proposed project may be offered the opportunity to visit OU.In general, Fellowships are offered to applicants meeting the following criteria:· Have excellent academic records in their current or previous program of study, as indicated by a cumulative grade point average of at least 3.3/4.0.· Score of 1200/1600 (quantitative + verbal) on the GRE general test for graduate students, and an ACT score of 30 or a SAT score of greater than 1325 for undergraduate students.· Show a strong interest in engineering, math, science, and math and science education pedagogy.· Indicate plans to pursue graduate degree, preferably Ph.D., in engineering, environmental science, or math and science education.· Identify areas of research interest
. Students are given the task of demonstrating the viability, attachment, andproliferation of HDF cells on PLLA films. Students must design their own experiments,including the number of repeat tests, type and number of controls, cell seeding concentrations,test surfaces, etc. While many of the experiments parallel those in BIOE 342, several differencesare also critical. For example, the well plate size is different. In addition, students have to attachthe glass coverslips coated with PLLA to the bottom of the well plates and manage with somecomplications that arise from that procedure. Students have to do substantial planning. Forexample, students have to manage their flasks of HDF cells so that the cells are confluent on thedays that they need
Funding Decision Event Plan Financing Options Yes Structuring Deal Prototyping Venture Orientation Product Orientation: Company Formation Validation NPD Eng & Mfg Dev Management Recruitment Pre-Production Strategy Refinement
national focus which is the point of contact. · Collating and disseminating good practice and innovation.In 2001 the Centre undertook a needs analysis of its stakeholders. The purpose was to assist theCentre in fine-tuning its strategy and work plan, and to ensure it understood the needs of itsclients. The consultation exercise sought information on issues, priority areas and on proposedCentre activities and communication methods. It was also the starting point for establishing aregister of expertise within UK engineering education.In order to meet the Centre’s aim of enhancing education, the views of all stakeholders toengineering education are important. The needs analysis polled engineers in academia, industryand the professional
College are described. The major elements of thecurriculum that is being planned include: (1) a set of modules for learning the basicsof entrepreneurship, (2) interaction with several on-campus and distributedhatcheries, (3) a set of in-depth learning interactions (projects, modules, courses) thatprovide depth of knowledge in engineering entrepreneurship and (4) capstoneexperiences in entrepreneurship during the sophomore year and the final year of theundergraduate curriculum. New courses/modules specifically targeted on technologyentrepreneurship are being designed between Babson College and Olin College.Babson College’s number one ranking in entrepreneurship is being fully leveraged byjoint appointments of faculty, cross registrations between
program coordinator scheduling courses and should be reviewed as input to the next schedule. Purpose for collecting this data Development of semester schedules Development of 3-year plan Correlation to program and department goals Department goals 5 and 6 are supported Evaluation and Assessment of Data An analysis of the raw data collected in section I will be completed and tabulated as appropriate tables, graphs, or charts. In addition, a short summary describing any significant trends or implications will be written. It is expected that the IET, OLS, MET and CGT programs will each track this data separately but in similar format so that it may also be compiled
through the international orientation of the dualsystem of German education and by integrating trainee exchange programs and periods ofoccupational development abroad (Germany, England, and the U.S.). Page 7.1157.5 Proceedings of the 2002American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationDue to the globalization of the workplace, it has become increasingly important to accept new andhighly differentiated forms of worker mobility between the individual company locations. Siemensis planning work placements as well as training and
’ the plan. plan. plan. 3. Information pertinent to thesolution? plan. Table 2. Content Portion of Final Report Scoring Rubric “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Page 7.479.5 -0- -1
size.ConclusionsWe discussed the online, near paperless, classroom based on a web site and presentation applications.For web sites, we looked at the characteristics of vendor-supplied packages and compared capabilitiesto a custom approach. Learning styles play a major role in how you prepare a lecture while presentationapplications facilitate its preparation and delivery. Lastly, we reviewed a student survey that measuredthe acceptance of a specific online classroom implementation.To plan your online classroom, begin with an assessment of your needs both today and in the future.This may include a by-course, by-program, by-department, by-college, and by-university perspective.If you plan to take the vendor route, prepare an RFP and determine your selection
Session 1330 Preliminary Findings from Coding Student Design Journals Durward K. Sobek, II Montana State UniversityAbstractSince Fall 2000, mechanical engineering students at Montana State University have been requiredto keep design journals of their senior design projects. We have now accumulated over 70journals on 21 design projects. We developed a coding scheme to code the journal data by designactivity (problem definition, idea generation, engineering analysis, and design refinement), designlevel (concept, system, detail), planning, and formal reporting. The
to be a reliablesource for developing school compensation plans which seek to attract, retain, and motivatefaculty. Some compensation plans not only incorporate guidelines for meritorious increases butalso contain suggested plans for new faculty that may include reduced teaching loads, summersupport, and/or start-up funds.This paper will include the 2001-02 Engineering Technology Faculty Salary Survey results.Results of mini-survey conducted in conjunction with the 2001-02 Engineering TechnologyFaculty Salary Survey concerning new faculty startup funds, new faculty summer support, andfaculty teaching assistants will also be reported in this paper. New faculty teaching loads, theteaching of on-line courses, provisions of internal grants
