image processing, computer vision, engineering education, and academic ethics. He has extensive experience as a computer hardware engineer at Hewlett-Packard. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27793Dr. Jie Yang, Northern Arizona University Dr. Yang is an assistant professor of practice in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems at Northern Arizona University. She serves a coordinating role in the NAU/CQUPT 3+1 Program. Her research interests are in wireless communications, signal processing, and engineering education. c American
theserelationships have been demonstrated in an ad hoc fashion. What we are doing now isformalizing that process which will hopefully enhance the success rate of our entrepreneurs. Figure 1 A Conceptual Framework for Implementation is Comprised of Four Steps Table 1 Ranking of Critical Risk Factors with at least 70% Consensus Critical Risk Factors Mean Value Founders and Management Team Factors - Ability to execute 5.00 Relationship Factors - Trustworthiness 5.00 Relationship Factors - Ethics/Honesty
Diego Mark Peters received a Bachelors degree in Economics from Georgetown University and then pursued a business career in New York City, working in many of the major business disciplines. Over the past twenty years, Mark has worked and consulted for large corporations, professional organizations, hospitals, churches, and universities. Dr. Peters earned a Masters Degree from the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry and a Ph.D. in Leadership Studies from the University of San Diego. He has taught in a variety of disciplines including: Business Management, Organizational Leadership, Economics, Ethics, and Leadership Stud- ies, at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Dr. Peters has twice served on the
populations, such as low-income students in engineering, by replacing previousmeasurements with this one that accounts for other considerations beyond just income. We claimthat any use other than what is proposed violates the basis and ethics of our work. Figure 1. Socioeconomic inequality as informed by neighborhood socioeconomic inequality.In our framework, we consider neighborhood socioeconomic inequality to be a product of multipleforms of oppression, informed by joint understanding of different localities such ZIP codes andcounties, which have histories of discriminatory redlining [27]. Information about income by ZIPcode and County Code are both available through the United States Census Bureau [32]. Further,multiple forms of discrimination
, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global
ethics requirements). Even though we have over500 students on our undergraduate degree course (approximately 140 per year), in total, 189students completed questionnaires, across all 4 years of the programme: year 1 (52), year 2(39), year 3 (40), year 4 (22) and did not state (36). An open-comments box was madeavailable following the survey questions for each of the 4 discrete topics for students to addtheir own comments if they so wished, which were also collated anonymously. Additionally,we have started conducting interviews with individual students. Again, an email was sent toall students across the 4-year programme seeking volunteers (they were reimbursed with £10vouchers). As students received a financial incentive and we were faced with
Understanding of Engineering Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28153 7. Bielefeldt, A. R., & Polmear, M., & Knight, D., & Canney, N. E., & Swan, C. (2017, June), Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into First-Year Engineering Course:: Results of a National Survey Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28515 8. Whalen, R., & Freeman, S. F., & Love, J. O., & Schulte Grahame, K., & Hertz, J. L. (2018, June), Evolution of Cornerstone: Creating a First-year Culture with a Multifaceted Approach Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference
; and (6) grand challenges. Each of the modules is comprised of two or threelessons that introduce each topic, with lessons accompanied by hands-on activities and in- andout-of-class reflections to actively engage the students.World-Class Engineering Attributes: This module is comprised of three lessons—world-classengineering attributes, teamwork, and leadership and ethics—that are broadly applicable to anyengineering discipline. These lessons invite the students to reflect on their own experiences, theirown motivations for pursuing engineering, and to think more broadly about the role ofengineering and engineers in society.Systems Thinking and Sustainability: This module incorporates core lessons on seeing the “bigpicture”, i.e., systems
professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Valparaiso University. His sci- entific research is in the area of nanotechnology. His pedagogical research interests include creativity, design, ethics, and computer programming. 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Promoting Student Confidence in a First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering Course Jennifer Felder Marley and Douglas Tougaw Valparaiso University, jennifer.marley@valpo.edu, doug.tougaw@valpo.eduAbstract – First-year electrical and computer engineering programming fundamentals, and the analysis of electrical(ECE) students who have not yet
industrial partners asfor all stakeholders, this is a relatively new experiment. Mentors/trainers on the job site mustremember that the students are under their tutelage for specific learning outcomes.Industrial Partner’s Perspective of the Advanced Manufacturing Technician Program:The establishment of the newly formed GeauxFame chapter ensures common practicesamongst all sponsoring manufacturers. A primary emphasis is on the technician developingprofessional and solid work ethic behaviors. The AMT program has redefined the customerrelationship of education thus making the employer the customer. And lastly, it gives thesponsoring manufacturer the opportunity to observe the student before hiring into a full-timeposition. Proceedings of
appropriate technical literature; (h) an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development; (i) an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity; (j) a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context; and (k) a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education
