thesubstrate, which resin to select, how to coat and load the foil on the plate, what are the optimalsettings for speed of the moving substrate, for applied force, height of the film, thickness of thetemplate, light intensity, etc.d) Selection of template and making the sampleCurrently there are only two options for the transparent templates. One such template, or mold, isshown in Figure 1 (left). We plan to have additional ones made in the near future. The templatesare approximately 2” x 2” and can be used multiple times. Once the teams chose the template,they proceed to make their own sample, under the supervision of the lab instructor. The resin isspread on the substrate using a film applicator. The samples are made on polyester flexiblesubstrate
interviews with panels of faculty,staff, industry representatives, and STEM students. Lesson learned: The first cohort launchedduring COVID, requiring a shift to video conferencing for information sessions and finalistinterviews. The second cohort also used video conferencing due to inclement weather. Having abackup plan is essential, and virtual options remain valuable for students with work, family, orother commitments.INNOV Curricular ComponentsBridge Program: The INNOV bridge program took place during the two-week intersession perioddirectly before the start of the students’ first fall semester on campus. The program consisted of anacademic component and a cohort building component. The academic component was three credit-hour course that served
their major planned for the upcoming summer.When addressing the prompt “SUCCESS Scholars Program activities made me feel moreconfident in pursuing a career in STEM disciplines,” responses from both groups wereoverwhelmingly positive, 95% and 94% for the Red and Blue Groups respectively. While thesurvey did not ask specifically which SSP activities help build their confidence in pursuing acareer in STEM disciplines, students cited professional development discussions, industry fieldtrips, and faculty mentors (Red Group) as having a meaningful impact on them.DiscussionSSP students currently demonstrate a positive trend toward graduation, surpassing the predictedretention rates. Indicators point towards this trend remaining positive given a
within four years, and then have the option of entering the classroomto teach, attending graduate school, or working in industry. The NSF Noyce Track 1 grant offers$20k/year scholarships in the junior and senior year that could offset the need to work in industryto pay off school loans instead of entering the K-12 classroom. We have been continuouslyshifting the culture at our institution to highlight the challenging, yet rewarding and impactful,career in teaching. Over the past 4 years (i.e., the duration of our grant), the number of TPPstudents have been increasing, as well as the number who plan to teach math, science,technology/engineering, or digital literacy/computer science at the secondary level (i.e., middleand high school). Roughly 1/3
process of writing up my dissertation and defending soon”.One of the metrics that we use to assess the impact and outcomes of this REU program is the percentage ofparticipants who later enroll in graduate school and pursue careers in STEM fields. This is in line with NSFgoals. Not all students from the 2021-2023 cohorts have graduated yet, so our analysis here focuses on the2006-2016 cohorts. This extends prior reporting that we had made on the earlier cohorts [10]. As shown inFigure 4, in their responses to the pre-REU surveys, between 10% and 44.4% of the 2006-2016 participantsstated future plans to attend graduate school; the remainder indicated that they were either undecided orplanned on working post-graduation. Not surprisingly, these
guidance of a Graduate ResearchAmbassador and with regular Faculty Mentor meeƟngs. ParƟcipants were able to see relevanceto Smart City innovaƟons of their backgrounds in microbiology, biochemistry, physics,mechanical engineering, computer science, architecture and urban planning, and civilengineering. ParƟcipants used new image analysis tools, sustainable materials analysis,technologies for quanƟfying indoor air quality and remediaƟng water polluƟon, decisionanalysis tools, and strategies for autonomous navigaƟon. Example research topics were digitalidenƟficaƟon of hurricane-damaged uƟlity poles damage aŌer hurricanes, indoor mapping insmart environments, quanƟfying traveler experience of transit passengers, and characterizingfungi in the built
phases and an education plan. The threephases on the research agenda are: 1) develop a conceptual model of student navigation [1]; 2)conduct interviews at one institution to determine role of identity in navigation [11]; 3) conductinterviews across several institutions to determine role of context in student navigation. We havecompleted all data collection for the research agenda. The education plan aims to disseminateresearch findings from the research phases through workshops and implement an SJI thatsurfaces the navigational tendencies of students.Current StatusResearch Agenda - Phase 3In this project, we collected data using semi-structured virtual interviews. We interviewed 47upper-division undergraduate engineering students across 12
