other for affirmation, respectively.To address these issues, educators should uses appropriate learning strategies, make choices thatare changing and engaging, and develop a positive orientation toward learning in theirclassrooms to promote a mastery orientation. As instructors, specific pedagogies can be used toinfluence whether students adopt a mastery orientation in the classroom. Some of these practicesinclude focusing attention on students’ effort and strategy use, not on abilities or intelligence;teaching adaptive learning strategies (e.g. planning, monitoring, and evaluating their progress inlearning); encouraging student involvement and a sense of personal responsibility; de-emphasizing the negative consequence of making errors
attainment of the targeted learning objectives. To that end, two engineering education researchers planned and carried out an intrinsic case study of the Winter 2013 offering of the course. After executing the study, the researchers were surprised to find quite a negative bent in students’ responses to the course in the data. They recognized that students’ expectations and perceived experiences were quite different from the instructor’s expectations and intended experiences for his students. Therefore, the study was extended for a second year. The objective of the broader study, within which this work is positioned, was to be a formative assessment tool for the course to explore students
based on on-line course learning system and cited references Resource as listed on Course Management System Consulted Cited ASCE What Went Wrong Why, 92 pg report21; pdf (listed first) 13 9 28 ASCE Lessons of Katrina 2015 Ethics Commentary ; link 6 2 Baillie Catalano Eng Society Social Justice – ethics; Ch4 Hurricane 8 1 Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans29; pdf Fields Disaster Planning Post Katrina – Wicked Problem,30 8 pg; pdf √ 11 5 22 House of
demographicclusters, not simply the dyads and binning which come from single measures treated separately.Part 2: How to collect and when to askAppreciating non-normative and holistic identities in engineering begins by understanding themethods that researchers use to gather demographic information. Methods include ensuringparticipant anonymity, avoiding bias simply through collecting data, and balancing efficiencywith accuracy. However, as will become apparent in the remainder of the paper, decisions aboutdemographic data collection are highly situated and rarely have a single answer.At the core of efforts to collect demographic data is a single, but vital, point: The planning andidentification of demographic data collection must occur prior to data
supposed hesitation of particular answers to provide a fullerunderstanding of the physical world as the students confirmed or rejected their own priorassumptions.Following the lesson, a post assessment was conducted wherein students were given a survey toindicate other types of experiments they might want to conduct using a MUAV. While some ofthe ideas conveyed in the survey are not deemed feasible, others provide an insight into howfuture teachers might design a MUAV lesson plan differently to better capture the interests of thestudents.2. MotivationThe AR Drone lab was integrated into a quantitative research class for 9th grade students. Belowwe discuss how the AR Drone lab design supports the goals of quantitative research in educationand how
could also provefruitful for STEM educators to assist in planning and ordering of interventions and strategies toensure students’ success.” (Long et al., 2015). These implications make clear recommendationsabout the need for further research based on their publication.Practice implications were most often recommendations for educators and other stakeholders inthe educational process. One example is “'Findings suggest that the interactive theater sketch canhelp students work on teams more productively and demonstrate increasing value for diversity.”(Paguyo, Atadero, Rambo-Hernandez, & Francis, 2015).Finally, the third type of implications observed was policy implications. These implications aremade to larger systems that govern or control
textbook required for the course. However, the course instructor plans to adapt atextbook as a future goal for the class. The textbook will be required to give an overview of theresearch design and methods, project management, quality control, ways to encourage teamwork, tips for the team leader, suggestions for sharing certain duties for a successful project,project reporting, cost estimation, resource management, prototyping, literature review, thepatent process, etc. The course instructor used a variety of resources for the initial courses tocover these topics but realized that the assessment of the specific topics are difficult without theuse of a textbook.VI. ProjectsThe projects identified by the course instructor were assigned based on
. From 1995 to 1997, Dr. Houshyar spent all of his spring and summer terms at Argonne National Labo- ratory (ANL) assisting them with the scheduling of the EBR-II nuclear reactor shutdown. Dr. Houshyar developed several mathematical and simulation models that helped plan for the reactor shutdown accord- ingly. Dr. Houshyar has served as the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Modelling and Simula- tion for over 20 years, and is very active in publication of scholarly articles. He has over 30 journal publications and 100 articles in conference proceedings. Some of Dr. Houshyar’s journal publications are in Computer and Industrial Engineering, Computers in Industry, The International Journal of Mod
Mehwish Butt, University of Alberta Mehwish Butt, BSc., is a Graduate Research Assistant at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Alberta. Her research area lies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Design Processes, Product Development and Evolution, Design interface across disciplines, and identifying the commonalities of design concepts across disciplines.Dr. Jason P. Carey, University of Alberta Jason P. Carey, PhD., PEng., is a Professor and Associate Dean of Programming and Planning, in the Faculty of Engineering, at the University of Alberta. He is a collaborator of the Transdisciplinary Design Education for Engineering Undergraduates research project. Dr. Carey research interests are in
“candybomber” deliver candy to children [26]—and develop and evaluate a plan for testing theparachutes. In keeping with the Next Generation Science Standards, which emphasize “planningand carrying out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered,” (3-5 ETS1-3) [27], the elementary students could create a testing plan (a genre). Using think-aloudsand discussion prompts, the teacher could model for students how to evaluate that genre usingthe discipline-specific evaluative frameworks generated from this study. For example, theelementary students might consider statements such as, “I believe the results from this test wouldbe repeatable (or not) when the candy bomber dropped the parachutes because…” “I believe