. If one thermocouple is touching the fins, then a hot spot would be seen andit can adversely affect the result. Another reason might be the equations used from literature hadlimitations over this study such as the Reynold’s number and fin dimensions.Assessment rubrics reflected students expectations from ABET learning outcomes. The capstoneassessment should be redesigned to include the other ABET outcomes such as ethics in workingenvironment and to allow better team work evaluation.References[1] Schmidt, E.D., (1926). “ie warmeuebertragung durch ripen,” Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, 70,pp. 885–951.[2] Duffin, R.J., (1959). “A variational problem related to cooling fins,” Journal of Mathematical Mechanics, 8, pp.47–56.[3
measurements and the total relative uncertainty, including random,bias, and system uncertainties, ranged between ±7-17% for most cases.Assessment rubrics reflected students’ expectations from ABET learning outcomes. Thecapstone assessment should be redesigned to include the other ABET outcomes such as ethics inworking environment and to allow better team work evaluation. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 545References[1] Mafiz, H., Huq, A. M. A., and Rahman, M. M., (1996). “An Experimental Study of Heat Transfer
, licensure, in the States of Texas and Alabama. Thealthough sometimes it does not. A much lower incidence relatively low rate of licensure among chemical engineers,of life-long learning occurred in the summer 2017 Design as compared to civil engineers, is also discussed. ToIII course offering, likely due to this course being counter this issue, the benefits of licensure, in particularconducted in a compressed environment of a single summer higher professional status and better employability, are(4½ week) term. emphasized. The responsibilities associated with licensure, Examples of senior design project technical problems including ethics and continuing
, ecological, and even ethical rationale for owner-repair—while alsodemonstrating a user-oriented template for effective repair procedure documentation. Thecollaboration between iFixit’s technical writers, the iFixit-trained course instructor, and studentsresults in an almost turn-key, online experience, entirely populated with student-created contentthat is subject to iterative feedback cycles before final approval by iFixit technical writing staff.At completion of each milestone, iFixit technical writers provide feedback for students, targetingtechnical prose; formatting; link navigation; image quality and lighting; and overall site usability.At project completion, students have performed essentially a corporate-led service that benefits acompany
Computer and Information Science. He served in the United States Marine Corps from 2000-2004 as intelligence specialist. He graduated from Mercyhurst University earning a BA in Intelligence Studies and Psychology (2008). Additionally, he earned a MS in Software Engineering from Gannon University in 2013. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Historical Mandate for the Open Source CommunityIntroductionMost think of the Open Source Community (OSC) as a venue to get free stuff, but a deepunderstanding is to know its attitude, its ethics, its purpose, and its sharp teeth. The OSC wasborn out of the hacker ethic which holds that the unfettered access to knowledge is a virtue of agood and free society
. Schrader, W. M. Riggs, & R. P. Smith (1993). Choice over Uncertainty and Ambiguity inTechnical Problem Solving, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 10, 1993,accessed on Jan. 30, 2019,https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/46980/choiceoveruncert00schr.pdf?s..[23] W. G. Perry Jr. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years:A Scheme. Perry, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1970. Reprinted by Jossey-Bass Higherand Adult Education Series, 1998[24] P. Fitch & R. S. Culver (1984). Educational activities to stimulate intellectual developmentin Perry’s scheme, Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE Washington, DC, 712
becoming increasingly common in the engineering education field.The field of Science and Technology studies has explored these interconnections for years.Thought leaders Baillie and Vanasupa design contextualized concepts for materials sciencestudents that introduce materials characterization, semiconductors, polymers, composites, andother common material science topics [5]. Others seek to bring sustainable engineering practicesinto the materials science classroom with short modules over the semester, a model much likethose presented in greater detail in this paper [6]. Some develop full courses that blendtechnology in materials science with ethics and social responsibility [7-9].The integration of the social and technical is also valued by ABET
group activities. The course works with an organizational real-life counterpart (acompany, the State or an NGO). At the end of the course the student will be able to understandand apply qualitative research methods to inform innovative design solutions. The focus of thecourse is to prepare students to face ill-defined issues using tools to understand the humaninterface and culture and to synthesize in innovative opportunities; to identify a qualitativeresearch question; to detect and delimit opportunities for innovation using tools to tackle ill-defined issues and imperfect knowledge; and to develop an ethical standpoint and criticalthinking on the social responsibilities of an engineer-designer” (Pontifia Universidad Católica,2018). The
[3] thatengineering problems to be solved may require synthesis of a broader range of interdisciplinaryknowledge and a greater focus on systemic constructs and outcomes. Additional researchfindings support the need for the engineering graduates to maintaining technical currency andhave the ability to frame problems, possess high ethical standards and a strong sense ofprofessionalism, good communication skills with multiple stakeholders, possess strong analyticalskills, exhibit practical ingenuity; possess creativity, and business and management skills;leadership abilities. [4]The ASME Vision 2030 [5] states that the problems that mechanical engineers work on ofteninclude elements of other engineering disciplines, require systems thinking in
theDepartment of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Teaching Team. Ethics approval wasgranted by the Imperial College London Educational Development Unit (EERP1819-014).References[1] D. Chadha and G. Nicholls, “Teaching Transferable Skills to Undergraduate Engineering Students: Recognising the Value of Embedded and Bolt-on Approaches,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 116–122.[2] I. Drummond, J. Wiltshire, and I. Nixon, “Personal transferable skills in higher education: the problems of implementing good practice,” Qual. Assur. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–27, Mar. 1998.[3] S. Fallows and C. Steven, Integrating Key Skills in Higher Education: Employability, Transferable Skills and Learning for Life. Stylus Publishing, Inc