(undergraduateteaching associates). When these students go to the hands-on labs, the class of 72 is split in half.In each lab room are one faculty member, one GTA, and one Peer mentor to work with nineteams of four students each. In 2001-2002, there were eight sections of 72 students of the firstcourse during Autumn Quarter and sections of the first course and sections of the seco ndcourse in Winter Quarter. Nine sections of the second course are planned for Spring Quarter2002.Program ComponentsThe programs were developed to incorporate features that had improved retention in otherprograms or at Ohio State. There were no new features or components added that had not beenused before. It is believed by these authors that the combination of components provides
committed, (4) very strongly committed, and (5) and extremely strongly committed.d) Procedures – During the first two weeks of their freshman semester (1999/2000), students completed an enrolling student survey in freshman seminar courses (which is a course required for all FTFTF). The forms were collected by freshmen seminar faculty and returned to the Office of Institutional Research and Planning. Forms were op-scanned and converted to a SAS database. The twelve goals were reviewed and characterized as extrinsic or intrinsic by the authors. See Chart 1 below: Chart 1: Entering Students Goals Extrinsic Obtain a degree. Prepare for a career. Obtains skills that will be useful on a job. Meet the academic requirement for
manufacturing course for senior students: This course will be developed and coordinated by the UMR Manufacturing Engineering Education Program (MEEP). In this course, interdisciplinary teams with students from various engineering and technology disciplines will cooperate to design, manufacture, and assemble a real-life product. Their customer will be a sponsoring company that is interested in prototyping a product or process, or in testing a new product or process. In case the produced product is a prototype, the student team will have to develop marketing and manufacturing plans for quantity production. Page
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationsun or using probes to collect data linked the math and technology into the science to help thestudents understand the usefulness of all the topics to one another.This was a planned experience incorporating teachers in different areas, but ran smoothly throughthe arrangement and preparation of the experience with the help of outside sources to moderatemeetings. The teachers appreciated the guidance to take the education of the students to a newlevel that facilitated the students learning to a greater level of understanding.Trying to be more scientific about the analysis of field trips, one study tried to control aspects ofthe
- Page 7.356.2 Wesley Publishing Company, Reading Massachusetts, 1995. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographical InformationPATRICA M SHAMAMY, P.E. is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at LawrenceTechnological University in Southfield, Michigan. Besides teaching, she currently doesconsulting work in materials and manufacturing and also serves on the University E-LearningCommittee and the College of Engineering Entrepreneurial Program Planning Committee.Address: Mechanical Engineering Dept., Lawrence Technological University, 21000 West TenMile Road, Southfield, MI 48075; e-mail
or program matters (Oglesby, 1990).The construction project, itself, has its own set of complexities. It involves the entire life cycle ofa physical facility beginning with a 'gleam in the eye' of an owner who is exploring the need forthe facility to its completion. The normal steps in the project life cycle are: conception,planning, authorization and financing, design, procurement, construction, start -up, operation/maintenance and dismantling. Each has a peculiar set of problems, and each needs anappropriate strategy/management to move from one step to the next step.Challenges in Construction’s FutureThe most profound recent developments in construction are seen as: the increasing complexity ofmany of its projects and organizations, the
students inthe class since they were able to plan their days and weeks according to the master schedule. Itwas particularly useful because the students could work ahead on the homework on weeks whenthey had many exams15. Because it was so useful to the students, it is advocated by this authorfor all syllabi. For an example of a complete syllabi, the website at:http://www.che.arizona.edu/Directory/Faculty/Blowers/chee_201.htm has more information.IV. Students and the Syllabus We've already seen how a complete syllabus can reduce student complaints anduncertainties throughout the semester. Students often review the syllabus to make sure theyunderstand the course guidelines and how they are being assessed on their assignments. Becausethe
particular task. The topics tobe discussed are set by suggestions from the faculty and the Advisory Board members. Because the Advisory Board meeting includes representatives from a broad rangeof constituencies (faculty, alumni, industry, academia, and the citizens of the statethrough the student participation) it is used to address the broadest scope of assessmentactivities. These would include changes to the program’s mission, objectives, andoutcomes, planning the future direction of the department, and curricular changes. Whileall of the assessment tools may provide information on these topics those proving to be ofparticular value are: the Advisory Board meeting itself, the alumni and employer survey,and the focus group discussions. The
conducted their own exitinterviews of graduating seniors to solicit input on their experiences in the majors. Several yearsago, a more formal “Commencement” survey was developed to get more uniform information onstudents’ post-graduation plans, administered as they arrived for the graduation ceremonies.Surveys of recent alumni have also been carried out for over fifteen years to provide information,in retrospect, from former students on impressions of their education and to track their earlypost-graduate education, professional development and work activities.Recently, however, the College has moved to develop a more comprehensive and systematicapproach to acquiring this information. The reasons for this initiative are many: While thedepartment
transition in the first course andare currently in the process of switching the controller in the second course. We plan to presentthe feedback from the second course along with the ones from the first course at the upcomingconference. In addition, we will also receive feedback from faculty and cadets in two otherspring 2002 electrical engineering major courses: Senior Design (EE 464) and Introduction toRobotic Systems (EE 387). Our focus of this paper is based on our experience in the firstmicrocontroller/ microprocessor course. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In thenext section, we show the process of implementation followed by the outcomes of theimplementation. We present lessons we learned as we administered the change. A