good at generating a bunch of different paths because that's how my brain works. Picking one, oh my God. It's horrible. It's terrifying. (Selyne)While Selyne had many ideas for her future, but was stifled by her fear of choosing one career topursue, Hannah expressed not wanting to plan for the future to avoid being disappointed: I'm going to be working, but I don't want to plan too specifically, I guess, and have plans change or something. …I just ... I don't want to be disappointed, I don't want to have ... I don't want to go in with a preconception that's going to affect how I make my decisions and things. I don't want to say oh, I thought I was going to be here, so I'm going to say no to this
includes engineering in her elementary and early childhood science methods courses and developed and taught an engineering methods course for middle school teachers. She also developed a graduate-level engineering education course for PreK-6 teachers. Dr. Lottero has provided professional learning experiences in multiple schools and school systems in Maryland. She has co-authored numerous engineering-focused articles for the teacher practitioner journal, Science and Children, and presents her research regularly through the American Society for Engineering Education. Her current research includes investigating how K-5 students plan, fail, and productively persist, and how simulated classroom environments can be used to
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Lessons Learned from a Summer Bridge Research Partnership Between a Community College and a UniversitySummer Bridge PartnershipAs part of a partnership between a local community college and university, we have established a summerbridge program that has been proceeding since summer 2017. During the last three years, it has developed andevolved becoming larger and increasingly successful; even more so than originally planned. Targeted studentsfor our summer bridge program include students from diverse backgrounds including minorities, females andeconomically disadvantaged individuals.For the past three summers, community college students have spent
Tolerance curriculum, Association of American Colleges andUniversity VALUE rubrics and the Stanford d-school design process [12] [18] [19]. Existinglesson plans were revised to allow for greater exploration of empathy in engineering disciplinesand engineering design while maintaining the creative, innovative and cross cutting scienceconnections that were built into the lesson plans. The appropriateness of teamwork andcollaboration is reinforced throughout the program as students are encouraged to work in groupsor discuss their thought process in pairs. These pair-and-share and teamwork opportunities helpstudents understand their own and others engineering design, prototyping, testing andimprovement as they considered the people, stakeholders, who
Analysis and FindingsMuch of the literature on faculty retention relies on turnover intentions (i.e., plans or desires toleave) as a proxy for actual turnover [2], [5], [8], [12], [18], [20]. Very little of this workexamines faculty retention directly. Of those that do, samples are often constructed from collegecatalogues and online resources [1], [10]. Our study differs from previous research by examiningactual faculty departures and retention cases with the use of a comprehensive data set providedby UX’s Office of Institutional Research. In contrast to catalog data and online resources,institutional data sets are more reliable and allow for removal of retired faculty. In the first stage of our quantitative analysis, we examined faculty
scheduling assessment - Contact client, collect plant data to check its eligibility for assessment - Set up assessment date if client meets eligibility criteria - Organize team meeting for pre-preparation - Assign lead author for the assessment report(ii) Pre-assessment activities - Create client file, check utility billings for completion - Contact client, confirm assessment visit date, record pre-assessment survey form - Do the billing analysis - Prepare pre audit report - Program data loggers, charge assessment equipment(iii) During assessment activities - Deliver assessment kick-off meeting - Collect general information about plant operation, production process - Conduct plan tour - Develop
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A case study on how instructors’ pedagogical knowledge influences their classroom practices for first-year engineering coursesAbstractThis complete research paper details an investigation into the influence of instructors'pedagogical knowledge on their classroom practices in the context of teaching first-yearengineering courses. First-year engineering courses are critical for introducing students to thefield and its teaching methods, providing essential skills for success in advanced topics, andhighlighting the significance of instructors' pedagogical knowledge in employing diversepedagogical strategies and engaging lesson plans. Despite the importance of pedagogicalknowledge, limited
engineering careers and curriculum is well-known. ABET lists“an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create acollaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” as astudent outcome in its outcomes-based assessment of engineering curricula [1]. Early careerengineers often describe effective teamwork and interpersonal skills as the most importantcompetencies in their jobs [2, 3]. The formation of teams can significantly affect how well a teamworks together, and team formation and function have been studied in engineering curriculum fordecades [4–6]. Previous research has shown that teams are more effective when instructors createthe teams considering students
transcript, asfinancial limitations are a key barrier to students’ academic plans, especially for first-generationstudents [12]. This range of academic and socioeconomic barriers can result in reducing theparticipation of underserved student populations in outreach programs, despite the programsbeing intentionally aimed to serve these populations.Solutions can be found in alternative program design structure, and small changes can makelarge impacts in removing barriers so a diverse population of students have equitable access. Forexample, removing the need for official transcripts and instead only requiring unofficialtranscripts or a captured ‘print screen’ of students’ grade information on their organization’sregistration software system, reducing
