Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 3: Evaluation & Assessment

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marko V. Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego; Maziar Ghazinejad, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, eGrove Education; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego; Josephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

preference for oral exams over written exams (16/16/24/24/20%). Table V. End-of-quarter survey. Not at all/ Significantly/ # Question Slightly Moderately To a great extent Did the oral exam(s) help you master the subject material better or provide extra incentive to do so? Did 1 they contribute positively to your learning in the course

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Carson Emeigh; Austin Griswold; Rumayel H. Pallock; Jaideep Sahni; Morgan Schake; Udochukwu Anuta; Jessica Deters; Sangjin Ryu

University ofTechnology in Japan, for sharing his microfluidics-based research in the class. SR appreciates hisdepartment for its generous support for the class and Teaching Fellows Program of his college ofengineering.References[1] N. Convey & N. Gadegaard, “30 years of microfluidics,” in Micro and Nano Engineering, 2019, vol. 2, pp.76-91.[2] J. Merrin, “Frontiers in microfluidics, a teaching resource review,” in Bioengineering, 2019, vol. 6, p.109.[3] N. Azizipour, R. Avazpour, D. H. Rosenzweig, M. Sawan & A. Ajji, “Evolution of biochip technology: A review from lab-on-a-chip to organ-on-a-chip,” in Micromachines, 2020, vol. p.599.[4] P. Cui & S. Wang, “Application of microfluidic chip

Conference Session

Equity and Belonging

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Figard, Arizona State University; Abimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University; Marcus Melo de Lyra, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

specificity without the formalized structure required by asystematic review (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Borrego et al., 2014; Grant & Booth, 2009;Samnani et al., 2017). ScLRs are particularly useful for quickly mapping out key concepts,existing literature, and evidence to identify gaps in current research defined by a specificresearch question (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Samnani et al., 2017). Our study used Arksey andO’Malley’s (2005) ScLR framework (Figure 1), which recommends a five-stage protocol forconducting a scoping review: (1) identify research question(s), (2) identify relevant studies, (3)select relevant studies, (4) chart the data, and (5) summarize and report the results. Figure 1further details the process used in our

Collection

2010 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Richard Devon; Kathryn Jablokow

spending more time on problem development, and the ease with which the FEED-Solution (F-S) approach can be taught to students.1. Design Maturation. Novice designers often neglect problem development, becoming fixatedon particular solution concepts that are later found to be unsatisfactory.5 Even then, novicedesigners may continue to hold on to their early ideas and try to “design out” their flaws insteadof starting over with a new design concept and/or returning to the problem definition to makesure they have understood it correctly - as an expert designer is more likely to do.At the same time, other studies in design education have shown that a systematic approach to theearly stages of design can be helpful to students,20 as long as it is not too

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (ELOS) Technical Session 3: Best of ELOS

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gautom K. Das, University of Maryland Baltimore County

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

able to: Summarize the problem into research Synthesis. Relate knowledge from several question(s) areas i.e. compose, combine, create Design the experiment in steps, at least Evaluation. Making choices based upon identify variables to be manipulated and reasoned arguments responding variables Predict the behavior or have hypothesis Synthesis. Relate knowledge from several areas i.e. compose, combine, create Collect and organize the data in table(s) that Analysis. Organization of parts. Identification is logical and understandable of components (order, classify, arrange) Plot the data

Collection

2004 GSW

Authors

David G. Johnson; Jessica D. Sanders

Session 034 A Golf Ball Launcher: An Engineering Dynamics Project David G. Johnson, Jessica D. Sanders Mechanical Engineering Department University of New Mexico Gregory S. Mowles Mechanical Engineering Department University of New Mexico Abstract The purpose of this project was to design and build an apparatus capable oflaunching a golf ball. The apparatus was required to fulfill certain constraints as well asmeet the target objective

Conference Session

Inclusive Leadership: A Panel Discussion

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Lamb P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University; Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

satisfaction regardless of the venue. The typical way to show results from a 5-point Likert scale is to show the values indistribution bars. Visualizing in this way is helpful for research when measuring impact but lesshelpful to inform decisions on actions to take based on the results. In this work, we convert theresponses into a percentage to support program benchmarking and facilitate goal setting and thenuse that to assign a letter grade. We then convert the results from each student to a percentage bysumming up all the scores given by the student and dividing by 35 (i.e., seven items x five-pointscale). For example, a student who responds to the PS items with 5's to six items and 4 to oneitem, provides a score of 34 out of 35 possible points