tasks of presentingcontent online. The plan was to organize students into learning groups within a "virtualclassroom" (VC) and provide them with the same sort of structured learning experiences thatcharacterize the methodology used in traditional sections of the same class. Although individuallesson plans were changed substantially to fit the online format, the intention was to retain themethodology of group discussion and group problem solving. A primary objective of this course is the formation of productive, cohesive, learning groups.The content of "Human Behavior in Organizations" includes extensive study of the behavior ofgroups within organizations. In classroom-based sections of this course, instructors requirestudents to form
described. Of course, the experiences of the previous year with the development andteaching of the statics courses were invaluable in planning for the implementation of the newstrength of materials course technology needs and formats. This article addresses thedevelopment of the material for the technologies used in the different sections of strength ofmaterials and preliminary information on student performance and satisfaction.II. Strength of Materials Course Material DevelopmentUpon reflection about which of the different technologies had the most stringent demands for thequality of video required, streaming video 4 was the obvious controlling media. Qualityrecording of the visual material used during each lecturer was essential. Consideration
. Several truss examples have beendeveloped along these lines, in order to cover variations in the problem and solution [9]. In theclassroom, the examples can be covered fairly quickly in an interactive manner, with studentsselecting solution methods and equilibrium equations.III. FramesThree key concepts in frame analysis include dismembering, deciding on an appropriate plan foranalysis and applying equilibrium equations. Whereas our previous approach [8] was to includeaspects of all of these concepts in each frame example, the current work addresses these conceptsseparately in order to provide a more useful classroom tool.Taking the first concept as an example, several modules focusing solely on dismembering frameshave been developed. Typical
personality type:better understanding of personal differences and preferences leads to better communication andbetter decision making. Communication pitfalls are avoided if people are able to talk “eachothers language”.An added benefit of type sharing is that tasks and functions can be distributed according tonatural individual preferences, thus lowering stress and increasing satisfaction. For example, INscan perform well in solitary, written brainstorming while ENs will be more comfortable in agroup vocal brainstorming session. TJ will be excellent in planning projects while TP will bebetter at modifying the original plan if something goes wrong along the way. People with astrong S function will gladly write the methodology and results section of a
these discussion groups of 5 to 8 faculty members aspart of its planning efforts. Some of the questions raised were: * If you could spend $50,000 per year to stimulate internationalization at Virginia Tech, how would you spend the money? This approximate amount is currently devoted to course development and faculty international travel. Page 7.733.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education * How do we best encourage/develop the next generation of faculty to take
only desired for improved teaching, but developing rapport with othersmay be a lesson in and of itself for the students. Experience developing professionalrelationships with superiors as well as colleagues is as important to the future career plans ofstudents as it is for the student and teacher in the present classroom environment. Developinggood rapport with students can result in more effective teaching, improved student evaluations,and a more rewarding experience for faculty and students in the and out of the classroom.Suggestions from the literature, as well as the author’s own experiences for developing andimproving student-faculty rapport are provided. With practice, developing good rapport withstudents can become second
application example elucidating how a learningsystem can be developed for determining and forecasting parts quantities in a supply chain.If a continuous system can reliably predict numbers of parts required at the right time and atthe right place, then the entire production schedule throughout the entire supply chain andwithin each organisation within it can be planned. All information flow routes and materialflow paths can be optimised. The possibilities are very promising. The challenge, however,is as to how these learning systems can be validated and used with Computerised EnterpriseResource Planning (CERP) packages already used in industryKeywords: Learning Systems, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Material and Informationflows in an
response to thethree sensor readings.ABET Criteria 3 Outcomes We believe the LEGO projects provide us the capability to address several of ourdepartments locally defined ABET Criteria 3 Outcomes (l-q), which are: l) formal practices of project planning and management m) the ability to identify what information is missing and to formulate specific critical engineering problems when given complex process problems n) the ability to make rapid and intelligent engineering decisions with minimal data o) the ability to find trends in large quantities of process data and relate those trends back to fundamental chemical engineering process principles p) the ability to identify modifications to process
department are project oriented.EM 460 – Experimental Mechanics. During the fall semester of their senior year, all EM andME majors are required to take a course in instrumentation. Experimental measurements andtheir application to the design process are stressed, including topics such as strain, vibration,temperature, and pressure. During the second half of the semester, students must submit aproject proposal and test plan, then collect and analyze their data. Projects include analyzingaccelerations during parachute openings, determining the stresses on a baseball bat, analyzingfatigue properties of alloy specimens, and examining the biomechanics of football kicking.EM 431 – Finite Element Analysis. Students typ ically learn finite element analysis