[8]. The third year of our project commenced our plans to assess performance of the LbEapproach compared to typical design pedagogy through quasi-experimental design. Through ano-cost extension we have continued a fourth year of data collection related to the effectivenessof LbE.Across the study our approaches have been collaboratively developed in situ with teacher andstudent participants. For example, we have built on an initial concept of the LbE approachthrough insight during classroom observations, reflections with teachers and students, analysis ofstudent performance during the experience, and numerous outreach activities with designeducators. Effort during the no-cost extension has also made progress towards the sustainabilityof the
Program.Key ActivitiesThe program focused on cohort-building activities such as orientation sessions, mentoringworkshops, and professional development seminars. These included a Financial LiteracySeminar, where students gained practical skills in budgeting and financial planning, and a CareerReadiness Workshop covering resume building, interview techniques, and navigatingprofessional networks. Faculty-led Tech Talks offered insights into emerging trends inengineering and computer science, while community-building events like holiday socials andgroup outings helped foster a sense of belonging among the cohorts. These diverse activitiesaddressed both academic and professional development needs, creating a comprehensive supportsystem for the ECS
meeting at least twice each semester with the students[1]; • Participate in monthly professional development and community-building sessions, in which all scholars gather to engage with essential topics and activities, like: building a solid resume, understanding the social impact of engineering and computing, understanding stress and burnout, and planning for summer success; • Are offered the opportunity to attend the EDI Summer Institute as a community-engaged researcher in engineering or computing[2], [3].This work-in-progress paper reports the current formative data helping shape the research team’splans for year 2 of the S-STEM EDI program. Our formative assessment includes both semesterlyreview of
research program was designed to enhance the participation and success ofunderrepresented groups in engineering through a combination of academic applied research,such as strong theory basis and rigorous scholarship, with essential business practices such asreal-world customer discovery and generation of sound business plans. Delivered as a 10-week,full-time (40 hours per week) program at a large Midwestern R1 University, the interventionconsisted of three key components: Onboarding (Virtual, Week 1), Project (In Person, Weeks 2-10), and Weekly Journaling.2.1.1 OnboardingThe intervention began with a virtual intensive week at the beginning of the program to promotea sense of belonging, accountability, team development, and provide an overview of
more to their plates. One participant from a large public institution shared, “I just try to listento where the needs are, and I don’t usually act without having someone ask for it first.”A common area the participants spoke of desiring to elevate was the training and support ofpostdoctoral scholar advisors. Priorities included formalized training on best practices inmentoring, creating actionable individualized development plans (IDPs), and implementingadvisor-advisee career planning. One participant from a large public institution noted he wouldlike to provide “a one-hour talk and overview of mentoring and then do breakouts and follow-upworkshops to have for faculty and postdocs…and if we were able to enforce it, that would begreat.” So not
things they learned or affirmed, two questions that they stillhave, and one thing that they plan to do differently going forward.Tables 1 and 2 summarize the student responses in spring 2024 (41 total students) and fall 2024(69 total students). Table 1 highlights the key themes that emerged when students were asked to“Identify three (3) things that you learned, found interesting, or confirmed”. Table 2 highlightsthe key themes that emerged when students were asked to “Identify one (1) thing that you plan todo (or do differently) going forward”. Table 1: Instances of self-reported student learning Spring 2024 Fall 2024 An Understanding of Differences
inclusive curriculum for their rural classrooms to help foster earlystudent STEM identity formation.The MEERC RET Site’s intellectual foci of energy and engineering are also major areas offocus for the Montana University System’s Science and Technology Plan as well as one ofMSU’s Research Grand Challenges. Energy is a key part of the Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS) cross cutting concept (CCC) of “Energy and Matter”. Montana adoptedNGSS-like standards that contain all the NGSS CCCs and most of the same performanceexpectations (standards) as NGSS. CCCs receive the least amount of attention of the NGSSdimensions and a lack of focus on CCCs can perpetuate misconceptions in children [8]. CCCshave also been reported as a potential “bridge” for
education equity, to workforce data. Pre-college summer bridge STEM programs 17 Diversity action plans 15 B. Initial Tool Development Near peer mentoring 15 Entrepreneurial programs (at any level) 14 To meet these needs and facilitate discussion among stake- Reforming curriculum and teaching practices 14 Collaborative learning / living environments 11 holders, the CIDER team began the development of the Institutional leadership engagement 11 Engineering Education Ecosystem Landscape Framework 3 . Mentoring with peers of color