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Instructional Practices

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicolás Amado-Moranchel, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Gibrán Sayeg-Sánchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

, mathematics, and physics. His current research interests are focused on educational innovation and educational technologies.Dr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM) Dr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez is professor – consultant in the Science Department in Tecnologico de Mon- terrey, Puebla campus. He studied a PhD in Financial Science in EGADE Business School (2016), a MSc in Industrial Engineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2011), and a BEng in Industrial and Systems En- gineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2006). Dr. Sayeg-S´anchez has more than 11 years of experience in teaching statistics, mathematics, and operations research; and more than 13 years of experience in Op- erational Excellence consulting

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hatsuko Yoshikubo, Shibaura Institute Of Technology, Japan; Gabriele Trovato, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan; Hiroyuki Ishizaki, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

of the technology used for theShinkansen was developed during the war for non-peaceful purposes. However, post-warJapanese engineers felt the need to expunge their guilt at having developed such technologyand instead utilised it for more peaceful purposes. The learning outcomes from this lecture were measured by filling out a questionnaire.Most of them mentioned their redemption by developing technology used for the war,importance of having a peaceful mindset, safety, and/or the contribution of the threeengineers as the most impressive lessons learned (see their feedback in ‘Program evaluation’below). Figure 4: Some slides from Lectures on ShinkansenProgram evaluation1. Quantitative analysis: MGUDS-S SIT values

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sequoia Callahan; Blaine Pedersen, Texas A&M University; Lerah Lockett, Prairie View A&M University; Camille Burnett, Prairie View A&M University; Bimal Nepal, Texas A&M University; Karen Rambo-Hernandez, Texas A&M University

Paper ID #37887Persistence and the Pandemic: Retention of HistoricallyUnderrepresented First-Year Engineering Students Beforeand After COVID-19Sequoia Naomi CallahanBlaine Austin Pedersen (Graduate Student)Lerah LockettCamille S. Burnett (Assistant Professor) Camille S. Burnett, Ph.D., ACUE, is Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education and Director of the SMaRTS (Science, Mathematics, Reading, Technology, and Social Studies) Curriculum Resource Lab in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Prairie View A&M University. She has almost 20 years of combined experience in the K-12 and higher education

Conference Session

ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Tufts University; Harpreet Auby, Tufts University; John Galisky, University of California, Santa Barbara; Susan Nolen

Journal, 56(3), 638-675.Kinser-Traut, J. Y., & Turner, E. E. (2020). Shared authority in the mathematics classroom: Successes and challenges throughout one teacher’s trajectory implementing ambitious practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(1), 5-34.Koretsky, M. D., Falconer, J. L., Brooks, B. J., Gilbuena, D. M., Silverstein, D. L., Smith, C., & Miletic, M. (2014). The AiChE Concept Warehouse: A web-based tool to promote concept-based instruction. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(1), 7:1-27.Koretsky, M. D., & Magana, A. J. (2019). Using Technology to Enhance Learning and Engagement in Engineering. Advances in Engineering Education.Koretsky, M., Nolen, S., Self, B

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 11 Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Clancy, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Diana Martin, Eindhoven University of Technology; Gunter Bombaerts

] I. Van de Poel, “Design for value change,” Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–5, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10676-018-9461-9.[5] H. C. Luegenbiehl and R. F. Clancy, Global engineering ethics. New York: Elsevier, 2017.[6] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[7] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[8] G. Hofstede, Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. New York: Sage, 2001.[9] K. Leung, M. H. Bond, and S

Conference Session

S6C: Full Papers - Cannot Have Too Much Math!

Collection

14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference

Authors

Todd France, Ohio Northern University; Tena L. Roepke; Karli Katterle; Dua Chaker, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

status and nature of K-12 engineering education in the U.S.” The Bridge 39, 3, pp. 5-10.[4] National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[5] I. Zeid, J. Chin, C. Duggan, and S. Kamarthi (2014). “Engineering Based Learning: A Paradigm Shift for High School STEM Teaching.” International Journal of Engineering Education 30(4), pp. 876-887.[6] M. S. Zarske, J. L. Yowell, H. L. Ringer, J. F. Sullivan, and P. A. Quinones (2012). “The Skyline TEAMS Model: A Longitudinal Look at the Impacts of K-12 Engineering on Perception, Preparation, and Persistence.” Advances

Conference Session

ERM: Teamwork makes the dream work!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pierre-Philippe Ouimet, University of Regina; Ying Cao, Drury University; Tong Wan, Westminster College

et al.’s framework [6]. We alsoidentified new themes emergent from our data.We identified an EER instance when one or more of the group members express negativejudgements of collaborative learning (including uncertainty) and intend to make an adjustment orchange to it. When an EER was identified, we assigned it a code of EER category—the targetarea of regulation (i.e., cognition, behavior, motivation, social, and emotion). We added thecategory of social, which is not in Sobocinski et al.’s framework, to code the regulation towardsconflicts between group members. Table 2 describes the EER categories of target areas.Table 2. Descriptions of target areas of EER. Category Description Cognition Regulating task understanding

Conference Session

PCEE Session 12: STEM, Technology, and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip Reed, Old Dominion University; Tyler Love, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College; Scott Bartholomew, Brigham Young University; Kelly Dooley, ITEEA

International. Kelly is truly passionate about STEM education and attributes much of her career success to the foundation built through her own STEM journey and a hands-on, systems- thinking approach to learning and development. She is excited to serve the ITEEA community of educators and advance technological and engineering capabilities for all.Tyler Love Tyler S. Love, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of elementary/middle grades STEM education and the Director of the Capital Area Institute for Mathematics and Science (CAIMS) at The Pennsylvania State University’s Capital Campus. He was previously an Associate Professor and Coordinator of Technology and Engineering Education at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. His

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abigail L. Beck; Eun Jeong Cha, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

. In the following sections, the studies on the effectiveness of game-basedlearning (GBL) are summarized first and review on its implementation potential to engineeringeducation is provided as well. Then, the developed game is explained briefly with the learninggoal and topics. We implemented this learning module in two different settings, first for 25 highschoolers at a civil and environmental engineering departmental summer camp and second for alittle under 30 community resilience researchers at the National Institute of Standards andTechnology (NIST)’s Center of Excellence for Community Resilience semi-annual meeting.Feedback was collected after the second implementation which is presented as well to discuss themodule’s future development

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Houshang Darabi, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Rezvan Nazempour, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Peter C. Nelson, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Renata A. Revelo, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Shanon Marie Reckinger, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Didem Ozevin, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Anthony E. Felder, The University of Illinois, Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

students’ learning. Dr. Darabi’s research has been funded by federal and corporate sponsors including the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety.Mrs. Rezvan Nazempour, The University of Illinois, Chicago Rezvan Nazempour is a graduate research assistant at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She is com- pleting her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and operations research at the Mechanical and Industrial En- gineering Department. She received her BSIE fromDr. Peter C. Nelson, The University of Illinois, Chicago Peter Nelson was appointed Dean of the University of Illinois at Chicagoˆa C™s (UIC) College of Engi- neering in July of 2008. Prior to assuming his

Conference Session

Work-in-Progress Session: Understanding Issues Faced by Graduate Students and Faculty

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eduardo Rodriguez Mejia, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

context.AcknowledgmentsThis work was made possible by a U.S. Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areasof National Need (GAANN) Grant Number P200A210109 and by a NSF Innovations inGraduate Education (IGE) Program [IGE DGE#2224724] grant. 5 References[1] Gilmore, J. A., Wofford, A. M., & Maher, M. A. (2016). The Flip Side of the Attrition Coin: Faculty Perceptions of Factors Supporting Graduate Student Success. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 419–439. https://doi.org/10.28945/3618[2] S. Spaulding, L., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2012). Hearing their Voices

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Enakshie Prasad; Eric Marcus, University of New Haven; Stephanie M. Gillespie, University of New Haven; Joseph Smolinski

