focus of many in education and in industry. To maintain its position as atechnological leader, the United States must not only continue to produce high-quality STEMfield graduates but accelerate this production. The priority of this effort is revealed by PresidentBarack Obama’s push to produce an additional one million STEM graduates within a decade andan additional 100,000 new teachers in these fields (Feder, 2012). The sheer number of graduatesrequired to fill the projected jobs in STEM fields will require both increasing the number ofstudents entering these fields but also reducing the rate that college students exit these fields.One of the keys to increasing the number of STEM professionals is to understand why studentswho start STEM
considers papers that relate to industrialtechnique, rather than analysis, and engineering education papers that focus on content, ratherthan methodology [2]. It is suggested too that the following subjects meet the aforementionedcriteria: accreditation, active learning, applied research, assessment, capstone projects, classroomactivities, curriculum design, distance learning, industry partners, innovative pedagogy,laboratories, non-technical skills, and other topics related to engineering technology practice andeducation.Using data contained in the Scopus database (Elsevier B.V.) and analyzed by SCImago (akaScimago), selected metrics were examined that characterize the Journal of EngineeringTechnology. A research group from the Consejo Superior de
nine minutes long (median = eightminutes, min = < one minute, max = 26 minutes). During class, students worked on challengeproblems to apply concepts learned from the interactive textbook and online lectures. Studentsworked in groups, requesting help from the instructor as needed. Two class meetings each weekwere facilitated by a faculty instructor and a lead course assistant. The Friday sessions werefacilitated by a lead course assistant and two other course assistants. Students completed weeklyquizzes and auto-graded coding challenges to assess their learning. Students self-scheduledproctored quizzes outside of class time in a computer lab. Students also completed fourcomputing projects contextualized by an engineering problem throughout
: How do students perceive the benefits and drawbacks of co-op participation? A. Both co-op and non-co-op students positively perceive co-op participation as providing in-depth experience.Both co-op and non-co-op students described the depth of experience gained through co-opparticipation as one of its primary benefits. The students attributed this depth of experience bothto the length of the co-op terms and to the multiple rotations with the same company. Theydescribed how this structure of co-op terms allowed students to become “immersed” in the co-opcompany and to learn more from in-depth projects. For example, Chris, a first-year engineeringstudent, wanted to “get more of an in-depth experience” and thus chose to pursue a co-op
awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education, and was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011. She has served on multiple NAE committees, and on the NSF ENG division’s Advisory Committee.Prof. Kenneth M. Anderson, University of Colorado Boulder Ken Anderson is a Professor of Computer Science and the Associate Dean for Education for the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Since 2009, he has co-directed Project EPIC; this NSF-funded project investigates how members of the public make use of social media during times of mass emergency. Professor Anderson leads the design and implementation of a large-scale data collection and analysis
education curriculum. This line ofinquiry is relevant to issues of representation in engineering schools: the socio-technical divideimpacts undergraduate engineering retention, especially students from historicallyunderrepresented groups in engineering (e.g. women, students of color, LGBTQIA, indigenous1people, and low-income) [5]. A recurring justification for upholding the socio-technical divide(that we have heard voiced during discussions about engineering curricula and that we want tointerrogate) is that technical content would have to be sacrificed in order to accommodate socialjustice issues. Therefore, a project in which students add context to traditional engineeringscience problems has the transformative potential of reaching students
Research Excellence Award and the 2017 North Carolina A & T State University (NCAT) Rookie Research Excellence Award. Under her mentorship, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s students have presented research posters at various NCAT Undergraduate Research Symposia resulting in her receiving a 2017 Certificate of Recognition for Undergraduate Re- search Mentoring. In 2016, her publication was recognized by the Built Environment Project and Asset Management Journal as the 2016 Highly Commended Paper. Andrea has served as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation (NSF), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and several journals and conferences. In 2015, Dr. Ofori-Boadu established her STEAM ACTIVATED! program for middle-school
). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Hsieh, S. “Design of Remotely Accessible Automated Systems to Enhance Industrial Automation Education,” ASEE 2017 Annual Conference, June 25 - 28, Columbus, Ohio.[2] Grodotzki, J., Ortelt, T.R. and Tekkaya, A.E., 2018. Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI project at the TU Dortmund University. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, pp.1349-1360, 2018.[3] Bikas, H., Stavropoulos, P. and Chryssolouris, C., “Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: A critical review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf
mathematics skills from 1-NotVery True to 5-Very True. These questions were developed using a study that was originally done at TheOhio State University but were adapted to fit the requirements for this project (Harper, Baker, &Grzybowski, 2013). The two key questions posed in the survey are these:• How important is it for students from the University of Toronto undergraduate engineering program to be able to competently apply mathematics concepts from each of these areas listed?• How competent (i.e., what level of competence to you perceive) is the average student from the University of Toronto undergraduate engineering program in the following areas?The survey was administered through the Dean’s office to all faculty; an introductory
76 79 Homework 10 % (paper submission) 15 % (online submission) Quizzes (in-class) 20 % 10 % Design Project 10 % 10 % 3 Exams (including final, 55 % 55 % in-class) LearnSmart Practice n/a 10 % (online through software) Attendance 5% ---The Spring 2016 course had homework problems assigned from the course textbook and studentssubmitted each homework assignment on paper, i.e. students would solve the problems on paperand submit to the
,along with their open-ended surveys, long-term projects, and interviews and focus groups. Thedata will first be looked at across the participants views of the EQ-i 2.0 assessment, use ofreflections, and coaching as pathways to their personal and professional growth as future leadersin engineering. Next, it will be looked at in terms of the participants perceptions on how thiscourse impacted them across their personal and professional landscapes. Emotional Intelligence Assessments Students were given the EQ i 2.0 assessment at the very beginning of the course andagain at the conclusion of the course. Figure 1 captures the average of the scores prior to thecoure and then again at the end of the course.Figure 1. Pre and Post EQ-i 2.0
, materials science, and sustainable energy courses and works on gas hydrate and algal biofuel research projects with students. She is very passionate about engaging and teaching up-and-coming students about engineering, especially topics related to cleaner, low carbon energy.Prof. Judy Randi EdD, University of New Haven Judy Randi, Ed.D. is Professor of Education at the University of New Haven where she is currently teaching in the Tagliatela College of Engineering and coordinating a college-wide initiative, the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits (PITCH). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Partnership Model for Integrating Technical Communication
scalp map showing scalp distribution of power at 6 Hz, 10 Hz, and 22 Hz3. ResultsDue to both unforeseen delays and difficulties in the COVID-19 pandemic, the experiment wasshortened. This has negatively influenced the sample size of this study so that, at the time ofwriting, data from three participants have been recorded and analyzed.The experiential learning data was eliminated due to high noise. The participants were workingin a group on a hands-on rover building project, in a busy fabrication facility environment. Theamount of body movements led to poor signal quality, and it was challenging to ensure theparticipants were only performing experiential learning task at all the sessions in the busyenvironment. The average spectral power for
building blocks as a prerequisite for building agrasp of larger-scale system design issues.The authors actively seek collaborations on projects such as this. All of our designs are opensource, and we will provide full manufacturing and course materials.References[1] H. C. Powell and B. Hayt, “Developing a Low-voltage Microgrid for Experiments in Renewable Energy Distribution,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018, Accessed: Feb. 01, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-a-low-voltage-microgrid-for-experiments-in-renewable- energy-distribution.[2] “Power Management.” https://university.ti.com/en/faculty/teaching-materials-and- classroom-resources/ti-based-teaching-kits-for
study support this notion as only 10.0% of students’ comments noted that biology isuseful for their career.Future work on this project will involve analyzing the semantic differential scale data and alsorepeating the thematic analysis with other cohorts of students. Additional types of attitudestowards biology will also be explored, including utility value (and the other values involved withexpectancy value theory) and self-efficacy towards biology. This will be an important area toexplore because even though emotions do not seem to be the reason while anecdotallyengineering students may not be enjoying biology, these other psychological aspects couldpotentially explain this observation.References[1] I. Ajzen, "From intentions to actions: A
/pattern and vector co-relation using the problem conceptthat they have been exposed to in previous curriculum, the students are introduced to a three-dimensional problem. The three-dimensional vector is made using a glass box and tape. Fig 3: Two dimensional vector problem solved using traditional lecture slides[5]Glass boxThe glass box is made of acrylic, with the brown long diagonal the length of the 3-d vector andthe three sides of the box representing the x, y and z components. The diagonals on each plane ingreen, orange and purple color would represent accurately the projections in the x-y, y-z and x-zplanes as shown in the Fig. 3. Fig 4: 3 D vectors used in the demonstrationColor scheme for the three
and structural engineering courses at VMI and enjoys working with the students on bridge related research projects and with the ASCE student chapter.Craig N. Musselman, A & E Consulting Craig N. Musselman, P.E. is a practicing civil and environmental engineer and is the Founder and Pres- ident of CMA Engineers, a consulting engineering firm with offices in New Hampshire and Maine. He holds B.S.C.E. and M.S.C.E. degrees from the University of Massachusetts and has more than 35 years experience in the planning, design and construction administration of public works facilities. Mussel- man is a former member of the New Hampshire Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and was actively involved in the
FE exam in their senior year of college. At the UFscience and engineering library sponsored workshops, engineering students, especially womenare encouraged to take the steps to become a PE. The workshop includes information onregistering and taking the FE exam and library resources that can help students to prepare for theexam.9. Use social media for awareness building and outreach to women engineering studentsSocial engagement increases women engineering students’ motivation to continue studyingengineering. Combining engineering and community engagement produces more sociallyconscious innovators.12 Using social media to build awareness of engineering projects that havebenefited society helps motivate students, especially women, to study
assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ash- ley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, the integration of engineering education and international development, and building capacity in low and middle income countries through inclusive technical education.Dr. Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Tech Dr. Cherie D. Edwards is a Postdoctoral Associate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Research and
she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC) and CATALYST Fellow at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Steve Robert Harrison, Dept of Computer Science, Virginia Tech Steve Harrison is the Director of the Human-Centered Design Program at Virginia Tech, an associate professor of practice in Computer Science
literature shows several activities that have been developed by educators tointroduce middle and high school students to the transportation engineering profession. Lukenand Mumbower (2010) proposed three such activities. The first investigated the tradeoff betweenvarious modes of transportation. The second aimed at informing students about design objectivesin transportation projects. The third focused on users of transportation systems and the role ofengineers in accommodating their needs. In the third activity, students were tasked with planningthe daily activities of a household of two parents and two children. Elam et al. (2011) developeda web-based tool to introduce students to transportation history, road signs and pavementmarkings, traffic
, positionopenings in physics, chemistry, and math are commonly the hardest to fill with qualifiedpersonnel [1]. This disparity has led to a large percentage of STEM teachers with no collegemajor or minor in their main subjects, or they have no complete certification. Among mathteachers, 40% fall into this description, while over 60% of physics, chemistry, and earth scienceteachers do so[2].This concern over STEM shortages is justified as STEM jobs are projected to grow by 13% from2012 - 2022 which is an increase of about 1 million jobs over a 10 year period. Only 5% ofUnited States workers are employed in STEM jobs, but these jobs drive 50% of the UnitedStates’ economic growth. To put this in perspective, for each new software, technology, or lifesciences
and improving the actual enrollment condition should not bediminished. Using this tool at the beginning of a program, when it needs to be reinvented, or as ascheduled maintenance check for your program’s relevance is beneficial to make sure courses arewell aligned with the interests of the students it serves.Paper authored and researched 4 by Laine Schrewe, engineering instructor for Tolles Career and Technical Centerlocated in Jonathan Alder High School, Plain City, Ohio ; March , 2018.Notes: 1. Source: National Girls Collaborative project; https://ngcproject.org/statistics (15% of engineers are women) 2. Claims extrapolated from sample size guidelines table data from https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size/ 3. Female
have a student that does not have the assumed prerequisite knowledge.Elliott4 suggests a review of the prerequisite material before delving into new material, howeverthat is not always possible for upper-level classes with a lot of prerequisites because that wouldnot leave enough time to teach the new material.In Computer Science, upper level classes often have group projects following the pattern laid outin the classic book “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People”2. In that book, Covey2 describes aprogression from dependence to independence, followed by interdependence. This closely mirrorsthe ideal path of a Computer Science student: they start in lower level classes being dependent onthe instructor and the textbook in order to acquire the
courses in the first year sequence, as well as instrumentation andmachine design in biological engineering. Nick also serves as the Undergraduate ProgramCoordinator and the Advisor of the Biological Engineering Student Organization.Marybeth Lima has served on the faculty of the Biological & Agricultural EngineeringDepartment at LSU since 1996. Her research interests include community-based engineeringdesign. Marybeth directs the LSU Community Playground Project, in which college andelementary school students work together to design playgrounds at local schools. Lima wasselected as an ASEE Fellow in 2012.
culturally inclusive classrooms, recognizing our biases andbehaviors, using a variety of teaching strategies to accommodate diverse learning styles,and including text/reading materials from diverse authors from different races, sexualorientations, genders and abilities.The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Excellence in Civil EngineeringEducation (ExCEEd) Teaching Workshops are currently in their 20th year of existence.This landmark project has over 980 graduates from 256 universities around the world.The week-long teacher training workshop has been successful by all measures and hasmade a substantial difference in civil engineering education in the United States.1 Itcontinues to grow and is widely supported by university deans, department
this project is to develop an inexpensive, small,user-friendly braille cell learning device.Background ResearchBraille is a language that can be read by using fingers to touch a series of raised dots created byLouis Braille and is used by the blind community [1]. The symbols are formed inside braille cellswhich are made up of 6 raised dots in three parallel rows each having two dots. A cell can beused to represent either a letter, number or punctuation mark. An example of this can be seen inFigure 1. Figure 1. Braille Alphabet courtesy of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Braille_alfabet.jpgAccording to the National Federation of the Blind, 63,357 students have been reported blindthroughout
Hotel. In both cases, the modelsare loaded to failure and the total weight added before failure is compared. After a shortdiscussion, a video of the Hyatt Regency Hotel tragedy is shown. The in-class assignment isfollowed up with a reflection paper assignment. In a survey administered to students in thecourse during fall 2017, 89 percent of student respondents (n = 48) indicated the activity addedto their understanding of the topic and indicated in descriptive questions that the activity washelpful and increased their interest in engineering.IntroductionDue to the nature of civil and mechanical engineering projects, it is vital for practitioners touphold ethical standards during the engineering design process. As educators, we have
, the problem-solving decisions it assesses, and ourqualitative analysis for the refinement and preliminary evaluation of the assessment.MethodsExpert problem solving was defined through expert interviews. Interviewees were establishedscientists, engineers and doctors in both academia and industry. The standardized interviewswere based off a cognitive task analysis protocol [7]. The experts were asked to recall a specificresearch project they had completed in the recent past and describe it step-by-step, emphasizingthe decisions they made. General themes common to all fields included the characterization ofproblems according to important features, requirements and goals, use of predictive frameworks,determination of information needed and how
currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech