both the lack of aclear set of instructions relevant to the audience as well as the publication of high qualityreviews using these instructions that may serve as a template for future efforts.AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank the additional workshop organizers, including: ProfessorHeather Ross, Professor Pascal Saikaly, Dr. Muhammad Ali, and Tobias Heselton.References 1. Henry and L. Stieglitz, “An Examination of Systematic Reviews in the Engineering Literature,” in Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Online, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34121. [Accessed May 20, 2021]. 2. S. Oerther, and D. B. Oerther, “Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice offers nurses a
ENGINEERING IDENTITY 10 ReferencesAuthor. (2017). [omitted for blind review]Bix, A. S. (2004). From "engineeresses" to" girl engineers" to" good engineers": A history of women's US engineering education. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 27-49.Bruning, M. J., Bystydzienski, J., & Eisenhard, M. (2015). Intersectionality as a framework for understanding diverse young women’s commitment to engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(1), 1-26.Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2013). The borderlands of education: Latinas in engineering. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.Carlone, H. B
4MessagesaboutEngineering Somegroupsofstudents aremorelikelytobe interestedinengineeringif theyareabletoseehow engineeringcanmakea positiveimpactonour worldPersonalinterests arethecharacteristicsofapersonthatinfluencehisorherengagementininteractionswiththesocialornonsocialenvironments.Situationalinterests istheinterestingnessofthesocialornonsocialenvironmentsthatevokeorencourageinteractionswithpeopleorobjects.Krapp,A.,Hidi,S.,&Renninger,K.A.(1992).Interest,Learning,andDevelopment.InK.A.Renninger,S.Hidi&A.Krapp (Eds.),Theroleofinterestinlearninganddevelopment.Hillsdale,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.ResearchQuestion:Whatisthealignmentbetweenthepersonalinterestsofchildrenin3rd- 5th
experiences are asked to indicate the gender of thefaculty or other university employee (e.g. counselors or administrators) with whom they firstdiscussed their experience provided they have discussed it with a university employee and howimportant the employee's gender was in their decision to approach them with the situation. Ifstudents indicated that they have not reported the incident(s), they are asked to indicate why andare provided with information regarding how to make such reports. The following are a list ofhypotheses the authors wish to test with these questions: ● Harassment, discrimination and unwelcomed gender-related comments towards gender- minority students is negatively correlated with the minority gender’s representation
events. Faculty advisors and staff assistantsare available to help and advise, but the students are the ones who do most of the work.In addition to planning events for the UD engineering community, all department representativesare liaisons, or points of reference, for other women in their departments. Similar to anombudsperson, WIE members are available to provide their peers guidance or information, or alink to a supportive faculty member. WIE committee members have in the past made criticalconnections between a student and the dean’s office, resulting in interventions that improved thestudent’s situation.Officers The committee elects officers, including a chair, a co-chair, webmaster(s) andpublicist(s). The role of the chair is to plan and
engineering education, 3(2), 2-16. 2. Hadim, H. A., & Esche, S. K. (2002). Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning. Frontiers in Education, IEEE. 3. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Advances in strategic management, 8(3), 345- 382. 4. Larochelle, P. (2005). Unifying assessment of freshman design teams with team project management. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. 5. Bannerot, R. (2005). Characteristics of good team players. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
summers. This paper clearly demonstrates that the program can more thandouble the engineering graduation rate for the student population with 17-25 ACT Math scoresand the majority graduate in four years. To date, 100% of the 232 students in the bridge programare African Americans (not required).BackgroundA detailed analysis of the cause(s) for low (15%) Engineering graduation rates clearly revealedthe problem was challenges with mathematics. The majority of first time freshman engineeringmajors were struggling with mathematics and changing majors, largely due to poor preparation.Most did not meet the College Readiness Benchmark for Mathematics. A summer bridgeprogram was developed for the ACT Math score of 17-25 because the preponderance (70
. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Chandrupatla, T. R., Dusseau, R. A., Schmalzel, J. L., Slater, C. S., (1996). “Development of multifunctional laboratories in a new engineering school.” Proc., ASEE, Washington, DC.2. Marchese, A. J., Hesketh, R. P., Jahan, K., (1997). “Design in the Rowan University Freshman Engineering Clinic.” Proc., ASEE, Milwaukee, WI.3. Newell, J. A., Marchese, A. J., Ramachandran, R. P., Sukumaran, B., Harvey, R., (1999) “Multidisciplinary design and communication: a pedagogical vision.” Int. J., Engineering Education, 15, 376–382.4. Dahm, K. D
programs at CSULBthereby improving the diversity of the profession.Bibliography[1] T. Camp, S. Zweben, D. Buell, and J. Stout. “Booming Enrollments: Survey Data,” ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16), pp. 398-399, March 2016.[2] W. M. DuBow, B. A. Quinn, G. C. Townsend, R. Robinson, and V. Barr. “Efforts to Make Computer Science More Inclusive of Women.” ACM Inroads 7, 4 (November 2016), pp. 74-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2998500[3] NCWIT. (2016, April 28). Recruit Strategically: A “High Yield in the Short Term” Workbook for Attracting Women to Undergraduate Computing and Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/recruitstrategicallyworkbook_print.pdf[4
: The Exercise of Control. New York, N.Y. W.H. Freeman andCompany. 1997.[6] Jenkins, Maura, and Robert G. Keim, “Gender Trends in Engineering Retention,” inProceeedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, Georgia,October, 2004.[7] Ting, S.R. “Predicting Academic Success of First-Year Engineering Students fromStandardized Test Scores and Psychosocil Variables.” International Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol 17, No.1, 2001, pp. 75 – 80.[8] Jin, Q., Imbrie, P. K., Lin, J.J. J., and Chen, X. C., “A Multi-Outcome Hybrid Model forPredicting Student Success in Engineering.”, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, June, 2011.[9] Brainard, S. G., and Carlin, L., “A
Study Student's Exhibition, didcomplete visual identities and package designs for the project and added valuable feedbackduring Team meetings: Evan Ardanaz, Angel Juarez, Jamie Liu, Jackson Magnaye, MatthewPerrotti, Francesca Robinson, and Alessandra Sardella.References 1. James L.Huff, Carla B. Zoltowski, and William C.Oakes, “Preparing Engineers for the Workplace through Service Learning: Perceptions of EPICS Alumni,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 2016): 43 – 69. 2. John S. Lamancusa, Jose L, Zayas, Allen L. Soyster, Lueny Morell, and Jens Jorgensen , “The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 2008): 5 - 11. 3. Alan J. Dutson, Robert H. Todd
offering to hone theirpresentation skills. The NYU Tandon director of enrollment management, an NYU financial aidofficer, and the DSI instructor led one and a half hour sessions of college advisement to groupsof 5 to 6 students. The students received feedback on their draft college essays and advice on:choosing a college essay topic, creating a list of candidate schools, interacting with interviewers,and understanding college financial aid terminology and processes.Each mentor was assigned one to two mentees and a given lab was assigned between two to fourmentees. Mentors, typically advanced graduate students or post-doctoral researchers, begancontact with their assigned mentee(s) after the completion of the matching process. Participantswere
automatic alerts that are integrated with the visualizations.References:[1] Z. T. Siti Khadijah Mohamada, "Educational data mining: A review," in The 9th InternationalConference on Cognitive Science, Malaysia, 2013.[2] R. S. Baker, "Data Mining for Education," in International Encyclopedia of Education (3rdedition), Oxford, 2012.[3] C. G. Merrett, "Using Textbook Readings, YouTube Videos, and Case Studies for FlippedClassroom Instruction of Engineering Design," in Proc. 2015 Canadian Engineering EducationAssociation (CEEA15) Conf., Canada, 2015.[4] D. N. A. G. M. S. Kenneth A. Connor, "Faculty Development and Patterns of StudentGrouping in Flipped Classrooms Enabled by Personal Instrumentation," in 2017 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition
, understanding majors and careers,academic requirements, student responsibilities, and financial management, it was notcompletely tooled to handle some issues pertinent to engineering disciplines.In 2016, the authors received an S-STEM Grant from NSF (Undergraduate Scholarships forExcellent Education in Environmental Engineering and Water Resources Management(USE4WRM)) to address the challenges being faced by first-generation minority students inengineering programs and to improve recruitment and retention of financially deprived studentswith high academic credentials who would pursue their undergraduate degrees in EnvironmentalEngineering or Water Resources Management. Since Fall 2016, the authors have taught a sessionof FYS 1101 for these majors as a
4.33 based applications that emphasize societal benefits. I currently use context-based approaches in my teaching that utilize technology 3.80 based applications that emphasize societal benefits. I think using context-based approaches in my teaching that utilize technology based applications that emphasize societal benefits will help my students learn content 4.56 covered in my course(s). I am currently engaged in research on current engineering topics. 3.62 I am aware of how to apply my research topics/projects to teaching that I am doing. 4.38 I connect the lessons and content that I teach to STEM careers
longterm benefits of the design solution to the client and end users. These descriptions, justificationsand evidence are gained through thinking, in a reflective manner, about the ramifications of whatthe students are designing to solve the problem(s) presented by the project client.Research MethodologyA weekly reflective journal assignment was given to approximately 50 students during each ofour fall and spring semesters, using a template containing sixteen rows and three columns. Eachrow corresponded to a specific week in the semester. The columns contained responses to thesequestions: What did you learn? Why is it important? Where else could you use it? During eachweek, students identified a specific skill, concept or insight that they learned
. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Biomedical Engineers, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/biomedical-engineers.htm.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Occupational Information Included in the OOH, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/about/occupational-information-included-in-the-ooh.htm.[3] C. G. Prober and S. Khan, “Medical Education Reimagined: A Call to Action.,” Acad Med, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1407–1410, Oct. 2013.[4] T. Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education.,” Science, Vol. 340, Issue 6130
with a variety of long-termcareer objectives including premedical students pursuing a baccalaureate inenvironmental engineering.Table 1. Summary of six seminal learning opportunities including a course at theUniversity of Cincinnati (CEE600) and a course at the Missouri University of Scienceand Technology (CE390/CE4099).Description; Co-leaners Outcome(s)Time frameCEE600 MDG7: Ensuring Author Development and deliveryEnvironmental 3 additional faculty of a term-length, dual-levelSustainability (dual-level, approx. 80 undergraduate course with two tripsterm-length course) and 40 graduate students abroad to IndiaAutumn, 2004
problems in their communities and beyond using the Game Changers as examples of innovative solutions.• Q: If you were going to grade our infrastructure systems (at the local, state or national level), what grade(s) would you give and why? Can you justify the grade(s) using similar criteria as in the Report Card? o Activities: For older students, teachers assist in exploring why the various infrastructure categories received the grades that they did, bring in local infrastructure “experts” to assist with the discussion and assessment. Additionally, depending on the infrastructure that is being considered, teachers
) “Educating Generation Net-- Can U.S. Engineering Woo and Win the Competition for Talent,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 246-257. 3. Tavrou, S., Thong, C., & Steele, C. (2011) Increased female participation into engineering education through specialised courses, Australasian. 4. Matusovich, H.M., Streveler, R.A. and Miller, R.L. (2010) “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 289-303.5. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002) “Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students,” Journal of Research in
Learning Communities: Building Connections among Teaching, Learning, andTechnology. Jeffrey S. Nugent, R. Martin Reardon, Fran G. Smith, Joan A. Rhodes, Mary Jane Zander,Teresa J Carter. 1, s.l. : International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2008, Vol. 20.51-58. 12AppendicesAll new faculty and academic staff are invited to participate in anonymous surveys at the end of eachsemester of their first year. This survey is Appendix 1: Biannual Survey. The post survey is for new facultyonce they have been at UW-Platteville for two years, and can be found in Appendix 2: Post SurveyAppendix 1: Biannual Survey 1. If you attended any meetings of the New Faculty Learning Community
. D., and B. Stein. The Ideal Problem Solver. New York: Freeman, 1983.Brent, R., & Felder. R. M. (2014). Want your students to think creatively and critically? How about teaching them? Chemical Engineering Education, 48(2), 113-114.Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Siefert, C. M. (2014). Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103 (3), 417-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048Dannenhoffer, J. F., Green, M. A. (2017). Use of a Full-motion Flight Simulator for Teaching Aircraft Performance and Dynamics, 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 9-13 January 2017, Grapevine, Texas.Diaz, A. Freeing the Creative Spirit. San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1992.Napolitano, M. R., Aircraft Dynamics
to the question “List the part(s) of today’s program you enjoyed most,” were more varied,but many fell into two general categories: • Nearly half of the responses (37/75, 49%) included some element of the overall experience that was enjoyable, such as learning something new, interacting with the University students, and the satisfaction of getting the circuit to function correctly. • A large portion of responses (30/75, 40%) included specific portions of the project that were enjoyable, such as learning how to wire circuits or learning about how computers work.There were relatively fewer responses to the question “List two ways to improve today’s program.” • A majority of the responses (40/67, 60%) indicated that no
that the effects ofgender on other forms of SI available to students be examined. This outcome could be madepossible by expanding the scope of the research to other freshman engineering courses with moremale and female lecturers. Lastly, partnering with counterparts at other universities can provideadditional data to support and augment findings presented here.References[1] S. E. Carrell, M. E. Page and J. E. West, "Sex and Science: how professor gender perpetuates the gender gap," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 1101- 1144, 2010.[2] L. MacNell, A. Driscoll and A. N. Hunt, "What's in a name: exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 291-303, 2015
Industry and Education Collaboration http://cip.asee.org/?page_id=158[3] M. Aggarwal, “College Industry Partnerships at its Best,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, Kentucky, June 2010. https://peer.asee.org/15665[4] S. Berkowitz, M. A. Centeno, M. Groh-Hammond, M. L. Resnck, J. A. Jacko, J. Schmidt, J. Parker, and A. M. Mitskevich, “A.R.I.S.E. Center: Developing Industry Partnerships, Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, June 1999. https://peer.asee.org/7540 9[5] T. Dallas, T Karp, B. S. Nutter, Y. D. Lie, R. O. Gale, R. Cox, and S. B. Bayne, “University-Industry Partnerships in Semiconductor Engineering
much as it can empower, usingcommon methods guided by a researcher’s position, i.e. narrative smoothing [26] and datacleaning of outliers. Our research intended and unintended consequences. References[1] Milner IV, H. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational researcher, 36(7), 388-400.[2] Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.[3] Campbell, C. M., & O’Meara, K. (2014). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 49-74.[4] Milner IV, H. R
-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66, 64.[3] Jungst, S., Likclider, L. L., & Wiersema, J. (2003). Providing support for faculty who wish to shift to a learning-centered paradigm in their higher education classrooms. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3(3), 69-81.[4] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 11(23), 8410-8415.[5] Hattie, J, Biggs, & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills
is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Rowan University. His research primar- ily concerns multi-scale geomaterial behavior under coupled processes across various time scales, with emphasis placed on microstructure characterization, constitutive model formulation, and computational geomechanics, for applications in geological storage and energy geotechnics. Prior to joining the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Rowan, he worked in the Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin. At Rowan, he teaches courses in geotechnical engineering and ge- omechanics. He is a recipient of James S. Lai Outstanding Graduate Award from the geosystems group at Georgia Tech
$5.00 per yard Juki Industrial Sewing By Appointment User Provided Machine Wacom Cintiq 13HD Drop-in No Charge Creative Pen Display Button Maker Drop-in $2.00 per 10 buttons Cutting Board and Cutting Drop-in No Charge Tools Epson Perfection V800 Drop-in No Charge Photo Flatbed Scanner Einscan-S 3D Scanner Drop-in No Charge Ultimaker 3 3D printers Operated by Makerspace 3 hours per user per month, (Extended) Student Advisors Only No Charge 3D Printer Pen* By Appointment
Conference.Gordon, D. M., Iwamoto, D., Ward, N., Potts, R., & Boyd, E. (2009). Mentoring urban Blackmiddle-school male students: Implications for academic achievement. The Journal of NegroEducation, 78(3), 277.Greer, R. P., Henderson, J. A., Summers, R. G., & Morphew, J. W. (2017, June). Engagement inPractice: Success Gleaned from the St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy. In 2017 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition. doi:105860/choice.41-1054Haik, Y., Sivaloganathan, S., & Shahin, T. M. (2015). Engineering design process. NelsonEducation.Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G. Sadler, P.M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physicsexperiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study.Journal of Research in