to learn CS.We have created a summer coding camp for high-school students (including 8th graders entering9th grade) and designed a multi-year study to assess its effectiveness as an informal learningenvironment, based on theories of human motivation such as Self-Determination Theory 1 .The camp is a 1-week immersion experience, 9am to 5pm with food and activities, that introducesbasic programming via MIT APP Inventor. Lecture material and in-class exercises draw uponmeaningful applications, many appealing to “social good.” One unique aspect is the inclusion ofprofessional and career development activities that engage students and broaden perspectives onCS and
infused throughout our four-year curriculum with a series of project-basedand problem-oriented learning modules. The pedagogy of vertical integration is implemented tocut across artificial course boundaries. The feedback from the initial implementation is verypositive and encouraging. The students enjoy what they learned and have more confidence andmotivation to pursue advanced studies and careers in CPS/IoT area.Background and motivationDue to our insatiable desires for more electronics functionalities and higher performancecommunications, computing, and automation, electrical engineers serve a vital function in ourmodern world. Currently, undergraduate electrical engineering (EE) students are in highdemands to be hired with the highest median
Health Research. She is a Fellow of both the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE), and is a Senior Member of both the IEEE and the SPIE.Ms. Julia N Savoy, University of Wisconsin - Madison Julia N. Savoy, M.S., is an Associate Researcher in the Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison. One aspect of her research examines the effects of professional development participation on the career pathways of doctoral students, postdoctoral scholars, and early-career faculty. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
support lifelong career success for our graduates. • Sponsoring, supporting, and advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.DiscoveryThe appreciative inquiry process uses a strengths-based approach to identify the current state ofthe group. Since the strategic plan was being developed during 2020 with the constraints of thepandemic, a survey method was used to efficiently collect the information from the members onthe strengths of the committee. Ten of the fourteen committee members responded to thequestion and prompts including “What are the strengths of the committee? What is thecommittee doing really well? What are the best things about the way the committee has workedtogether? What are the personal strengths and
position at acompany in the region that recruits every year at the university's career fair. The event II keynotespeakers were from a company in the region that recruits at the university's career fair but were notalumni of the institution and were not in a technical position. The event III keynote speaker was analumnus who held a vice president of diversity affairs position at a major company thatoccasionally recruited students from the university. The event IV keynote was an alumnus whoheld a chief diversity officer position at a major company that had high brand recognition withengineering students.Many students attending event I and II mentioned their interest in learning more about the keynotespeaker’s company. Event IV included more than 10
women full ChE professors in the country, her research interests are in interfacial phenomena and recently biomedical systems. She is the first Associate Dean of Faculty Ad- vancement in NC State’s College of Engineering. Awards/service include 2015 AAAS Mentor Award, Fellow in American Institute of Chemical Engineers Board of Directors, NSF Presidential Award for Ex- cellence in Science, Math and Engineering Mentoring, Council for Chemical Research Diversity Award. She is the founding director of the Promoting Underrepresented Presence on Science and Engineering Faculties (PURPOSE) Institute”. A certified coach, Grant consults and empowers STEM individuals at all levels in the academy towards excellence in career
establishing a variety of programs that provideteaching training for PhD students, which is much more effective in developing their teachingskills than relying on them to mimic their former instructors [2]. While many of these programsaim at improving the teaching ability of current graduate teaching assistants in lab courses [3] aswell as a more holistic approach involving student-led discussions about the TA experience [4],other programs focus on a more general method for preparing PhD students for careers inacademia with an emphasis on teaching training. Some universities provide teaching experienceby thrusting graduate students into the instructor of record role for small courses [5], but agentler and more common approach is a formal program
College Station, Texas AbstractThe purpose of the study was to determine industry’s perception regarding the need fortechnical writing skills among Construction Science graduates. A standard Likert stylesurvey was used to gather the data related to the technical writing skill set of constructionscience graduates. This survey was sent to members of Texas A&M University’sDepartment of Construction Science Career Fair Database and faculty members of in theAssociated Schools of Construction. The results of the survey were used to analyzewhether industry and faculty perceive technical writing skills to be a necessity. The datawas analyzed by administering one-sample and two-sample t-tests to the responses