are described below. The wind tunnel has a test section measuring approximately 12 in x12 in x 24 in (305mm x 305mm x 610mm), and has a maximum air speed of approximately 140mph (63 m/s). It is instrumented with an electronic strain-gage based balance for measurementsof normal force, axial force, pitching moment, and pressure distribution as a function of air speedand angle of attack. Both manual as well as electronic pressure sensing is available on thisfacility. An electronic pressure scanning unit containing 32 individual electronic pressuresensors is also used in conjunction with this facility. This latter unit can be used to provide real-time visualization of the pressure distribution in the wind tunnel, in much the same manner as ithas
should ask the studentsto discuss it with the person(s) in the immediate vicinity and try to determine “the truth”through discussion. They’ll stare blankly at first but once the instructor says “No, I’mserious - discuss it with each other,” they’ll get the message. One might suppose that theresult of such a request would be some desultory and quiet discussions which would quicklydie down. How wrong such a presumption would be. Every time I’ve initiated such a processthe noise level ratchets up at an amazing rate. Students truly get into it - arguing forciblyfor one view or another. The energy level generated is simply astounding.After a couple of minutes the instructor should call time and again ask for a show of hands.Depending on the point
Montana, and to disseminate the kit designs and lab experiments to other Page 10.447.15interested engineering programs for possible adoption. We would welcome contact from any ofour colleagues around the country. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography 1. Tobias, S. (1990), “They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier,” Tucson: Research Corporation. 2. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., and C. J. Atman (1994), “Survey Design Methodology: Measuring Freshman
In the midst of hardship, Tesla mustered the energy to file in March 1886 a patentapplication for a thermo-magnetic motor--a novel device powered by heating and coolingmagnets.23 Discussions about his invention with the foreman at his ditch-digging job led to anintroduction to Charles F. Peck. Intrigued by the thermo-magnetic motor concept, Peckoffered to underwrite Tesla’s research. Because Peck was no technical expert, he invitedAlfred S. Brown, a superintendent at Western Union, to join him in supporting Tesla. Topermit Tesla to concentrate on inventing, Peck and Brown organized the Tesla ElectricCompany, rented a laboratory for him in Manhattan's financial district, and brought Szigetifrom Europe to assist him. With support from Peck and
– for example, a community service agency, museum or school, orgovernment agency and a faculty or industry advisor. A pool of graduate teaching assistantsfrom seven departments provides technical guidance and administrative assistance.Each EPICS team is vertically integrated, consisting of a mix of freshmen, sophomores, juniors,and senior and is constituted for several years, from initial project definition through finaldeployment. Once the initial project(s) is completed and deployed, new projects are identifiedby the team and community partner allowing the team to continue to work with the samecommunity partner for many years. Each undergraduate student may earn academic credit forseveral semesters, registering for the course for 1 or 2
time.ReflectionsThe problem of retention of engineering students has been the focus of discussion since the1980’s. However, it was not until the landmark study of Seymour and Hewitt that many of usdeveloped any understanding why students were leaving. Unfortunately, too few faculty areaware of this report or have the time to devote to reading it. Sitting in on most departmentmeetings will reinforce that the apparent mismatch between student and faculty perceptions oncourse difficulty and course instruction, which was reported in Carter and Brickhouse’s [5] studyin 1986, can still be found today. As a result, this paper attempts to provide an overview of thosefactors negatively effecting student retention. In addition, a review of a number of curricular
© 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”The third flight lab focuses on the stability characteristics of the airplane. The objectives ofFlight Lab Three are: 1. To determine the effect of center of gravity (CG) location on aircraft stability. 2. To predict the neutral point of the aircraft. 3. To determine the aircraft’s longitudinal dynamic stability response (phugoid). 4. To demonstrate some of the C-182’s static stability characteristics.The beginning of Flight Lab Three is devoted to demonstrating some of the directional andlateral stability characteristics to include Dutch Roll, Adverse Aileron Yaw, and Proverse Roll.These demonstrations truly showcase the benefit of the flight lab program. All of
a useful and necessary purpose in an organization’stechnical function.The performance appraisal of scientists, engineers, and technologists is a mainstay ofengineering management and of such courses. It is hoped this paper has provided some insightand much need course material where little is to be found and where great controversy can exist.Bibliography[1] Booz, Allen, Hamilton, Inc., Study of Performance Management Systems Compatible with Total Quality Management (TQM). Washington, D.C.:Department of the Navy, 1990[2] Cohen, S. “Reviewing the review: critics charge that employee evaluations are outdated, ineffective, and a waste of time.” The Tampa Tribune., 19 June, p. 1, 1994.[3] Raelin, J. A. “The basis for the
Senior Level Design Course", ", Proceedings of the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Available at http://www.asee.org/conferences/search/02625_2001.pdf· Seebauer, E. G., and R. L. Barry, Fundamentals of Ethics for Scientists and Engineers, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.· Butler, S., "Catalysing Student Autonomy Through Action Research in a Problem -Centered Learning Environment, Research in Science Education, vol. 29, no. 1, 1999, pp. 127-140.· Reference 3.DAVID W. M ILLERDavid W. Miller is Assistant Professor and Director of the Space Systems Laboratory in the Department ofAeronautics and Astronautics at MIT. He is currently a member of NASA ORIGINS Technology Working Group
stands for the National Society of Professional Engineers.3 Michael Pritchard & Mark Holtzapple (1997) Responsible Engineering: Gilbane Gold Revisited Science andEngineering Ethics 3; 217-2304 Michael Davis (1999) Ethics and the University, Routledge, London, 128, 157.5 Michael J. Rabins, Edwin Harris Jr., &Jeremy E. Hanzlik (1996) An NSF /Bovay Endowment SupportedWorkshop to Develop Numerical Problems Associated with Ethics Caswes for Use in Required UndergraduateEngineering Courses. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conferenceand Exposition: session 3332. See also http://ethics.tamu.edu/.6 C. E. Harris, M. S. Pritchard, & M. J. Rabins (2000) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases
. Twigg, Carol A., Innovations in Online Learning: Moving Beyond No Significant Difference. Publication of the Pew Learning and Technology Program, Pew Charitable Trusts, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute’s Center for Academic Transformation, 2001.16. Hergenhahn, B. and Olson, M., An introduction to theories of learning, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1997.17. Klein, S., Learning: principles and application, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996.18. Dupagne, M., How to Set up a Video Streaming Operation: Lessons from a University of Miami Project. [On- Line], 2000, Available: http://www.miami.edu/com/c_handout.htm.Biographic InformationDONALD E. WROBLEWSKIDonald Wroblewski is an Associate Professor of Aerospace and
will be included in the priceSystem Functionality ?? The system will present customer information and the corresponding delivery information for each individual pickup as entered by one of the office staff. ?? If the customer is a repeat user, entering his or her name or the customer id will automatically bring up their location, telephone number(s), and billing information (credit card, etc.). ?? Data can be entered at any time of the day as well as be outputted any time of day on either the screen or to the printer. ?? The organization of data is a vast improvement over the existing system. ?? The program will provide detailed reporting of the customer base at different intervals and real-time. These
live project demonstrations to larger audience, writing monthlyreports to the supervisors’ manager, and requirement to document testing of final functionalitymade a significant enhancement to the1199 course, and student learning outcomes. Employerssending prior graduates to recruit new graduates at the university is a testament to the valuablestudent industry-centric training this program provides. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2022, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 525References[1] Ozkan, D. S., & Murzi, H. G., & Salado, A
Effective Alternate-access Plan for Vision-impairedand Blind Students Enrolled in Mechanical Engineering Technology Courses," 2021 ASEEVirtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021,[6] Mukhiddinov, M., and Kim, S., "A systematic literature review on the automatic creation oftactile graphics for the blind and visually impaired," Processes, Vol. 9, No. 10, 2021, pp. 1726.[7] Race, L., Fleet, C., Miele, J.A., "Designing tactile schematics: Improving electronic circuitaccessibility," Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference onComputers and Accessibility, 2019, pp. 581-583.[8] Engel, C., Müller, E.F., and Weber, G., "SVGPlott: an accessible tool to generate highlyadaptable, accessible audio-tactile charts for and from blind and
conditioning When Do I Replace My Swamp Cooler. https://thompsonnm.com/replace-swamp-cooler/#:~:text=If you have regular maintenance,monitor how well its performing18. YCHARTS 3 Month Treasury Bill Rate (I:3MTBRNK). https://ycharts.com/indicators/3_month_t_bill#:~:text=Basic Info,long term average of 4.19%25.19. IRS Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit. https://www.irs.gov/credits- deductions/energy-efficient-home-improvement-credit#:~:text=If you make qualified energy,previous versions of Form 569520. Snohomish PUD Site Built Homes. www.snopud.com/wp- content/uploads/2021/10/InsulationTables.pdf21. B. M. P, K. H. J, A. S. MSC, Gowda A (2022) Numerical simulation of airflow in naturally ventilated
. Theballoon, from launch to impact,traveled roughly 250 miles Westfrom launch location as shown in Figure 2. HASP flight path.Figure 2. HASP was then able tounpack all payloads from the launch platform and ship them back to teams. After receiving, teamswould test and report if there was any damage from impact, or shipping. Thankfully, there has notbeen any noticed damage to our team’s payload.5. Numerical Results and Discussions For the HASP flight campaign, three cameras on the Raspberry Pi’s were used due to theprocessing power-related issues mentioned above on our Raspberry Pi3. Figure 3~Figure 5 showthe three snapshots of video streams saved on Raspberry Pi4’s SD card in three scenarios. TheseProceedings of the 2024 ASEE
[1] The Deep Space Habitat Project website: www.nasa.gov/exploration/technology/deep_space_habitat/[2] The Advanced Exploration Systems website: www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/aes/[3] Howe, A.S., Kennedy, K., Gill, T., et. al., “NASA Habitation Demonstration Unit (HDU) Deep Space Habitat Analong,”AIAA Space Conference, San Diego, 2013.[4] Colozza, A.J., George, P., Gambrell, R., Chapman, C., “Overview of the Habitat Demonstration Unit Power SystemIntegration and Operation at Desert RATS 2010,” NASA TM-2013-217861, 2013.[5] The X-Hab Academic Innovative Challenge website:www.nasa.gov/exploration/technology/deep_space_habitat/xhab/index.html#.UioX4sZwo1I[6] Howe, A. S., “X-Hab Challenge: Students in the Critical Path,” Global Space Exploration
. In addition, TAs were responsible for providing academic interventionsand academic coaching for their students throughout the course of the semester. At the end ofthe semester, the TAs also provided quantitative and qualitative feedback to project organizers toimprove program effectiveness.For students at UNM, an early-alert academic intervention system was piloted. This systeminvolved UNM professional staff and mostly TAs contacting students who wereunderperforming in their engineering course(s) to assist them in accessing support resources anddeveloping strategies for improvement.Academic Adviser. The Electrical Engineering Department at UNM provided the service of
., and D. V. Watkins, “Beyond Leadership,” International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2012, pp. 22-30.20. Schindel, W.D., S.N. Peffers, J.H. Hanson, J. Ahmed, and W.A. Kline, “All Innovation is Innovation of Systems: An Integrated 3-D Model of Innovation Competencies,” Presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, 2011. Available online at: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asee.org%2Fpublic%2Fconferences%2F1%2Fpapers%2F1370%2Fdownload&ei= 88C4UtKlIOKbygH2z4GgAw&usg=AFQjCNF0gIcZcdvgiM1n_hBbCUsxkYq9RQ&bvm=bv.58187178,d. aWc
Journal of Engineering Education. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference.Prof. Kumbakonam Ramamani Rajagopal, Texas A&M University Dr. Rajagopal is currently a Distingnished Professor and Regents Professor at Texas A&M Uniersity. He holds the Forsyth Chair in Mechanical Engineering and holds joint appointments in the departments of Mathematics, Biomedical Engineering, Civil Engineering and Chemical Engineering. He is also a Senior Researeh Scientist at the Texas Transportation Institute. Prof. Rajagopal obtained an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, a M. S. in Aerospace
passivating coatings and encapsulation, and surface texturing, all ofwhich impose many interesting features to their images. Moreover, these effects aresensitive to operational conditions such as temperature, light intensity, electrical bias,and mechanical stress, as well as device design and materials characteristics related to Page 24.1091.4impurities, oxidation, precipitates, grain size and texture, dislocations, and many typesof defects. All of these effects vary over the area and surface(s) of the solar cell, and 3captured images of solar cells reveal, either directly or indirectly, the spatial distributionmap of
Science Education, ITiCSE ’05, pages 123–127, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.5 S. Kurkovsky. Can mobile game development foster student interest in computer science? In Games Innovations Conference, 2009. ICE-GIC 2009. International IEEE Consumer Electronics Society’s, pages 92–100, 2009.6 F. Dochy, Mien Segers, and Dominique Sluijsmans. The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher education, 24(3):331–350, 1999.7 Donald Chinn. Peer assessment in the algorithms course. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE ’05, pages 69–73, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.8 Philip M Sadler and Eddie Good. The impact
Paper ID #8648The Effect of Cooperative Education, Contextual Support, and Self-Efficacyon Male and Female Student RetentionProf. Joseph A Raelin, Northeastern University JOE RAELIN is an internationally-recognized scholar in the fields of work-based learning and leader- ship. He holds the Asa S. Knowles Chair of Practice-Oriented Education at Northeastern University’s D’Amore-McKim School of Business in Boston where is he also professor of management.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is the Principal Investigator (PI) for the Dr. Bailey is a Professor
Education, 31 (1): 30-43.2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.3. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.4. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.5. [Reference redacted for blind review]6. [Reference redacted for blind review]7. Boelkins, M. (2013). Active Calculus. Electronic book available at http://faculty.gvsu.edu/boelkinm/Home/ Download.html .8. Hake, R.. (1998
., . . . Trenor, J. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.7. Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.8. Bowring, S., Epstein, A., & Harvey, C. (2014). Engaging First-Year Students in Team- Oriented Research: The Terrascope Learning Community Geoscience Research and Education (pp. 223-236): Springer.9. Heinricher, A., Savilonis, B., Spanagel, D., Traver, R., & Wobbe, K. (2008). Great Problems Seminars: A New First-Year Foundation at WPI. Paper presented at the ASEE Regional Meeting