postdoctoral researcher in the Design Lab at UC San Diego.Dr. Mohsen M Dorodchi, UNC, Charlotte Dr. Dorodchi has been teaching in the field of computing for over 30 years of which 20 years as educator. He has taught majority of the courses in the computer science and engineering curriculum over the past 20 years such as introductory programming, data structures, databases, software engineering, system programming, etc. He is involved in multiple NSF supported research projects including Learning and Predictive Analytics Research, Research Practitioner Partnership, Implementing Teaching Methods to help Students learn more efficiently in active learning, etc.Erfan Al-Hossami, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Erfan Al
programs that work to bolster invention and entrepreneurship maypositively impact both students and teachers in their personal and professional growth and alsoinfluence the well-being of rural communities more broadly. Despite the symbiosis between rural areas and entrepreneurship, past attempts to expandthe K12 InVenture Prize program to rural regions have not been successful. A first strategyattempted was to provide travel stipends for students to travel to Georgia Tech for the statefinals. This offering, however, did not address the anxiety that students and teachers have aboutpresenting a project at an elite university. The leap from school competition to state competitionfelt too large for many schools. A second strategy was to
curriculum.An approach to enhance spatial thinking or spatial reasoning skills is learning three-dimensional(3D) modeling [4]. 3D modeling involves several steps and design decisions to make sure that afeasible design is made. Learning 3D modeling is supposed to not only enhance students’ designdecisions but also improve their spatial thinking ability. With the proliferation of consumer-level3D printing, Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR), there is a sparked interestamong educators to teach 3D modeling using tools like Tinkercad in formal and informal settings[5], [6]. An additional benefit of 3D modeling knowledge is the career path it opens. Severalcompanies and industries are in the need for 3D designers for a variety of projects
better matched their strengths and/or interests. Someof the students with the “biggest ideas” around advancing novel, environmentally-friendlydesigns were disappointed that the engineering courses seemed to be focused on teaching currentpractice rather than creative solutions. Given these findings, it might be impactful on retention tohave EnvE students take a course specific to environmental engineering and/or one that allowsthem to be innovative in envisioning solutions to problems of their interest (such as a project-based course that allows students to select a project of interest, and significant latitude increatively exploring solutions).Students who felt that their education should be more balanced between technical and societalissues
evaluation. MethodsThe present work was conducted as part of a larger study of teaching effectiveness across STEMat the research site (Bouwma-Gearhart, Perry, & Presley, 2014; Koretsky, 2015; Koretsky et al.,2016). The research project is a broad institutional effort to cultivate interdisciplinarycommunities of practice focused on improving teaching practices in STEM. Faculty evaluationthus plays a critical role in enhancing teaching practices because the data collected and feedbackprovided are designed to help faculty improve as instructors. As a result, this research focuses onfaculty perceptions of teaching evaluation data, in particular the kinds of data they would like tocollect or stakeholders
manufacturing-focused courses. Sarah’s research interests include aspects of project-based learning and enhancing 21st century skills in undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Adam Lenz, Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring students’ and instructors’ perceptions of engineering: case studies of professionally-focused and career exploration courses Work in ProgressAbstractPrevious work developed a working definition of engineering professional identity (EPI), definedas the degree of internalization of the norms, behaviors, language, values, and practices ofengineering. This EPI
protons and electrons with varyingnumber of neutrons. By focusing on calculus there are some books that include visualexplanations (see for example references [2-10]). Of a special interest is the work by Apostol andMamikon from Caltech [11,12]. They were able to explain integration of some functions withoutthe need for mathematical formulas. The author of this paper published papers on this topic [13-20] in addition to books [21,22], one for understanding concepts in “Control Systems” and theother for understanding the basics of “Newton’s Laws of Motion.”The bigger pictureThis work is part of a multi-modal integrated project aimed at understanding concepts in STEM.The approach is meant to help both teachers and students, thereby allowing for
of Colorado (CU) Boulder [6] concluded that a hands-on approachto engineering education greatly benefited overall retention, particularly in underrepresentedpopulations. The researchers implemented a course called First-Year Engineering Projects,which required hands-on design experience which emphasized teamwork and successfulimplementation of a student-researched plan [6]. Traditionally, such an experience would notoccur for engineering students until the final year of their program, in the form of a SeniorDesign or Capstone project. Alternatively, low retention rates in engineering curriculum have been attributed todifficulties insufficient support in non-engineering core math and science courses required to betaken by engineering
the professor for this course. In theinitial contact, the goal was to begin building a collaborative relationship as they discussed somebackground information on the course and the way it had been run in the past. After thatconversation, an official ‘kick-off’ meeting was held. The discussion centered on the overallredesign process as well as a projected timeline. Roles were defined and a general plan of attackwas created. Regular weekly meetings (Thursday mornings) were scheduled with thestakeholders involved (instructor and instructional designer) in order to help keep the project ontrack.The first thing done was to begin a document that came to be called the ‘Course Map’. It wascreated as a Google Doc so all parties involved could add
Paper ID #21703#EngineersWeek: Broadening our Understanding of Community Engage-ment Through Analysis of Twitter Use During the National Engineers WeekDr. Aqdas Malik, George Mason University Aqdas Malik is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology, George Mason University. His multidisciplinary academic and industry experience spans two key disciplines: Human-Computer Interaction and Social Media Communication and Analytics. He is currently engaged in a number of research projects funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). In some of his recent projects he has applied
division bylaws;• developed and circulated newsletters on Diversity Committee efforts;• worked with the ASEE Board of Directors to get Figure 1. Example of Footsteps from approval for and to institutionalize the ASEE Best 2017 Annual Conference Diversity Paper;• piloted the footsteps project, where large stickers were placed on the floor throughout the convention center in Indianapolis in high traffic spaces (see Figure 3);• created the call for papers and an assessment tool for the ASEE Best Diversity Paper; and• worked with ASEE information technology staff to identify potential papers within the paper review
Paper ID #22312BYOE: Activities to Map Intuition to Lumped System ModelsRaina White, Dartmouth College Raina White is an Engineering Lab Instructor at Dartmouth College. She earned a BS in Mechanical Engineering and a M.Eng in Systems engineering from Cornell University. She worked as a Systems Engineer at Hamilton Sundstrand, and then transitioned to teaching high school Physics. Currently Mrs. White works with students at Dartmouth College in systems, fluids, mechanical engineering, and auto- motive engineering courses and projects. She is very interested in improving student’s ability to translate coursework into
equity, and implicit bias in academia.Dr. Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is an Associate Dean and a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engi- neering. In her role of Associate Dean, she advocates for equity and access. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAIN SLO learning initiative, she and her colleagues have been active researching in transformation in higher education.Ms. Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow currently works at a tech startup accelerator in
, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Andr´e Schleife is a Blue Waters Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineer- ing at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He obtained his Diploma and Ph.D. at Friedrich- Schiller-University in Jena, Germany for his theoretical work on transparent conducting oxides. Before he started at UIUC he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory on a project that aimed at a description of non-adiabatic electron ion dynamics. His research revolves around excited electronic states and their dynamics in various materials using accurate computational methods and making use of modern super computers in order to understand
. Facilitate opportunities for employees to work on projects or issues that are socially relevant Men working in engineering and computing to serve as role models. Emphasize ethical and social issues when teaching engineering and computing. Encourage a supportive environment in the classroom and in the program. Encourage and assist early contact between students and professionals. Emphasize the wide variety of expertise necessary to be successful as an engineer or computing professional. Highlight as early as possible the different facets that make up engineering and computing.Methodology and Educational Learning Strategies:This course came out of a passion by the instructor to enhance leadership
Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Arkansas and is currently working on a PhD in Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas.Mr. Trevor Joe Dodson, University of Arkansas c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Effectiveness of GRE Workshops to Increase AwarenessAbstractExcelling on the Graduate Records Exam (GRE) can be an important milestone for students whowish to attend graduate school. As part of an NSF-STEM project, two GRE workshops wereimplemented to inform students about the importance of starting the preparation process earlierin their undergraduate career. The second workshop, occurring the year after the first, includedminor modifications based on the
can build self-efficacy directly and encourage moremastery experiences.Contextual examples of each of Bandura’s four sources of self-efficacy in undergraduateengineering education: first, mastery experiences could consist of completing practice problemsto master theory, engaging in project work and hands-on activities to build engineering skills,and successfully working in teams and giving technical presentations. Second, role models whoshare a similar identity in populations of upper year students, alumni, outside speakers, or facultymay provide vicarious experiences. Third, classmates, teaching assistant, professors, mentors,friends and family may all provide social persuasion, and fourth, an individual's’ personal orextra-curricular
. In the 2012-13 accreditation cycle programs had to prepare students towork professionally in both thermal and mechanical systems areas. This required students tocomplete design projects both in thermal and mechanical systems areas. This requirement waschanged in 2013-14 accreditation cycle and the programs are now required to prepare students towork professionally in either thermal or mechanical systems while requiring topics in each area.Therefore the design projects are only needed in one area, but students must still be exposed totopics in both areas.Table 2. Changes in Curriculum requirements of ME Program Criteria Changes in Curriculum requirements of ME Program Criteria 2008-09 Accreditation Cycle 2012-13 Accreditation
scale, disparate data. He is currently working on a project that ambition to design a system capable of providing students customized motivational stimuli and perfor- mance feedback based on their affective states.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled Data Mining–Driven Design (EDSGN 561). As part of the Engineering Design Program’s
use avariety of qualitative analysis methods to answer questions that contribute to the ongoingresearch and development of the project. This paper reports on an engineering activity designedusing the aforementioned interest-based framework. The participants of this activity wererecruited from a 5-week summer camp focused on positive youth development by engagingstudents in a number of physical (i.e., swimming, judo, and basketball) and learning (i.e.,videography, financial literacy) activities. This study reports on 40 students who consented to bea part of the study, all of whom were between 9-14 years of age and qualified for free or reducedlunch. The students participated in an engineering activity designed and delivered by the researchteam
there is still room for improvingparticipation at all levels of the professoriate.LSAMP13 has four alliance tracks that assist universities and colleges in their efforts to increasethe numbers of students matriculating into and successfully completing high quality degreeprograms in STEM. Specifically, Bridge to Doctorate (BD) projects are for post-baccalaureatefellowships that provides support to students in the first two years of STEM graduate studies. In2015, at the 37th Annual Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysisand Management (APPAM), Margaret Sullivan of Mathematica Policy Research presentedfindings from the evaluation of the LSAMP impact on URM students with support from the BDprogram. Sullivan stated URM
enzymes and biopolymers. He is involved in various projects directed towards the improvement of the bulk mechanical properties of soil, surficial soil stabilization, sustainable building materials, facilitated mineral precipitation and environmental remediation.Prof. Edward Kavazanjian Jr., Arizona State University Professor Kavazanjian is a Regents Professor and the Ira A. Fulton Professor of Geotechnical Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). He is also Director of the Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics, a National Science Foundation Gen-3 Engineering Research Center. He has Bachelor and Master of Science degrees from M.I.T. and a PhD from the University of California at Berkeley in Civil
Stanford University. Subsequently, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Computer Science, also at Stanford University. He has been with the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Illinois since 2006, where he now serves as Associate Head for Undergraduate Programs. He holds an affiliate appointment in the Coordinated Science Laboratory, where he leads a research group that works on a diverse set of projects (http://bretl.csl.illinois.edu/). Dr. Bretl received the National Science Foundation Early Career Development Award in 2010. He has also received numerous awards for undergraduate teaching in the area of dynamics and control, including all three teaching awards given by the College of Engineering at
study followed by research. Graduate education duringthe century that followed evolved to become a mentor based learning environment wherestudents worked alongside professors on research projects. The benefit of this mentor-basedprocess was that students would transition from consumers of research to producers of research.This process was accelerated in the post-World War II period where the economic expansion andcold war competition of the time period encouraged significant financial support for research. Bythe 1970s top tier universities had interwoven organized research and graduate education andlower tiered institutions strove to emulate this practice.As US Federal research funds began to diminish in the 1970s and 1980s, reduced
st 1 year 64% 61% 85 + 42 = 127 2nd year 23% 25% 31 + 17 = 48 rd 3 year 8% 9% 10 + 6 = 16 4th year 5% 5% 7 + 4 = 11 During the first week of the semester, students self-enrolled in teams of 6 or 7 for an out-of-class design project using the self-sign-up group feature of Canvas (Instructure, Salt Lake CityUT); these same teams were also used for all in-class learning activities. Class periods devoted toactive learning where indicated as such on the course syllabus and schedule. On these scheduled
the 2015 Best Diversity Paper.Mejia, et al., [3] presented a paper nominated by the K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Divisionexploring Latinx adolescents’ perceptions of engineering and their engineering abilities afterparticipation in community-based design projects. Students were from working class familiesand most had parents with limited education who worked in farming or other manual laboractivities. The adolescents, ages 14-17, worked in teams to identify a problem in theircommunity and to use engineering design to solve the problem. Most of the participants changedboth their perceptions of engineering as well as their self-efficacy as they worked on theseprojects. The design experience influenced participants’ perceptions of
manufacturing in both of these disciplinesis needed8. Many current engineering programs do not emphasize the marriage of design andmanufacturing in a modern industrial technical workforce [10].Many research studies have assessed the quality of exposure to manufacturing through the seniordesign or capstone course. McMasters and Lang indicate that few people in industry have anunderstanding of how the current engineering education is undertaken. Through design projects,the inclusion of industry partners in the education process will enhance the education provided tothe students and better reflect the expectations of industry [11]. Universities are exposingstudents to manufacturing through senior capstone design courses to offer students with arealistic
. was formed in conjunction with thecreation of the nation as a social project. Critical race theorists identify that race is indicative ofnot just the creation, but its continuation each day [14]. Although we are using two frameworksto look at individual and structural racism from a critical perspective, we recognize that theseframeworks are not part of critical race theory.Engineering Education and Critical Race StudiesEngineering education research focuses on guiding the future engineering practice towardsimproved quality and diversity. Some engineering education researchers investigate the field’spersistent racial homogeneity [4]. There is constant talk about the need for diversity, and effortsare made through “minority in engineering
University Todd Haskell is a cognitive scientist interested in learning and the development of expertise, especially in STEM fields. He is currently Associate Professor of Psychology at Western Washington University. In previous projects Dr. Haskell has worked on understanding how chemistry novices and experts navi- gate between macroscopic, symbolic, and small particle representations, and how pre-service elementary teachers translate an understanding of energy concepts from physics to other disciplines.Ms. Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University Jill Davishahl is the Director of Pre-Engineering Program Development and faculty member at West- ern Washington University. She spends her time teaching, developing and
projection, 16% of the top 25 are engineering [2]. Of the total occupationsrequiring a bachelor's degree, 13% are in engineering [2]. Those employed with a bachelor'sdegree in engineering comprise 23% of the top one-half of the median average and 13% of thetop quarter median wage earners [2]. Thus, engineering is one of the highest paying and in-demand professions for students graduating with a bachelor's degree.There are "two viable pathways to the baccalaureate degree [which] have developed in the pastone hundred years - a direct entry route where a student begins and ends at a four-yearinstitution, and a transfer route" [1]. The transfer route is usually accomplished by the studentattending a smaller institution, whether two years or four years