project itself, established atthe beginning of a project are immutable was an unrealistic, but apparently widespread,expectation of students and faculty during the project. It occurred, for example, that students,faculty, and various community partners established a set of design goals, at which pointstudents used resources to purchase materials and develop a systemic design plan. However,the sociopolitical realities of the community context resulted in changing design constraints,particularly as community permissions to implement design solutions changed from day-to-dayor, perhaps, from hour-to-hour. When such changes occur, our well-trained approaches toengineering design became ill-suited for completing the community-based project, which
Necesse Est: Defining Purpose and Adaptability in ASEE and TELPhEIn recent months, ASEE has engaged its membership in discussions aimed at revitalizing theorganization and redefining its purpose. This strategic planning initiative seeks to ensure ASEE’scontinued relevance for a future where teaching in increasingly impacted by technology. Aparallel debate has been taking place within the Technological and Engineering Literacy /Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhE) division, serving as a microcosm of the broader dialoguewithin ASEE about its role and direction.Currently, ASEE demands little of its divisions other than the production of a quota of papers forthe annual conference, which grants them limited visibility. TELPhE, like other
using the career construction theory [5], which underscores personal meaning of one’slived experiences, constructing careers through a sense of meaning, and clarifying plans. Threecomponents contribute to this theory: vocational personality (or career identity), careeradaptability, and life themes. Vocational personality is a person’s career-related abilities and interests, and pertains to how an individual constructs a career. Careeradaptability allows the person to construct a career that pertains to what career they desire. Lifethemes, the third component, deal with why a person selects that career. These themes emergethrough one’s lived experiences and personal stories and are often connected to one’s personalityand purpose. Career
people. Grayson also highlights how during the mid-19th century mostengineers were still trained on-the-job but those with an engineering degree were able to findjobs working in railroad and bridge construction [5]. The primary problem facing engineeringeducation at this time was simply producing enough skilled engineers to meet the demands ofindustry. While engineers were involved with the planning and design of the railroads, they werenot the workers responsible for the construction. Many immigrant workers were key in buildingthe transcontinental railroad with more than ten thousand Chinese workers performing thephysical labor for the project. Poor working conditions killed an uncertain number of Chineselaborers, with a lack or reporting from
planning, implementation, and self-assessment efforts, beliefs move [10].Institutions should use combined approaches of strategic targeting of selective initiatives andidentifying and addressing barriers such as promotion criteria, budget control, and unit reporting[10]. Strategic targeting can be top down to align with state and federal priorities and universitystrengths [2], [10] or faculty led bottom-up efforts [4], [10]. Efforts succeed with bothsubstantial faculty buy-in and administrative sponsorship [11].Challenges and OpportunitiesKlein and Schneider (2010) summarize barriers and disincentives to interdisciplinarity into thesethemes: (i) organizational structure and administration; (ii) procedures and policies; (iii)resources and
in 2024. This camp is a two-week camp. During the first week, a group of HSTAteachers come to campus to learn about the activities with faculty, meet the mentors, and explorethe campus. The goal of this week is 1) to help teachers prepare to help teach the lesson plans ofthe camp to students, 2) build a database of activities that they can use in the future in theirclassrooms, 3) further their confidence in STEM. The second week students attend the campwhich is broken into three components: STEM activities, a team-building project, andexploration of the regional area.ChallengesRunning these summer programs requires year-round duties of a faculty member to prepare forthe summer months. Responsibilities for the organization of these camps fall
teaching andresearch capabilities. This paper reflects on the experiences of a faculty member (author) whoparticipated in the Associated General Contractors of America’s Robert L. Bowen IndustryResidency Initiative, which allowed them to work closely with a multinational constructioncompany on a major medical center expansion project. The internship spanned various aspects ofthe project, including safety management, pre-construction planning, communication strategies,and business development. The paper emphasizes the immediate benefits of this internship, suchas deeper insights into modern construction technologies, safety protocols, and projectmanagement practices. It also discusses the long-term impact, which extends to curriculumimprovements in
