. Zhyvotovska, “An intersectional technofeminist framework for community-driven technology innovation,” Comput. Compos., vol. 51, pp. 43–54, 2019.[9] S. A. Morimoto, A. M. Zajicek, V. H. Hunt, and R. Lisnic, “Beyond Binders Full of Women: NSF ADVANCE and Initiatives for Institutional Transformation,” Sociol. Spectr., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 397–415, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1080/02732173.2013.818505.[10] M. F. Fox and C. Colatrella, “Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 31, pp. 377–386, 2006.[11] NSF, “Making Visible the Invisible - Understanding Intersectionality,” National Science Foundation, Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science
: 10.1002/jee.20190.[6] G. Potvin et al., “Gendered interests in electrical, computer, and biomedical engineering: Intersections with career outcome expectations,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 298–304, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TE.2018.2859825.[7] J. DeWaters and B. Kotla, “Using an open-ended socio-technical design challenge for entrepreneurship education in a first-year engineering course,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. May, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1198161.[8] C. A. Roberts and S. M. Lord, “Making Engineering Sociotechnical,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2020-Octob, pp. 15–18, 2020, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273957.[9] V. Svihla et al., “The Educative Design Problem Framework
programsDr. Hangen (Social-Personality Psychology): Currently Dr. Drazan and I meet weekly to advance ourwork. Within 11 months of beginning our collaboration we have worked across at six projects which haveresulting in various scholarly products such as a co-authored podium presentation at the OrthopedicResearch Society Annual meeting that was recognized as a Finalist for the New Investigator RecognitionAward (NIRA), co-authored a manuscript on a sports biomechanics STEM outreach intervention (inprep), and as co-PI’s (along with another colleague) a National Science Foundation S-STEM proposal.These early, tangible, outcomes have laid the groundwork for future projects and collaborations at theboundary of our respective fields.More broadly, I have
reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] Cumulative Anti-Transgender Legislation, The EqualityFederation, www.equalityfederation.org/tracker/cumulative-anti-transgender, accessedSeptember 25, 2023.[2] 2023 Anti-Trans Legislation, Track Trans Legislation, www.tracktranslegislation.com/,accessed September 25, 2023.[3] B.E. Hughes, and S. Kothari, “Don’t be too political: depoliticization, sexual orientation, andundergraduate STEM major persistence,” Journal of Homosexuality, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 632–659,2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.1996101.[4] E. Cech, and T. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: theexperiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Engineering Studies, vol. 3, no. 1
) the NSF Pathway Fellowsprogram, 2) work published in a 2016 ASEE Paper, 3) redefinition of the programgoals to include retention of underrepresented students and exposure to globalengagement and 4) the evolution & connection to the Penn State Clark ScholarsProgram 8U NITED S TATES F ULBRIGHT S CHOLAR 2015 AT U NIVERSIDADN ACIONAL DE INGENIERIA (UNI) – L IMA , P ERU• PILOT: NSF PATHWAY FELLOWS TRIP TO PERUPilot 2015: The research question in this project was: While conventional retentionprograms for underrepresented students have shown to achieve graduation ratesequal to or surpassing those of the majority male population over an extendedperiod, could
IndustryNieto, A.1, & Murzi, H.1, & Akanmu, A.2, & Yusuf, A.O.2, & Ball, S.3, & Walid S.4, & Ofori- Boadu, A.N.5 1 Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech 2 Myers Lawson School of Construction at Virginia Tech 3 School of Neuroscience at Virginia Tech 4 Electrical and Comp. Eng. at Virginia Tech 5 Dep. Built Environment at NCATKeywords Construction industry, connecting professional and educational communities,diversity, equity, and
T. K. K. B. Morgan, “Mechanisms by Which Indigenous Students Achieved a Sense of Belonging and Identity in Engineering Education,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Aug. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/mechanisms-by-which-indigenous-students-achieved-a-sense-of-b Elonging-and-identity-in-engineering-education[8] M. D. Johnson, A. E. Sprowles, K. R. Goldenberg, S. T. Margell, and L. Castellino, “Effect of a Place-Based Learning Community on Belonging, Persistence, and Equity Gaps for First-Year STEM Students,” Innov High Educ, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 509–531, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10755-020-09519-5.[9] T. L. Strayhorn
