process forapplying for grants: where to get NSF Fastlane or NIH Commons accounts; what internal formsneed to accompany an application; who needs to sign off on grant applications; when are thedeadlines for submitting a proposal; and, how does one build a budget including correct amountsfor indirect costs and fringe benefits. New faculty were also given copies of the OU Researchmagazine, which is another source of information about research projects currently underway atOU.As new faculty work on writing research proposals, one of the ways that they can hone theirproposal writing skills and build a funding record early on is to apply for internal fundingopportunities. Such opportunities clearly vary from institution to institution, but at OU, one
increasing number of flipped classroom resources to support technical education for renewable energy technicians. Jim sincerely believes energy independence through development of renewable energy sources is the correct course for our nation’s future and actively promotes and supports development of renewable energy projects in the Pacific Northwest. Page 26.494.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Developing and Deploying Flipped Classroom Resources for RenewableEnergy TechniciansMr. James Pytel, CREATE and Columbia Gorge Community CollegeJim Pytel received a Bachelor
. Courses are often integrated into these two major fields to allow for some exposure to themanufacturing industry. A paper in the Journal of Engineering Education notes that amovement to move to higher course content on manufacturing in both of these disciplines isneeded8. Many current engineering programs do not emphasize the marriage of design andmanufacturing in a modern industrial technical workforce.Many research studies have assessed the quality of exposure to manufacturing through the senior“Capstone” design project course. McMasters and Lang believe that too few in industry have anunderstanding of how the current engineering education is set-up. Therefore, if industry partnersare brought into the education process through design projects
support a subset of existing literature that shows studentsengaging in expert engineering practices and approaching problems with more nuance and skillthan is often expected of children in grade 3-5.11,12 This is further supported by an ongoing studyin its second year looking closely at teachers’ use of textbook based science and engineeringcurriculum versus teachers using researched project based science, hands on science andengineering curricula that directly addresses NGSS’ call for integrating engineering andscience.14 In the first year results of their study, students engaged in the hands-on project basedcurriculum outperformed their peers in the comparison curriculum, that used textbook basedwork, on outcome measures aligned to the core
simulation tools for quantum mechanics learning?Method and Research DesignThis work is part of Quantum Learning in Engineering And Physics (Quantum LEAP)project. The Quantum LEAP project aims to develop an integrated framework for the designand assessment of effective simulation-based learning environments for quantum educationbased on studies about engineering and physics students’ non-normative conceptions andmetacognitive learning strategies.Research Design. The presented study is guided by interpretive research design. Interpretiveresearch design enables the researcher to presume that knowledge and understanding areresults of interpretation and based on individual’s subjective experiences12. Interpretiveresearches consider that knowledge and
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The DeFINE Program: A Clinical Immersion for Biomedical Needs Identification I. IntroductionThere is a need for biomedical engineering students to more fully engage in the problemidentification and needs-finding stages of the biomedical device design process throughexperiential learning and immersive experiences. Many publications have documented theimportance of immersion outcomes in design, technology commercialization, and overall studentlearning.Kline et al. documents eight best practices for technology commercialization projects that fosterinnovation education and fit a variety of innovation stages that might vary per student design.1Zappe et al. agrees
-making duringthe student-to-student interaction of collaborative engineering design projects? To confirmopportunities for all six reflective decision-making elements during classroom project work, weconducted content analysis of the EiE curriculum units. As discussed above, in Lesson 4 of allunits, we found learning tasks that could reasonably be expected to call upon these six elements.Partnering with four elementary teachers, we video recorded seven EiE units at four differentgrade levels (water filters in 2nd grade, bridges in 3rd grade, circuits in 4th grade, and maglevvehicles, windmills, pollinators, and knee braces in 5th grade). During each unit, we focusedvideo recorders on one or two student groups. We also collected students’ paper
Paper ID #11853Using an Instrument Blueprint to Support the Rigorous Development of NewSurveys and Assessments in Engineering EducationMs. Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, and innovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentor in the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of a
beginning of class. 6At Michigan Technological University (Michigan Tech), an initiative to encourage the inclusionof blended learning in the classroom began in the 2013-2014 academic year. Faculty wereencouraged to submit proposals to the Jackson Center Blended Learning Grant program for“course/program reform or expansion projects using blended and online learning”.7 Through thisprogram, faculty can receive funds to help them incorporate blended learning or on-lineresources into their courses or programs. Faculty within the First-Year Engineering Programreceived a small grant to develop pre-lesson instructional modules for the coverage of first-yearENG course topics on MATLAB. These pre-lessons would allow for additional course support,instruction
Paper ID #12501Presenting Test Benches and Device Characteristics of Programmable LogicIn An Introductory Logic Circuits CourseDr. Krista M Hill, University of Hartford Dr. Krista M. Hill is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Hartford in Connecticut. PhD and MSEE from Worcester Polytechnic Inst. in Worcester MA, and previ- ously a project engineer at Digital Equipment Corp. She instructs graduate and undergraduate computer engineering computer courses, directs graduate research, and performs research involving embedded mi- croprocessor based systems. Her current projects
