Engineering Department at Santa Clara University. With additional interventions andattention to the goal of creating a welcome and inclusive atmosphere, racial discrimination,sexism and other forms of discrimination can be reduced.References [1] DiClementi, J. D., & Handelsman, M. M. (2005). Empowering students: Class-generated course rules. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 18–21. [2] Hertz, J. L., & Davis, D., & O'Connell, B. P., & Mukasa, C. (2019, June), gruepr: An Open Source Program for Creating Student Project Teams Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32880 [3] Hertz, J. L., & Freeman, S. F. (2020, June), gruepr, an Open Source Tool for Creating
. Accessed March4, 2021[15] National Society of Professional Engineers. 2019. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineershttps://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/ Accessed March 4, 2021[16] Center for Socially Engaged Design (2020). Socially Engaged Design Process Model.Available at: https://csed.engin.umich.edu/socially-engaged-design-process-model[17] Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A BlackFeminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, (1989,139–168.[18] National Academy of Engineering. Grand Challenges for Engineering. 2015.http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996.aspx Accessed March 4, 2021[19] Edington, S., & Holmes, A. L., & Reinke, P. (2015, June), A Tale of Two
, 2017, Vol. 87(3), pp. 456- 477[2] W. Evans, M. Kearney, B. Perry, and J. Sullivan, “Increasing Community College Completion Rates Among Low- Income Students: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of a Case- Management Intervention”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2020, Vol. 39(4), pp. 930-965[3] American Society for Engineering Education. (2020). Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019. Washington, DC. Available online at https://ira.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/02/Engineering-by-the-Numbers-FINAL-2021.pdf Last retrieved March 4, 2021.[4] M. Jimenez, S. Bartolomei, L. Guillemard, A. Santiago, M. Suarez, N. Santiago, C. López, P. Quintero, N. Cardona, “Impacting
from Fink’s Taxonomy. Additionally, final exams previously assigned in eachof these courses were also mapped to the relevant objectives from Fink’s Taxonomy (Table 1).Students were given approximately 6 weeks to complete this project; students were expected towork on their final project concurrently with normal weekly labs and class assignments. Thefinal projects were then coded for specific skills and knowledge.Table 1: Deliverables required for final project mapped to the relevant Fink’s Taxonomyobjectives and coded for whether explicitly or implicitly assessedStudent FeedbackIn the final week of the course, students submitted anonymous course evaluations for each classand the professor(s) associated with them. They evaluated the courses on
Science Foundation Award #1623208 which was awarded to the first and second authors. Any opinion, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] DJ Wardynski. Getting to know mobile development best practices. Brainspire.com, 2020. URL https://www.brainspire.com/blog/getting-to-know-mobile-development-best-practices. [2] Louisa A Stark. Cell biology apps for apple devices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(3):226–230, 2012. [3] Camilo Lellis-Santos and Fernando Abdulkader. Smartphone-assisted experimentation as a didactic strategy to maintain practical lessons in remote education: alternatives for
described above and the columns represent the home department 1 of theworkshop attendees (Figure 3). Note that the same groupings were used for home department(i.e. “Mech” means the workshop attendee was from the mechanical engineering department).The value in each matrix cell represents the fraction of participants from a particular departmentgrouping that attended a workshop of a particular category (e.g. a value of 0.2 in cell A(1,2)would mean that 20% of the participants that attended the mechanical-oriented workshops werefrom the electrical engineering department).If the makerspace was completely siloed, A would have only 1’s down the diagonal (i.e. onlythose from mechanical engineering attended mechanical-oriented workshops, only those
ASEE Virtual Annu. Conf., pp. 22-26, 2020.[10] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 - 2022," [Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting engineering-programs-2021-2022/. [Accessed May. 28, 2021][11] I. Kim and J. Kuljis, “Applying content analysis to web-based content, J. of Comput. and Inf. Technol., vol. 4, pp. 369-375, 2010.[12] H. Kim, J. R. Coyle, and S. J. Gould, “Collectivist and individualist influences on website design in South Korea and the U.S.: A cross-cultural content analysis,” J. of Computer- Mediated Commun., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 581-601, 2009.[13] M. Prince, “Does active learning work: A review of the research,” J. of
-high-wage-ohio/?agreed=1[2] A. Carrick, “Series (1 of 7): Rankings of States by Industrial Sub-Sector Jobs – Manufacturing:”,January 2019, [Online] Available:https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/economic/2019/01/series-1-7-rankings-statesindustrial-sub-sector-jobs-weight-concentration-maps-manufacturing )Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Departmentof Commerce. www.bea.gov[3] Program Insights, Burning Glass Technologies, January 2020, [Online] Available:(https://www.burning-glass.com)[4] K. S. Rawat and G. H. Massiha, "A hands-on laboratory-based approach to undergraduate roboticseducation," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04.2004, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2004, pp. 1370-1374 Vol.2.[5] M
-during-covid-19. [Accessed May 13, 2020].[2] R. Felder, "Designing Tests to Maximize Learning." J. Prof. Issues in Engr. Education & Practice, Vol. 128, pp 1-3, 2002.[3] D. Berrett, “A Professor Asked His Students to Write Their Own Exam Questions. Here’s What He Found,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 28, 2019. [Online]. Available: www.chronicle.com. [Accessed March 17, 2020].[4] M. Teplitski, T. Irani, et al., "Student-Generated Pre-Exam Questions is an Effective Tool for Participatory Learning: A Case Study from Ecology of Waterborne Pathogens Course" Journal of Food Science Education, 17, 76-84, 2018.[5] S. Bottomly and P. Denny, “A Participatory Learning Approach to Biochemistry Using Student Authored and Evaluated
Press. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference.[3] Chen, J.C., Whittinghill, D.C., and Kadlowec, J.A. 2006. Using rapid feedback to enhance student learning and satisfaction. Frontiers in Education.[4] Ferster, C.B. & Skinner, B.F. 1957. Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.[5] Hausfather, S. J. 1996. Vygotsky and schooling: Creating a social context for learning. Action in Teacher Education. (18) 1-10.[6] Johnson, D.W., Johnson, D.T. & Smith, K.A. 1998. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, 2nd Ed. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.[7] Jones, D.W. 1996. Empowering teams in the classroom can work. Journal for Quality and Participation, 19(1
other competencies of systems engineers. Systems Engineering-Practice and Theory, B. Cogan, ed., INTECH Open Access Publisher, pages 217–230, 2012.[10] John Krupczak Jr. and A. Mehran Shahhosseini. Application of a computerized method for evaluating systems-level thinking. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–32097, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/32097.[11] Marsha Lovett, Oded Meyer, and Candace Thille. The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the oli statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008.[12] S. Eppinger and K. Ulrich. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill Higher
technology to solve broadly defined engineering problems appropriate to thediscipline; and the ability to function effectively as a member as well as a leader on technicalteams. Assignments and Quizzes, and attendance and participation were found to be the mostcontributing factor for one of the student outcomes, whereas the Project was found to contributethe most to three student outcomes. Recommendations are given by the instructors and theymainly focus on ways that help overcome the project-related challenges as they are the dominantelement in all the comparisons and analysis performed in this study.References[1] B. Dutch, S. Groh, and D. Allen, The Power of Problem-Based Learning, Wiley, 2001.[2] Oliver, K. and Hannafin, M., "Developing and
conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluatinginformation gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, orcommunication, as a guide to belief and action.” In simpler words, CT involves the three majorskills of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation which are the higher order thinking skills accordingto Bloom’s Taxonomy [9]. A more general and rudimentary definition of CT was coined by Qiao[10], proposing that critical thinking is the same as “scientific thinking.” This instinctivelyredirects us to what is known as the “scientific method” [11] that consists of the well-knownsteps: define a question; gather relevant information; form an explanatory hypothesis; conductexperiment/s to test the hypothesis
. S., Lai, K. W., & Holton, D. (2003). Students' satisfaction and perceived learningwith a web-based course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 6(1), 116-124.[7] Bali, M., & Ramadan, A. R. (2007). Using rubrics and content analysis for evaluating onlinediscussion: A case study from an environmental course. Journal of Asynchronous LearningNetworks, 11(4).
the CornellActive Learning Initiative.References [1] ABET, “2019-2020 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” 2018. . [2] N. G. Holmes, J. Olsen, J. L. Thomas, and C. E. Wieman, “Value added or misattributed? A multi-institution study on the educational benefit of labs for reinforcing physics content,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017. [3] S. Willner-Giwerc, K. B. Wendell, C. B. Rogers, E. E. Danahy, and I. Stuopis, “Solution diversity in engineering computing final projects,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020. doi:10.18260/1-2–35198. [4] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering
quadcopter family,” IoT S P 2017 - Proc. 2017 Work. Internet Things Secur. Privacy, co-located with CCS 2017, no. Ii, pp. 31–36, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3139937.3139943.[17] C. G. Leela Krishna and R. Murphy, “A review on cybersecurity vulnerabilities for unmanned aerial vehicles,” Auvsi Xponential 2018, pp. 0–5, 2018.[18] D. Rainer, “Code corner,” Chem. Heal. Saf., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 39–40, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.chs.2005.05.008.[19] Interagency Security Committee, “Protecting Against The Threat of Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” 2020.
determine the effectiveness of the project at meetingskillset-based course outcomes (course outcomes a, b, c, and h), individual performance on thoseoutcomes by students that complete the project will be compared to the performance of students whodo not.AcknowledgmentsThis work began at an Innovating Curriculum with an Entrepreneurial Mindset workshop organizedby KEEN. I would like to acknowledge the critical feedback and support provided by workshopfacilitators Andy Gerhart, Glenn Gaudette, and Brad Dennis, as well as the ongoing support andcoaching of Heather Dillon.References[1] R. Marra, D. Jonassen, B. Palmer, and S. Luft, “Why Problem-Based Learning Works: Theoretical Foundations.,” J. Excell. Coll. Teach., 2014.[2] C. L. Dym, A
-Clark, “Access to everything: Building the future academic library collection,” Portal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 425–437, 2014. [9] L. K. Dunn and S. Xie, “Standards collection development and management in an academic library: A case study at the university of Western Ontario libraries,” Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh., vol. 2017, no. 87, Jun. 2017.Appendix AAccessing Engineering Standards: A Study in ARL Best Practices for Acquiring andDisseminating Standard survey questions. 1. Do you have a set budget each year for purchasing Standards? a. Yes b. No c. It is part of the firm order budget 2. What is your yearly Standards budget? 3. In the last year, how much would
://www.dnr.state.mn.us/forests_types/oldgrowth/description.html[11] D.J. Doorn; S. Janssen, M. O'Brien, “Student Attitudes and Approaches to OnlineHomework,” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, v4 n1 Article 5Jan 2010.
science and mathematics: Hindsights and new visions of the sisters in science program as an equity reform model, J. Wom. Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 333-348, 2003. 4. Alemdar, M., Gale, J. D., Lingle, J., Newton, S. H., Moore, R., Rosen, J. H., & Usselman, M. (2017). Students’ Perception of a Middle School STEM Innovation and Design Course. 5. PCAST, President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (2010). Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for America’s future: Washington: Executive Office of the President. 6. Knobloch, N. A., Esters, L. T., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Rehmat, A. P., Clark, Q. M., Hester, U., Johnson, T. A
Institutions, Washington D.C., 2013. [2] “Built Environment and Health Initiative”, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015. [3] W. Perdue, L. Stone, L. Gostin, “The Built Environment and Its Relationship to the Public’s Health: The Legal Framework” American Public Health Association, September 2003. [4] J. Kent and S. Thompson, “Health and the Built Environment: Exploring Foundations for a New Interdisciplinary Profession”, Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Volume 2012. APPENDIX A – SWOT Analysis for Bush Hills Neighborhood Meeting Strengths WeaknessesNeighborhood
Association for Interdisciplinary Studies 41st Annual Conference, Oct. 23-26, 2019, University van Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019.[4] J. C. Roberts, C. Headleand, and P. D Ritsos, "Sketching Designs Using the Five Design- Sheet Methodology." IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 419-28, 2016.[5] S. McKenna, L. Alexander, and M. Meyer. "Worksheets for Guiding Novices through the Visualization Design Process." ArXiv.org, p. 17+, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.05723.pdf. [Accessed January 30, 2020].[6] J. Brooke, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4-7, 1996.[7] A. Cairo, “Ethical Infographics,” IRE Journal, vol. 37
, doi: 10.5860/crl-223.[7] J. W. Rosenzweig, M. Thill, and F. Lambert, “Student Constructions of Authority in the Framework Era: A Bibliometric Pilot Study Using a Faceted Taxonomy,” Coll. Res. Libr., vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 401–420, 2019.[8] T. E. Pinelli, “The Information-Seeking Habits and Practices of Engineers,” in Information Seeking and Communicating Behavior of Scientists and Engineers, New York: The Haworth Press, 1991, pp. 5–26.[9] B. A. Osif, Using the engineering literature. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2012.[10] R. A. MacLeod and J. Corlett, Information sources in engineering, 4th ed. München, Munich, [Germany]: KGSaur, KGSäur, 2005.[11] S. Allard, K. J. Levine, and C. Tenopir, “Design engineers and technical
”.References[1] American Society for Engineering Education (2012). Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing Students. Available:https://www.asee.org/retention-project[2] Jones, B. D. (2009). Motivating Students to Engage in Learning: The MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 272-285.[3] Eccles, J. S., (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors.[4] Jones, B. D., Tendhar, C., & Paretti, M. C. (2016). The effects of students’ course perceptions on their domain identification, motivational beliefs, and goals. Journal of Career Development, 43(5), 383-397.[5
understand students’engineering identity development.” Thus, we feel this validated instrument is a strong fit for ourongoing study. In addition to Godwin’s identity instrument, the students were asked a series ofquestions in key theme areas, including the decision to enter engineering, prior mentoringexperiences and educational experiences. Topics queried are as follows: 1. To what extent did the following factors influence your decision to major in engineering: Parent(s), Sibling, Other relative, Friends, Guidance counselor, Extra-curricular activities, Career interests, Teachers, Potential future earnings, Other. In this case the responses were on a 5-point Likert scale from “Very important” = 1 to “Not at all important” = 5. 2
them. Retrieving data using the Arduino kit was relatively simple;however, data retrieval during resistor capacitor discharge was more challenging as students oftenhad to add more resistors to increase the time constant of the voltage drop. It was educational todetermine the selection of resistors required to collect the desired number of data points over atime period. The difficulty was in analyzing the data using Excel and compiling the handcalculations. The grades for the labs were a broad range from 50 to 96 with averages in the low tomid 80’s and standard deviation of 7 to 11. Data analysis and write up were where most pointswere lost. For the final project, the students started a
. Research in Learning Technology, 2004, 12, 113–124.12) Downes, S. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2010, 2, 27–33.13) Kirsch, C. “John Green to Crash Course Fans: “Read Your Boring Textbooks”. PublishersWeekly 2015. Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/2xN7dhy on Mar. 17, 2020.14) Chen, B.; Wei, L.; Li, H. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2016, 6, 148-165.15) Fernandez, V.; Simo, P.; Algaba, I.; Albareda-Sambola, M.; Salan, N.; Amanate, B.; Enache,M.; Bravo, E.R.; Sune, A.; Garcia-Almin Ana, D.; Rajadell, M.; Garriga, F. International Journalof Engineering Education 2011, 27, 1–10.16) Crash Course. “What Is Engineering?: Crash Course Engineering #1.” YouTube, 17 May 2018,https://youtu.be/btGYcizV0iI.17) Crash Course
responsibilities, and reward them for their contributions, or,would we want to fire them? We use weekly work logs, group reports in class, peer evaluations,and communications as evidence. Interactions with students are important as well – faculty andproject managers take into account how receptive students have been to comments, how self-motivated students have been to take on tasks, do students and groups complete work on time,and what level of task(s) students have taken responsibility for. A main lesson learned forstudents with respect to this aspect of the course is to take ownership. For some, it means takingon leadership or positions that are outside of their comfort zones. For others, it means steppingaside to let others do their share of the work
Courses - Undergraduate Writing - Academic Guides atWalden University.[4] A. Hur. 2017. Capstone: Applied Research. https://wagner.nyu.edu/files/syllabi/201709/CAP-GP.3148.001.pdf[5] Callender, et al. 2014. Undergraduate research as a capstone requirement. involve: a journal of mathematics,Vol. 7, No. 3, pp 273.[6] R. C. Moore 2005. The capstone course, assessing media education: A resource for educators andadministrators. Hillsdale, NJ.[7] Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., Davis, I. 2006. Deriving Design Course Learning Outcomes from a Professional Profile.International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, no. 1.[8] M. Plumley, W. Palm, and W. Simpson. 2008. A Common Design-Build-Test Project Incorporating Freshmanand Senior Undergraduate Analysis
, Vol 3, no. 2, article 14, October 2012. [Online]. Available:http://ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/14.yazici.pdf. [Accessed Jan. 2, 2020].[2] F.U.A. Shaikh, “Role of Commercial Software in Teaching Finite Element Analysis atUndergraduate Level 2012 a Case Study:,” Journal of Engineering Education, a Journal of theHigher Education Academy, Vol. 7, no. 2, 2012. [Online]. Available:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.11120/ened.2012.07020002. [Accessed Jan. 2, 2020].[3] R.G. Black and S. Duff, “A Model for Teaching Structures: Finite Element Analysis inArchitectural Education,” Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 48, no. 1, pp 38- 55, 1994. .[Online]. Available:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10464883.1994.10734621