generate profits and retain competitive advantage. In this vein, such dynamic businessenvironment compels organizations to foster and equip a competent workforce with enhancedlevels of skill and quality needed for sustainable advantage. (Markovic, 2008). To achieve this,organizations have adopted various human resource development (HRD) interventions such astraining to ensure their workforce has the necessary competencies to stay abreast of changes inthe market (Potnuru & Sahoo, 2016). Hellriegel and Slocum (2011, pg. 8) have described sevenkey competencies that affect individual behaviors, teams and subsequently the organization: 1. employee’s ethical competency; 2. self-competency; 3. diversity competencies; 4
understanding, success skills development and the project itself”, and “G. Motivating further development of the project to go beyond classroom but into real products for public”. Meanwhile, everyone rated either “quite a bit” or “very much” regarding the level of the capstone experience contributed to their development in the following areas: “C. Thinking critically and analytically”, “E. Acquiring job- or work-related knowledge and skills”, “F. Working effectively with others”, “G. Developing or clarifying a personal code of values and ethics”, “H. Understanding people of other backgrounds (economic, racial/ethnic, political, religious, nationality, etc.)”, “I. Solving complex real-world problems”, and “J. Being an
education pipeline, the scope of this paperfocuses on an undergraduate class early in the curriculum, which is an important time framewhere women are more likely than men to leave the engineering track [3], [12]. The aim of thisstudy is to analyze several variables within an engineering curriculum where gender differencesexist: spatial visualization ability, performance in introductory engineering graphics courses, andwork-ethic with respect to classroom tasks, within the context of self-efficacy and persistence inengineering. Understanding the factors related to the gender gap in engineering is an importantfirst step toward future studies of targeted interventions to better meet the pedagogical needs of amore diverse student population.It has been
-raffle like system. Another food pantrywanted to utilize their storage space more efficiently, so the engineering students drafted a 3Dblueprint to redesign the storage layout; during their discussion with their agency liaison,students realized that in order to make the change, funding would be a problem, so the groupbrainstormed and proposed a capital campaign to raise the fund for their solution. Through themultidisciplinary collaboration and communication with the community partners, students werepushed to design solutions that were ethical, technically sound, and financially feasible. Research showed our pilot year project was a success in engaging students withsatisfactory learning outcomes, but the project’s open-ended problem
of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designsand teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity andinclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentorsUW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities. She also leads STEM outreach activitiesfor the UW community and local K-12 students involving toy adaptation for children with disabilities. Di-anne holds a PhD in Genetics from Duke University, and BS in Molecular Biology and BA in Psychologyfrom the University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Engagement in Practice: Toy Adaptation for
with the hope that students would also: Develop educational materials and hands-on STEM activities as a service to the community Develop project/time management, organizational, and leadership skills. Develop effective listening/collaboration skills while working with community partners. Recognize and understand ethical responsibilities of engineers.Course History:This course was created in 2014 and was, initially, a two-unit course that served as a vehicle forthe outreach, discussions with partner liaisons, and assignments. Soon after, one to two “lunch andlearns” were included each quarter to provide a more convenient avenue for guest speakers anddiscussions. In 2015, the course took on its current three-unit format with a lecture and a
ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs; (d) an ability to function in multidisciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems; (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) an ability to communicate effectively; (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context; (i) a recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning; (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues; (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.Since the course is intended to show that students are able to address the issues of
, “Specialreport: The research agenda for the new discipline of engineering education,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 95, pp. 259–261, 2006.[2] B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich, “The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs aboutknowledge and knowing and their relation to learning,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 67,pp. 88-140, 1997.[3] W. G. Perry, Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.[4] P. M. King & K. S. Kitchener, The Development of Reflective Judgment: Understanding andPromoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 1994.[5] M. Schommer, “Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge
; teaching engineering ethics; developingdecision-making competencies; impact of problem-based learning on women in STEM; facultyworkshops; cultures of innovation; and, educating creatives.The fact that there is very little published on the design, pedagogy, implementation, and iterativeimprovement of multi-college interdisciplinary innovation-based concentration / track forengineering and business students together does not confirm they do not exist. There were twoprograms identified: 1. University of Nebraska [155]: focused on computer science, computer engineering and management, only. 2. The Ohio State University [156]: an integrated business and engineering honors program taking existing classes together as a cohort focused on