Departmentboard of industrial advisors prepared a list of major program curriculum areas. The programcurriculum would contain coursework in the essential technical aspects of the industry including:1. Generation,2. Transmission and distribution,3. Electrical machines and machine control (including PLCs as well as microprocessor controlledpower semiconductor motor controls),4. Electrical system protection emphasizing microprocessor based protection relays,5. Electrical system design and project management,6. The electrical industry practices and relationships,The curriculum would emphasize the use of computers and software in the industry and electivesin alternate energy systems, power semiconductor converters and power system communicationswere to be
disposal. Nuclear fuel managementand reactor physics are addressed in the context of fuel burnup calculations. In additionto treatment of engineering aspects of fuel cycles, the course utilizes cross-disciplinarytools such as cost-benefit and environmental impact analyses. In addition to fuel cyclescurrently in use, advanced fuel cycle concepts currently being presented in the technicalliterature are studied. The course also includes a group project to research, analyze anddocument the technical, economic and/or environmental ramifications of one of theseadvanced fuel cycles. Page 11.509.3Mathematical Methods for Nuclear and Radiation EngineersFundamental
surface from pulling out withthe handle. In Maya 7, the ability to crease polygon surfaces edges has been added. Polygonmode surface edges can also be manually subdivided with the Split Polygon tool. However,manual splitting of polygons tends to distort the topology of the smooth polygon surface mesh.Car Windows and Doors Image 4: Perspective ViewTo create windows and doors for the car,flat 2D NURBS curves were created bytracing orthographic views onto the X, Y,and Z planes. With the flat 3D windowand door curves were projected onto the3D car surface to create curves on surface(cos). However, since curves can only beprojected onto NURBS surfaces, thesubdivision surface was converted to aNURBS surface for final detail
- Page 11.561.5Picayune, New Orleans’ daily newspaper, even obtained the “final review set of design 4drawings for the project”. These showed “the pilings on the New Orleans side of thecanal were to be driven 10 feet”.10 That seemed to be the last word. Even on December 22, 2005, the date I stoppedmy research, the entry for Katrina in Wikipedia (the online encyclopedia) still asserted:“The flood was caused by several levee breaches due to misdesign by the United StatesArmy Corps of Engineers, improper construction, and lack of supervision by the OrleansLevee Board.”11Cause: “take 3” As of that date (December 22), the Corps of Engineers still
andhave become successful faculty at a wide range of institutions, from primarily undergraduateteaching-oriented schools to very competitive Research I universities. The UM ASEE studentchapter has had a long history of active involvement directing, organizing, and running variousservice projects. In recent years the student chapter served as essentially a service organizationthat offered various opportunities to organize and operate various teaching oriented sessions andpresentations that the members felt were unavailable from other sources and which appealed to awider CoE audience. The additional benefit of these activities was to help develop camaraderieand friendship between students of different backgrounds and disciplines.Examples of
– Provide funding for faculty to integrate undergraduate students in their research projects. Strategy 3 – Produce an informational campaign targeting underrepresented groups at the K-12 level. Strategy 4 – Establish partnerships with corporations having a strong commitment to diversity. Strategy 5 – Develop a faculty led task force for undergraduate diversity to help in recruitment efforts. Strategy 6 – Develop a student diversity team to increase student awareness of benefits of diversity. Strategy 7 – Increase undergraduate scholarships through solicitation of funds that
been well established in the literature5-7 that engineering students are typically visual ratherthan verbal learners. Nonetheless, we engineering instructors still rely heavily on the traditionallecture to teach our students. Granted that these lectures are often accompanied by sketches onthe chalkboard or pictures projected onto a screen, but the primary instructional tool is stillverbal in nature. All too often our instructional approach is still “instructor-centered” rather than“student-centered.”Accompanying the dramatic rise in the use of the internet in the past ten years has been thedevelopment and collection of online learning materials. A learning object is any entity, be itdigital or non-digital that may be used for education and/or
. Page 11.479.9VI. AcknowledgementSome of the work presented herein was partially funded by the NSF Engineering EducationDivision Grant EEC-0314875 entitled “Multi-Semester Interwoven Project for Teaching BasicCore STEM Material Critical for Solving Dynamic Systems Problems”. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation The authors are gratefulfor the support obtained from NSF to further engineering education.VI Bibliography1 Higley,K.A., Marianno,C.M., “Making Engineering Education Fun”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 90, No. 1, pp105-107, January 20012 Knight,C.V., McDonald,G.H
