Paper ID #25883First-Generation College Students and Othering in Undergraduate Engineer-ingProf. Harriet Hartman, Rowan University Professor of Sociology, Chair of Sociology and Anthropology Department and IRB Chair, Rowan Uni- versity. Co-p.i. of RED NSF RevED project at Rowan University. Editor-in-chief, Contemporary Jewry.Dr. Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University Dr. Ralph Dusseau is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University in Glass- boro, New Jersey. Dr. Dusseau is also serving as the Associate Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Dr. Dusseau was an Assistant
/assessment, grant evaluation, analytics related to student success, and system design. His passion is analyzing institutional data related to student academic factors, psycho-social factors collected using surveys, and demographics to uncover factors impacting student success that could be used in strategic decision making. Some of the current projects have an objective of finding differences among the FTIC and Transfer student population at UCF with respect to student success and engagement metrics, factors impacting retention, graduation and time to graduation. Mr. Nair holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering (1997) and couple of graduate degrees - Masters in Industrial Engineering (2001) and Business
to examine classroom argumentation from faculty and studentunderstanding of it.Together, these interview data will be used to characterize faculty epistemic beliefs and examinethe relationship between faculty and students’ conceptualizations of disseminated ideas in theclassroom. A pilot study is planned in order to present initial data and get feedback to refineinterview protocols via presentation at the ASEE Annual Conference.SignificanceBeyond the primary outcome of the characterization of the epistemic beliefs of chemicalengineering faculty, some connections between exhibited epistemology and pedagogy may bedrawn from the observations of classroom practices and following interviews. The broader goalof this project in describing these
. Novak and D. B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1984.[7] K. M. Hamza and P. O. Wickman, “Student engagement with artefacts and scientific ideas in a laboratory and a concept-mapping activity,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 35, pp. 2254-2277, Jul. 2013.[8] H. Wang, I. Huang and G. Hwang, “Effects of a question prompt-based concept mapping approach on students’ learning achievements, attitudes and 5C competences in project- based computer course activities,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 19, pp. 351- 364, Jul. 2016.[9] A. Acharya and D. Sinha, “An intelligent web-based system for diagnosing student learning problems using
interestsand opportunities among the three partners, how the workshop was designed and why, somedetails about the workshop’s impact, and future work.Lesson: Be humble; assemble a team to cover the required expertise.The origins of this workshop effort trace back to an initiative in the College of Engineeringfocused on student mental health. Among the college’s projects under this initiative were trainingworkshops for various key audiences, including engineering faculty, advising staff, and graduatestudents (for their work as TAs). With workshop topics including such complex and sensitiveones as suicide, the college staff person who was charged with the mental health initiativerecognized the need to bring in expertise from the counseling center. The
Design & Manufacturing Engineering Student “Find a good group of other students to work with.” — Mechanical Engineering Student “If you’re organized, it really helps a lot. I put every class on my calendar and every assignment that was due on my calendar.” — Product Design & Manufacturing Engineering StudentFigure 2 continued. Advice from graduating seniors to incoming students in the engineeringprogram at Grand Valley State University.ConclusionThis project is a work in progress. The learning skills modules have been developed andimplemented in an Introduction to Engineering course. The goal of developing these moduleswas to use them as a foundation for a first-year engineering seminar, which is still underdevelopment. Based on
the impact of creating the videos is inprogress and will be reported at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference.5. Conclusion This project is studying the role of prosocial affordance beliefs about the ECE professionon motivation to persist in the profession. It also seeks to understand whether a simpleclassroom intervention that forces the student to think about the prosocial value of thecourse material can improve their beliefs about the profession, and in turn, their persistenceintensions. 46. References Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). “Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 32, 2010/04/30 2010, doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-32.[8] L. Rubin and C. Hebert, "Model for Active Learning: Collaborative Peer Teaching," College Teaching, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 26-30, 1998/01/01 1998, doi: 10.1080/87567559809596229.[9] V. Tinto, "Colleges as Communities: Taking Research on Student Persistence Seriously," vol. 21, ed. The Review of Higher Education: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998, pp. 167- 177.[10] E. Litzler and J. Young, “Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the project to assess climate in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, issue 2, pp. 319–345, April 2012.[11] E. Seymour, et al., “Establishing the benefits of research