built environment and create value for clients and keystakeholders to meet societal demands. This study focused on developing new course materialsfor two civil engineering technology technical elective courses, “Design of Highway Bridges”and “Construction Planning, Scheduling, and Control,” to incorporate the entrepreneurialmindset and reinforce the application of the three Cs in the civil engineering industry. Theconnection between different components of the design and construction phases was emphasizedin both courses to promote students’ whole-system awareness. The updated course materialsincluded recorded interviews with civil engineering design and construction professionals, casestudies, lecture content, and targeted assignments. These
FindingsData from and analysis of the site audits suggest that accommodation for Disabled Workers isnot part of the typical safety and access plans for most construction sites, with feweraccommodations made early in the building process. After reviewing the data, results can begrouped into four primary areas of focus. a) Mobility & Physical LimitationsMobility concerns are the most significant impediment to full participation in work activities.Challenges begin at the site entrances, in most instances, with alternative routes that requireassistance to navigate (Figure 1).Figure 1 Site Entrance shows the access gate in red, slightly too narrow to accommodate the wheelchair user in the vehicletraffic entrance.Openings at the perimeter fencing
and part-time during theacademic year. Proximity of the worksites to the PSU campus enables the interns to participate inthe program while attending school full-time. During the academic year, students average fifteenhours per week, adjusting their work schedule according to their academic workload. The internsare allocated 930 hours per year, 480 in the summer and 450 during the academic year, whichthey can plan as they see fit. The internships provide meaningful financial support for thestudents, who can earn up to $21k if they use all of their allocated hours. Such funding isparticularly important for the typical student who attends a minority serving institutions, such asPSU [2, 3].The PEI is open to engineering students in their junior
an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as tDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school
ChatGPT; almost two-thirds(64%) planned to implement the technology more often [4].Pre-service teachers are in a prime position to learn about and engage with this emergingtechnology, preparing them to enter the workforce with innovative knowledge. A recent report bythe Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) found that 59% of pre-service teacherprograms provided some AI-related instruction; most of the instruction was related to helpingfuture teachers prevent plagiarism [5] . With the recent growth of GenAI, there is a call to prepareeducators and students to engage with this evolving technology in productive and ethical ways[6, 7].ContextGenAI at Colorado School of MinesThis paper examines the implementation of GenAI ethics instruction in
process (EDP). The EDP is a series of stepsengineers follow to find a solution to a problem.7,8 The Engineering Place adapted the designprocess from the Museum of Science Boston's “Engineering is Elementary” program to includethe following: ask, imagine, plan, create, and improve. This interactive framework begins withAsk, where we identify the problem, determine the design’s purpose, and establish criteria forsuccess and testing. Next is Imagine, where knowledge and creativity come together as teamsbrainstorm ideas, discuss possibilities, and select a solution to pursue. During the Plan stage,participants think critically about materials and resources, sketch detailed designs, and presenttheir ideas for feedback. The Create stage involves
Paper ID #47207Relationships between Biometric Indicators and Psychological Experiencesof ThrivingNoah Pointer, Biologically Inspired Design for Resilience(BID4R) lab. Noah Pointer is a first generation college student and veteran of the United States Army. He is currently pursuing his Bachelor’s of Science in Software Engineering and is a recipient of the SAGE-STEM scholarship. He plans on pursuing an accelerated Master’s of Science in Software Engineering and continuing research throughout his academic career.Julianna Gesun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Julianna Gesun, Ph.D., is currently a
services that we provide to the whole society can't be interrupted. Basically, if your activity is so important, energy production for example, you need to be able to manage the crisis in an overall way." (FG#04- A)Public safety professionals also agreed with the importance of equipping engineering studentswith EDCM skills and knowledge. An assistant chief in a fire department in Texas (S#003)viewed engineers as subject matter experts (SMEs) who can provide crucial information thathelps emergency responders to assess situations and build action plans. In addition, theprofessionals highlighted importance roles of engineers during EDCS, being designers of safeindustrial processes and facilities (S#002) and the first line of defense