supports Innovation and Start-Up Projects. While at Un- ternehmerTUM, Florian was involved in a marketing project for a tourism startup (Social Tourist) and consulting for another startup that monitors super lightweight structures (fos4x). He joined the Designing Education Lab to learn more about entrepreneurial decision making for profit or non-profit organizations and social entrepreneurship in general.Dr. Qu Jin, Stanford University Qu Jin is a postdoctoral scholar in the Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. She earned her Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2013, M.S. degree in Biomedical En- gineering from Purdue University in 2009, and B.S. degree in Material Science and
student led presentation. It would to be nice if each student could present more than once in the semester with a different team member. It was a good learning experience. I wish you could do it twice a week! • I am a busy grad student and didn’t have time to devote 20+ hours to one presentation. Time guidelines for the project may help future students have an idea of how much time is expected to be spend on this. [My team mate and I] had very different views on how much time each task would require, which caused some issues, I think. Good – I really learned that material and felt confident about the concepts. • Students can be given the choice to select team
Page 26.238.2for water demand worldwide present challenges to scientists and engineers to attain sustainablemanagement of water resources. A recent United Nations report projects that virtually everynation will face a water supply problem within the next 8 years; currently more than a billionpeople have little access to clean drinking water, and 2 billion live in conditions of waterscarcity2. To address these critical issues, the NAE’s “The Engineer of 2020” highlights the needfor implementing ecologically sustainable practices to preserve the environment for futuregenerations. Further, the report emphasizes that water supplies will affect the future of theworld’s economy and stability3. As a result, the NAE warns that unless better ways to
, TaskValue and Intrinsic Goal Orientation in 2012, and Task Value in 2013). This suggests that themost stable impact of the studio-based learning environment is the impact it has on students’views of Task Value. Unfortunately, the stable impact of the new instructional technique yieldeda decrease in students’ perceptions of the class’ Task Value. However, even Task Value scoreswere found to vary as a function of Major, Race, and Gender. This suggests that these TaskValue scores, as well as those from other scales, must be evaluated in light of the demographiccharacteristics of the students who provide those scores.Qualitative DataAs part of the overall research for this project, all participants were asked to complete a series of50 qualitative
an ongoing collaborative action research project that aims to develop a tool for assessingengineering students’ development of WSP literacy. Specifically, we provide a matrix of 22concrete ILOs for WSP literacy, as well as two different approaches to assessing (some of) themin engineering education. We expect that engineering educators will find these ILOs andassessment strategies valuable for adopting a constructive alignment approach for WSP literacyin their teaching.Study overviewThe study reported on in this paper is a collaborative action research project in which theresearchers have worked together with different groups of interested engineering educators tomake sense of previous empirical research about engineering students
includes group design - build projects incorporating planning, management, and documentation. Page 26.262.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessment of Inverted Classroom Success Based on Felder’s Index of Learning StylesAbstractInverting the classroom is a pedagogical practice that has recently gained significant popularity.With the increase in its use, it is essential to understand the impacts of the practice and students’experiences in this type of classroom. This pedagogical structure was implemented in a first-yearengineering course
approach to teaching professional communication, andintroduce our larger research project, which aims to assess the effectiveness of our program.Finally, we shall briefly reflect on whether the small communication class is really as inefficientas some have suggested. The purpose of this study is to develop the theoretical groundwork fora larger study we are just beginning to conduct on the efficacy of our professionalcommunication program. Using the investigative tools of narrative research and discourseanalysis, we hope ultimately to determine the degree to which our program, which maintainssmall classes and focuses on cultivating students’ rhetorical judgment, effectively graftsprofessional communication onto our students’ burgeoning
Paper ID #14483Understanding Diverse and Atypical Engineering Students: Lessons LearnedFrom Community College Transfer Scholarship RecipientsDr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University Prof. Melani Plett is a Professor in Electrical Engineering at Seattle Pacific University. She has over eigh- teen years of experience in teaching a variety of engineering undergraduate students (freshman through senior) and has participated in several engineering education research projects, with a focus on how fac- ulty can best facilitate student learning.Angelina Lane, Seattle Pacific UniversityProf. Donald M. Peter P.E., Seattle
Technology, Athens, Greece. He has published more than 50 referred journal and conference papers and 4 book chapters. He has been project manager and a member of several research and industrial grants. Dr. Agrawal actively serves as committee member and reviewer for conferences and journals in his area of research. He is a senior member of IEEE and a member of ACM, and ASEE.Mr. Myron L. Stevenson, North Carolina A&T State University Myron Stevenson is a candidate for a Masters of Information Technology degree at North Carolina A&T State University. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Mass Communications from Elon University in 1998. Myron has over 15 years experience in information technology. He is currently a
Engineering Seminar. LTC Starke has published over 10 peer reviewed research arti- cles and has presented his research at national and international meetings (most recently Portugal). Most recently, he led a service learning project with 5 students to build a latrine-based biogas system in west- ern Uganda for an elementary school of 1400 students. LTC Starke is a registered Professional Engineer (Delaware), member of several professional associations, and is a member of the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank Dr. Ed Bouwer (Johns Hopkins