2014 report indicate thatneurodiverse individuals make up only around 3% of science and engineering doctoral degreerecipients [10].Graduate students face a unique set of challenges when compared to undergraduate students,with faculty advisors playing a large role in student success. Several studies have noted specificchallenges related to advisors, including work-life balance, which may be impacted by facultyexpectations, and hierarchical faculty-student relationships [11]-[13]. Satterfield et al.’s [14]literature review focused on the experiences of graduate students during their studies andexplored how individual factors (the influence of the student’s advisor), programmatic factors(isolation and teaching assistantships), and external
relationshipwith your mentor (s)?” and “How has your participation in this program reinforced your identityas a Latina/o in Engineering?” Second interview responses informed and framed this study. Onaverage, interviews lasted 40 minutes. All interviews took place in the university facilities whenstudents were available. Researchers used consent forms to comply with the Institutional ReviewBoard (IRB) requirements. All interviews were recorded and transcribed; the transcriptions wereused for the analysis. Researchers used Dedoose, a qualitative tool to help in the data analysis.Researchers started with the unitization of data, that is, every piece of information that can beunderstood by itself is classified under a theme and then reclassified using
at a larger scale.Finally, the questions in the academic integrity theme aim to capture students' experiences andobservations on how these tools are used and framed in academic institutions. We aim toreplicate Zastidul [9] finding that students believe the amount of plagiarism will increase as AItools increase in popularity. We expand this work by capturing the context of the institutions andcourse policies around AI usage. Table 1: List of Survey Questions by theme Theme Questions Awareness and ● Do you currently use an AI product? Use of AI in Education ● What AI product(s) do you currently use? ● How much do you pay for the AI products you use
ofEngineering of Andrés Bello University. They also thank the Educational and Academic Unit(UNIDA) for its mentoring and guidance in developing scientific articles in higher educationresearch.References[1] S. Berres, L. Maldonado, P. Grassia, E. Ventura-Medina, and V. Magueijo, "Competencias necesarias en graduados de ingeniería según representantes de la industria regional Chilena", in XXIX UFRO 2016 - Formación de Capital Humano en Ingeniería en el contexto de una Sociedad Global, pp. 9, Temuco, Chile, 2016.[2] L. M. Pedraja-Rejas, E. R. Rodríguez-Ponce, C. J. Espinoza-Marchant, and C. P. Muñoz-Fritis, "Liderazgo y cultura en carreras de ingeniería: estudio en una universidad chilena", Formación Universitaria, vol
. Crafted by S2D participantswith the support of writing coaches, personal statements written during the program reflectparticipant stories and the effectiveness of programming and staff. The exit survey providesfeedback on programming from the participant perspective which will help administrators takesteps toward enhanced curriculum building. Currently, research is being conducted to performpost program analysis. The research details where past S2D participants are now, how S2Dcontributed to their academic journeys, and which component(s) of past S2D programming pastS2D participants found most useful. Post program analysis provides administrators with insightregarding long term outcomes of S2D programming.BiasTwo types of bias to be highlighted
theProfessoriate (AGEP) Program Solicitation." NSF21-576, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21576/nsf21576.pdf[19] P. Felder, "On Doctoral Student Development: Exploring Faculty Mentoring in the Shapingof African American Doctoral Student Success." Qualitative Report, vol. 15, no. 2, 2010, pp.455-474.[20] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, (2019). “Social cognitive career theory at 25: empirical statusof the interest, choice, and performance models.” J. Vocat. Behav, 115, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004[21] R. W. Lent, H.-B. Sheu, M. J. Miller, M. E. Cusick, L. T. Penn, and N. N. Truong,“Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model
question and aided inproducing a thick and rich dataset. The first question asked about the project(s) the student wasworking on and the second asked why he or she chose to participate in the extracurricularproject(s). The next four questions asked the students to discuss how their learning, engagement,confidence, and career prospects are affected by the project(s). The seventh question asked themto describe, in detail, the project building process, while the last two questions had them reflecton the value of the experience and the support they received. After each interview, codingcommenced using a constant comparative technique. Heuristic, discrete units of data was codedand categorized, initially through the note-taking process within the
of thinking that roughly capture patterns in LAs’descriptions and diagnoses of, and imagined responses to, the teamwork troubles: individualaccountability, where the trouble is seen as caused by individual(s) described as “off task” or“checked out” or demonstrating some level of incompetence; delegation of work, where thetrouble was located in the team leader’s inability to delegate tasks effectively to team members,or in the group’s general lack of communication about what tasks need to be completed, whoshould execute the tasks, and what work other groups in the team were doing; and emergentsystems, where trouble was described as a group-level phenomenon emerging from the patternsof interaction amongst group members, contextual features
), as higher competency is demonstrated for each construct. For example, for Cultural SelfAwareness (Knowledge), criteria for meeting the Benchmark Level is “Shows minimal awareness of own cultural rules and biases (even those shared with own cultural group(s)) (e.g. uncomfortable with identifying possible cultural differences with others.)” To achieve the Capstone level of this construct, one must articulate “insights into own cultural rules and biases (e.g. seeking complexity; aware of how her/his experiences have shaped these rules, and how to recognize and respond to cultural biases, resulting in a shift in selfdescription.)”. Overview of diversity and inclusion awareness in monthly program meetings Since February 2015, most monthly
] Syaputra, Adi & Hasanah, Enung. (2022). Learning Strategies In The Digital Era. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation. 3. 74-83. 10.12928/ijemi.v3i1.5507.[2] Athanasios Christopoulos & Pieter Sprangers — Shuyan Wang (Reviewing editor) (2021) Integration of educational technology during the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of teacher and student receptions, Cogent Education, 8:1, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1964690[3] Ayodele Abosede Ogegbo & Umesh Ramnarain (2022) A systematic review of computational thinking in science classrooms, Studies in Science Education, 58:2, 203-230, DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2021.1963580[4] S. N. S. Yasin, R. Ibrahim and R. C. M. Yusoff, ”Mobile Educational Games User Experience
Paper ID #39902Evaluation of a Work-Integrated Learning Program for Undergraduate STEMOutreach InstructorsDr. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching and Associate Director of the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice.Daniel Munro, University of TorontoVirginia HallMs. Tracy L. Ross, Actua Tracy Ross holds a B.Sc. (Hons) in Environmental Chemistry from Queenˆa C™s University and a M.A. in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology from University of Toronto. She has overseen high quality, targeted STEM outreach programs at a
senior designproject allowed the students to achieve the course learning objectives, including designing formanufacturing, learning modern manufacturing tools, and conducting ethical design/designingfor the environment.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Hunt and Hunt Ltd. for their generous support of this series ofsenior design projects.References [1] A. Chamas, H. Moon, J. Zheng, Y. Qiu, T. Tabassum, J. H. Jang, M. Abu-Omar, S. L. Scott, and S. Suh, “Degradation Rates of Plastics in the Environment,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol 8, Iss. 9, pp. 3494-351, 2020, doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635 [2] United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Facts and Figures about Materials, Waste
support for BLI students in engineering is needednow, more than ever, as engineering degree completion has stagnated among BLI students.Acknowledgement This work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation IUSEGrant No. 2111114/2111513 (PIs: Linda DeAngelo and Allison Godwin). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Theauthors of this article extend their thanks to the larger research team we work with on this grantand especially to Charlie Diaz for providing feedback that shaped the writing of this particularpublication.References[1] National Center for Science and
demographics: ethnicity,gender, and first-generation students pursuing a bachelor’s degree. In addition to obtaining a largersample size of responses, methods will be developed to quantitatively analyze open responsesproviding feedback on the effectiveness of the EML project and to what extent students believedtheir background influenced this experience. We will additionally report a consensus on studentrecommendations for programs or resources that the university should supply to further supportHRMs. This work underscores the importance of incorporating EML material for HRM groupsand further diagnoses the presence of content exclusivity in EML-based projects.References[1] C. Carroll, S. Sell, M. Sabick, Introduction to Entrepreneurial-minded
by other students and how instructors can work todisrupt these dynamics and support all students in engaging in more careful classroominteractions.References[1] D. Ozkan and C. Andrews (2022). “Perspectives of Seven Minoritized Students in a First-Year Course Redesign toward Sociotechnical Engineering Education”. Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41382[2] Fries-Britt, S., George Mwangi, C. A., and Peralta, A. M. (2014). Learning race in a U.S. context: An emergent framework on the perceptions of race among foreign-born students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035636[3] Ross, M. B. Capobianco, and A
cs g E g ER s y l g AD ro or si in
: 2017 Update,” U.S. Department of Commerce Economicsand Statistics Administration Office of the Chief Economist, 2017. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023.[Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED590906.pdf]9] N. Mamaril and K. Royal, “Women and Minorities in STEM,” in Midwestern EducationalResearch Association, 2008, pp. 1–28.[10] S. Carbajal and R. I. Toro, “Filial responsibility, bicultural competence, and socioemotionalwell-being among Latina college students.,” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology,Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000467.[11] C. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, A. Garcia-Hidalgo, and A. de los Angeles, “Gender andengineering: Developing actions to encourage women in tech,” in 2018 IEEE global
examples to general guidelines,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2004.[3] “What Is Accreditation? | ABET.” [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/what-is-accreditation/ [Accessed Feb. 17, 2023].[4] J. Asuncion Zarate-Garcia, A. Serrano-Reyes, M. X. Rodriguez-Paz, and I. Zamora- Hernandez, “A continuous improvement model to enhance academic quality in engineering programs,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020, vol. 2020-June.[5] C. Balascio, T. Brumm, and S. Mickelson, “Competency-based assessment of engineering technology program outcomes,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2010.[6] G. Neff, S. Scachitti, and M
scientists/engineers in your field should consider how their professional work intersects with issues of social justice? Question 4: Social How would you describe the network(s) that you use to access Capital professional resources and opportunities? Follow-up: Who has helped you to access those professional networks? How has your research supervisor helped you in building your professional network?Discussion Although the focus groups are pending, we had 17 participants for the survey this year.These 17 students will be invited to participate in the focus groups to be held by the externalevaluator. The focus groups will be virtual
challenges, another critical aspect thatmust be taken up is sharing discipline-specific lesson plans. What specifically can be done in afluid mechanics course, for example? What are some small, intermediate, or large changes thatcan be made, and what is their effectiveness? While some resources are available in variousplaces, building a network to share teaching materials and practices would help to advance thiswork more widely.This work was funded by a grant from the Lemelson Foundation, grant #22-02094, July 2022 toJune 2024.References[1] S. Hoffmann, I. Hua, E. Blatchley, and L. Nies, "Integrating sustainability into courses across the engineering curriculum: a faculty workshop model," in ASEE Ann. Conf. Expo, Louisville, KY, Jun
. (2010). A national analysis of minorities in science andengineering faculties at research universities (2nded.). Unpublished policy report.[5] Reybold, L. E. (2003). Pathways to the professorate: The development of faculty identity ineducation. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 235-252.[6] Sklar, D. P. (2016). Moving from faculty development to faculty identity, growth, andempowerment. Academic Medicine, 91(12), 1585-1587.[7] Whittaker, J. A., Montgomery, B. L., & Acosta, V. G. M. (2015). Retention ofunderrepresented minority faculty: strategic initiatives for institutional value proposition basedon perspectives from a range of academic institutions. Journal of Undergraduate NeuroscienceEducation, 13(3), A136.[8] Lieff, S., Baker, L., Mori