size, as well as provide opportunities to test other Minecraft-based activitiestargeting additional spatial skills like mental slicing and perspective taking. Ultimately, weintend to assess the effectiveness of those new activities with the results from refined mentalrotation and 2D-to-3D transformation activities, intent on developing a cohesive Minecraft-basedintervention that most effectively grows a variety of spatial skills in middle grades learners.FundingThis project is funded by the National Science Foundation under Award DRL-1720801.References[1] C. M. Ganley, M. Vasilyeva, and A. Dulaney, "Spatial Ability Mediates the Gender Difference in Middle School Students' Science Performance," Child Development, vol. 85, no. 4, pp
Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Multi-Institutional Study of Pre- and Post-Course Knowledge Surveys in Undergraduate Geotechnical Engineering CoursesIntroductionGeotechnical engineering is not a list of procedures, but a list of challenges1. Geotechnicalengineering projects are designed and analyzed based on data available at a particular site, whichin turn are subject to quality and budget considerations. Two project sites are highly unlikely toshare the same subsurface conditions1,2,3. Thus, solving a geotechnical engineering problemheavily relies on a strong understanding of the basic principles of soil mechanics and asignificant amount of judgment. In most introductory geotechnical engineering courses, there isoften
Development at Purdue University. Ed has been developing a new approach to developing strategies for complex col- laboration in open, loosely connected networks. Called ”strategic doing”, this methodology emphasizes the strategic value of collaboration in today’s global economy. For over twenty-five years, he conducted strategy projects throughout the U.S. His work won the first Arthur D. Little Award for excellence in economic development presented by the American Economic Development Council. Prior to starting his economic development work, Ed worked for Telesis, a corporate strategy consulting firm. In this position, he served on consulting teams for clients such as Ford Motor Company, Volvo, and General Electric. He
Tsinghua University in China in 2007. Her research interests focus on educational studies that can help improve teaching, learning, and educational policy decision makings using both quantitative and qual- itative research methods. Her current research project in National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) focuses on measuring engineering students’ entrepreneurial interests and related individual characteristics. Her Ph.D. dissertation involved using statistical modeling methods to explain and predict engineering students’ success outcomes, such as retention, academic performance, and grad- uation.Ms. Carolin Christin Dungs, Stanford UniversityDr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D
17 to do Mentions specific company / university Technology 17In response to Question 2, students tended to mention intrinsic motives more often than extrinsicmotives. Interestingly, both the enjoyment of math and the enjoyment of science appear in thislist, indicating that many of the students do understand the reality that engineers focus theirstudies in mathematics and science.For Question 3, the most frequently mentioned codes prominently refer to people who wereinfluential to the student’s decision to pursue engineering. Many students mentioned their father,and many of these stated that he was an engineer or did something related to engineering(professional trades, computer science, project
data wasused to map successful cognitive (math) progression to non-cognitive attributes like self-determination, grit and motivational drivers for minority students. Because the Collegehad limited available retention data from which to begin this project, the retrospectivebaseline for the study was established using descriptive and regression analysis first-yearengineering students (N=1,484) who entered the college in Fall 2011, 2012 and 2013.In examining the available student data, the attrition rate for first-year students in theCollege averaged 25%, with an additional 25-30% leaving engineering by theirsophomore year. In the following chart, SAT Math scores correlated to results onuniversity math placement exams, yielding the following
would implement a second collective based motion such as the leader based collectivemotion illustrated here in Figures 3 and 4. This simulation assignment in which students wereallotted two weeks to work on the simulation allowed students to simulate simple multi-agentsystems. This was part one of a class project. The other half was for a system engineering model fora complex system. 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0
Paper ID #16954Engineering Students’ Perception of Relevance of Physics and MathematicsProf. Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM) Professor of the Physics Department at the Tecnologico de Monterrey. He is a member of the National Research System in Mexico and is the leader of the Physics Education Research and innovation Group. He has 74 papers in journals and proceedings, 6 books, 8 book chapters, 137 presentations in Mexico, Korea, Denmark, Hungary, Cuba, United States, Ecuador, Chile and Argentina and 26 workshops in Mex- ico, Chile and Argentina. He has participated obtaining projects funded by the
Course Textbook: Applied Naval Architecture by Robert B. Zubaly, 1996 [5]. Coursematerial supplemented with instructor material.Software (online) / Labs: GHS, Rhino, ORCA 3D, Ship Stability Simulator, Shipyard tour,Principles of Sailing lab, overview of CFD for marine applications.Students must conduct an independent research project on a topic pertaining to navalarchitecture. The instructor gives several suggested topics to show the breadth of topics thatcould be selected. All students are required to submit their proposed topic and abstract to theinstructor for approval. Students could also work in pairs, however the requirements (depth ofresearch and length of paper) are increased accordingly. Students submit a draft and theinstructor
College Rebecca Citrin is a presently employed as a Site/Civil Staff Engineer for Langan Engineering and Envi- ronmental Service. Rebecca graduated from Lafayette College in 2014 with a Bachelor’s of Science in Civil Engineering and a minor in Environmental Science. She previously worked with Lafayette College and North Carolina State University faculty members on an NSF funded education project. Rebecca has conducted research on various informal K – 12 engineering education projects and has worked on devel- oping assessment methods for these projects. Rebecca has also organized various student events such as the Lafayette College Engineering Brain Bowl and the Lafayette College STEM Camp, to both promote
applications - solid oxide fuel cells, oxygen separation membranes, sensors and catalysis.Dr. Haiyan Bai, University of Central Florida Haiyan Bai, PhD., is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology in the College of Education and Human Performance at the University of Central Florida. Her interests include resampling method, propensity score analysis, research design, measurement and evaluation, and the applications of statistical methods in educational research and behavioral sciences. She is actively involved educational and social science research projects. Dr. Bai has published books and many professional articles in refereed national and international journals. She has won several competitive awards
. Yet muchremains to be learned about how to hone MOOCs into cost-effective tools that provide valuewithout overly burdening a cost-sensitive public education system. This paper provides insightinto the issue by reporting on the efforts of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (CalPoly Pomona) to scale-up a MOOC from a small $8000 pilot project. The pilot MOOC was a 10-week introduction to computer programming course that took place during Spring 2014 and wasopen to everyone in the world for free. Over 2100 participants enrolled in the pilot MOOC with16% successfully completing the course. Results from the pilot MOOC were reported in theProceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference.A scaled-up version of the pilot MOOC took place
using bubble-pump technology. • A business to business venture around HVAC energy discounting. • A blimp-type drone for search and rescue operations. • An electronic bike venture for college campuses. • An on-person medical records system to assist with EMT trauma and pharmacy interaction with Alzheimer’s patients. The self-directed components of the program (idea voting, team formation) ensuredthat students felt a sense of buy-in and commitment for the projects. Students were thenpresented with an overview of the lean launch pad methodology [1]. Teams were giventime to then work on the lean launch pad canvas pertaining to their particular ventureclosing out day one. Figure 4: Students present
analysis.MotivationWe need more engineers and community colleges provide a pathway for additional engineeringstudents [1, 2]. Currently, there are seven million students in community colleges nationally andover two million students in public California community colleges [3, 4]. Understanding andimproving pathways to engineering via the community college route has the potential tocontribute currently untapped engineering talent to help fill the projected engineer deficit.Metrics should be established in order to assess the current rate of success and identify areas ofimprovement in community college transfer programs.Background on transfer program goalsSuccess of engineering transfer programs can be defined by how well it meets its objectives. Theauthors
/07/RHC-Self-Evaluation-2014-Report-Final.pdf3. Community College Week, Associate Degree and Certificate Producers, 2015, retrieved fromhttp://ccweek.com/articles.sec-17-1-top-100-charts.html4. See http://www.riohondo.edu/mathematics-and-sciences/mathematics-and-sciences-homepage/starss/5.Strayhorn, T. L., A hierarchical analysis predicting sense of belonging among Latino students, Journal ofHispanic Higher Education, 7(4), 301-320, 2010.6. Spieler-Persad, G., Progress Report Form, California Community College Chancellor’s Office, Academic AffairsDivision, 2016.7. Cole, D and Espinoza, A., Examining the academic success of Latino students in STEM majors, Project MUSE,49(4), 298-299, 2008.
about the accuracy of the feedback they receivedand how confident they felt in providing feedback to their peers.Taken together, the present research explores student reactions to this tool and their intentions toalter their behavior after being presented with the feedback generated from the assessment.MethodParticipantsParticipants in this study were students enrolled in an electrical engineering course at a largeCanadian university, N = 159. Students worked with group members over the course of thesemester on a number of projects, thereby building an interpersonal connection to the membersof their team prior to providing the ratings.Materials and ProcedureStudents completed a peer feedback assessment via the ITP Metrics platform, in which
. e. Planning - Project Management (Office Project, Word Processing, Ganttproject, Openproj, etc.) calendars, flow charts, mind maps, etc.). f. Blogging/vlogging - Blogging tool, blogger, wordpress, edublogs, classroom blogmiester, bloglines voicethread, Skype, etc. g. Modeling (Sketchup, Blender, Maya3d PLE, Autocad, tinkercad, thingiverse, Cubify, Mathematica, SystemModeler, Aspen, Minitab, SPSS, several statistical software, Mathcad, etc.). h. Song (finale notepad, garageband, Audacity, podcasting, recording narration, Office Mix, etc.).As can be seen in Figures 3 and 4, cognitive processes related to the cognitive process entitledcreate should
. In one case, the ethical dilemmas causedhim to leave engineering entirely for a career in family therapy. This quote from his interviewillustrates the issue: …there's a fundamental incompatibility that's being for profit and being for the public good… and so there were a few situations where I was asked to do things that I thought were unethical, and I kind of asked around to other people in the field who had been in similar situations where, like, the major client would say like, ‘Oh, we don't think that these laws are accurate. Can you go back and, like, make these changes or...’ …or one of my project managers actually he told me to kind of bury some of the findings that we came up with in text rather
locale, andeventually have a mutually beneficial relations with the industrial sector; not so muchto supplement their income, but, principally, to be able to reach the broader goal, i.e.,to gain valuable experience and be truly involved in real engineering.iii) Third, reaching out to the industrial sector and engineering services in the Region,and striving to form symbiotic partnerships between local industry and academiathrough: capstone projects, theses work with practical overtones, and applied researchprojects in selected domains, is extremely desirable and beneficial. Today, with theengineering profession undergoing dramatic changes on many fronts - there is realneed for faculty and students, to become involved with practical problems and
differentiated-inventive design solutions across all aspects of the user-product experience. As a consultant using this strategy, Dan has worked with large and small companies to create and commercialize many differentiated products and processes for their customers, often creatively redefining these spaces, while at the same time receiving an additional twenty patents for his unique and novel new product solutions. In 2001, Dan challenged himself to create a case study project for his design philosophy, to validate the methodologies of his design strategies, and to provide a sales and marketing tool for his design services. Seeking to create a new and innovative product while emulating the Differentiation by Design process
Semester 2015 offeringof the course the students were given laboratory projects where they used a Doble F6150e PowerSystem Simulator to test either a Schweitzer Engineering Labs SEL-221F microprocessor-basedrelay or a Westinghouse (ABB) Type CO electromechanical relay. The test setup for testing theSEL -221F is shown in Figure 8 below. Figure 8. Protective Relay Testing Lab SetupBased on employer input, the electromechanical relays were not included in the Winter Semester2016 lab assignments, and will not be included in the future. Also based on employers’comments, the students performed the tests individually rather than in teams. This allowed thestudents to gain experience in all aspects of testing – setting
Material Science and Engineering from Tsinghua University in China in 2007. Her research interests focus on educational studies that can help improve teaching, learning, and educational policy decision makings using both quantitative and qual- itative research methods. Her current research project in National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) focuses on measuring engineering students’ entrepreneurial interests and related individual characteristics. Her Ph.D. dissertation involved using statistical modeling methods to explain and predict engineering students’ success outcomes, such as retention, academic performance, and grad- uation