. Forexample, a well-designed pretest posttest for computer architecture with built-in flexibility toincorporate specific course outcomes at different institutions for a course in computerarchitecture will serve the following purposes. 1. Provide an educational innovator with a measure for testing the effectiveness of the innovation, without having to invent and validate a new one. 2. Provide a potential adopter the same measure to test the effectiveness in their institutional context. 3. Add credibility to the entire project by facilitating the validation and transferability of the innovation by providing a resource for all adopters to use. 4. Enable both the innovator and the adopter to publish the classroom experiment results
, scheduling, communication, and inter- personal skills. Prior to entering academia, Stuart spent 25 years working in the construction industry as a tradesman, designer, and project manager. Bernstein’s interests are in improving both classroom and online teaching methods and technologies, and has developed a new, interactive, synchronous distance learning platform that is structured for the development of emotional presence and intelligence.Brett Meyer, University of Nebraska - Lincoln c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using Blended Learning to Address Instructional Challenges in a Freshman Engineering CourseAbstract This study analyzed
Paper ID #15856Using the Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT) for Ethics InstructionMs. Alison J. Kerr, The University of Tulsa Alison Kerr is a graduate student at The University of Tulsa. She is pursuing a doctoral degree in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include training development and evaluation as explored across a variety of academic disciplines and organizational settings. She is currently assist- ing on a number of training projects aimed at developing engineering students on relevant non-technical professional skills including ethical practice and presentation.Prof. Bradley J
placed in the front office of the Engineering Opportunities Center (EOC). The EOC is a location within the WCOE that offers resources on tutoring, career opportunities, community, and retention (Engineering Opportunities Center, 2016). During these hours, students can walkin and ask general questions to the Diplomats. Popular program marketing materials are available for Diplomats to hand out and they utilize computers to help students navigate the IEP website. These three things are some of the largest uses of time for IEP advisors and by utilizing the Diplomats, IEP advisors are able to work on projects and other duties. The IEP has worked hard since the organization’s creation to grow membership, expand duties, and increase their presence
example, the curricula provide some opportunity for reflection and making inference, butoverall, the emphasis of the worksheets was for recording observations and performingcalculations. While these types of formative assessments are useful for projects, they do notadequately measure students’ abilities to make engineering decisions from a depth of contentunderstanding or their ability to scope an engineering design problem. The findings based on the level of cognitive demand also supports the lack of assessmentof students’ abilities to make engineering designs and problem scope. Lower cognitive demandcategories such as Memorized Practices or Memorized Content are the foundations for studentsto develop high-order thinking. However, by
(OLI), started at Carnegie Mellon University in 2002,and Smart Sparrow emerged in 2010 thanks to work started in 2007 in the engineering school atthe University of New South Wales. Furthermore, many of the online learning platformscurrently developing MOOCs and increasingly deploying adaptive learning, such as Coursera,Udacity, and Open EdEx, also emerged from universities, as have usually the algorithms thesecompanies are now using. For example, Montana State University is in the middle of a multi-year project to introduce adaptive learning into its digital logic courses. [28] Universities havealso invested in developing predictive student models for use in early warning systems for at-riskstudents. These models assist in the design and
, 2017 An Assessment Framework for First- Year Introduction to Engineering Courses AbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, we describe an assessment framework that applies to first-year introductory engineering courses. First-year engineering courses cover a variety of learningobjectives that address both technical and professional outcomes outlined in ABET. Thesecourses also often involve open-ended design and modeling projects. The assessment of multiplecompetencies along with open-ended design can be a challenging task for educators. In thispaper, we describe a framework that guides instructional processes for effective assessment forstudent learning
Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1800 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral student and graduate research
level are. Around methodologies of teaching ethical codes, there aredifferent teaching approaches discussed in literature. The most relevant is case-based teaching toencourage students to apply ethical codes in courses of their later years9. Other authors suggestthat ethical teaching can be linked with team methodologies around project design12. Thiscollective approach facilitates the assessment of the understanding of important norms anddecision making processes, which could be a difficult aspect to assess individually. In spite of the differences that may exist among disciplines or countries, all engineeringethical codes share certain core values. These values are: contributing to the human well-being,the responsibility of the
collaborative learning is not directly relevant to our approach since thekinds of activities considered in much of that work, e.g., team projects in capstone design coursesas well as in several of the systems listed above do not, for the most part, involve students in ateam trying to resolve cognitive conflicts. Indeed, students in such teams often go out of their wayto not criticize the ideas offered by other members of the team for fear of offending them. Morerelevant for us is the work on the role of argumentation in learning. But, as Driver et al. [8] putit, “[although] argument is a central feature of the resolution of scientific controversies, scienceteaching has paid . . . little attention to [this] practice . . . It is our contention that