semester we are testingthis technique again in a different course.IntroductionSTUDENT ENGAGEMENT, “SE,” is a technique devised by Celt, “Center for Learning andTeaching,” at California State University Northridge. This technique is one of many approachesto engage students. In this paper we used weekly quizzes all semester long. In addition we hadexaminations homework and group projects. While this technique is not unique or new, we areusing it in combination with its assessment to quantify its effectiveness.ECE 412 was the course used to test this approach. This course is named Power Electronics andMotor Drives. Because the complexity of the course and the required application of most of themathematical background the students should have, it was
award. In total, her projects have received over $20 million dollars in external funding. This funding has produced 12 software packages that have been requested from (and shared with) more than 3000 researchers in 86 countries (as of October 2012). Dr. Camp has published over 80 refereed articles and 12 invited articles, and these articles have been cited almost 4,000 times (per Microsoft Academic Search) and over 7,000 times (per Google Scholar) as of December 2012. Dr. Camp is an ACM Fellow, an ACM Distinguished Lecturer, and an IEEE Fellow. She has enjoyed being a Fulbright Scholar in New Zealand (in 2006), a Distinguished Visitor at the University of Bonn in Germany (in 2010), and a keynote presenter at
in equipping our students with the “tools of the trade” thenwe need to alert our graduate students( the future engineering teachers) to the need ofdeveloping proper and enduring connections with industries in their locale, andeventually have a mutually beneficial relations with the industrial sector; not so muchto supplement their income; but, principally, to be able to reach the broader goal, i.e.,to gain valuable experience and be truly involved in real engineering.iii) Third, reaching out to the industrial sector and engineering services in the Region,and striving to form symbiotic partnerships between local industry and academiathrough: capstone projects, theses work with practical overtones, and applied researchprojects in selected
samecitizenship/service expectations as professorial faculty. The teaching loads also varied accordingto these service expectations, with professor educators having the greatest teaching load andprofessional faculty having the smallest teaching load among these professional faculty. Research faculty were not expected to do any teaching, and generally performed limitedservice. Their primary assignment was research and scholarship, so they were expected to workwith a cadre of research assistants, seek funding for research projects, and publish their findings. Adjunct faculty were found in four sub-types, and were also known as contingent faculty.The first type were faculty who worked full-time in nearby industries and who taught no morethan
, while excessive R and Tcomponents strongly and positively correlate with negative emotions. The definition ofthe three components is such that it precludes the possibility of a human being possessingonly the S component, or, for that matter, only the T component and so perfection is notpossible here either. The three components and the two emotions lead to two equivalent Table I. Six Sigma Phases and Steps Phase Steps Description I. Scope 1 Articulate the problem statement. 2 Define the response variable (outcome(s)). 3 State the project goal. II. 4 Draw a process map. Measure 5 Validate the measurement systems. 6 Collect data on the response
Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Clemson University. Her research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization of thin films. She also contributes to the engineering education community through research related to undergraduate research programs and navigational capital needed for graduate school.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and
opportunity for the CQU students to experience a different mode ofinstruction and interaction, but a mode that is common in the US. Moreover, the format can helpstudents be more self-directed and take greater responsibility for their learning than traditionalface-to-face courses (Ruey, 2010; Wuensch et al, 2008). Since the students will be coming to theUS for the last two academic semesters, providing this experience before they arrive was seen ashelpful to their development and future success in the US. In particular, practice at conveyingthoughts through writing will help these students in their senior design projects and othercoursework.Lessons LearnedBased on this experience, the following lessons learned are provided to assist others who mightbe
initial visits have been verypositive.References[1] National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring Progress Toward Successful K-12 STEM Education: A Nation Advancing? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[2] NGSS. (2016). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org[3] NCWIT, Roadshow-in-a-Box: Capitalizing on Models for Outreach. Retrieved from https://www.ncwit.org/resources/roadshow-box-capitalizing-models-outreach.AcknowledgementsThis project was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA Cooperative Agreement#NNX15AW22A) and the Golden LEAF Foundation (Grant# FY-2015-2014).
“Online College Students 2015: Comprehensive Data onDemands and Preferences”, a joint project of The Learning House, Inc. and Aslanian MarketResearch led by Dr. David L. Clinefelter and Carol Aslanian, key concerns with online learningincluded: Perceptions of quality of online study – 27% of respondents Inconsistent/poor contact and communication with instructors – 21% of respondents Lack of direct contact with other students – 17% of respondents Inconsistent/poor quality of instruction – 17% of respondentsThe only two other concerns with a higher number of respondents weremotivation/attention/focus challenges at 27% and cost at 16% (Clinefelter and Aslanian, 2015).When you review the data about online student preferences
that were previously present.Humans process information and remember through language.2 By incorporating discussionsinto the classroom, students are forced to confront their assumptions, implement collaborativelearning, and improve their synthesis skills.3 Furthermore, classroom talk increases studentlearning and understanding4 to potentially move students from novices (blindly following rules)to experts (using intuition to find a solution).5One common “learning by talking” technique historically used is the oral examination, which hasbeen shown to increase student knowledge and cognitive learning.6-8 With the advancements oftechnology, today’s students learn by talking through the creation of videos for projects whichhave also shown to
Board for the Southwest Research Institute.Dr. James R. Hallmark, Texas A&M University System James Hallmark currently serves as Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs for the Texas A&M University System. In this position, Hallmark oversees all matters involving faculty, curriculum, student affairs, stu- dent success, enrollment management/admissions, and special projects for the 11 universities and 140,000 students in the A&M System. Prior to this appointment, Hallmark served as Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs at West Texas A&M University (WTAMU) as well as a lengthy term as Dean of the Graduate School and Research at that institution. In 2016 Hallmark briefly returned to West Texas A&M
attending to student thinking than about analyzing or responding to student thinking.McCormick, Wendell, & O’Connell (2014) showed video of students engaged in engineeringdesign to five in-service teachers (i.e. practicing elementary school teachers) new to engineeringand then interviewed the teachers about what they noticed and how they might respond to thestudents. The researchers categorized four themes of teacher noticing and three themes ofhypothesized responses. The results suggested that while these teachers were new to engineering,they still exhibited productive beginnings of responsive teaching in engineering. In another studyas a part of the same project, Johnson, Wendell, & Watkins (2016) categorized what in-serviceteachers who
Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incorporat- ing engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering
increased awareness ofparticipants’ own lives and actions, and have the potential to “disrupt the everyday practices ofparticipants through enforcing an awareness and visibility of action previously absent” (p. 35)39.MethodsIn this section, we describe the Articulating a Succinct Description method. While we provide abrief overview of the initial ethnographic research that launched the ACC project, for thepurposes of this paper we will be focusing on the participants, data analysis, case study creation,and cultural probe intervention from the preliminary study that was conducted in Fall 2016.ParticipantsOver 565 students have been involved with the Advancing Cultural Change (ACC) projectthrough assignments in an introductory cultural anthropology
theMethodology section below.As researchers who are new to the study of entrepreneurship education, it was important to us toA) control for our own assumptions about entrepreneurship or what students do know or shouldknow on the topic of entrepreneurship, B) learn about the initial impressions of students insteadof making assumptions about where they stand, and C) have an experimental flavor to ourresearch to better understand if our new pedagogical approaches are effective throughcomparison between treatment and control groups.As educators, we feel that authenticity is important for engineering education, so we hope tohighlight courses where authentic practices are found; for example: teamwork, project-basedapproach to learning, incorporation of non
progress has been questioned, as has the notion that technology itself isvalue-free.According to philosopher Eric Katz, “Perhaps the oldest commonplace about the nature oftechnology is that technological artifacts are inherently neutral or value-free. Humans createtechnological objects for a specific range of purposes, but the actual use of the technology issubject to the intentions of the user.”5 A serious debate crystallized after the explosion of theatomic bomb, an action that psychologically leveled Manhattan Project civilian director J. RobertOppenheimer and stunned others involved in its creation; Monsanto’s Charles Thomas, forexample, expressed grave concern after the Trinity test: “It is safe to say that nothing as terriblehas been made by
mis-information to their progeny as parents are the predominant source ofoccupational information for young children.8, 15, 24Parents are a significant influence on the occupational interest of their children.8, 15, 24 Parentshave been identified as the key-socializing agent by introducing a child to roles within differentsituations.25-26 The way that parents socialize their children regarding occupations can haveprofound impacts on the way that the children perceive the occupation and how it can relate totheir own self-interests and abilities.8 Having interviewed engineers, Zhang and Cardella (2010)found that parents encourage their children to play with particular toys and books, participate inaround-the-house projects, and engage in
Paper ID #19081Getting to Gender Parity in a Top-Tier Mechanical Engineering Department:A Case StudyMs. Kath Xu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Kath Xu is a Class of 2016 graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she studied mechanical engineering. She will join the Yale Law School Class of 2020 in the fall.Dr. Dawn Wendell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Dawn Wendell is an engineer whose past projects range from BattleBots robots to medical devices, for which she holds several patents. She received four degrees from MIT including a PhD in Mechanical Engineering. She worked as a fluid
).Hypothesis/PilotBased on the work of Oldenburg’s (2001) “Third Place” (also known as “alternative space”) andYosso et. al’s cultural wealth (2005), the hypothesis of our work is that the social media platformfunctions as a “third place,” (virtual as it is), and that a level of meaningful mentoring can takeplace in that space. As an initial pilot to test the hypothesis, we developed a session with womenin engineering in 2015 at an annual “WEPAN - Women in Engineering Proactive Network”conference, with collaborators from four universities from various regions of the country.Building on earlier collaborative NSF ADVANCE grant funded success around mentoringwomen in STEM, this panel aimed to showcase potential projects to support the careeradvancement
engineering: Project-based learning experience. IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2012. IEEE.[3] Wolfram, C. (2009, July 13). 5,000 Demonstrations: The Time to Go Interactive Is Now. Retrieved from Wolfram Blog: http://blog.wolfram.com/2009/07/13/5000- demonstrations-the-time-to-go-interactive-is-now/[4] Hands-on learning with Analog Discovery. (2015, 10). Retrieved 10 12, 2016, from ANALOG DEVICES: http://www.analog.com/en/education/university- engagement/analog-discovery-design-kit.html[5] Shayesteh, S., & Rizkalla, M. E. (2016). New Modes of Instructions for Electrical Engineering Course Offered to Non-. ASEE`s 123rd Annual Conference & Exhibition
Paper ID #18816Influence of a Compressed Semester on Student Performance in a Construc-tion Science CourseDr. Ifte Choudhury, Texas A&M University Ifte Choudhury is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Science at Texas A&M University and has extensive experience as a consulting architect working on projects funded by the World Bank. His areas of emphasis include housing, alternative technology, issues related to international construction, and construction education. He is also a Fulbright scholar. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Influence of
Paper ID #19857Infusing Empathy Into Engineering Design: Supporting Under-representedStudent Interest and Sense of BelongingnessMs. Henriette D Burns, Washington State University, Vancouver Henriette is retired engineer and has worked at Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Labs, Baxter Labs, Tenneco, Monsanto, Frucon Construction, SC Johnson Wax and HP as a manufacturing engineer, a design engineer and a project manager. She holds an engineering degree from Northwestern University, an MBA from University of Oregon and a MiT from Washington State University where she is currently a Ph.D. candi- date in Math/Science Education