. Thisinaugural ASEE panel centered on challenges of and potential initiatives to support studentveterans in STEM. Outcomes from the panel discussion were subsequently reported in a paperpresented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference in Columbus, OH [14].In 2022, the MVD leadership team planned, coordinated, and conducted a follow-on panel,comprised of veteran engineering education stakeholders and addressing the broad theme ofveteran pathways to engineering careers. Presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference, thepurpose of the stakeholder panel, “Veteran Pathways to Engineering,” was multifold: to examineveterans’ engineering career pathways from viewpoints that may not be as well represented inthe literature (i.e., veteran and current enlisted
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching First-year Students to See Infrastructure Issues as Equity IssuesAbstractThe fundamental role of civil infrastructure in helping to ameliorate or further exacerbate socialinequities has become increasingly clear in recent years. In order to make more equitabledecisions in how we plan, design, operate, and manage our infrastructure, civil engineers need tobetter understand the fundamental and ubiquitous role of infrastructure in society. This paperdescribes three first-year courses that address equity and infrastructure in different ways. AtLafayette College, a small, private liberal arts college, a first-semester course is focused on
focused on STEMinterests while the Group Work Skills Questionnaire Manual Survey is centered on studentcollaboration. The results of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests indicated positive significant impactson 21st-century learning, Group work, student’s expected class performances (in Math, Science,Engineering, and English) and student’s plan to take advanced courses in the future (in Math,Science, and Engineering). Additionally, daily reflection surveys were administered tounderstand the impact of individual activities students participated in each day. Results wereanalyzed to identify activities that positively improved domains in student interests, whichprovided additional context to the meaning of the results from the pre- and post-survey
approach to address this issue, and it involves transforming a directednetwork into an undirected one while accounting for missing ties. The survey data initiallyrepresented directed relationships between organizations, indicating the strength of connection ineach category (contact, information sharing, and co-planning). To prepare the data for SNA, asymmetrization process was employed using the average or mean method. We employed thisprocedure to treat relationships as bidirectional, assuming mutual organizational interactions.While no approach to dealing with missing data in SNA is perfect, alternative methods, such asdeletion of missing data or imputation, risk the loss of valuable information. Symmetrizationcircumvents this issue by leveraging
members' pressure to focus theirtime on producing a substantial volume of grant-funded research publications and the effortexpended to develop a new course or modify an existing course [2]. Felder and Brentrecommended the following considerations for STEM instructors who evaluate textbook options: ● book reviews, ● match of content and the content order to the course plan, ● instructor supports (test question banks, illustrations, and other materials to support lectures), ● learner supports (self-tests, practice problems with answers), ● inclusion of multimedia (illustrations, tutorials, equations), and ● cost to students [2].However, newer faculty may be advised to replicate what their peers have already developed orto
(Spanish for “baby chicks”) and included strongties to the popular Spanish language song, “Los Pollitos Dicen” (Figure 3). This activity askedfamilies to use wooden blocks to keep a hen and her family of baby chicks safe and cozy.Pollitos included two books for educators to incorporate: Los Pollitos Dicen by Ashley Wolffand The Chick That Wouldn’t Hatch by Claire Daniel. The second activity was named Doggiesand based on the book Big Dog… Little Dog by P.D. Eastman. Doggies invited families to buildbeds or houses that are just the right size for a small and large stuffed dog using craft materials(e.g., popsicle sticks, index cards, sticky dots). The third activity was named Tacos and askedfamilies to plan a taco party and test different processes
skills. The development of bettercommunication skills helped students become more confident and, in turn, improved theirleadership skills. Undergraduate student leaders in STEM outreach programs value the ability toapply what they learned in their own courses and transfer the knowledge to the outreachparticipants [23]. The student leaders expressed feeling challenged–yet rewarded–to think innew ways. Several studies have found that students improve their communication, teamwork,and other professional skills from their experience leading outreach activities [23-25]. Studentsalso reported improved understanding of technical content [23, 25]. Participating in outreach caninfluence students’ post-graduate plans, such as attending graduate school [26
for in-person sessions over remote oneswas voiced by some participants, indicating a nuanced response to virtual programming.Volunteers offered constructive feedback on the planning and logistics of virtual events,emphasizing the importance of clarifying roles, optimizing break times, increasing interaction inbreakout rooms, encouraging camera usage, and ensuring diverse representation in studentpanels. Further recommendations from volunteers and facilitators centered on improving follow-up strategies for parents’ post-workshop, including the distribution of recordings and chattranscripts, offering a more structured follow-up plan, providing actionable items, and assessingthe practical application of the information provided. These insightful
advanced topic; create Planning, Perception & Control your own prelab & lab * Note that some of these classes were taught multiple times. Other topics were developed but have yet to be taught - these are not included here.The high structure of First Year Design, made transparent to learners and emphasized from thebeginning, helps to create a more participatory learning environment of rigor, accountability,practice, and ownership. Learning is distributed into weekly modules that provide diversifiedopportunities for non-optional participation and rapid feedback, which, in turn, supportsformative assessments and responsive, dynamic teaching. Early modules foster skilldevelopment