Work In Progress: Development of a Taxonomy of Undergraduate Engineering Admissions Practices and Protocols

Trevor Franklin

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 5
Tagged Division: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/48350

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Trevor Franklin Cornell University

visit author page

Dr. Trevor Franklin is a postdoctoral scholar at the Robert F. Smith School of Chemical and Biological Engineering at Cornell University. His educational background includes a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Tufts University and a Ph.D. from Cornell University focused on polymeric biomaterials. He is a National Science Foundation STEM Education Postdoctoral Research Fellow and performs research focused on undergraduate engineering admissions with the goal of broadening participation in engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

This work in progress research paper presents the development of a taxonomy of undergraduate engineering admissions to classify admissions practices and protocols. Engineering admissions has a profound influence on engineering participation as the entry point to higher education programs but has only been partially studied and questioned. Undergraduate engineering admissions counselors often use private methods to assess the qualifications of high school applicants and typically only share aggregate measures of standardized test scores and grade point averages publicly. As legal judgments like the recent Supreme Court ruling in Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v President & Fellows of Harvard College restrict admissions protocols, it is important to understand the new processes that will emerge as a result. Undergraduate admissions processes vary across institutions; however, there is no current coherent framing of admissions practices in the engineering education research community. A taxonomy will enable a shared classification to accelerate research and triangulate findings across studies.

Data for taxonomy development are being collected for all ABET-accredited undergraduate colleges/universities across four domains from undergraduate admissions websites, informational phone calls, and actual applications. “Admissions Experience” data include information that dictates the pathway a student must follow to enter the admissions process (e.g., deadlines). Data categorized as “Student Data” include pieces of personal and educational information requested from the applicant, either through the application (e.g., demographic information and essays) or third-party submission (e.g., transcript and recommendations). These data capture the scope of information used by an admissions office to determine an admissions decision. “Admissions Review” data encompass how an admissions decision is determined based on a review of the “Student Data” through an institution-specific protocol. Finally, “Institutional Characteristics,” including size/enrollment, student demographics, and location were collected to correlate the admissions data to institutional qualities. Collectively, these data represent a start-to-finish characterization of the undergraduate admissions process that addresses the roles of all parties/individuals involved.

The paper presents the progress towards developing a taxonomy that features classification which takes into account the application type, required documents, and admissions review process. Exploratory data analysis of the taxonomy data was conducted and reveals patterns in admissions processes across institutions. Analyses can also highlight the prevalence of biased practices in the engineering undergraduate admissions landscape (i.e., examining what percentage of students are admitted to universities that offer Early Decision deadlines known to restrict racial and geographic diversity). The taxonomy will provide the first comprehensive understanding of the undergraduate engineering landscape with benefits to both the engineering education research and undergraduate admissions enterprises. Future engineering education research may target individuals or groups of institutions for study according to taxonomy affiliations that are relevant to the specific research objective. Furthermore, the taxonomy will support efforts of admissions offices to contextualize their practice within the broader scope of admissions approaches.

Keywords: taxonomy development, undergraduate admissions, policies and practices

Citation
Format

Franklin, T. (2024, June), Work In Progress: Development of a Taxonomy of Undergraduate Engineering Admissions Practices and Protocols Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/48350

TY - CPAPER
AB - This work in progress research paper presents the development of a taxonomy of undergraduate engineering admissions to classify admissions practices and protocols. Engineering admissions has a profound influence on engineering participation as the entry point to higher education programs but has only been partially studied and questioned. Undergraduate engineering admissions counselors often use private methods to assess the qualifications of high school applicants and typically only share aggregate measures of standardized test scores and grade point averages publicly. As legal judgments like the recent Supreme Court ruling in Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v President &amp;amp; Fellows of Harvard College restrict admissions protocols, it is important to understand the new processes that will emerge as a result. Undergraduate admissions processes vary across institutions; however, there is no current coherent framing of admissions practices in the engineering education research community. A taxonomy will enable a shared classification to accelerate research and triangulate findings across studies.

Data for taxonomy development are being collected for all ABET-accredited undergraduate colleges/universities across four domains from undergraduate admissions websites, informational phone calls, and actual applications. “Admissions Experience” data include information that dictates the pathway a student must follow to enter the admissions process (e.g., deadlines). Data categorized as “Student Data” include pieces of personal and educational information requested from the applicant, either through the application (e.g., demographic information and essays) or third-party submission (e.g., transcript and recommendations). These data capture the scope of information used by an admissions office to determine an admissions decision. “Admissions Review” data encompass how an admissions decision is determined based on a review of the “Student Data” through an institution-specific protocol. Finally, “Institutional Characteristics,” including size/enrollment, student demographics, and location were collected to correlate the admissions data to institutional qualities. Collectively, these data represent a start-to-finish characterization of the undergraduate admissions process that addresses the roles of all parties/individuals involved.

The paper presents the progress towards developing a taxonomy that features classification which takes into account the application type, required documents, and admissions review process. Exploratory data analysis of the taxonomy data was conducted and reveals patterns in admissions processes across institutions. Analyses can also highlight the prevalence of biased practices in the engineering undergraduate admissions landscape (i.e., examining what percentage of students are admitted to universities that offer Early Decision deadlines known to restrict racial and geographic diversity). The taxonomy will provide the first comprehensive understanding of the undergraduate engineering landscape with benefits to both the engineering education research and undergraduate admissions enterprises. Future engineering education research may target individuals or groups of institutions for study according to taxonomy affiliations that are relevant to the specific research objective. Furthermore, the taxonomy will support efforts of admissions offices to contextualize their practice within the broader scope of admissions approaches.

Keywords: taxonomy development, undergraduate admissions, policies and practices
AU - Trevor Franklin
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Work In Progress: Development of a Taxonomy of Undergraduate Engineering Admissions Practices and Protocols
UR - https://peer.asee.org/48350
ER -