Paper ID #22312BYOE: Activities to Map Intuition to Lumped System ModelsRaina White, Dartmouth College Raina White is an Engineering Lab Instructor at Dartmouth College. She earned a BS in Mechanical Engineering and a M.Eng in Systems engineering from Cornell University. She worked as a Systems Engineer at Hamilton Sundstrand, and then transitioned to teaching high school Physics. Currently Mrs. White works with students at Dartmouth College in systems, fluids, mechanical engineering, and auto- motive engineering courses and projects. She is very interested in improving student’s ability to translate coursework into
equity, and implicit bias in academia.Dr. Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is an Associate Dean and a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engi- neering. In her role of Associate Dean, she advocates for equity and access. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAIN SLO learning initiative, she and her colleagues have been active researching in transformation in higher education.Ms. Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow currently works at a tech startup accelerator in
, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Andr´e Schleife is a Blue Waters Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineer- ing at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He obtained his Diploma and Ph.D. at Friedrich- Schiller-University in Jena, Germany for his theoretical work on transparent conducting oxides. Before he started at UIUC he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory on a project that aimed at a description of non-adiabatic electron ion dynamics. His research revolves around excited electronic states and their dynamics in various materials using accurate computational methods and making use of modern super computers in order to understand
. Facilitate opportunities for employees to work on projects or issues that are socially relevant Men working in engineering and computing to serve as role models. Emphasize ethical and social issues when teaching engineering and computing. Encourage a supportive environment in the classroom and in the program. Encourage and assist early contact between students and professionals. Emphasize the wide variety of expertise necessary to be successful as an engineer or computing professional. Highlight as early as possible the different facets that make up engineering and computing.Methodology and Educational Learning Strategies:This course came out of a passion by the instructor to enhance leadership
Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Arkansas and is currently working on a PhD in Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas.Mr. Trevor Joe Dodson, University of Arkansas c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Effectiveness of GRE Workshops to Increase AwarenessAbstractExcelling on the Graduate Records Exam (GRE) can be an important milestone for students whowish to attend graduate school. As part of an NSF-STEM project, two GRE workshops wereimplemented to inform students about the importance of starting the preparation process earlierin their undergraduate career. The second workshop, occurring the year after the first, includedminor modifications based on the
can build self-efficacy directly and encourage moremastery experiences.Contextual examples of each of Bandura’s four sources of self-efficacy in undergraduateengineering education: first, mastery experiences could consist of completing practice problemsto master theory, engaging in project work and hands-on activities to build engineering skills,and successfully working in teams and giving technical presentations. Second, role models whoshare a similar identity in populations of upper year students, alumni, outside speakers, or facultymay provide vicarious experiences. Third, classmates, teaching assistant, professors, mentors,friends and family may all provide social persuasion, and fourth, an individual's’ personal orextra-curricular
. In the 2012-13 accreditation cycle programs had to prepare students towork professionally in both thermal and mechanical systems areas. This required students tocomplete design projects both in thermal and mechanical systems areas. This requirement waschanged in 2013-14 accreditation cycle and the programs are now required to prepare students towork professionally in either thermal or mechanical systems while requiring topics in each area.Therefore the design projects are only needed in one area, but students must still be exposed totopics in both areas.Table 2. Changes in Curriculum requirements of ME Program Criteria Changes in Curriculum requirements of ME Program Criteria 2008-09 Accreditation Cycle 2012-13 Accreditation
scale, disparate data. He is currently working on a project that ambition to design a system capable of providing students customized motivational stimuli and perfor- mance feedback based on their affective states.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled Data Mining–Driven Design (EDSGN 561). As part of the Engineering Design Program’s
use avariety of qualitative analysis methods to answer questions that contribute to the ongoingresearch and development of the project. This paper reports on an engineering activity designedusing the aforementioned interest-based framework. The participants of this activity wererecruited from a 5-week summer camp focused on positive youth development by engagingstudents in a number of physical (i.e., swimming, judo, and basketball) and learning (i.e.,videography, financial literacy) activities. This study reports on 40 students who consented to bea part of the study, all of whom were between 9-14 years of age and qualified for free or reducedlunch. The students participated in an engineering activity designed and delivered by the researchteam
there is still room for improvingparticipation at all levels of the professoriate.LSAMP13 has four alliance tracks that assist universities and colleges in their efforts to increasethe numbers of students matriculating into and successfully completing high quality degreeprograms in STEM. Specifically, Bridge to Doctorate (BD) projects are for post-baccalaureatefellowships that provides support to students in the first two years of STEM graduate studies. In2015, at the 37th Annual Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysisand Management (APPAM), Margaret Sullivan of Mathematica Policy Research presentedfindings from the evaluation of the LSAMP impact on URM students with support from the BDprogram. Sullivan stated URM
enzymes and biopolymers. He is involved in various projects directed towards the improvement of the bulk mechanical properties of soil, surficial soil stabilization, sustainable building materials, facilitated mineral precipitation and environmental remediation.Prof. Edward Kavazanjian Jr., Arizona State University Professor Kavazanjian is a Regents Professor and the Ira A. Fulton Professor of Geotechnical Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). He is also Director of the Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics, a National Science Foundation Gen-3 Engineering Research Center. He has Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from M.I.T. and a PhD from the University of California at Berkeley in Civil
Stanford University. Subsequently, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Computer Science, also at Stanford University. He has been with the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Illinois since 2006, where he now serves as Associate Head for Undergraduate Programs. He holds an affiliate appointment in the Coordinated Science Laboratory, where he leads a research group that works on a diverse set of projects (http://bretl.csl.illinois.edu/). Dr. Bretl received the National Science Foundation Early Career Development Award in 2010. He has also received numerous awards for undergraduate teaching in the area of dynamics and control, including all three teaching awards given by the College of Engineering at
study followed by research. Graduate education duringthe century that followed evolved to become a mentor based learning environment wherestudents worked alongside professors on research projects. The benefit of this mentor-basedprocess was that students would transition from consumers of research to producers of research.This process was accelerated in the post-World War II period where the economic expansion andcold war competition of the time period encouraged significant financial support for research. Bythe 1970s top tier universities had interwoven organized research and graduate education andlower tiered institutions strove to emulate this practice.As US Federal research funds began to diminish in the 1970s and 1980s, reduced
st 1 year 64% 61% 85 + 42 = 127 2nd year 23% 25% 31 + 17 = 48 rd 3 year 8% 9% 10 + 6 = 16 4th year 5% 5% 7 + 4 = 11 During the first week of the semester, students self-enrolled in teams of 6 or 7 for an out-of-class design project using the self-sign-up group feature of Canvas (Instructure, Salt Lake CityUT); these same teams were also used for all in-class learning activities. Class periods devoted toactive learning where indicated as such on the course syllabus and schedule. On these scheduled
the 2015 Best Diversity Paper.Mejia, et al., [3] presented a paper nominated by the K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Divisionexploring Latinx adolescents’ perceptions of engineering and their engineering abilities afterparticipation in community-based design projects. Students were from working class familiesand most had parents with limited education who worked in farming or other manual laboractivities. The adolescents, ages 14-17, worked in teams to identify a problem in theircommunity and to use engineering design to solve the problem. Most of the participants changedboth their perceptions of engineering as well as their self-efficacy as they worked on theseprojects. The design experience influenced participants’ perceptions of
manufacturing in both of these disciplinesis needed8. Many current engineering programs do not emphasize the marriage of design andmanufacturing in a modern industrial technical workforce [10].Many research studies have assessed the quality of exposure to manufacturing through the seniordesign or capstone course. McMasters and Lang indicate that few people in industry have anunderstanding of how the current engineering education is undertaken. Through design projects,the inclusion of industry partners in the education process will enhance the education provided tothe students and better reflect the expectations of industry [11]. Universities are exposingstudents to manufacturing through senior capstone design courses to offer students with arealistic
. was formed in conjunction with thecreation of the nation as a social project. Critical race theorists identify that race is indicative ofnot just the creation, but its continuation each day [14]. Although we are using two frameworksto look at individual and structural racism from a critical perspective, we recognize that theseframeworks are not part of critical race theory.Engineering Education and Critical Race StudiesEngineering education research focuses on guiding the future engineering practice towardsimproved quality and diversity. Some engineering education researchers investigate the field’spersistent racial homogeneity [4]. There is constant talk about the need for diversity, and effortsare made through “minority in engineering
University Todd Haskell is a cognitive scientist interested in learning and the development of expertise, especially in STEM fields. He is currently Associate Professor of Psychology at Western Washington University. In previous projects Dr. Haskell has worked on understanding how chemistry novices and experts navi- gate between macroscopic, symbolic, and small particle representations, and how pre-service elementary teachers translate an understanding of energy concepts from physics to other disciplines.Ms. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is the Director of Pre-Engineering Program Development and faculty member at West- ern Washington University. She spends her time teaching, developing and
projection, 16% of the top 25 are engineering [2]. Of the total occupationsrequiring a bachelor's degree, 13% are in engineering [2]. Those employed with a bachelor'sdegree in engineering comprise 23% of the top one-half of the median average and 13% of thetop quarter median wage earners [2]. Thus, engineering is one of the highest paying and in-demand professions for students graduating with a bachelor's degree.There are "two viable pathways to the baccalaureate degree [which] have developed in the pastone hundred years - a direct entry route where a student begins and ends at a four-yearinstitution, and a transfer route" [1]. The transfer route is usually accomplished by the studentattending a smaller institution, whether two years or four years
Computing Identity and Persistence Across Multiple Groups Using Structural Equation ModelingAbstractDespite the projected growth of computer and information technology occupations, manycomputing students fail to graduate. Studying students’ self-beliefs is one way to understandpersistence in a school setting. This paper explores how students' disciplinary identity sub-constructs including competence/performance, recognition, interest, and sense of belongingcontribute to academic persistence. A survey of 1,640 students as part of an NSF grant wasconducted at three South Florida metropolitan public universities. A quantitative analysis wasperformed which included a structural equation model (SEM) and a multigroup SEM. The
History and Ethics of Technology).Dr. Karolina Doulougeri, Eindhoven University of Technology Dr. Karolina Doulougeri is a post-doctoral research fellow in the Technological University of Eindhoven. Her research focuses on engineering students’ motivation and deep learning strategies, coaching in design based learning and educational redesign of engineering courses. She received her PhD in Organizational Psychology from the University of Macedonia, in Greece. She has worked in several international research projects focusing on students and employees’ well- being, professional development and performance. Her work has been published in peer reviewed journals and presented in several international conferences
University’s Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation, where he consults with faculty, graduate students, and post-docs to design, implement, and assess research projects that relate to teaching and learning in their classrooms. He also contributes to a variety of program-level assessment projects on the CMU campus. Mike’s training includes an M.A. and Ph.D. in Social Psychology from the University of New Hampshire, as well as an M.Ed. in sport and performance psychology from Springfield College. His interests include the science of learning, research methodology, and data analysis. Prior to joining the Eberly Center in 2017, Mike worked as the Teaching and Learning Research Coordinator at the Center
improvements and our desire to capture information we heard in conversations withparticipants. The evaluation was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University ofToronto as a quality improvement project. Findings presented in this paper were not gainedthrough research but rather a quality improvement project for The OPTIONS Program.The pre-evaluation included demographic and information gathering questions (e.g., degree-related work experience, extra-curricular/professional development activities). We do not presentsuch data in this paper. The post-evaluation had four open-ended questions including: “What didyou like about the program” and “What did you not like about the program?”. The post-evaluation also assessed the usefulness of
, and educational psychology, as well as a co-PI, an external evaluator or advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects (CA- REER, iCorps, REU, RIEF, etc.).Dr. Maria Claudia Alves , Texas A&M University Maria Claudia Alves Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University Ms. Maria C. Alves is the Director for the Halliburton Engineering Global Programs at Texas A&M University . She has been in this position since July 2012. In this position she is responsible for inter- nationalizing the research and education activities of the College of Engineering. Under her leadership the college has significantly increased the number of students studying abroad, established new
st 1 year 64% 61% 85 + 42 = 127 2nd year 23% 25% 31 + 17 = 48 rd 3 year 8% 9% 10 + 6 = 16 4th year 5% 5% 7 + 4 = 11 During the first week of the semester, students self-enrolled in teams of 6 or 7 for an out-of-class design project using the self-sign-up group feature of Canvas (Instructure, Salt Lake CityUT); these same teams were also used for all in-class learning activities. Class periods devoted toactive learning where indicated as such on the course syllabus and schedule. On these scheduled
toassign scores, meaning that the assessed learning tied to a given point may even fluctuate.As the latest pedagogical trends have shifted in the direction of a more holistic, experientialapproach to education through methods such as project-based and active learning, the educationcommunity has sought alternative ways to assess student learning in these systems. Thechallenges faced by such a reform are formidable, not least of which being a pervasive mindsetthat the primary function of grading is differentiating between students, rather than assessing aparticular student’s achievement or competency.4 However, there is a building momentum forchange, as researchers and practitioners have begun to question the ability of a traditional,summative
Paper ID #15101A Survey of the State of the Power Engineering Profession in the PacificNorthwest and what Working Professionals are Defining as Priorities for Prepar-ing Students to Fill Present and Near-Future VacanciesProf. Donald M. Peter P.E., Seattle Pacific University Don has taught electrical engineering at Seattle Pacific University since 1987, specializing in analog and power electronics, Before that he worked as a design/evaluation/diagnostics engineer at Tektronx, Inc. for eleven years. He has been involved in various consulting projects, including two summers as a NASA Summer Faculty Fellow at the Jet Propulsion
also was the associate director of operations for the Engineering Education Re- search Center from January 2011 to September 2013. Her work experience includes two years as a project manager in the planning department of the Port Authority of Allegheny County in Pittsburgh, and a re- search associate at the University of Novi Sad’s Institute for Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Dr. Vidic has published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings, including those of ASEE and INFORMS. She currently is participating in collaborative research on improving engineering students’ learning strategies through models and modeling and is interested in the assessment and effectiveness of model-eliciting
An Alternative to Videos for Lecture Preparation in a Flipped First-Year Engineering Computing CourseAbstractThis paper describes an evidence-based practice project. At the University of Cincinnati, twocourses, Engineering Models I and II, are offered to all first-year engineering students and form atwo-semester sequence in which students apply fundamental theories from algebra, trigonometry,calculus and physics to relevant engineering applications chosen from a variety of disciplines.MATLAB® is introduced and progressively developed as a computing tool to enable students toexplore engineering concepts, to investigate solutions to problems too complex for handsolutions, to analyze and present data effectively, and to
Illinois at Chicago B.S. Purdue University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Continuous Evaluation of Student Class Performance Using Group Based, In-class QuizzesIntroductionTraditional methods of evaluating student performance in the classroom involve assigningweekly homework assignments, semester long projects, conducting examinations (e.g., mid-terms/finals), and holding arbitrary pop quizzes. Amongst these methods homework assignmentsare a traditional indicator of a student’s continuous learning of the subject matter. Traditionally,performance on homework assignments reflects the level of understanding that the student has ofthe material that is covered in the