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

institution.Faculty participating in our study were asked to develop projects and course integrations that aim todevelop some aspect(s) of students EM. The final deliverable, at the conclusion of the 2-year period, isthe submission of an Engineering Unleashed Card [8]. These cards function as a combination of blog andresource-sharing website all in one page, documenting the course plans/activities with sufficient detailthat other faculty could then take the plan/activity and modify it to fit and deploy it in their own courses.Research on mentoring models for faculty developmentThere has been a growing body of research on the effectiveness of peer mentoring programs rooted insocial cognitive theories and research on influence [9]. Social cognitive theory, SCT

Conference Session

Work-in-Progress Session: Supporting Students To, Through, and Beyond Transitions

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra Sue Ellen Jamison, Rowan University; Justin Charles Major, Rowan University ; Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

undergraduate students NicholasInsinga, David Lentz, Dylan Letcher, Alfred Marchev, and Ryan Petzitillo who assisted in thedevelopment of the interview protocol and identification of the initial emergent codes.References[1] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity‐ based motivation: Connections between first‐year students’ engineering role identities and future‐time perspectives,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20324.[2] D. R. Simmons, J. Van Mullekom, and M. W. Ohland, “The Popularity and Intensity of Engineering Undergraduate Out‐of‐Class Activities,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 611–635, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20235.[3] R. S. Adams, S. R. Daly, L. M. Mann, and G. Dall’Alba

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED): Best of Works in Progress

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine E. King, University of California, Irvine; Kit Roy Feeney; Quangminh Tang; Milan Das; Dalton Salvo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

slight increase in drowsiness. One participantfelt the video was longer than in actuality, while the other two felt it was shorter than in actuality. Theclinical immersion video (see appendix Table 5) elicited an average level of engagement at 6.33, with twoof the participants beginning to feel bored at around 10 minutes. No participant fell asleep, one felt adrowsiness level of 7 out of 9 while the other two did not experience any drowsiness from watching thevideo. Interestingly, all participants felt that the video was longer than in actuality.Discussion:Due to issues during data acquisition, the EEG statistical analysis was inconclusive despite observingstatistical difference in subjects 2 and 3 (see appendix Table 1). Namely, Subject 2’s

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Miriam Howland Cummings, University of Colorado Denver; Stephanie Ivey, The University of Memphis; David Russomanno, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Karen Alfrey, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Danny King, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Jeffrey Watt; Craig Stewart; Michael Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver; Tom Altman; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; Gregory Simon, University of Colorado Denver

Paper ID #38426Three Years of the Urban STEM CollaboratoryMaryam Darbeheshti (Faculty) Dr. Maryam Darbeheshti is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver. Her research interests are in multiphase fluid flow, and Engineering Education.Miriam Howland Cummings (Graduate Research Assistant) Miriam is a PhD candidate in Education Research and Evaluation Methods at the University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver) and a graduate research assistant on an NSF S-STEM grant in CU Denver's College of Engineering, Design, and Computing.Stephanie S Ivey (Associate Dean for Research

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamecia R. Jones, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Leah Bug, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

. 5 Resources[1] K. Krippendorff, Content analysis : an introduction to its methodology, 3rd ed. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1980.[2] G. L. Gray, D. Evans, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, and B. Self, "The Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test: A Progress Report," in Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2005.[3] G. L. Gray, D. Evans, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, and B. Self, "Toward a Nationwide Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test," in Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003.[4] P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, "A Statics

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Michael G Joseph, University of Bridgeport; Khaled Elleithy, University of Bridgeport

Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 2-21, 2003.[2] M. Oren and S. K. Nayar, "Generalization of Lambert's reflectance model," in Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 1994, pp. 239-246.[3] V. Brajovic, "Model for reflectance perception in vision," in Bioengineered and Bioinspired Systems, 2003, vol. 5119, pp. 307-315: International Society for Optics and Photonics.[4] S. K. Nayar and R. M. Bolle, "Computing reflectance ratios from an image," Pattern recognition, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1529-1542, 1993.[5] S. K. Yarlagadda and F. Zhu, "A reflectance based method for shadow detection and removal," in 2018 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Tedi Qafko, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Trevyn Larson; Andrew Michael Seredinski, Wentworth Institute of Technology

thank Dr. M. Tylinski of the Wentworth Institute of Technology for assistance incharacterizing the LEDs we used for this experiment. Finally, we wish to thank the staff ofAccelerate at the Wentworth Institute of Technology.7. Citations[1] K. S. Novoselov et al., “Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films,” Science (80-. )., vol. 306, no. 5696, pp. 666–669, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1126/science.1102896.[2] K. S. Novoselov et al., “Two-dimensional atomic crystals.,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 102, no. 30, pp. 10451–3, Jul. 2005, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502848102.[3] J. Zupan and D. Kolar, “Optical properties of graphite and boron nitride,” J. Phys. C Solid State Phys., vol. 5, no. 21, p. 3097, Oct. 1972, doi

Conference Session

Academic Success and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Lampe, University of Virginia; Megan Harris, University of Colorado Boulder; Kayla Brooks, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

,” National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA, Signature Report 19, Dec. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/Completions_Report_2020.pdf[2] D. Shapiro, A. Dundar, F. Huie, P. Wakhungu, A. Bhimdiwala, and S. Wilson, “Completing college: A state-level view of student completion rates includes for the first- time, race and ethnicity outcomes for four-year public institutions,” National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA, 16a, Feb. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.studentclearinghouse.org/blog/completing-college-a-state-level-view-of- student-completion-rates-includes-for-the-first-time-race-and-ethnicity-outcomes-for-four- year-public

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cynthia Howard-Reed, The Pennsylvania State University; Erin A Hostetler, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Postsecondary Research., Bloomington, 2007.[2] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock and J. McCullough, "Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences," Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548-549, 2007.[3] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid and K. W. Bauer, "Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 151 - 157, 2002.[4] R. S. Hathaway, B. A. Nagda and S. R. Gregerman, "The Relationship of Undergraduate Research Participation to Graduate and Professional Education Pursuit: An Empirical Study," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 614-631, 2002.[5] B. A. Nagda, S. R. Gregorman, J. Jonides, W. v. Hippel and J. S. Lerner, "Undergraduate

Collection

2010 North Midwest Section

Authors

B. D. Braaten; D. A. Rogers; R. M. Nelson

the opportunity towork with new and up-to-date professional measurement equipment and software. Begun almosta half century ago, the laboratory capabilities and student experiments were originally based onmeasurement equipment in the VHF, UHF, and X-bands. In the early years core experimentswere based on use of the slotted line and General Radio equipment at the lower frequencies andthe slotted waveguide and Hewlett Packard equipment in the X-band. In time, computer analysisand design of microwave devices was added.STUDENT EXPERIMENTS IN THE EARLY YEARSThe applied electromagnetics laboratory of the 1970 s included labs such as the following: (1)measurement of transmission-line characteristics, (2) microwave power measurements, (3)modeling

Collection

2011 North Midwest Section

Authors

Keith B. Lodge

; another responsibility is the implementation of continuous processimprovement by improving the experiments and their descriptions. This has been the sameperson since the course s inception; it was first run in 2003. It was developed from an electivelecture-only course that this individual gave in 2000; it was found that particle technology is arich subject for class-demonstrations and the experiments to be described grew out of these. Theapparatus for the experiments was constructed with readily available components and simplebench-top or hand tools; no machine-shop work was required. Two texts have been used over the history of the course, viz. Introduction to ParticleTechnology (1) and Fundamentals of Particle Technology (2). The latter one is

Collection

2011 North Midwest Section

Authors

Stephen Patchin; Cody Kangas; Jamie Lindquist

Mind Trekkers Science and Engineering Festivals: Inspiring K-12 students to explore STEM Stephen Patchin, Cody Kangas, and Jamie Lindquist Michigan Technological UniversityThe Challenge O Ma 5, 2010 e Na a Sc e ce B a d b ed a e ed P e a e NeGeneration of STEM Innovators: Identifying and Developing Our Nation H a Ca a .S ed b e Na a Sc e ce F da , e e e ed ec e dato support the identification and development of talented young men and women who have the e a bec e C e e e a n of science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM